First Series Using Ultrasonic Propulsion and Burst Wave Lithotripsy to Treat Ureteral Stones.

PURPOSE: Our goal was to test transcutaneous focused ultrasound in the form of ultrasonic propulsion and burst wave lithotripsy to reposition ureteral stones and facilitate passage in awake subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult subjects with a diagnosed proximal or distal ureteral stone were prospectively recruited. Ultrasonic propulsion alone or with burst wave lithotripsy was administered by a handheld transducer to awake, unanesthetized subjects. Efficacy outcomes included stone motion, stone passage, and pain relief. Safety outcome was the reporting of associated anticipated or adverse events. RESULTS: Twenty-nine subjects received either ultrasonic propulsion alone (n = 16) or with burst wave lithotripsy bursts (n = 13), and stone motion was observed in 19 (66%). The stone passed in 18 (86%) of the 21 distal ureteral stone cases with at least 2 weeks follow-up in an average of 3.9±4.9 days post-procedure. Fragmentation was observed in 7 of the burst wave lithotripsy cases. All subjects tolerated the procedure with average pain scores (0-10) dropping from 2.1±2.3 to 1.6±2.0 (P = .03). Anticipated events were limited to hematuria on initial urination post-procedure and mild pain. In total, 7 subjects had associated discomfort with only 2.2% (18 of 820) propulsion bursts. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the efficacy and safety of using ultrasonic propulsion and burst wave lithotripsy in awake subjects to reposition and break ureteral stones to relieve pain and facilitate passage.

Retrospective comparison of measured stone size and posterior acoustic shadow width in clinical ultrasound images.

PURPOSE: Posterior acoustic shadow width has been proposed as a more accurate measure of kidney stone size compared to direct measurement of stone width on ultrasound (US). Published data in humans to date have been based on a research using US system. Herein, we compared these two measurements in clinical US images. METHODS: Thirty patient image sets where computed tomography (CT) and US images were captured less than 1 day apart were retrospectively reviewed. Five blinded reviewers independently assessed the largest stone in each image set for shadow presence and size. Shadow size was compared to US and CT stone sizes. RESULTS: Eighty percent of included stones demonstrated an acoustic shadow; 83% of stones without a shadow were ≤ 5 mm on CT. Average stone size was 6.5 ± 4.0 mm on CT, 10.3 ± 4.1 mm on US, and 7.5 ± 4.2 mm by shadow width. On average, US overestimated stone size by 3.8 ± 2.4 mm based on stone width (p < 0.001) and 1.0 ± 1.4 mm based on shadow width (p < 0.0098). Shadow measurements decreased misclassification of stones by 25% among three clinically relevant size categories (≤ 5, 5.1-10, > 10 mm), and by 50% for stones ≤ 5 mm. CONCLUSIONS: US overestimates stone size compared to CT. Retrospective measurement of the acoustic shadow from the same clinical US images is a more accurate reflection of true stone size than direct stone measurement. Most stones without a posterior shadow are ≤ 5 mm.

Feasibility of Antegrade Contrast-enhanced US Nephrostograms to Evaluate Ureteral Patency.

Purpose To demonstrate the feasibility of contrast material-enhanced ulrasonographic (US) nephrostograms to assess ureteral patency after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in this proof-of-concept study. Materials and Methods For this HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved prospective blinded pilot study, patients undergoing PCNL provided consent to undergo contrast-enhanced US and fluoroscopic nephrostograms on postoperative day 1. For contrast-enhanced US, 1.5 mL of Optison (GE Healthcare, Oslo, Norway) microbubble contrast agent solution (perflutren protein-type A microspheres) was injected via the nephrostomy tube. Unobstructed antegrade ureteral flow was defined by the presence of contrast material in the bladder. Contrast-enhanced US results were compared against those of fluoroscopic nephrostograms for concordance. Results Ten studies were performed in nine patients (four women, five men). Contrast-enhanced US demonstrated ureteral patency in eight studies and obstruction in two. One patient underwent two studies, one showing obstruction and the second showing patency. Concordance between US and fluoroscopic assessments of ureteral patency was evaluated by using a Clopper-Pearson exact binomial test. These results were perfectly concordant with fluoroscopic nephrostogram results, with a 95% confidence interval of 69.2% and 100%. No complications or adverse events related to contrast-enhanced US occurred. Conclusion Contrast-enhanced US nephrostograms are simple to perform and are capable of demonstrating both patency and obstruction of the ureter. The perfect concordance with fluoroscopic results across 10 studies demonstrated here is not sufficient to establish diagnostic accuracy of this technique, but motivates further, larger scale investigation. If subsequent larger studies confirm these preliminary results, contrast-enhanced US may provide a safer, more convenient way to evaluate ureteral patency than fluoroscopy. © RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound as a Radiation-Free Alternative to Fluoroscopic Nephrostogram for Evaluating Ureteral Patency.

PURPOSE: We compared contrast enhanced ultrasound and fluoroscopic nephrostography in the evaluation of ureteral patency following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective cohort, noninferiority study was performed after obtaining institutional review board approval. We enrolled eligible patients with kidney and proximal ureteral stones who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy at our center. On postoperative day 1 patients received contrast enhanced ultrasound and fluoroscopic nephrostogram within 2 hours of each other to evaluate ureteral patency, which was the primary outcome of this study. RESULTS: A total of 92 pairs of imaging studies were performed in 82 patients during the study period. Five study pairs were excluded due to technical errors that prevented imaging interpretation. Females slightly predominated over males with a mean ± SD age of 50.5 ± 15.9 years and a mean body mass index of 29.6 ± 8.6 kg/m2. Of the remaining 87 sets of studies 69 (79.3%) demonstrated concordant findings regarding ureteral patency for the 2 imaging techniques and 18 (20.7%) were discordant. The nephrostomy tube was removed on the same day in 15 of the 17 patients who demonstrated antegrade urine flow only on contrast enhanced ultrasound and they had no subsequent adverse events. No adverse events were noted related to ultrasound contrast injection. While contrast enhanced ultrasound used no ionizing radiation, fluoroscopic nephrostograms provided a mean radiation exposure dose of 2.8 ± 3.7 mGy. CONCLUSIONS: A contrast enhanced ultrasound nephrostogram can be safely performed to evaluate for ureteral patency following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. This imaging technique was mostly concordant with fluoroscopic findings. Most discordance was likely attributable to the higher sensitivity for patency of contrast enhanced ultrasound compared to fluoroscopy.

Nephrolithiasis in Pregnancy: Treating for Two.

OBJECTIVES: To review the literature regarding the epidemiology of stone disease and develop a management algorithm based on current evidence and societal guidelines. METHODS: A structured literature review was performed to determine highest quality of evidence guiding care for pregnant patients with symptomatic nephrolithiasis. PUBMED and EMBASE databases were searched using terms "pregnancy," "nephrolithiasis," or "pregnancy" and "renal colic" alone and in combination with "stone", "kidney stone," "ultrasound," "MRI," "CT," "percutaneous nephrostomy," "ureteral stent," or "ureteroscopy." All English-language abstracts were reviewed for relevance and full-length articles were reviewed for content. Articles published prior to 1990 were excluded, and priority for inclusion was given to multi-institutional studies and larger institutional studies, reflecting the highest level of current available evidence and most contemporaneous practice patterns. RESULTS: Symptomatic nephrolithiasis affects less than 1% of pregnancies but poses unique diagnostic challenges due to the physiologic changes of pregnancy and risks of ionizing radiation exposure to the fetus. Ultrasound remains the imaging modality of choice. Most patients may be managed non-operatively, but drainage with percutaneous nephrostomy or ureteral stent may be performed if warranted. Growing evidence also supports the safety and efficacy of definitive stone treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Though rare, symptomatic nephrolithiasis poses significant clinical challenges due to the need to minimize risk for both mother and fetus with diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. A multi-disciplinary approach is paramount, as is shared decision making with the patient at each step of care.

National Imaging Trends in Nephrolithiasis-Does Renal Ultrasound in the Emergency Department Pave the Way for Computerized Tomography?

INTRODUCTION: Concern regarding radiation exposure has led to increased interest in the use of ultrasound for the initial imaging of suspected renal colic in the emergency department. It is unknown whether such an approach simply defers computerized tomography to outpatient followup. We analyzed national imaging patterns to explore this relationship. METHODS: Using the MarketScan® insurance claims database we reviewed adult patients newly diagnosed with nephrolithiasis in U.S. emergency departments between 2007 and 2015. Patients were excluded if they had been diagnosed with or undergone treatment for nephrolithiasis in the preceding 180 days. RESULTS: From 2007 to 2015, 830,785 emergency department nephrolithiasis encounters met inclusion criteria. The ultrasound-only rate increased from 2.7% to 6.9%, while the computerized tomography-only rate remained stable at 85.8%. A history of computerized tomography in the 30 days before emergency department presentation increased the rate of ultrasound-only imaging from 4.6% to 8.9%. The mean cumulative computerized tomography scans from the emergency department visit to 90 days after was significantly lower in those imaged with emergency department ultrasound (0.82±0.77) compared to those imaged with emergency department computerized tomography (1.2±0.51, p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who undergo ultrasonography in the emergency department for evaluation of renal colic undergo fewer cumulative computerized tomography scans in the 90 days following their visit than do patients initially imaged with computerized tomography. Ultrasound use for the evaluation of renal colic has increased while computerized tomography rates have remained stable.

National Trends in CT Utilization and Estimated CT-related Radiation Exposure in the Evaluation and Follow-up of Stone Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To describe trends in computed tomography (CT) use and estimate the radiation exposure among stone formers using a national insurance claims database. METHODS: Within MarketScan, adult stone patients from 2007 to 2013 were identified using International Classification of Diseases-Revision 9, International Classification of Diseases-Revision 10, and Current Procedural Terminology codes. Patients were classified as "active" (≥2 diagnosis codes for nephrolithiasis, or receipt of stone surgery) or "inactive" (1 stone diagnosis) and compared to age- and gender-matched controls. CT utilization was tracked over 3 years for each group. Annual CT-related radiation exposure was estimated using previously published dose values and compared using Kruskal-Wallis and χ2 tests. Demographic factors associated with greater CT exposure were identified on multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Of active stone patients, 112,140 underwent surgery and 215,376 were managed nonoperatively. There were 175,228 inactive stone patients and 502,744 controls. On average, active stone patients received nearly 10 times as many CTs as controls at 3 years (P <.001), and more acute imaging (P <.001). About 25% and 15% of operative and nonoperative patients, respectively, received ≥3 CTs in 3 years. This was associated with female gender. For nonoperative patients, this was also associated with age, residence in the North-Central or South regions, and inversely associated with metropolitan residence (all P <.01). Over 10% of active stone patients are estimated to receive >20 mSv in the first year alone. CONCLUSION: CT use and nonsurgical radiation exposure for active stone patients is significant. Over 10% are estimated to exceed occupational limits in the first year. Judicious CT imaging and low-dose protocols are critical for stone patients.

Quantitative Assessment of Effectiveness of Ultrasonic Propulsion of Kidney Stones.

Purpose: Ultrasonic propulsion is an investigative modality to noninvasively image and reposition urinary stones. Our goals were to test safety and effectiveness of new acoustic exposure conditions from a new transducer, and to use simultaneous ureteroscopic and ultrasonic observation to quantify stone repositioning. Materials and Methods: During operation, ultrasonic propulsion was applied transcutaneously, whereas stone targets were visualized ureteroscopically. Exposures were 350 kHz frequency, ≤200 W/cm2 focal intensity, and ≤3-second bursts per push. Ureteroscope and ultrasound (US) videos were recorded. Video clips with and without stone motion were randomized and scored for motion ≥3 mm by independent reviewers blinded to the exposures. Subjects were followed with telephone calls, imaging, and chart review for adverse events. Results: The investigative treatment was used in 18 subjects and 19 kidneys. A total of 62 stone targets were treated ranging in size from a collection of "dust" to 15 mm. Subjects received an average of 17 ± 14 propulsion bursts (per kidney) for a total average exposure time of 40 ± 40 seconds. Independent reviewers scored at least one stone movement ≥3 mm in 18 of 19 kidneys (95%) from the ureteroscope videos and in 15 of 19 kidneys (79%) from the US videos. This difference was probably because of motion out of the US imaging plane. Treatment repositioned stones in two cases that would have otherwise required basket repositioning. No serious adverse events were observed with the device or procedure. Conclusions: Ultrasonic propulsion was shown to be safe, and it effectively repositioned stones in 95% of kidneys despite positioning and access restrictions caused by working in an operating room on anesthetized subjects.

Computed Tomography Radiation Exposure Among Referred Kidney Stone Patients: Results from the Registry for Stones of the Kidney and Ureter.

Purpose: Kidney stone patients routinely have CT scans during diagnostic work-up before being referred to a tertiary center. How often these patients exceed the recommended dose limits for occupational radiation exposure of >100 mSv for 5 years and >50 mSv in a single year from CT alone remains unknown. This study aimed to quantify radiation doses from CTs received by stone patients before their evaluation at a tertiary care stone clinic. Methods: From November 2015 to March 2017, consecutive new patients enrolled into the Registry for Stones of the Kidney and Ureter (ReSKU™) had the dose-length product of every available CT abdomen/pelvis within 5 years of their initial visit recorded, allowing for an effective dose (EDose) calculation. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified factors associated with exceeding recommended dose limits. Models were created to test radiation reducing effects of low-dose and phase-reduction CT protocols. Results: Of 343 noncontrast CTs performed, only 29 (8%) were low-dose CTs (calculated EDose <4 mSv). Among 389 total patients, 101 (26%) and 25 (6%) had an EDose >20 mSv and >50 mSv/year, respectively. Increased body mass index, number of scans, and multiphase scans were associated with exceeding exposure thresholds (p < 0.01). The implementation of a low-dose CT protocol decreased the estimated number of scans contributing to overexposure by >50%. Conclusions: Stone patients referred to a tertiary stone center may receive excessive radiation from CT scans alone. Unnecessary phases and underutilization of low-dose CT protocols continue to take place. Enacting new approaches to CT protocols may spare stone patients from exceeding recommended dose limits.

Anaphylactoid Reactions After Instillation of Contrast Material Into the Urinary Tract: A Survey of Contemporary Practice Patterns and Review of the Literature.

OBJECTIVE: To assess drug reactions (ADRs) encountered by practicing urologists for contrast instilled into the urinary collecting system, and to describe current practice patterns regarding contrast administration into the urinary tract for patients with known contrast allergies. METHODS: Endourological Society members were e-mailed a web-based survey about their prior experience with contrast-related ADRs and practices for contrast administration into the urinary tract among patients with known intravenous contrast allergies. Chi-squared analysis was used to compare management patterns between patients with established allergies and those without. RESULTS: An estimated 2300-2500 e-mails were reached, resulting in an estimated response rate of 6.3%-8%. Over 75% of respondents were fellowship trained. Average time in practice was 16 years, and respondents performed a mean of 6.7 urologic contrast studies per week. Among respondents, 32.6%, 14.7%, and 4.0% had treated at least 1 patient with a mild, moderate, or severe reaction, respectively. Contrast-related ADRs were most commonly associated with retrograde pyelogram (50%). For patients with known contrast allergies, 5.4% pursue additional work-up before administering contrast in the urinary tract. Pretreatment with antihistamine or steroids is used by 24.8% and 23.4%, respectively. When performing retrograde pyelograms for such patients, urologists are more likely to use dilute contrast (P = .003), but otherwise do not significantly alter technique. CONCLUSION: Contrast ADRs are encountered not infrequently among practicing urologists. There is notable practice variation in the management of patients with known contrast allergies, though the overall perceived risk of contrast use in these patients is low, provided good technique is used.

Ultrasound Guidance to Assist Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Reduces Radiation Exposure in Obese Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of body mass index (BMI) on perioperative outcomes and radiation exposure for ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were prospectively collected for consecutive patients who underwent PCNL at the University of California, San Francisco, from July 2013 to November 2015. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to their BMI: <25 (normal weight), 25-29.9 (overweight), and >30 (obese) kg/m2. Perioperative outcomes were compared between patients who underwent US-guided vs fluoroscopy-guided PCNL. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-five patients were enrolled; 93 cases were performed under US and 42 under fluoroscopic guidance. US successfully guided renal access in 76.9% of normal weight, 79.0% of overweight, and 45.7% of obese patients (P < .05). Mean fluoroscopic screening time and radiation exposure dose were reduced for US compared to fluoroscopy cases across all BMI categories (P < .05). As BMI increased, radiation exposure dose rose disproportionately faster compared to screening time (P < .001). No significant differences among the BMI groups were found with regard to complication rate, hospital stay, and stone-free status. CONCLUSION: US-guided PCNL may be more difficult in obese patients, but with its use, the overweight and obese experience the largest absolute reduction in radiation exposure. Because these patients are inherently at greater risk for radiation exposure compared to normal weight patients, they may benefit the most from adoption of US for PCNL.

Rationale and Design of the Registry for Stones of the Kidney and Ureter (ReSKU): A Prospective Observational Registry to Study the Natural History of Urolithiasis Patients.

OBJECTIVES: Registry-based clinical research in nephrolithiasis is critical to advancing quality in urinary stone disease management and ultimately reducing stone recurrence. A need exists to develop Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)-compliant registries that comprise integrated electronic health record (EHR) data using prospectively defined variables. An EHR-based standardized patient database-the Registry for Stones of the Kidney and Ureter (ReSKU™)-was developed, and herein we describe our implementation outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Interviews with academic and community endourologists in the United States, Canada, China, and Japan identified demographic, intraoperative, and perioperative variables to populate our registry. Variables were incorporated into a HIPAA-compliant Research Electronic Data Capture database linked to text prompts and registration data within the Epic EHR platform. Specific data collection instruments supporting New patient, Surgery, Postoperative, and Follow-up clinical encounters were created within Epic to facilitate automated data extraction into ReSKU. RESULTS: The number of variables within each instrument includes the following: New patient-60, Surgery-80, Postoperative-64, and Follow-up-64. With manual data entry, the mean times to complete each of the clinic-based instruments were (minutes) as follows: New patient-12.06 ± 2.30, Postoperative-7.18 ± 1.02, and Follow-up-8.10 ± 0.58. These times were significantly reduced with the use of ReSKU structured clinic note templates to the following: New patient-4.09 ± 1.73, Postoperative-1.41 ± 0.41, and Follow-up-0.79 ± 0.38. With automated data extraction from Epic, manual entry is obviated. CONCLUSIONS: ReSKU is a longitudinal prospective nephrolithiasis registry that integrates EHR data, lowering the barriers to performing high quality clinical research and quality outcome assessments in urinary stone disease.