Gender Differences in Hospital Outcomes among COVID-19 Hospitalizations.

OBJECTIVES: Many epidemiological studies have shown that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) disproportionately affects males, compared with females, although other studies show that there were no such differences. The aim of the present study was to assess differences in the prevalence of hospitalizations and in-hospital outcomes between the sexes, using a larger administrative database. METHODS: We used the 2020 California State Inpatient Database for this retrospective analysis. International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis code U07.1 was used to identify COVID-19 hospitalizations. These hospitalizations were subsequently stratified by male and female sex. Diagnosis and procedures were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. The primary outcome of the study was hospitalization rate, and secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, prolonged length of stay, vasopressor use, mechanical ventilation, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. RESULTS: There were 95,180 COVID-19 hospitalizations among patients 18 years and older, 52,465 (55.1%) of which were among men and 42,715 (44.9%) were among women. In-hospital mortality (12.4% vs 10.1%), prolonged length of hospital stays (30.6% vs 25.8%), vasopressor use (2.6% vs 1.6%), mechanical ventilation (11.8% vs 8.0%), and ICU admission rates (11.4% versus 7.8%) were significantly higher among male compared with female hospitalizations. Conditional logistic regression analysis showed that the odds of mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.38-1.44), hospital lengths of stay (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.31-1.39), vasopressor use (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.51-1.66), mechanical ventilation (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.47-1.78), and ICU admission rates (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.51-1.66) were significantly higher among male hospitalizations. CONCLUSION: Our findings show that male sex is an independent and strong risk factor associated with COVID-19 severity.

Rationale and Design of the Proactive-HF Trial for Managing Patients With NYHA Class III Heart Failure by Using the Combined Cordella Pulmonary Artery Sensor and the Cordella Heart Failure System.

BACKGROUND: Optimizing guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) and monitoring congestion in patients with heart failure (HF) are key to disease management and preventing hospitalizations. A pulmonary artery pressure (PAP)-guided HF management system providing access to body weight, blood pressure, heart rate, blood oxygen saturation, PAP, and symptoms, may provide new insights into the effects of patient engagement and comprehensive care for remote GDMT titration and congestion management. METHODS: The PROACTIVE-HF study was originally approved in 2018 as a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind, multicenter trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Cordella PAP Sensor in patients with HF and with New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III symptoms. Since then, robust clinical evidence supporting PAP-guided HF management has emerged, making clinical equipoise and enrolling patients into a standard-of-care control arm challenging. Therefore, PROACTIVE-HF was changed to a single-arm trial in 2021 with prespecified safety and effectiveness endpoints to provide evidence for a similar risk/benefit profile as the CardioMEMS HF System. CONCLUSION: The single-arm PROACTIVE-HF trial is expected to further demonstrate the benefits of PAP-guided HF management of patients with NYHA class III HF. The addition of vital signs, patient engagement and self-reported symptoms may provide new insights into remote GDMT titration and congestion management.

Effects of bromocriptine in peripartum cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) is a rare but potentially life-threatening form of heart failure (HF). Bromocriptine, a dopamine D2 agonist, has been used as an adjunctive treatment for PPCM with controversial benefits. A comprehensive literature search was conducted through June 2021. We included studies comparing the outcomes of PPCM with or without bromocriptine use. Pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and I2 statistics were calculated. Composite major adverse outcomes were defined by a composite of death, need for advanced HF therapies, persistent New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III/V, or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35% at 6-month follow-up. LVEF recovery was defined by improvement of LVEF to more than 50%. Eight studies (two randomized-controlled, six observational) involving 593 PPCM patients were included. Bromocriptine use was associated with significantly higher survival (91.6% vs. 83.9%, RR 1.11 p = 0.02). Baseline LVEF was not significantly different between the groups. LVEF at follow-up was significantly higher in the bromocriptine group (53.3% vs. 41.8%, p < 0.001). There was no significant association between bromocriptine use and lower composite major adverse outcomes (13.7% vs. 33.3%, RR 0.60 p = 0.54) or LVEF recovery (46.9% vs. 46.8%, RR 0.94 p = 0.74). In conclusion, the addition of bromocriptine to standard HF treatment in PPCM was associated with significantly higher survival and higher LVEF improvement. No association with lower composite adverse clinical outcomes or LVEF recovery was seen. The findings, although encouraging, warrant larger randomized-controlled studies.

Pre-operative atrial fibrillation and early right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Right ventricular failure (RVF) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality after left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Atrial fibrillation (AF) is known for its deleterious effects on cardiac function and hemodynamics. The association of pre-operative AF with the risk of early post-LVAD RVF has not been well described. METHOD: A comprehensive literature search was performed through April, 9 2021. Cohort studies comparing the risk of post-operative RVF and/or need for right ventricular assist device (RVAD) after LVAD in patients with or without AF were included. Pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and I2 statistic were calculated using the random-effects model. RESULTS: Six studies were included in the analysis. Post-operative RVF was reported in 5 studies (1,841 patients) and RVAD use was reported in 4 studies (1,355 patients). There is a non-significant trend toward a higher risk of post-operative RVF in the AF group (pooled OR=1.25, 95%CI=0.99-1.58). No significant association between AF and RVAD use is noted (pooled OR=1.17, 95%CI=0.82-1.66). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-operative AF is not significantly associated with higher risks of post-operative RVF and RVAD use after LVAD implantation, although the trend toward higher post-operative RVF is observed in patients with pre-operative AF. Additional research using a larger study population is warranted to better understand the association of pre-operative AF and the development of post-LVAD RVF.

Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitors and Outcomes During Left Ventricular Assist Device Support: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5i) have been used to treat pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular failure in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVAD). The effects of PDE5i on post-LVAD outcomes including hemocompatibility-related adverse events are not well-established. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effects of PDE5i on post-LVAD outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using Pubmed and Embase databases from inception through November 25, 2020, to compare post-LVAD outcomes in patients with or without PDE5i use. Pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and I2 statistic were calculated. Thirteen observational studies were included in this analysis. The use of PDE5i was not significantly associated with lower postoperative right ventricular failure (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.02-5.96, P = .41). There was no significant association between PDE5i and gastrointestinal bleeding (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.76-1.98, P = .2), overall stroke (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.21-1.68, P = .17), ischemic stroke (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.09-4.07, P = .38), or pump thrombosis (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.14-3.54, P = .46). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis showed no significant association between PDE5i and post-LVAD right ventricular failure. Despite the antiplatelet effects of PDE5i, there was no significant association between PDE5i and gastrointestinal bleeding, overall stroke, ischemic stroke, or pump thrombosis. Randomized controlled studies are warranted to evaluate the net benefits or harms of PDE5i in the LVAD population.

Bicaval vs biatrial anastomosis techniques in orthotopic heart transplantation: An updated analysis of the UNOS database.

BACKGROUND: Despite the significant increase in the number of orthotopic heart transplants (OHT) performed yearly using the bicaval anastomosis technique, the impact on long-term outcomes remains a topic of debate. We analyzed the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database in search of the latest insight. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of the UNOS database from 2006 to 2016 to identify first-time OHT recipients. Patients were primarily stratified according to anastomosis technique: bicaval vs biatrial. Baseline characteristics and clinical status were recorded. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included need for permanent pacemaker (PPM), and length of hospital stay (LOS). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare survival between the two groups. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to conduct multivariable analysis. Statistical significance established at P < .0001. RESULTS: A total of 26 990 patients were identified. Of those who met the inclusion criteria (21 597), 16 573 (77%) underwent bicaval anastomosis. There were no major differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. The bicaval anastomosis technique was not associated with increased survival during the study period (hazard ratio: 0.97; P = .3557), but the bicaval group required postoperative PPM less often (2.51% vs 5.79%, P < .0001) and was associated with shorter LOS on multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The use of either bicaval or biatrial anastomosis during OHT offers comparable survival advantage. Nonetheless, bicaval anastomosis is associated with less need for postoperative PPM and slightly shorter LOS.

Evaluating the impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on in-hospital outcomes following left ventricular assist device implantation.

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a cause of ventricular dysfunction. However, in the setting of patients with heart failure undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, there is a paucity of data on the association between COPD and in-hospital outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Retrospective cohort study based on the NIS including patients ≥18 years who underwent LVAD implantation from 2011 to 2017. Multivariate regression was used to evaluate the impact of COPD on in-hospital outcomes. A total of 25,503 patients underwent LVAD implantation, of which 13.8% also had COPD. COPD group was older (median 62 vs. 58 years), and more males (82% vs. 76.4%, p < .001 for both). COPD group had more hypertension, diabetes, atrial tachyarrhythmias, dyslipidemia, prior stroke, coronary artery diseases, pulmonary hypertension, and chronic kidney disease (p < .001 for all). No differences in strokes, infections, mechanical circulatory support, and LVAD thrombosis. There was a higher incident of inpatient acute kidney injury, major bleeding, cardiac complications, thromboembolism, and cardiac arrest in patients without COPD (p < .05 for all). Compared with no-COPD group, COPD group had a lower mortality (6.2% vs. 12.4%; odds ratio, 0.59; confidence interval, 0.512-0.685; p < .05). CONCLUSION: Patients with COPD undergoing LVAD implantation have more comorbidities, without an associated increase mortality.

Is it safe to remove an infected cardiac implantable electronic device at the time of heart transplantation? Report of two cases.

Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections are treated with antibiotics and device explantation. Lack of CIED removal is associated with infection recurrence. However, CIED removal can be associated with major complications including death. We reported two patients with advanced heart disease who developed CIED infection due Staphylococcus epidermidis while awaiting for orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT). Both patients were managed with a different approach. They were treated with antibiotic therapy and had their CIED removal postponed until OHT. Both patients were kept on suppressive antibiotic treatment until undergoing simultaneous OHT and removal of infected CIED. None of the patients had infection recurrence. Large studies are needed to assess whether the approach of delaying CIED removal until OHT is safe among carefully selected patients with CIED infection.

Left ventricular assist device recovery: does duration of mechanical support matter?

Heart failure is a widespread condition in the United States that is predicted to significantly increase in prevalence in the next decade. Many heart failure patients are given a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) while they wait for a heart transplant, while those that are not able to undergo a heart transplant may be given an LVAD permanently. However, past studies have observed a small subset of heart failure patients that recovered cardiac function of their native heart after being placed on an LVAD. As a result, some patients have been able to have their LVAD explanted and no longer needed a heart transplant. In this review, we analyzed the data of 15 studies that observed recovery of cardiac function in LVAD patients in order to investigate the effects that duration of LVAD support has on patient outcomes. From our review, we identified that there may be negative consequences of prolonged duration of mechanical support such as myocardial atrophy and abnormal calcium cycling as well as circumstances that may allow for a longer duration of LVAD support such as in patients using a continuous-flow LVAD, non-ischemic cardiomyopathy patients, and the specific pharmacological therapy.

Mycobacterium abscessus Left Ventricle Assist Device Driveline Infections: An Emerging Pathogen?

The use of left ventricular assist device is associated with improvement in survival in patients with refractory heart failure. However, driveline infection limits the success of its use as it is associated with significant mortality. We describe the first 2 cases of Mycobacterium abscessus driveline infection. Both patients had persistent infection despite of aggressive antibiotic treatment and local debridement, and only improved after removal of their left ventricular assist devices.

Hospital Outcomes in Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension With Atrial Fibrillation in the United States.

In this study, using a large database, we examined the association between atrial fibrillation (AF) in hospitalized patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) and in-hospital mortality and other adverse hospital outcomes. This study was a retrospective analysis of the United States National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample from 2005 to 2014. All hospitalizations for patients diagnosed with primary PH and over the age of 65 years were included and then grouped based on the presence AF. The outcomes were in-hospital mortality rate, hospital length of stay, and hospitalization costs. Weighted regression analyses were performed to find the association between AF and outcomes. Of the 5,428,332 hospitalizations with PH, 2,531,075 (46.6%) had concomitant AF. The Cox proportional regression analysis showed that in patients with PE, all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 1.35, confidence interval [CI] 1.15 to 1.55) was significantly higher in patients with AF than those without AF. In addition, PH hospitalizations with AF had a longer hospital length of stay (ß coefficient 1.74, 95% CI 1.58 to 1.83) and higher hospitalization cost (ß coefficient 1.33, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.42). In patients aged over 65 years admitted for PH, the presence of AF was very frequent and worsened the prognosis. In conclusion, to improve patient outcomes and decrease hospital burden, it is important to consider AF during risk stratification for patients with PH to provide timely and prompt interventions. An interdisciplinary approach to treatment should be used to account for the burden of co-morbidities in this population.

Correction: Chaparro et al. Whey as an Alternative Nutrient Medium for Growth of Sporosarcina pasteurii and Its Effect on CaCO3 Polymorphism and Fly Ash Bioconsolidation. Materials 2021, 14, 2470.

The Editorial Office was made aware of an error in Figure S1 within the original publication [...].

Implementing Strategies to Recruit and Retain a Diverse Sample of Heart Failure Patients.

Introduction: The increased prevalence, severity, and mortality of heart disease and specifically heart failure among Hispanic and Black populations are a concern for clinicians and researchers. Additionally, patients of poor socioeconomic status also have worse outcomes for cardiovascular disease. To address disparities, it is necessary to address the persistent lack of representation in clinical research of diverse populations, including the Hispanic and Black populations and individuals who are of low socioeconomic status. Method: This study was a pilot randomized trial of a medication adherence intervention for heart failure patients conducted at a safety net hospital and affiliated pharmacy with a diverse patient population. Using an evidence-based multifactorial approach, this investigation implemented and adapted best practices to support the inclusion of Hispanic, Black, and socioeconomically diverse participants. Results: A total of 40 participants were recruited, 58% were Hispanic, 38% Black, and 5% White. A total of 40% reported the need for socioeconomic assistance. At 30 days after discharge, follow-up data were obtained for 37 of 40 (93%) of participants either by interview, electronic record, or both. Conclusion: Findings suggest that a combination of strategies used in this trial can be applied to recruit and retain ethnically and socioeconomically diverse participants.

Burden of cardiovascular disease on coronavirus disease 2019 hospitalizations in the USA.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and risk factors have increased rates of adverse events and mortality after hospitalization for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In this study, we attempted to identify and assess the effects of CVD on COVID-19 hospitalizations in the USA using a large national database. METHODS: The current study was a retrospective analysis of data from the US National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample from 2020. All adult patients 18 years of age and older who were admitted with the primary diagnosis of COVID-19 were included. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, while secondary outcomes included prolonged hospital length of stay, mechanical ventilation, and disposition other than home. Prolonged hospital length of stay was defined as a length of stay greater than the 75th percentile for the full sample. The diagnoses were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes. RESULTS: A total of 1 050 040 patients were included in the study, of which 454 650 (43.3%) had prior CVD. Patients with CVD had higher mortality during COVID-19 hospitalization (19.3 vs. 5.0%, P < 0.001). Similarly, these patients had a higher rate of prolonged hospital length of stay (34.5 vs. 21.0%, P < 0.001), required mechanical ventilation (15.4 vs. 5.6%, P < 0.001), and were more likely to be discharged to a disposition other than home (62.5 vs. 32.3%, P < 0.001). Mean hospitalization cost was also higher in patients with CVD during hospitalization ($24 023 vs. $15 320, P < 0.001). Conditional logistic regression analysis showed that the odds of in-hospital mortality [odds ratio (OR), 3.23; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.91-3.45] were significantly higher for COVID-19 hospitalizations with CVD, compared with those without CVD. Similarly, prolonged hospital length (OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.43-2.23), mechanical ventilation (OR, 3.31; 95% CI, 3.06-3.67), and disposition other than home (OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.87-2.21) were also significantly higher for COVID-19 hospitalizations with coronary artery disease. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that the presence of CVD has a significant negative impact on the prognosis of patients hospitalized for COVID-19. There was an associated increase in mortality, length of stay, ventilator use, and adverse discharge dispositions among COVID-19 patients with CVD. Adjustment in treatment for CVD should be considered when providing care to patients hospitalized for COVID-19 to mitigate some of the adverse hospital outcomes.

Prevalence and effects of acute myocardial infarction on hospital outcomes among COVID-19 patients.

BACKGROUND: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is one of the most lethal complications of COVID-19 hospitalization. In this study, we looked for the occurrence of AMI and its effects on hospital outcomes among COVID-19 patients. METHODS: Data from the 2020 California State Inpatient Database was used retrospectively. All COVID-19 hospitalizations with age ≥ 18 years were included in the analyses. Adverse hospital outcomes included in-hospital mortality, prolonged length of stay (LOS), vasopressor use, mechanical ventilation, and ICU admission. Prolonged LOS was defined as any hospital LOS ≥ 75th percentile. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to understand the strength of associations after adjusting for cofactors. RESULTS: Our analysis had 94 114 COVID-19 hospitalizations, and 1548 (1.6%) had AMI. Mortality (43.2% vs. 10.8%, P  < 0.001), prolonged LOS (39.9% vs. 28.2%, P  < 0.001), vasopressor use (7.8% vs. 2.1%, P  < 0.001), mechanical ventilation (35.0% vs. 9.7%, P  < 0.001), and ICU admission (33.0% vs. 9.4%, P  < 0.001) were significantly higher among COVID-19 hospitalizations with AMI. The odds of adverse outcomes such as mortality (aOR 3.90, 95% CI: 3.48-4.36), prolonged LOS (aOR 1.23, 95% CI: 1.10-1.37), vasopressor use (aOR 3.71, 95% CI: 3.30-4.17), mechanical ventilation (aOR 2.71, 95% CI: 2.21-3.32), and ICU admission (aOR 3.51, 95% CI: 3.12-3.96) were significantly more among COVID-19 hospitalizations with AMI. CONCLUSION: Despite the very low prevalence of AMI among COVID-19 hospitalizations, the study showed a substantially greater risk of adverse hospital outcomes and mortality. COVID-19 patients with AMI should be aggressively treated to improve hospital outcomes.

Leadless pacemaker in heart transplantation: a case report and literature review.

Our case demonstrates the safe and effective use of a leadless pacemaker in a heart transplant recipient. A man in his 60s with a history of heart transplantation with biatrial anastomosis 7 months prior presented to the emergency department after several syncopal episodes. Telemetry monitoring revealed a paroxysmal complete atrioventricular block. Given his immunocompromised state and prior dual chamber pacemaker extraction at the time of heart transplantation, the patient underwent successful implantation of a leadless pacemaker. Over the past 5 years since device implantation, the patient has not had any syncopal events nor has he had any device-related complications, such as infection.

The impact of the Coronavirus disease 2019 on hospitalizations for coronary artery revascularization: results from California State Inpatient Database.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has negatively impacted routine cardiovascular care. In this study, we assessed the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on percutaneous coronary artery intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) hospitalizations and outcomes using a large database. METHODS: The current study was a retrospective analysis of California State Inpatient Database (SID) during March-December of 2019 and 2020. All adult hospitalizations for coronary artery revascularization were included for the analysis. ICD-10-CM diagnosis and procedure codes were used for identifying hospitalizations and procedures. The primary outcome was inhospital mortality, and secondary outcomes were hospital length of stay, stroke, acute kidney injury, and mechanical ventilation. Propensity score match analysis was done to compare adverse clinical outcomes. RESULTS: PCI hospitalizations (relative decrease, 15.0%, P for trend <0.001) and CABG hospitalizations (relative decrease, 16.4%, P for trend <0.001) decreased from 2019 to 2020, while viral pneumonia hospitalizations increased (relative increase, 1751.6%, P for trend <0.001). Monthly PCI and CABG hospitalization showed decreasing trends from January 2019 to December 2020. Propensity score match analysis showed that the odds of inhospital mortality (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.01-1.24), acute kidney injury (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.06-1.17), and ARDS (OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.18-3.01) were higher among patients who received PCI in 2020. CONCLUSION: Results of our study indicate that initiatives such as encouraging patients to receive treatments and controlling the spread of COVID-19 should be instituted to improve PCI and CABG hospitalizations.

Association Between Frailty, 30-day Unplanned Readmission and Mortality After Hospitalization for Heart Failure: Results From the Nationwide Readmissions Database.

Objectives: This study examined how frailty in traditional risk-adjusted models could improve the predictability of unplanned 30-day readmission and mortality among heart failure patients. Methods: This study was a retrospective analysis of Nationwide Readmissions Database data collected during the years 2010-2018. All patients ≥65 years who had a principal diagnosis of heart failure were included in the analysis. The Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups frailty-defining diagnosis indicator was used to identify frail patients. Results: There was a total of 819,854 patients admitted for heart failure during the study period. Among them, 63,302 (7.7%) were frail. In the regression analysis, the risk of all-cause 30-day readmission (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.14-1.22) and in-hospital mortality (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.40-1.66) were higher in patients with frailty. Discussion: Inclusion of frailty in comorbidity-based risk-prediction models significantly improved the predictability of unplanned 30-day readmission and in-hospital mortality.

Racial difference in mortality among COVID-19 hospitalizations in California.

In the US, racial disparities in hospital outcomes are well documented. We explored whether race was associated with all-cause in-hospital mortality and intensive care unit (ICU) admission among COVID-19 patients in California. This was a retrospective analysis of California State Inpatient Database during 2020. Hospitalizations ≥ 18 years of age for COVID-19 were included. Cox proportional hazards with mixed effects were used for associations between race and in-hospital mortality. Logistic regression was used for the association between race and ICU admission. Among 87,934 COVID-19 hospitalizations, majority were Hispanics (56.5%), followed by White (27.3%), Asian, Pacific Islander, Native American (9.9%), and Black (6.3%). Cox regression showed higher mortality risk among Hispanics, compared to Whites (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% CI 0.87-0.96), Blacks (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% CI 0.79-0.94), and Asian, Pacific Islander, Native American (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% CI 0.83-0.95). Logistic regression showed that the odds of ICU admission were significantly higher among Hispanics, compared to Whites (OR, 1.70; 95% CI 1.67-1.74), Blacks (OR, 1.70; 95% CI 1.64-1.78), and Asian, Pacific Islander, Native American (OR, 1.82; 95% CI 1.76-1.89). We found significant disparities in mortality among COVID-19 hospitalizations in California. Hispanics were the worst affected with the highest mortality and ICU admission rates.

Adverse Outcomes in Hospitalizations for Amyloid-Related Heart Failure.

Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy is being increasingly recognized as an important cause of heart failure (HF). In this study, we looked at adverse outcomes in hospitalizations with amyloid-related HF. This study was a retrospective analysis of the National Inpatient Sample data, collected from 2016 to 2019. Patients ≥41 years of age and admitted for HF were included in the study. In these hospitalizations, amyloid-related HF was identified through the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes for amyloidosis. The primary outcome of the study was in-hospital mortality, whereas secondary outcomes were prolonged length of stay, mechanical ventilation, mechanical circulatory support, vasopressors use, and dispositions other than home. From 2016 to 2019, there were 4,705,274 HF hospitalizations, of which 16,955 (0.4%) had amyloid cardiomyopathy. In all HF hospitalizations, amyloid-related increased from 0.26% in 2016 to 0.46% in 2019 (relative increase, 76.9%, P for trend <0.001). Amyloid-related HF hospitalizations were more common in older, male, and Black patients. The odds of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR], 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11 to 1.38), prolonged hospital length (OR, 1.61; 95% CI: 1.49 to 1.73) and vasopressors use (OR, 1.59; 95% CI: 1.23 to 2.05) were significantly higher for amyloid-related hospitalizations. Amyloid-related HF hospitalizations are increasing substantially and are associated with adverse hospital outcomes. These hospitalizations were disproportionately higher for older, male, and Black patients. Amyloid-related HF is rare and underdiagnosed yet has several adverse outcomes. Hence, healthcare providers should be watchful of this condition for early identification and prompt management.