Unsupervised High-Dimensional Analysis Aligns Dendritic Cells across Tissues and Species.

Dendritic cells (DCs) are professional antigen-presenting cells that hold great therapeutic potential. Multiple DC subsets have been described, and it remains challenging to align them across tissues and species to analyze their function in the absence of macrophage contamination. Here, we provide and validate a universal toolbox for the automated identification of DCs through unsupervised analysis of conventional flow cytometry and mass cytometry data obtained from multiple mouse, macaque, and human tissues. The use of a minimal set of lineage-imprinted markers was sufficient to subdivide DCs into conventional type 1 (cDC1s), conventional type 2 (cDC2s), and plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs) across tissues and species. This way, a large number of additional markers can still be used to further characterize the heterogeneity of DCs across tissues and during inflammation. This framework represents the way forward to a universal, high-throughput, and standardized analysis of DC populations from mutant mice and human patients.

Human fetal dendritic cells promote prenatal T-cell immune suppression through arginase-2.

During gestation the developing human fetus is exposed to a diverse range of potentially immune-stimulatory molecules including semi-allogeneic antigens from maternal cells, substances from ingested amniotic fluid, food antigens, and microbes. Yet the capacity of the fetal immune system, including antigen-presenting cells, to detect and respond to such stimuli remains unclear. In particular, dendritic cells, which are crucial for effective immunity and tolerance, remain poorly characterized in the developing fetus. Here we show that subsets of antigen-presenting cells can be identified in fetal tissues and are related to adult populations of antigen-presenting cells. Similar to adult dendritic cells, fetal dendritic cells migrate to lymph nodes and respond to toll-like receptor ligation; however, they differ markedly in their response to allogeneic antigens, strongly promoting regulatory T-cell induction and inhibiting T-cell tumour-necrosis factor-α production through arginase-2 activity. Our results reveal a previously unappreciated role of dendritic cells within the developing fetus and indicate that they mediate homeostatic immune-suppressive responses during gestation.

Primary tumour immune response and lymph node yields in colon cancer.

BACKGROUND: The mechanism underlying improved survival in non-metastatic colon cancer with higher lymph node (LN) yield is unknown. This study aimed to identify whether molecular features in the primary tumour were predictive of LN yield. METHODS: Clinical, genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic and methylation data of non-metastatic, colon cancers studied in The Cancer Genome Atlas were interrogated for associations with LN yield. Based on maximal survival effects, patients were segregated into high (>15) and low (≤15) LN yield. Gene set enrichment analysis was performed on transcriptomic changes to identify biological processes associated with LN yield. Correlations were validated in an independent set of Stage II colon cancers. RESULTS: High LN yield was found predictive of overall and disease-free survival. There was no association of higher LN yield and increasing nodal positivity. High LN yield was strongly linked with gene expression changes associated with the adaptive and dendritic cell immune response. This association was most prominent in node-negative cancers. Analogous findings were reproduced in the validation dataset. CONCLUSION: The study shows a strong association of an activated immune response in tumours with a high LN yield. Immunogenic tumours have a better prognosis, likely explaining the survival benefit with higher LN yields.

Lymphocyte-White Cell Ratio Is a Novel Marker of Morbidity Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery.

BACKGROUND: A preoperative marker for morbidity in patients with colorectal cancer would help to risk stratify patients and allow for timely intervention to avert poor outcomes. We conducted this study to evaluate preoperative lymphocyte-white blood cell ratio (LWR) as a marker of postoperative morbidity. METHODS: A prospective cohort of patients who underwent elective surgery for colorectal cancer was reviewed. Three morbidity-related outcomes were described-overall morbidity, multiple morbidities, and severe morbidity, defined as Clavien-Dindo Class ≥3. Univariable and multivariable analyses of presurgical predictors of these three outcomes were performed. Preoperative variables included hemoglobin levels, neoadjuvant therapy, albumin levels, white blood cell count, lymphocyte count, LWR, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, and prognostic nutritional index. RESULTS: Of 177 patients, 31.6% (56/177) suffered at least one morbidity, 15.3% (27/177) had multiple morbidities, 7.9% (14/177) suffered severe morbidity. On multivariate analysis, only LWR <0.180 (odds ratio [OR] 2.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-5.55) and neoadjuvant therapy (OR 2.49, 95% CI 1.16-5.24) were associated with overall morbidity. For multiple morbidities and severe morbidity, only LWR <0.180 was significantly associated on multivariate analysis with an OR of 2.92 (95% CI 1.19-7.13) and 4.62 (95% CI 1.45-14.73), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: LWR is a preoperative marker which can be conveniently applied using standard preoperative blood tests. LWR is an independent risk factor for overall morbidity, multiple morbidities, as well as severe morbidity when used with a cut-off of LWR<1.80.

Enhanced recovery program versus conventional care after colorectal surgery in the geriatric population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs for patients undergoing colorectal surgery has yielded promising results. However, there remains controversy regarding the application of ERAS protocols in an elderly population. The aim of this review is to compare the clinical outcomes between ERAS versus conventional peri-operative care (Non-ERAS) for colorectal surgery in patients aged ≥ 65 years old. METHODS: The PRISMA guidelines were adhered to. A comprehensive search was performed using Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library electronic databases and relevant articles were identified. Indications for the colorectal resections included both benign and malignant diseases, while emergency surgeries were excluded. Primary outcomes include post-operative morbidity, length of stay and re-admission rates. Data analysis was performed using Revman 5.3. RESULTS: A total of six studies were included, which involved a total of 1174 patients. ERAS was associated with a lower incidence of post-operative morbidity compared to Non-ERAS (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.25-0.59), p < 0.001). Similarly, ERAS was also associated with a significantly shorter hospital length of stay (MD - 2.49, 95% CI - 4.11 to 0.88, p = 0.002). Return of bowel function as measured by time to flatus was significantly faster in the ERAS group (MD - 20.01 95% CI - 36.23 to 3.79, p = 0.02), but post-operative ileus rates (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.50-1.47, p = 0.58) were comparable. Re-admission, re-operation and post-operative mortality rates were also similar between both groups. CONCLUSION: The application of ERAS protocols in an elderly population provides the advantages of lower post-operative morbidity and shorter hospital length of stay. Future studies should aim to evaluate factors that can improve ERAS compliance rates in this group of patients.

Early surgery after bridge-to-surgery stenting for malignant bowel obstruction is associated with better oncological outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Placement of self-expanding metal stents has been increasingly adopted as a bridge to surgery in patients presenting with obstructed left-sided colorectal cancers. The optimal bridging time has yet to be widely established, hence this retrospective study aims to determine the optimal bridging time to elective surgery post endoluminal stenting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent colorectal stenting for large bowel obstruction in a single, tertiary hospital in Singapore between January 2003 and December 2017 were retrospectively identified. Patients' baseline demographics, tumour characteristics, stent-related complications, intra-operative details, post-operative complications and oncological outcomes were analysed. RESULTS: Of the 53 patients who successfully underwent colonic stenting for malignant left sided obstruction, 33.96% of patients underwent surgery within two weeks of stent placement while 66.04% of patients underwent surgery after 2 weeks of stent placement. Univariate analysis between both groups did not demonstrate significant differences in postoperative complications and stoma formation. Significant differences were observed between both groups for stent complications (38.89% vs 8.57%, p = 0.022), on-table decompression (38.89% vs 2.86%, p = 0.001) and systemic recurrence (11.11% vs 40.00%, p = 0.030). Increased bridging interval to surgery (OR 13.16, CI 1.37-126.96, p = 0.026) was a significant risk factor for systemic recurrence on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing definitive surgery within 2 weeks of colonic stenting may have better oncological outcomes without compromising on postoperative outcomes. Further prospective studies are required to compare outcomes between emergency surgery and different bridging intervals.

A simple prediction score for prolonged length of stay following elective colorectal cancer surgery.

BACKGROUND: Current enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are designed for all patients without tailored programmes for at-risk groups. A risk score to determine elective colorectal cancer patients at risk for prolonged length of stay (LOS) would help to identify this group for preoperative intervention. METHODS: Multivariate analysis of demographic and preoperative variables was performed to identify independent risk factors for prolonged LOS, defined as 7 days or more. A stepwise variable selection approach using logistic regression was then used to build a risk prediction model. RESULTS: Among 172 patients in our population, 41.9% of patients had prolonged LOS. Five variables were included in our risk prediction model. These were age ≥ 65 years (OR 13.9 5.09-38.0; p < 0.0001), neoadjuvant therapy (OR 7.60 2.51-23.0; p < 0.0001), open approach (OR 3.96 1.68-15.9); p = 0.008), history of smoking (OR 5.18 1.68-15.9; p = 0.004) and white blood cell (WBC) count (OR 0.83/unit 0.69-0.99; p = 0.040). These variables were combined to produce a score, for which the area under the receiving operator curve was 0.82 (95% CI 0.76-0.88), and Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed a χ2 statistic of 9.14 and p = 0.519. Using 0.9 as a cut-off, the score has sensitivity of 81.9% and specificity of 65.0%. CONCLUSION: A simple, clinical score can be used to predict for prolonged LOS based on preoperative variables, allowing for intervention before surgery. Age, neoadjuvant therapy, smoking status, open approach and WBC count are independent risk factors for prolonged length of stay following elective colorectal cancer surgery. A risk score comprising the above independent variables was developed with area under the receiving operator curve of 0.82 (95% CI 0.76-0.88), and a Hosmer-Lemeshow test showing a χ2 statistic of 9.14 and p = 0.519.

Perioperative and oncologic outcomes in young and octogenarian patients with colorectal cancer: a comparison at the extremes.

INTRODUCTION: In colorectal cancer (CRC), surgical outcomes in the young (< 50) and octogenarian populations are believed to be poor due to an aggressive phenotype in the former, and increased frailty in the latter. Given that age-related effects are inversely related between groups, we compared short- and long-term outcomes of young and octogenarian patients with CRC to determine the dominance of one age-related factor over another. METHODS: A prospectively collected database from 2015 to 2020 of all CRC was analyzed. Cases were divided into metastatic and non-metastatic groups. RESULTS: Among non-metastatic cases, there were 34 young and 113 octogenarian patients. Mean CEA was higher among octogenarians (11.2 vs 32.8 units/ml; p = 0.041). Octogenarians suffered from more comorbidities than younger counterparts, with increased rates of postoperative UTI (3.3% vs 10.3%; p = 0.246) and pneumonia (3.1% vs 8.8%; p = 0.331). There was no increased rate of reintervention or Clavien-Dindo scores. We noticed a statistically significant higher proportion of extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) (8.8% vs 32.3%; p = 0.003) among the young. When excluding octogenarians who had declined surgery, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no difference in disease-free (p = 0.290) or overall survival (p = 0.111). Among metastatic cases, there were 21 young and 19 octogenarian patients. Young patients were treated more aggressively with chemotherapy (55.6% vs 12.5%; p = 0.040). There was however no difference in overall survival between groups (p = 0.610). CONCLUSIONS: Octogenarians may have more comorbidities, but can achieve similar surgical outcomes with younger patients. There is no reason to suspect a more aggressive phenotype in younger patients.

Continuous wound infusion with ropivacaine alone provides adequate analgesia following laparotomy.

BACKGROUND: Although continuous wound infusion (CWI) with local anaesthetic has been used as an adjunct for pain relief following laparotomy, its use as the main modality has not been studied. This approach negates side effects related to intravenous opioid administration, therefore promoting enhanced recovery from surgery. We conducted this study to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of CWI following laparotomy. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent laparotomy from June 2016 to December 2019 were analysed. All patients were given CWI with only oral supplementation. Pain was assessed based on the numeric rating scale (NRS). RESULTS: One hundred and three patients were analysed. Mean age was 61.1 (standard deviation 16.7). 47.6% of patients were operated for intestinal obstruction. Large bowel resection was the most common operation performed (49.5%). 69.9% of patients underwent emergency surgery, whilst 51.5% of patients had surgery for cancer. On postoperative day 0, NRS was 3.2 (standard deviation (sd) 2.6) which decreased to 1.5 (sd 1.9) on day 3, and 1.1 (sd 1.8) on day 5. Mean time to flatus was 2.3 (sd 1.4) days, whilst mean time to first bowel movement was 3.1 (sd 1.7) days. Patients were able to commence ambulation by 2.5 (sd 1.8) days. Patients could tolerate a normal diet on day 3.9 (sd 3.3), and IV drip was removed on day 3.5 (sd 3.0). Mean length of stay was 9.1 (sd 6.9) days. Only two patients suffered from respiratory depression (1.9%) whilst five patients suffered from hypotension (4.9%). No patients had pruritus. 23.3% of patients had nausea or vomiting. Only one patient had a catheter-related complication which was easily addressed. CONCLUSION: CWI provides adequate pain relief as the principle modality of analgesia after surgery, without opioid side effects.

Chemotherapy and adverse cardiovascular events in colorectal cancer patients undergoing surgical resection.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer patients undergoing surgical resection are at increased short-term risk of post-operative adverse events. However, specific predictors for long-term major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) are unclear. We hypothesised that patients who receive chemotherapy are at higher risk of MACCE than those who did not. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 412 patients who underwent surgical resection for newly diagnosed colorectal cancer from January 2013 to April 2015 were grouped according to chemotherapy status. MACCE was defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, unplanned revascularisation, hospitalisation for heart failure or angina. Predictors of MACCE were identified using competing risks regression, with non-cardiovascular death a competing risk. RESULTS: There were 200 patients in the chemotherapy group and 212 patients in the non-chemotherapy group. The overall prevalence of prior cardiovascular disease was 20.9%. Over a median follow-up duration of 5.1 years from diagnosis, the incidence of MACCE was 13.3%. Diabetes mellitus and prior cardiovascular disease were associated with an increased risk of MACCE (subdistribution hazard ratio, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.48-4.42) and 2.38 (95% CI, 1.36-4.18) respectively. The chemotherapy group was associated with a lower risk of MACCE (subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.19-0.75) compared to the non-chemotherapy group. CONCLUSIONS: Amongst colorectal cancer patients undergoing surgical resection, there was a high incidence of MACCE. Diabetes mellitus and prior cardiovascular disease were associated with an increased risk of MACCE. Chemotherapy was associated with a lower risk of MACCE, but further research is required to clarify this association.

Increased Morbidity and Mortality of Emergency Laparotomy in Elderly Patients.

BACKGROUND: There is an increasing incidence of elderly patients requiring emergency laparotomy. Our study compares the outcomes of elderly patients undergoing emergency laparotomy against the outcomes of non-elderly patients. METHODOLOGY: Patients who underwent emergency laparotomy between 2015 and 2017 from the National University Hospital, Singapore, were included. Apart from demographic data, indication of surgery and surgical procedure performed were collected. Prospectively collected nutritional scores were evaluated. Outcome measures included duration of surgery, length of ICU and total hospital stay, post-operative complications, and mortality indices. We performed multivariate Cox regression analysis to determine the contribution of various risk factors towards overall survival following emergency laparotomy. RESULTS: A total of 170 emergency laparotomies were performed. Compared to non-elderly patients, elderly patients had a significantly longer mean stay in hospital (31.5 vs. 18.6 days, p = 0.006) and mean stay in ICU (13.1 vs. 5.3 days, p = 0.003). More elderly patients suffered from post-laparotomy complications compared with non-elderly patients (65.8% vs. 37.4%, p < 0.001). 30-day mortality (31.5% vs. 8.8%, p = 0.019) and 1-year mortality (27.9% vs. 14.3%, p = 0.023) were higher in elderly patients compared with non-elderly patients. Interestingly, there was no statistically significant difference between elderly and non-elderly groups in both the global 3-MinNS as well as the global SGA nutritional scores. ASA status (HR 2.61, 95% CI 1.05-6.45, p = 0.038) was an independent risk factor for decreased survival following emergency laparotomy. Notably, while age ≥ 65 demonstrated a significant correlation with survival on univariate analysis (HR 1.03 (1.01-1.05), p = 0.003), this effect was lost following multivariate regression (HR 1.01 (0.453-2.23), p = 0.989). CONCLUSION: Elderly patients suffer worse morbidity and mortality following emergency laparotomy. This is likely contributed by comorbidities resulting in higher ASA status.

Age is an independent risk factor for increased morbidity in elective colorectal cancer surgery despite an ERAS protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Elderly patients with colorectal cancer are high-risk surgical candidates. ERAS protocols have been developed to mitigate against these risks. We performed this study to quantify the risks which elderly patients face and then to determine independent risk factors for short-term ERAS-specific outcomes. METHODS: An analysis of a prospectively collected audit database of all patients who underwent elective colorectal cancer resection within an ERAS framework from January 2018 to December 2018 was performed. Elderly was defined in our study as age ≥ 65 years. RESULTS: There were 172 elective colorectal cancer resections performed. Ninety-seven (56.4%) were elderly. Elderly patients were at increased risk of developing post-operative complications (33.0% vs 16.0%, p = 0.011), longer time to diet (3.4 vs 2.2 days, p = 0.001), and longer hospital stay (10.9 vs 6.7 days, p = 0.007). Independent risk factors were determined for the abovementioned three outcomes. Elderly status was the only risk factor for increased complications (OR 2.61 95% CI (1.05-6.51), p = 0.040). For delayed time to soft diet, male gender (OR 6.67(1.92-20.0), p = 0.002), open approach (OR 9.06(2.26-36.30), p = 0.002), and increased operative time (OR 1.01(1.00-1.01) p = 0.014) were risk factors. Finally, elderly age (OR 5.53(1.82-16.84), p = 0.003), leucocyte count (OR 1.39(0.76-2.57), p = 0.038), open approach (OR 5.26(1.41-19.62), p = 0.013), operative time (OR 1.01(1.00-1.01), p = 0.021), and Clavien-Dindo classification (OR 7.97(1.27-49.88), p = 0.027) were risk factors for prolonged length of stay. CONCLUSION: Elderly patients are intrinsically at risk for increased complications, longer time to soft diet and longer hospital stay. ERAS protocols may need to be specifically tailored for elderly patients.

Successful use of tissue expander and pelvic sling to exclude small bowel for high-dose pelvic irradiation.

OBJECTIVE: Our study seeks to describe our surgical technique of the use of a tissue expander and a pelvic sling in order to perform high-dose pelvic irradiation without incurring radiation toxicity to the small bowel. High-dose radiation therapy for pelvic tumours comes at a risk of radiation toxicity to the small bowel. Our study discusses our novel surgical technique of compartmentalising the abdomen and the pelvis through the use of a tissue expander and pelvic sling to avoid small bowel radiation toxicity. METHODS: We present a patient with an unresectable sacral chordoma. We describe our surgical technique incorporating both a tissue expander and an absorbable pelvic mesh sling to successfully compartmentalise the abdomen from the pelvis. RESULTS: The patient underwent an uneventful surgical procedure to place the tissue expander within the pelvis and deploy the pelvic mesh sling. Following surgery, a separation of at least 8 cm was achieved between bowel loops and the tumour. A dose of 70 Gy delivered over 35 fractions using intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was administered to the sacral chordoma, whilst managing to constrain the maximum bowel dose to 35.7 Gy. Surgery to remove the tissue expander was uneventful. The patient has not suffered any small bowel irradiation toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Our technique to exclude small bowel from the pelvis is effective and safe. This technique not only can be applied in the setting of unresectable sacral chordomas but also may be applicable to other pelvic cancers which require radiation therapy.

Journey for patients following ileostomy creation is not straightforward.

BACKGROUND: An ileostomy is usually created to avert systemic sepsis in a patient with a tenuous anastomosis. However, what is often not reported are the numerous issues facing these patients subsequently, ranging from readmissions, non-reversal of the stoma, and complications from the closure. This study was performed to identify these issues among patients following creation of an ileostomy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who had an ileostomy created from January 2011 to December 2016 at two institutions. Statistical analysis was performed to identify risk factors associated with readmissions and ileostomy non-reversal. RESULTS: In total, 193 patients had an ileostomy created during the study period. Twenty-six (13.5%) patients developed stoma-related complications requiring readmission. The most common cause of readmission (9.3%) was due to dehydration and acute kidney injury secondary to high stoma output. One hundred thirty (67.4%) patients had their ileostomy reversed. On multivariate analysis, only stomas created during an ultra-low anterior resection were associated with reversal (OR 2.88 [95% CI, 1.24-6.68]; p = 0.014). Among the patients who underwent ileostomy reversal, seven (3.6%) patients developed complications from their ileostomy reversal. Four patients (2.1%) suffered from an anastomotic leak which required repeat surgical intervention with one mortality from the ensuing sepsis. CONCLUSION: Almost half of the patients who had an Ileostomy had an undesirable outcome, including readmissions, non-reversal, and post-operative complications following closure. Patients need to be properly counselled about the risks involved prior to the index operation.

Asian patients with Hinchey Ia acute diverticulitis: a condition for the ambulatory setting?

BACKGROUND: Diverticulitis in Asians is a different disease entity from Western counterparts. Few Asian studies have evaluated the management of acute Hinchey Ia diverticulitis with consideration for outpatient management. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of Asian patients with Hinchey Ia acute diverticulitis. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients who were treated for Hinchey Ia acute colonic diverticulitis between 2012 and 2014 was performed. All patients were diagnosed on computed tomography (CT). RESULTS: There were 129 patients with Hinchey Ia acute diverticulitis. Fifty-five (42.6%) patients were male, and the median age was 54 years (range, 30-86). Eighty-seven (67.4%) patients had right-sided diverticulitis. Most patients were treated empirically with intravenous ceftriaxone and metronidazole (89.1%). They were then discharged with oral antibiotics. Only 6.1% of patients had a positive blood culture. The median length of stay in the hospital was 4 (range, 3-4) days. Only three (2.3%) patients were readmitted for acute diverticulitis within 30 days. They were managed with antibiotics and discharged well. The repeated CT scans reconfirmed Hinchey Ia diverticulitis. No patients required emergency surgery, and there were no 30-day mortalities. CONCLUSION: Asian patients with Hinchey Ia diverticulitis recovered well with conservative management and could be amenable to outpatient therapy. Future prospective studies should be performed amongst Asians to evaluate managing this condition in an ambulatory setting.

Accredited residents perform colonoscopy to the same high standards as consultants.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopy remains a critical component of General Surgery and Gastroenterology training. Whilst residents need to gain experience, the quality of endoscopy which patients receive cannot be compromised. We conducted this study to compare quality indicators between consultants and residents with regards to colonoscopy. METHODS: A review of colonoscopies from a prospectively collected database was performed from September 2011 to February 2016. Quality indicators such as caecum intubation rate, adenoma detection rate, adherence to a 6-min withdrawal rule, mean number of polyps detected per colonoscope, and complications were collected and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: In total, out of 25,749 colonoscopies that were performed, 14,168 (55.0%) were performed by Consultants. Consultants achieved a better caecum intubation rate compared with residents (96.0% vs 94.9%, p < 0.001), and were more compliant to the 6-min withdrawal rule (74.7% vs 68.6%, p < 0.001). There were, however, no statistically significant differences in the adenoma detection rate (33.5% vs 34.5%, p = 0.098). Bleeding was a rare complication that was encountered more frequently in colonoscopies performed by consultants than for residents (0.002% vs 0.00008%, p < 0.001). There were only three (%) perforations in the entire series, and all were from colonoscopies performed by Consultants. CONCLUSION: Given the proper training, residents are able to perform colonoscopy with the same level of competence as consultants. Whilst colonoscopic related complications are often tied to the difficulty of the procedures, the adherence to the 6-min withdrawal rule must be reinforced and continually educated to both residents and consultants.

Endoscopic Stenting Does Not Worsen Long Term Outcomes Amongst Patients Presenting with Obstruction from Colorectal Cancers.

BACKGROUND: Stenting has been increasingly adopted in colorectal cancer patients presenting with acute large bowel obstruction. However, long-term outcomes of stenting are lacking in the literature. Our study attempts to compare the long-term outcomes of colonic stenting and emergency surgery amongst left-sided colorectal cancer patients presenting with acute large bowel obstruction. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients who presented with nonmetastatic colorectal cancer who underwent either endoscopic stenting or emergency surgery for acute large bowel obstruction was performed from January 2007 to April 2016. Patients were analysed in an intention-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: Forty-seven (46.1%) patients underwent emergency surgery, whereas 55 (53.9%) underwent colonic stenting with a technical success rate of 71.0%. Patients who underwent emergency surgery were more likely to develop severe complications compared with patients who underwent successful colonic stenting, but the difference was not statistically significant (odds ratio [OR] 2.84; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71-11.3, p = 0.139). Patients were followed up for a median of 48.3 months (3.1-111) in the stenting group and 51.2 months (1.2-117.1) in the emergency surgery group. Recurrence rates between colonic stenting and emergency surgery were similar (25.6% vs. 21.3%, p = 0.500), with more anastomotic and peritoneal recurrences were noted in the emergency surgery group. 5 year disease free survival (77% vs. 73%, p = 0.708) and overall survival (86% vs. 62%, p = 0.064) also were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent endoscopic stenting for large bowel obstruction have comparable long-term outcomes as those who undergo emergency surgery. The role of endoscopic stenting in obstructed colorectal cancers merits further evaluation.

Laparoscopic surgery should be considered in T4 colon cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopy in T4 colon cancers is not widely advocated due to concerns regarding safety and oncologic efficacy. We conducted this study to compare the short- and long-term oncological outcomes between laparoscopic and open approaches in T4 colon cancers. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent surgery for T4 colon cancer from 2008 to 2014 was performed. Margin positive rate, lymph node yield, local or distant recurrence and overall survival were analysed. RESULTS: A total of 59 patients received open surgery, whilst 93 underwent laparoscopic surgery, with a conversion rate of 8.6%. There was no difference in the various measured outcomes between the laparoscopic and open groups. The relative risks of positive margins and inadequate lymph node yield for staging were 0.95 (0.74-1.23, p = 0.692) and 1.01 (0.97-1.05, p = 0.710), respectively, for the laparoscopic group when compared to the open approach. Regarding long-term outcomes, the relative risk of local recurrence in the laparoscopic group was 0.99 (0.96-1.02, p = 0.477), whilst there were also no increased risks of developing distal recurrences at the liver (RR 1.19, 0.51-2.82, p = 0.684), lungs (RR 1.20, 0.50-2.87, p = 0.678) and peritoneum (RR 1.22, 0.51-2.95, p = 0.653) in the laparoscopic group. There was also no difference in the overall survival (RR 0.70, 0.42-1.16, p = 0.168). Patients were followed up for a median of 73.3 months (range 34.8-144.7). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic surgery does not compromise oncological outcomes in T4 colon cancers compared to the open approach. Because of its proven associated benefits, laparoscopy should be considered in selected T4 colon cancers.

Is gastroscopy for fecal immunochemical test positive patients worthwhile?

BACKGROUND: The use of fecal immunochemical test (FIT) in the screening for colorectal cancer is long established. However, more than 50 % of patients with positive FITs have a negative colonoscopy. The role of a subsequent oesophago-gastro-duodenoscopy (OGD) is debatable. The aim of this study is to evaluate the yield of OGD in patients with positive FITs. METHODOLOGY: A retrospective review of patients who underwent colonoscopy for a positive FIT between Jan. 2008 and Dec. 2012 was identified from a prospectively collected endoscopy database at the National University Hospital, Singapore. Patients who underwent concurrent or subsequent OGDs for positive FIT formed the study group. We considered any new cancer or significant upper gastrointestinal pathology such as peptic ulcer disease or gastritis requiring treatment as a positive examination. RESULTS: A total of 202 patients underwent both a colonoscopy and an OGD for a positive FIT and formed the study group. One hundred and six (52.5 %) of them had a positive examination with gastritis and duodenitis representing the most common UGI pathology in 89 (44.1 %) patients. Twenty-nine (14.4 %) patients tested positive for helicobacter pylori infection and another 16 (7.9 %) patients had peptic ulcer disease. There were no UGI cancers detected. One patient had an esophageal leiomyoma that was treated conservatively. CONCLUSION: Routine gastroscopy for FIT positivity has a high diagnostic yield for benign upper gastrointestinal pathology. Well-designed prospective studies to further evaluate the cost-effectiveness of routine gastroscopy in the work up of FIT positivity are warranted to make better clinical practice guidelines.

Getting the first degree relatives to screen for colorectal cancer is harder than it seems-patients' and their first degree relatives' perspectives.

INTRODUCTION: First degree relatives (FDR) of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients are at increased risk of CRC compared to the general population. However, screening colonoscopy rates amongst the FDRs remain dismal. The aim of the study was to explore the various issues amongst the patients and their FDR precluding their adoption of screening colonoscopy. METHODS: A qualitative study of CRC patients and their FDRs was performed. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants using open-ended questions until data saturation was achieved. These qualitative data were then thematically analysed. RESULTS: Fifty CRC patients and thirty-one FDRs were recruited between June 2015 and December 2015. For the patients, three main themes emerged, which include (i) poor understanding of the CRC screening guidelines for their FDRs, (ii) recommendations are lacking amongst medical professionals and (iii) numerous barriers are hindering patients from being advocates for screening colonoscopy for their FDRs. For the FDRs, three main themes emerged. These include (i) poor understanding of the exact CRC screening guidelines amongst the FDRs, (ii) the lack of health promotion efforts amongst medical professionals and (iii) barriers to the uptake of screening colonoscopy such as fear of colonoscopy, high cost of the procedure, its associated inconvenience and perceived invulnerability of the individual. CONCLUSIONS: Patients and FDRs are not aware of the increased risks of developing CRC amongst the family members. Guidelines regarding screening are also not clearly understood. The numerous barriers that are present amongst the CRC patients and their FDRs can be addressed.