Revision sacrocolpopexy: tips and tricks for optimal outcomes.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this video is to highlight important considerations and techniques for revision sacrocolpopexy in women with symptomatic recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse after sacrocolpopexy. METHODS: In this video, we show five patients who presented with recurrent symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse after prior sacrocolpopexy. We demonstrate techniques for robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy revision including surgical dissection, revision of existing mesh, and/or addition of new mesh. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, revision sacrocolpopexy requires an individualized approach. These surgeries are often challenging because of adhesions and altered anatomy from the prior sacrocolpopexy. The reviewed considerations and techniques can be useful for ensuring a safe and effective outcome.

Surgical correction of the genital hiatus at the time of sacrocolpopexy - a 7-year Markov analysis: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: To perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of concurrent posterior repair performed at the time of laparoscopic hysterectomy with sacrocolpopexy over a 7-year time period. We hypothesize it is not cost-effective to perform a posterior colporrhaphy. METHODS: We used TreeAge Pro® to construct a decision model with Markov modeling to compare sacrocolpopexy with and without concurrent posterior repair (SCP and SCP+PR) over a time horizon of 7 years. Outcomes included probability and costs associated with prolapse recurrence, prolapse retreatment, and complications including rectal injury, rectovaginal hematoma requiring reoperation, and postoperative dyspareunia. Cost-effectiveness was defined as an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) calculated as ∆ costs /∆ effectiveness and the willingness to pay (WTP) was set at $100,000/QALY. RESULTS: Our model showed that SCP was the dominant strategy, with lower costs (-$ 2681.06) and higher effectiveness (+0.10) compared to SCP+PR over the 7-year period. In two-way sensitivity analyses, we varied the probability of prolapse recurrence after both strategies. Our conclusions would only change if the probability of recurrence after SCP was at least 29.7% higher than after SCP+PR. When varying the probabilities of dyspareunia for both strategies, SCP+PR only became the dominant strategy if the probability of dyspareunia for SCP+PR was lower than the rate of SCP alone. CONCLUSIONS: In this 7-year Markov cost-effectiveness analysis, SCP without concurrent PR was the dominant strategy. SCP+PR costs more with lower effectiveness than SCP alone, due to higher surgical cost of SCP+PR and higher probability of dyspareunia after SCP+PR.

Who Places High Value on the Uterus? A Cross-sectional Survey Study Evaluating Predictors for Uterine Preservation.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine predictors for placing high value on the uterus in patients who no longer desire fertility. The secondary objective was to identify reasons for placing high value on the uterus. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey study. SETTING: Three hospitals within a large healthcare system in the United States. PATIENTS: New patients ≥45 years old seeking care for benign gynecologic conditions, including abnormal uterine bleeding, uterine myomas, pelvic organ prolapse, endometriosis, or pelvic pain. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was the summative score of the validated Value of Uterus (VALUS) instrument for measuring value placed on the uterus and the validated visual analog scale with the question "how important is it to you to keep your uterus when you have a gynecologic condition?" A total of 163 surveys were returned for analysis (79.2%). Using the VALUS cutoff, 64 patients (45.7%) were considered to have low value for their uterus (VALUS score <14), whereas 76 patients (54.3%) were considered to have high value for their uterus (VALUS score ≥14). The adjusted odds of placing high value for the uterus was 5.06 times higher among those who wanted to be sexually active in the future than those who do not desire to be sexually active (95% confidence interval, 1.55-16.52, p = .01). Patients who are sexually active have 3.94 higher adjusted odds of placing high value on the uterus than those who are not sexually active and do not desire to be (95% confidence interval, 1.36-11.43; p = .01). Race, religion, and personal history of cancer were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Patients who highly value the uterus were highly motivated by the desire to be sexually active. Nonwhite race, religion, and personal history of cancer were not predictors for placing high value on uterine preservation.

Development and validation of the Value of Uterus instrument and visual analog scale to measure patients' valuation of their uterus.

BACKGROUND: Currently, there are no clear frameworks or tools to objectively or subjectively evaluate patient attitudes toward uterine preservation and how they influence the decision to proceed with hysterectomy vs uterine preservation when undergoing prolapse surgery. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop a reliable and valid instrument to measure patients' valuation of their uterus. STUDY DESIGN: The Value of Uterus instrument was developed on the basis of existing literature and created with structured patient-reported outcome measurement development methodology. An initial 14-question instrument was administered to 152 patients, and the instrument was revised on the basis of an analysis of internal consistency. The resulting Value of Uterus instrument has 6 items and includes a visual analog scale for the question "How important is it to you to keep your uterus when you have a gynecologic condition?" To validate the instrument, we recruited 51 patients aged >45 years with uterovaginal prolapse who presented to the urogynecology department and were scheduled to undergo vaginal surgery with or without hysterectomy. Internal reliability of the instrument was measured with Cronbach alpha. For known-groups validity, Value of Uterus summary scores were compared between women who underwent hysteropexy and those who underwent hysterectomy using the t test. Intraclass correlation coefficient was used to assess test-retest reliability with Value of Uterus administered to women twice. Lastly, a receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis was conducted to identify a cutoff Value of Uterus and visual analog scale score for predicting whether a woman would undergo hysteropexy (vs hysterectomy). RESULTS: A total of 51 patients were recruited (26 patients in the hysterectomy and 25 in the hysteropexy group), with a mean age of 64±10 years; 87.8% of patients self-identified as White. There were no differences in demographics between the groups. Cronbach's alpha was 0.94, suggesting excellent internal consistency of the items in the Value of Uterus instrument. The Value of Uterus instrument was highly correlated with the visual analog scale question, with r=0.82 (95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.89; P<.001). Patients in the hysteropexy group had significantly higher Value of Uterus scores (indicating greater value placed on the uterus) than women who underwent hysterectomy (20.8 vs 12.2; P<.001). Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis identified a Value of Uterus cutoff score ≥14, with good accuracy for predicting hysteropexy (area under the curve, 0.87; sensitivity, 92.0%; specificity, 68%). CONCLUSION: Value of Uterus is a reliable and valid 6-item instrument that measures patients' valuation of the uterus and preferences for uterine preservation when undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Value of Uterus and visual analog scale were shown to reliably predict whether a patient undergoes uterine-preserving prolapse surgery. The Value of Uterus instrument and visual analog scale tool can be useful tools to ensure that the patient's preferences are included in the medical decision-making. Value of Uterus may be useful for future research in other gynecologic conditions where uterine preservation is an option.

Salpingo-oophorectomy or surveillance for ovarian endometrioma in asymptomatic premenopausal women: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

BACKGROUND: The lifetime risk of ovarian cancer is 1.9% among women with endometriosis compared with 1.3% among the general population. When an asymptomatic endometrioma is incidentally discovered on imaging, gynecologists must weigh the procedural complications and the potential for subsequent surgical menopause against future ovarian pathology or cancer. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine if performing unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is a more cost-effective strategy for the prevention of death than surveillance for asymptomatic endometriomas. STUDY DESIGN: We created a cost-effectiveness model using TreeAge Pro (TreeAge Software Inc; Williamstown, MA) with a lifetime horizon. Our hypothetical cohort included premenopausal patients with 2 ovaries who did not desire fertility. Those diagnosed with asymptomatic endometrioma underwent either unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy or surveillance (ultrasound 6-12 weeks after diagnosis, then annually). Our primary effectiveness outcome was mortality, including death from ovarian cancer or surgery and all-cause mortality related to surgical menopause (± hormone replacement therapy) if the contralateral ovary is removed. We modeled the probabilities of surgical complications, occult malignancy, development of contralateral adnexal pathology, surgical menopause, use of hormone replacement therapy, and development of ovarian cancer. The costs included surgical procedures, complications, ultrasound surveillance, hormone therapy, and treatment of ovarian cancer, with information gathered from Medicare reimbursement data and published literature. Cost-effectiveness was determined using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of Δ costs / Δ deaths with a willingness-to-pay threshold of $11.6 million as the value of a statistical life. Multiple 1-way sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate model robustness. RESULTS: Our model demonstrated that unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is associated with improved outcomes compared with surveillance, with fewer deaths (0.28% vs 1.50%) and fewer cases of ovarian cancer (0.42% vs 2.96%). However, it costs more than sonographic surveillance at $6403.43 vs $5381.39 per case of incidental endometrioma. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio showed that unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy costs $83,773.77 per death prevented and $40,237.80 per case of ovarian cancer prevented. As both values were well below the willingness-to-pay threshold, unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is cost-effective and is the preferred strategy. If unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy were chosen over surveillance for premenopausal patients with incidental endometriomas, 1 diagnosis of ovarian cancer would be prevented in every 40 patients and 1 death averted in every 82 patients. We performed 1-way sensitivity analyses for all input variables and determined that there were no reasonable inputs that would alter our conclusions. CONCLUSION: Unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is cost-effective and is the preferred strategy compared with surveillance for the management of incidental endometrioma in a premenopausal patient not desiring fertility. It incurs fewer deaths and fewer cases of ovarian cancer with costs below the national willingness-to-pay thresholds.

Surgical Outcomes in Benign Gynecologic Surgery Patients during the COVID-19 Pandemic (SOCOVID study).

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of perioperative coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in women undergoing benign gynecologic surgery and to evaluate perioperative complication rates in patients with active, previous, or no previous severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. DESIGN: A multicenter prospective cohort study. SETTING: Ten institutions in the United States. PATIENTS: Patients aged >18 years who underwent benign gynecologic surgery from July 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020, were included. All patients were followed up from the time of surgery to 10 weeks postoperatively. Those with intrauterine pregnancy or known gynecologic malignancy were excluded. INTERVENTIONS: Benign gynecologic surgery. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was the incidence of perioperative COVID-19 infections, which was stratified as (1) previous COVID-19 infection, (2) preoperative COVID-19 infection, and (3) postoperative COVID-19 infection. Secondary outcomes included adverse events and mortality after surgery and predictors for postoperative COVID-19 infection. If surgery was delayed because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the reason for postponement and any subsequent adverse event was recorded. Of 3423 patients included for final analysis, 189 (5.5%) postponed their gynecologic surgery during the pandemic. Forty-three patients (1.3% of total cases) had a history of COVID-19. The majority (182, 96.3%) had no sequelae attributed to surgical postponement. After hospital discharge to 10 weeks postoperatively, 39 patients (1.1%) became infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. The mean duration of time between hospital discharge and the follow-up positive COVID-19 test was 22.1 ± 12.3 days (range, 4-50 days). Eleven (31.4% of postoperative COVID-19 infections, 0.3% of total cases) of the newly diagnosed COVID-19 infections occurred within 14 days of hospital discharge. On multivariable logistic regression, living in the Southwest (adjusted odds ratio, 6.8) and single-unit increase in age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (adjusted odds ratio, 1.2) increased the odds of postoperative COVID-19 infection. Perioperative complications were not significantly higher in patients with a history of positive COVID-19 than those without a history of COVID-19, although the mean duration of time between previous COVID-19 diagnosis and surgery was 97 days (14 weeks). CONCLUSION: In this large multicenter prospective cohort study of benign gynecologic surgeries, only 1.1% of patients developed a postoperative COVID-19 infection, with 0.3% of infection in the immediate 14 days after surgery. The incidence of postoperative complications was not different in those with and without previous COVID-19 infections.

Risk factors for ureteral obstruction and the diagnostic value of the "cysto-under-tension" technique at the time of uterosacral colpopexy.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective is to determine the incidence of ureteral obstruction and delayed ureteral injury and to identify risk factors for ureteral obstruction following uterosacral colpopexy. The secondary objective is to evaluate the diagnostic value of the "cysto-under-tension" technique, when a cystoscopy is performed prior to vaginal cuff closure with the uterosacral sutures on tension. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of patients undergoing uterosacral ligament colpopexy between 2007 and 2012 with a nested case-control analysis. Patients with documented ureteral obstruction on cystoscopy or a delayed ureteral injury were identified. Cases were defined as patients with a ureteral obstruction on cystoscopy and controls as those who did not; a multivariable regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 551 patients underwent uterosacral ligament colpopexy. Twenty-four (4.3% [95% CI = 2.94-6.40]) patients had a ureteral obstruction on cystoscopy, and two (0.4% [95% CI = 0.09-1.31]) patients experienced a delayed ureteral injury. The "cysto-under-tension" technique was used in 40 (7.3%) cases, with a sensitivity of 50.0% (CI = 1.26-98.74) and specificity of 97.4% (CI = 86.2-99.9) to detect ureteral obstruction. On logistic regression for the case-control analysis, increased age remained associated with increased odds of ureteral obstruction (adjOR 1.06, 95% CI = 1.02-1.11) and a higher BMI had lower odds (adjOR 0.89, 95% CI = 0.79-0.98). CONCLUSIONS: In this large cohort study, older age was associated with higher odds of obstruction at the time of colpopexy while a higher BMI might have been protective. The "cysto-under-tension" technique overall may not be that useful in detecting ureteral obstructions but has high negative predictive value.

Anticholinergic prescribing pattern changes of urogynecology providers in response to evidence of potential dementia risk.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Recent publications show an association between exposure to anticholinergic medications and the risk of developing dementia. We hypothesized that urogynecology providers have changed their overactive bladder syndrome treatment as a result of this literature. METHODS: This was an anonymous, cross-sectional, web-based survey of American Urogynecologic Society members. Survey questions queried awareness of the referenced literature, prescribing practices, the impact of insurance on treatment plans, and demographics. Our primary outcome measured the change in prescribing practice in response to literature linking anticholinergic medications with the risk of dementia. Descriptive statistics were used. RESULTS: A total of 222 urogynecology providers completed the survey. Nearly all respondents (99.1%) were aware of the recent literature, and, as a result, 90.5% reported changing their practice. Prior to the publication of recent literature, a "non-CNS-sparing" anticholinergic (e.g., oxybutynin) was most commonly prescribed (64.4%), whereas after the literature was published, this shifted to ß3-adrenoceptor agonists (58.5%, p < 0.001). A majority of respondents (96.6%) reported that insurance restrictions led to a change in treatment for some patients, with 73.5% describing the prior-authorization process as difficult. Many providers (61.8%) reported that a trial of anticholinergics was required by insurance companies prior to authorizing mirabegron. CONCLUSIONS: The recent literature associating anticholinergic medications with the development of dementia has changed practice patterns among survey respondents, with a shift away from anticholinergic medications and toward ß3-adrenoceptor agonists. The majority of respondents report insurance barriers to non-anticholinergic therapies, resulting in alteration of their preferred practices.

Occult Uterine Malignancy at the Time of Sacrocolpopexy in the Context of the Safety Communication on Power Morcellation by the FDA.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the incidence of occult uterine malignancy at the time of sacrocolpopexy with concurrent hysterectomy, in the context of practice pattern changes as a result of the 2014 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) power morcellation safety communication. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Tertiary care referral center in the United States. PATIENTS: A total of 839 patients who underwent sacrocolpopexy from January 2004 to December 2018. INTERVENTIONS: All patients received a concurrent hysterectomy without a diagnosis of suspected or confirmed gynecologic malignancy before surgery. Trends of surgeries were compared before and after the 2014 FDA power morcellation safety communication. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Demographic and perioperative data were collected from the system-wide electronic medical record. Operative and pathology reports were reviewed to determine the method of specimen retrieval and specimen pathology results. A total of 238 patients (28.4%) had a hysterectomy at the time of sacrocolpopexy. There were no cases of occult uterine malignancy (0%, 95% CI 0%-1.6%). There was 1 case of borderline tumor of the ovary. The most common mode of hysterectomy over the 15-year period was laparoscopic hysterectomy (n = 84, 35.3%), followed by vaginal hysterectomy (n = 63, 26.5%). After the FDA communication, the most common form of hysterectomy changed significantly to vaginal hysterectomy (n = 35, 55.6%; p <.001). When comparing the first 2 years after the announcement (2014-2016) to the subsequent 2 years (2017-2018), there was again a significant increase in the use of laparoscopic hysterectomy in the latter time period (7.3% vs 40.9%; p <.001). CONCLUSION: In this cohort of patients undergoing sacrocolpopexy with concurrent hysterectomy, the incidence of occult uterine malignancy was low. After the FDA safety communication, practice patterns with regard to the mode of hysterectomy changed, but the magnitude of these changes were transient.

Does concurrent posterior repair for an asymptomatic rectocele reduce the risk of surgical failure in patients undergoing sacrocolpopexy?

PURPOSE: To determine if a concurrent posterior repair for an asymptomatic rectocele at the time of sacrocolpopexy reduces the incidence of surgical failure. METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review with a cross-sectional follow-up survey of all patients who underwent sacrocolpopexy from 2004 to 2014. Demographic and operative data were collected from the medical record. For the cross-sectional portion, patients were contacted to obtain information on symptoms and retreatment after surgery. In this study, we included patients with an asymptomatic rectocele on examination, defined as Ap or Bp ≥ -1 on POP-Q without defecatory dysfunction, which was defined as constipation based on the Rome III criteria, dyschezia, excessive straining and/or splinting to have a bowel movement. The primary outcome was a composite score of subjective bulge symptoms or retreatment for prolapse. RESULTS: Three hundred forty-four patients met the inclusion criteria: 185 (53.8%) had a sacrocolpopexy only (SCP) and 159 (46.2%) had a concurrent posterior repair (SCP + PR). The composite failure rate was 10.2% (95% CI = 7.4-13.8%), with a 13.5% (25) failure rate in the SCP group compared with 6.3% (10) in the SCP + PR group (p = 0.03). On multivariable logistic regression, the adjusted odds of failure was 2.79 in the SCP compared with the SCP + PR group (CI 1.25-6.23; P = 0.01). The rates of de novo defecatory dysfunction following surgery were low (SCP = 5.6% vs. SCP + PR = 7.5%, p = 0.55). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with asymptomatic rectoceles, a concurrent posterior repair at the time of sacrocolpopexy reduces the odds of composite patient-centered failure without an increased rate of dyspareunia or de novo defecatory dysfunction.

Revitalizing research in genitourinary syndrome of menopause.

Genitourinary syndrome of menopause is defined as the collection of signs and symptoms of the genitourinary tract from menopause, previously known as vulvovaginal atrophy. The Food and Drug Administration has approved select hormonal and nonhormonal treatment for vaginal atrophy, including systemic estrogen, vaginal estrogen, estrogen receptor modulators, and dehydroepiandrosterone. These medications can increase the risk of thromboembolic disease and malignancy; furthermore, the cost of the medications have been increasing. Energy-based therapy such as the fractional CO2 laser energy or nonablative photothermal Erbium:YAG-laser has emerged as an alternative treatment option for genitourinary syndrome of menopause. However, in July of 2018, the Food and Drug Administration released a statement cautioning women against vaginal rejuvenation devices and highlighted the paucity of long-term clinical research in this field. This statement may result in patients' hesitation to seek care for genitourinary syndrome of menopause. These recent events should be a call to action to urge physicians to address the barriers that exist in the treatment of genitourinary syndrome of menopause because of limited clinical research, cost of treatment, and fear.

Comparing postoperative voiding dysfunction after mid-urethral sling using either a Babcock or Kelly clamp tensioning technique.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to compare postoperative urinary retention using the Babcock and Kelly clamps for retropubic midurethral sling (RPS) tensioning. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort of isolated RPS procedures from December 2010 through April 2016 by five fellowship-trained surgeons at two institutions. Slings were tensioned with a Babcock clamp by grasping a 3-mm midline fold of mesh (RPS-B) or a Kelly clamp as a spacer between the sling and suburethral tissue (RPS-K). Assessment of urinary retention included the primary outcome of postoperative catheterization and several secondary outcomes, including discharge home with a catheter, within 1 year of surgery. Analysis of covariance was used to compute the mean difference in duration of catheterization and log-binomial regression was used to calculate risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: We included 240 patients. The RPS-B group had a lower body mass index and was more likely to be menopausal, have had pelvic organ prolapse surgery, and have a lower maximum urethral closure pressure than the RPS-K group. The mean duration of catheterization was similar, as demonstrated by the crude (0.21 days [-0.30-0.71]) and BMI-adjusted (0.07 days [-0.41-0.55]) mean difference in duration of catheterization. The incidence of postoperative OAB symptoms was comparable between the groups (BMI-adjusted RR: 0.95 (0.80-1.1)), and the incidence of revision did not differ (p = 0.7). CONCLUSIONS: The Babcock and Kelly clamp tensioning techniques appear comparable, with a low incidence of prolonged postoperative catheterization. Most catheters were removed on the day of the surgery. It is reasonable to tension retropubic midurethral slings with either method.

Urethral Bulking With Polyacrylamide Hydrogel Compared With Other Treatments for Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Our objective was to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing polyacrylamide hydrogel urethral bulking with other surgical and nonsurgical treatments for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). We created a cost-effectiveness analysis using TreeAge Pro, modeling eight SUI treatments. Treatment with midurethral sling (MUS) had the highest effectiveness (1.86 quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs]), followed by polyacrylamide hydrogel (1.82 QALYs), with a difference (Δ 0.02/year) less than the minimally important difference for utilities of 0.03 annually. When the proportion of polyacrylamide hydrogel urethral bulking procedures performed in the office setting is greater than 58%, polyacrylamide hydrogel is a cost-effective treatment for SUI, along with pessary, pelvic floor physical therapy, and MUS. Although MUS is more effective and, therefore, the preferred SUI treatment, polyacrylamide hydrogel is a reasonable alternative depending on patient preferences and treatment goals.

Effects of Obesity on Urogynecologic Prolapse Surgery Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the literature on outcomes of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery in patients from various body mass index (BMI) categories to determine the association between obesity and surgical outcomes. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to April 12, 2022; ClinicalTrials.gov was searched in September 2022 (PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022326255). Randomized and nonrandomized studies of urogynecologic POP surgery outcomes were accepted in which categories of BMI or obesity were compared. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: In total, 9,037 abstracts were screened; 759 abstracts were identified for full-text screening, and 31 articles were accepted for inclusion and data were extracted. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Studies were extracted for participant information, intervention, comparator, and outcomes, including subjective outcomes, objective outcomes, and complications. Outcomes were compared among obesity categories (eg, BMI 30-34.9, 35-40, higher than 40), and meta-analysis was performed among different surgical approaches. Individual studies reported varying results as to whether obesity affects surgical outcomes. By meta-analysis, obesity (BMI 30 or higher) is associated with an increased odds of objective prolapse recurrence after vaginal prolapse repair (odds ratio [OR] 1.38, 95% CI, 1.14-1.67) and after prolapse repair from any surgical approach (OR 1.31, 95% CI, 1.12-1.53) and with complications such as mesh exposure after both vaginal and laparoscopic POP repair (OR 2.10, 95% CI, 1.01-4.39). CONCLUSION: Obesity is associated with increased likelihood of prolapse recurrence and mesh complications after POP repair. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42022326255.

Trainee Perspectives Regarding the Effect of the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization Supreme Court Decision on Obstetrics and Gynecology Training.

Objectives: We aimed to describe obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) trainees' anticipation of how the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (Dobbs) U.S. Supreme Court decision may affect their training. Methods: A REDCap survey of OBGYN residents and fellows in the United States from September 19, 2022, to December 1, 2022, queried trainees' anticipated achievement of relevant Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) training milestones, their concerns about the ability to provide care and concern about legal repercussions during training, and the importance of OBGYN competence in managing certain clinical situations for residency graduates. The primary outcome was an ACGME program trainee feeling uncertain or unable to obtain the highest level queried for a relevant ACGME milestone, including experiencing 20 abortion procedures in residency. Results: We received 469 eligible responses; the primary outcome was endorsed by 157 respondents (33.5%). After correction for confounders, significant predictors of the primary outcome were state environment (aOR = 3.94 for pending abortion restrictions; aOR = 2.71 for current abortion restrictions), trainee type (aOR = 0.21 for fellow vs. resident), and a present or past Ryan Training Program in residency (aOR = 0.55). Although the vast majority of trainees believed managing relevant clinical situations are key to OBGYN competence, 10%-30% of trainees believed they would have to stop providing the standard of care in clinical situations during training. Conclusions: This survey of OBGYN trainees indicates higher uncertainty about achieving ACGME milestones and procedural competency in clinical situations potentially affected by the Dobbs decision in states with legal restrictions on abortion.