Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol ; 24(3): 310-322, 2020 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32987428

RESUMO

Several interventional treatments have recently been integrated into the therapeutic armamentarium available for the treatment of bone tumors. In some scenarios (e.g., osteoid osteoma), interventional treatments represent the sole and definitive applied treatment. Due to the absence of widely shared protocols and the complex multivariate scenarios underlying the clinical presentation of the remaining bone tumors including metastases, therapeutic strategies derived from a multidisciplinary tumor board are essential to provide effective treatments tailored to each patient. In the present review, we present the multidisciplinary therapeutic strategies commonly adopted for the most frequent bone tumors.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Ósseas/terapia , Neoplasias Musculares/terapia , Radiografia Intervencionista/métodos , Neoplasias Ósseas/diagnóstico por imagem , Terapia Combinada , França , Humanos , Neoplasias Musculares/diagnóstico por imagem
2.
Eur Spine J ; 29(7): 1580-1589, 2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31270676

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To assess technical feasibility, accuracy, safety and patient radiation exposure of a novel navigational tool integrating augmented reality (AR) and artificial intelligence (AI), during percutaneous vertebroplasty of patients with vertebral compression fractures (VCFs). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective parallel randomised open trial compared the trans-pedicular access phase of percutaneous vertebroplasty across two groups of 10 patients, electronically randomised, with symptomatic single-level VCFs. Trocar insertion was performed using AR/AI-guidance with motion compensation in Group A, and standard fluoroscopy in Group B. The primary endpoint was technical feasibility in Group A. Secondary outcomes included the comparison of Groups A and B in terms of accuracy of trocar placement (distance between planned/actual trajectory on sagittal/coronal fluoroscopic images); complications; time for trocar deployment; and radiation dose/fluoroscopy time. RESULTS: Technical feasibility in Group A was 100%. Accuracy in Group A was 1.68 ± 0.25 mm (skin entry point), and 1.02 ± 0.26 mm (trocar tip) in the sagittal plane, and 1.88 ± 0.28 mm (skin entry point) and 0.86 ± 0.17 mm (trocar tip) in the coronal plane, without any significant difference compared to Group B (p > 0.05). No complications were observed in the entire population. Time for trocar deployment was significantly longer in Group A (642 ± 210 s) than in Group B (336 ± 60 s; p = 0.001). Dose-area product and fluoroscopy time were significantly lower in Group A (182.6 ± 106.7 mGy cm2 and 5.2 ± 2.6 s) than in Group B (367.8 ± 184.7 mGy cm2 and 10.4 ± 4.1 s; p = 0.025 and 0.005), respectively. CONCLUSION: AR/AI-guided percutaneous vertebroplasty appears feasible, accurate and safe, and facilitates lower patient radiation exposure compared to standard fluoroscopic guidance. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.


Assuntos
Realidade Aumentada , Vertebroplastia , Inteligência Artificial , Fluoroscopia , Fraturas por Compressão/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas por Compressão/cirurgia , Humanos , Projetos Piloto , Estudos Prospectivos , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa