Relationship between sex biases in gene expression and sex biases in autism and Alzheimer's disease.

BACKGROUND: Sex differences in the brain may play an important role in sex-differential prevalence of neuropsychiatric conditions. METHODS: In order to understand the transcriptional basis of sex differences, we analyzed multiple, large-scale, human postmortem brain RNA-Seq datasets using both within-region and pan-regional frameworks. RESULTS: We find evidence of sex-biased transcription in many autosomal genes, some of which provide evidence for pathways and cell population differences between chromosomally male and female individuals. These analyses also highlight regional differences in the extent of sex-differential gene expression. We observe an increase in specific neuronal transcripts in male brains and an increase in immune and glial function-related transcripts in female brains. Integration with single-nucleus data suggests this corresponds to sex differences in cellular states rather than cell abundance. Integration with case-control gene expression studies suggests a female molecular predisposition towards Alzheimer's disease, a female-biased disease. Autism, a male-biased diagnosis, does not exhibit a male predisposition pattern in our analysis. CONCLUSION: Overall, these analyses highlight mechanisms by which sex differences may interact with sex-biased conditions in the brain. Furthermore, we provide region-specific analyses of sex differences in brain gene expression to enable additional studies at the interface of gene expression and diagnostic differences.

We sought to understand why females have higher rates of Alzheimer's disease, and males have higher rates of autism. One idea was that the female brain at baseline may be more similar to an Alzheimer's brain, so it is easier for them to shift into that state (likewise, males may be more similar to autism). To test this, we examined gene expression differences between brains of biological males and biological females. While all people have the same ~ 25,000 genes, each gene can be on or off ('expressed') to different extents. Overall, we found that there were differences in gene expression between males and females in all brain regions tested but more differences in some brain regions than others. By looking at the role of these genes we estimate that female immune system processes might be more active in the brain. We also found female brain gene expression looked slightly more like people with Alzheimer's compared to people without Alzheimer's, which may explain why females get Alzheimer's disease more easily. However, the male brain gene expression did not look more like autism, suggesting that the reason males have higher rates of autism is complex and needs further investigation.

Relationship between sex biases in gene expression and sex biases in autism and Alzheimer's disease.

Sex differences in the brain may play an important role in sex-differential prevalence of neuropsychiatric conditions. In order to understand the transcriptional basis of sex differences, we analyzed multiple, large-scale, human postmortem brain RNA-seq datasets using both within-region and pan-regional frameworks. We find evidence of sex-biased transcription in many autosomal genes, some of which provide evidence for pathways and cell population differences between chromosomally male and female individuals. These analyses also highlight regional differences in the extent of sex-differential gene expression. We observe an increase in specific neuronal transcripts in male brains and an increase in immune and glial function-related transcripts in female brains. Integration with single-cell data suggests this corresponds to sex differences in cellular states rather than cell abundance. Integration with case-control gene expression studies suggests a female molecular predisposition towards Alzheimer's disease, a female-biased disease. Autism, a male-biased diagnosis, does not exhibit a male predisposition pattern in our analysis. Finally, we provide region specific analyses of sex differences in brain gene expression to enable additional studies at the interface of gene expression and diagnostic differences.

Circadian neurons in the paraventricular nucleus entrain and sustain daily rhythms in glucocorticoids.

Signals from the central circadian pacemaker, the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), must be decoded to generate daily rhythms in hormone release. Here, we hypothesized that the SCN entrains rhythms in the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) to time the daily release of corticosterone. In vivo recording revealed a critical circuit from SCN vasoactive intestinal peptide (SCNVIP)-producing neurons to PVN corticotropin-releasing hormone (PVNCRH)-producing neurons. PVNCRH neurons peak in clock gene expression around midday and in calcium activity about three hours later. Loss of the clock gene Bmal1 in CRH neurons results in arrhythmic PVNCRH calcium activity and dramatically reduces the amplitude and precision of daily corticosterone release. SCNVIP activation reduces (and inactivation increases) corticosterone release and PVNCRH calcium activity, and daily SCNVIP activation entrains PVN clock gene rhythms by inhibiting PVNCRH neurons. We conclude that daily corticosterone release depends on coordinated clock gene and neuronal activity rhythms in both SCNVIP and PVNCRH neurons.

The time is now: Student-driven implementation of social justice and anti-racism focused curricula in medical scientist training program education.

There exists a dearth of supplementary programs to educate physician-scientist trainees on anti-racism and topics surrounding social justice in medicine and science. Education on these topics is critical to prevent the perpetuation of systemic racism within the institutions of academia and medicine. Students in the Washington University School of Medicine Medical Scientist Training Program and the Tri-Institutional MD-PhD Program developed journal clubs with curricula focused on social justice and anti-racism for the summer of 2020. In this article, we describe the impact of the Washington University journal club on the education of first year MD-PhD students and summarize the progress to date. The role of the journal club in the midst of the "double pandemic" of COVID-19 and generational systemic racism is discussed, highlighting the need for such supplemental curricula in MD-PhD programs nation-wide.