RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the occurrence, nature, and reporting of sexual harassment in surgical training and to understand why surgical trainees who experience harassment might not report it. This information will inform ways to overcome barriers to reporting sexual harassment. SUMMARY/ BACKGROUND DATA: Sexual harassment in the workplace is a known phenomenon with reports of high frequency in the medical field. Aspects of surgical training leave trainees especially vulnerable to harassing behavior. The characteristics of sexual harassment and reasons for its underreporting have yet to be studied on the national level in this population. METHODS: An electronic anonymous survey was distributed to general surgery trainees in participating program; all general surgery training programs nationally were invited to participate. RESULTS: Sixteen general surgery training programs participated, yielding 270 completed surveys (response rate of 30%). Overall, 48.9% of all respondents and 70.8% of female respondents experienced at least 1 form of sexual harassment during their training. Of the respondents who experienced sexual harassment, 7.6% reported the incident. The most common cited reasons for nonreporting were believing that the action was harmless (62.1%) and believing reporting would be a waste of time (47.7%). CONCLUSION: Sexual harassment occurs in surgical training and is rarely reported. Many residents who are harassed question if the behavior they experienced was harassment or feel that reporting would be ineffectual-leading to frequent nonreporting. Surgical training programs should provide all-level education on sexual harassment and delineate the best mechanism for resident reporting of sexual harassment.
Assuntos
Revelação/estatística & dados numéricos , Cirurgia Geral/educação , Internato e Residência , Assédio Sexual , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Relações Interprofissionais , Masculino , Médicas , Poder Psicológico , Meio Social , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Appendicitis has traditionally been treated surgically. Recently, nonoperative management is emerging as a viable alternative to the traditional operative approach. This raises the question of what are the unintended consequences of nonoperative management of appendicitis with respect to cost and patient burden. METHODS: National Readmissions Database was queried between 2010 and 2014. Patients who were admitted with acute appendicitis between January and June of each year were identified. Patients who underwent appendectomy were compared with those treated nonoperatively. Six-month all-cause readmission rates and aggregate costs between index hospitalization and readmissions were calculated. RESULTS: We identified 438,995 adult admissions for acute appendicitis. Most cases were managed with appendectomy (93.2%). There was a significant increase in the rate of nonoperative management, from 3.6% in 2010 to 6.8% in 2014 (P value for trend <0.01). Discharges receiving nonoperative management tended to be older and have more comorbidities. There was a 59% decreased adjusted odds of readmission within 6 mo among patients receiving appendectomy in comparison to those managed nonoperatively. Despite this, in multivariable linear regression, there was an adjusted $2900 cost increase associated with surgical management (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that nonoperative management is increasing. Patients treated nonoperatively may have an increased risk of readmission within 6 mo but incur a decreased average adjusted total cost. Given this, it is important that surgeons critically assess patients who are being considered for nonoperative management of appendicitis.
Assuntos
Apendicite/terapia , Tratamento Conservador/estatística & dados numéricos , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Apendicectomia/economia , Apendicite/economia , Apendicite/mortalidade , Tratamento Conservador/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the potential mortality reduction if patients chose the safest hospitals for complex cancer surgery. BACKGROUND: Mortality after complex oncologic surgery is highly variable across hospitals, and directing patients away from unsafe hospitals could potentially improve survivorship. Hospital quality measures are becoming increasingly accessible at a time when patients are more engaged in choosing providers. It is currently unclear what information to share with patients to maximally capitalize on patient-centered realignment. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for adults undergoing 5 complex cancer surgeries (pulmonary lobectomy, pneumonectomy, esophagectomy, gastrectomy, and colectomy) for a primary cancer between 2008 and 2012. Risk-standardized mortality rate (RSMR) methodology, currently used by Medicare-based hospital rating systems, was used to classify hospitals as "safest" and "least safe" by procedure. Patients were modeled moving from "least safe" to "safest" hospitals and the potential number of lives saved through patient realignment determined. As surgical volume has historically been used to distinguish safe hospitals, comparisons were made to models moving patients from low-volume to high-volume hospitals. RESULTS: A total of 292,040 patients were analyzed. In an optimally modeled scenario, realignment using RSMR would result in a greater number of lives saved (3592 vs 2161, P < 0.01) and require only 15 patients to change hospitals to save a life, compared to 78 patients using volume models (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Public reporting of hospital safety, specifically based on RSMR instead of volume, has the potential to lead to meaningful reductions in surgical mortality after complex cancer surgery, even in the setting of a modest patient realignment.
Assuntos
Neoplasias/cirurgia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/normas , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendências , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Leading cancer hospitals have increasingly shared their 'brand' with smaller hospitals through affiliations. Because each brand evokes a distinct reputation for the care provided, 'brand-sharing' has the potential to impact the public's ability to differentiate the safety and quality within hospital networks. The general public was surveyed to determine the perceived similarities and differences in the safety and quality of complex cancer surgery performed at top cancer hospitals and their smaller affiliate hospitals. METHODS: A national, web-based KnowledgePanel (GfK) survey of American adults was conducted. Respondents were asked about their beliefs regarding the quality and safety of complex cancer surgery at a large, top-ranked cancer hospital and a smaller, local hospital, both in the presence and absence of an affiliation between the hospitals. RESULTS: A total of 1010 surveys were completed (58.1% response rate). Overall, 85% of respondents felt 'motivated' to travel an hour for complex surgery at a larger hospital specializing in cancer, over a smaller local hospital. However, if the smaller hospital was affiliated with a top-ranked cancer hospital, 31% of the motivated respondents changed their preference to the smaller hospital. When asked to compare leading cancer hospitals and their smaller affiliates, 47% of respondents felt that surgical safety, 66% felt guideline compliance, and 53% felt cure rates would be the same at both hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately half of surveyed Americans did not distinguish the quality and safety of surgical care at top-ranked cancer hospitals from their smaller affiliates, potentially decreasing their motivation to travel to top centers for complex surgical care.
Assuntos
Institutos de Câncer/normas , Atenção à Saúde/normas , Serviços Hospitalares Compartilhados/métodos , Hospitais/normas , Marketing , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Adolescents who use prescription opioids have an increased risk for future drug abuse and overdose, making them a high-risk population. Appendectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures in this age group, often requires opioid analgesia, and is performed by both pediatric and general surgeons. Prescription patterns comparing these two provider groups have not yet been evaluated; we hypothesize that general surgery providers prescribe more opioids for adolescent and young adult patients than do pediatric surgery providers. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted across a single health system consisting of four hospitals. All uncomplicated laparoscopic appendectomies performed between January 1, 2016 and August 14, 2017 on patients aged 7-20 were included for analysis. Any case coded for multiple procedures, identified as converted to open, or had a length of stay >48 h were excluded. The primary outcome measure was amount of opioid prescribed postoperatively. To standardize different formulations and types of analgesia prescribed, prescriptions were converted into oral morphine equivalents (OMEs). For reference, one 5 mg pill of oxycodone equals 7.5 OME. Linear regression was performed controlling for patient weight, gender, race, insurance status, provider type (pediatric versus general surgery), and provider level (resident, advanced practice provider, and attending). RESULTS: A total of 336 pediatric laparoscopic appendectomies were analyzed, 148 by general surgeons and 188 by pediatric surgeons. Pediatric surgeons prescribed less opioid than general surgeons overall (59 OME versus 90 OME, P < 0.0001). For patients aged <13 y, there was no significant difference between pediatric (26 OME) and general (37 OME, P = 0.8921) surgeons. However, for the age group 13-20 y, pediatric surgeons prescribed 25% less opioid than general surgeons (90 OME versus 112.5 OME, P < 0.0001). Regression analysis demonstrated that being cared for by a general surgery service (+24.1 OME [95% confidence interval 9.8-38.3]) was associated with high prescribing, whereas having Medicaid was associated with lower prescription amounts (-16.4 OME [95% confidence interval -32.5 to -0.3]). CONCLUSIONS: After an uncomplicated laparoscopic appendectomy, general surgeons prescribe significantly more opioid to adolescent patients than do pediatric surgeons, even when controlling for age and weight. One substantial and modifiable contributor of the opioid epidemic is the amount of opioid prescribed. The variability of prescribing habits to adolescents and young adults demonstrates a clear need for increased education and guidelines on this topic, especially for surgeons who do not frequently treat the younger and more vulnerable population.
Assuntos
Apendicectomia/efeitos adversos , Cirurgia Geral/estatística & dados numéricos , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Pediatria/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Laparoscopia , Masculino , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Many believe that the use of ureteral stents in colorectal surgery for diverticulitis aids prevention and easier identification of ureteral injuries; others argue that the added time, cost, and risks of stent placement negate potential benefits. Even among providers who use stents, selective use is common. Among unclear consensus, it remains unknown if the use of stents is growing. MATERIALS: Patients in the National Inpatient Sample who underwent a partial colectomy or anterior rectal excision for diverticulitis between 2000 and 2013 were included (n = 811,071). Trends in ureteral stent use, multivariate logistic regression of factors influencing stent placement, and linear regression of length of stay (LOS) and costs associated with stent use were examined. RESULTS: Usage of ureteral stents increased from 6.66% in 2000 to 16.30% in 2013 (P < 0.0001). Rates of stent usage were higher with laparoscopic surgery (19.31% versus 12.31% open, P < 0.0001). Regression demonstrated patients in the Northeast (Midwest odds ratio (OR) 0.49 [0.37-0.66] P < 0.0001, South OR 0.60 [0.45-0.80] P = 0.0004, West OR 0.30 [0.22-0.41], P < 0.0001), and those whose admission was elective (OR 2.37 [2.08-2.69], P < 0.0001) were more likely to receive stents. Stent use was associated with an increased LOS (0.55 days, P < 0.0001) and cost ($1,983, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of ureteral stents in surgery for diverticulitis has steadily increased since 2000, despite the lack of consensus of their overall benefit. Stent usage is associated with laparoscopic surgery and varies widely among regions of the country. Further studies are required to truly understand the risk-benefit ratio of ureteral stenting and to determine if its increased use is warranted.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/instrumentação , Diverticulite/cirurgia , Stents/tendências , Ureter , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Stents/economia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Current guidelines for small bowel obstruction (SBO) recommend a limited trial of nonoperative management of no more than 3-5 d. For patients requiring surgery, it is uncertain if sociodemographic factors are associated with disparities in the duration of the trial of nonoperative therapy. METHODS: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample from 2012 to 2014 was queried for discharges with a primary diagnosis of SBO. Primary outcomes of interest were the effects of sociodemographic factors, including race, insurance status, and income on the rate of receiving any operative management for SBO, and subsequently, among patients managed surgically, the risk of operative delay, defined as operative management ≥ 5 d after admission. We did this by using logistic hierarchical generalized linear models, accounting for hospital clustering and adjusted for sex, age, comorbidity, and hospital factors. RESULTS: Of the 589,850 admissions for SBO between 2012 and 2014, 22.0% underwent operations. Overall, 26.2% were non-White, including 12.2% Black and 8.6% Hispanic patients, and the majority (56.0%) had Medicare insurance coverage. Income quartiles were evenly distributed across the overall study population. In adjusted logistic regression, operative delay was associated with increased odds of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 1.30 95% confidence interval [1.10, 1.54]). Adjusted for patient and hospital factors, Black patients were significantly more likely to receive operations for SBO, whereas Medicaid and Medicare patients were significantly less likely. However, Black, Medicaid, and Medicare patients who were managed operatively were significantly more likely to have an operative delay of 5 or more d. There was no significant association between income and operative management in adjusted regression models. CONCLUSIONS: Significant disparities in the operative management were based on race and insurance status. Further research is warranted to understand the causes of, and solutions to, these sociodemographic disparities in care.
Assuntos
Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/normas , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pacientes Internados/estatística & dados numéricos , Obstrução Intestinal/cirurgia , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/economia , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro/economia , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Intestino Delgado/cirurgia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Grupos Raciais/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tempo para o Tratamento/economia , Tempo para o Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Under the Affordable Care Act, eligibility for Medicaid coverage was expanded to all adults with incomes up to 138% of the federal poverty level in states that participated. We sought to examine the national impact Medicaid expansion has had on insurance coverage for patients undergoing emergency general surgery (EGS) and the cost burden to patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) was used to identify adults ≥18 y old who underwent the 10 most burdensome EGS operations (defined as a combination of frequency, cost, and morbidity). Distribution of insurance type before and after Medicaid expansion and charges to uninsured patients was evaluated. Weighted averages were used to produce nationally representative estimates. RESULTS: A total of 6,847,169 patients were included. The percentage of uninsured EGS patients changed from 9.4% the year before Medicaid expansion to 7.0% after (P < 0.01), whereas the percentage of patients on Medicaid increased from 16.4% to 19.4% (P < 0.01). The cumulative charges to uninsured patients for EGS decreased from $1590 million before expansion to $1211 million after. CONCLUSIONS: In the first year of Medicaid expansion, the number of uninsured EGS patients dropped by 2.4%. The cost burden to uninsured EGS patients decreased by over $300 million.
Assuntos
Emergências , Medicaid , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/economia , Adulto , Idoso , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Custos Hospitalares , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Falls are the leading source of injury and trauma-related hospital admissions for elderly adults in the USA. Elderly patients with a history of a fall have the highest risk of falling again, and the decision on whether to continue anticoagulation after a fall is difficult. To inform this decision, we evaluated the rate of recurrent falls and the impact of anticoagulation on outcomes. METHODS: All patients of age ≥ 65 years and hospitalized for a fall in the first 6 months of 2013 and 2014 were identified in the nationwide readmission database, a nationally representative all-payer database tracking patient readmissions. Readmissions for a recurrent fall within 6 months, and mortality and bleeding injuries (intracranial hemorrhage, solid organ bleed, and hemothorax) during readmission were identified. Logistic regression evaluated factors associated with mortality on repeat falls. RESULTS: Of the 331,982 patients admitted for a fall, 15,565 (4.7%) were admitted for a recurrent fall within 6 months. The median time to repeat fall was 57 days (IQR 19-111 days), and 9.0% (1406) of repeat fallers were on anticoagulation. The rate of bleeding injury was similar regardless of anticoagulation status (12.8 vs. 12.7% not on anticoagulation, p = 0.97); however, among patients with a bleeding injury, those on anticoagulation had significantly higher mortality (21.5 vs. 6.9% not on anticoagulation, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Among patients hospitalized for a fall, 4.7% will be hospitalized for a recurrent fall within 6 months. Patients on anticoagulation with repeat falls do not have increased rates of bleeding injury but do have significantly higher rates of death with a bleeding injury. This information is essential to discuss with patients when deciding to restart their anticoagulation.
Assuntos
Acidentes por Quedas/estatística & dados numéricos , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , RecidivaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Primary hyperparathyroidism is underdiagnosed and surgical treatment is underutilized and inequitably distributed. We present a review of the current literature on disparities in the treatment of hyperparathyroidism, with a focus on gaps in knowledge and paths forward. METHODS: We searched PubMed and Scopus for abstracts related to disparities in hyperparathyroidism. RESULTS: 16 articles (of 1541) met inclusion criteria. The most commonly examined disparity was race. Notably, Black, Hispanic, and Asian patients were less likely to undergo surgery after diagnosis, face delays in obtaining treatment, and less likely to see a high-volume surgeon. Similar disparities in care were noted among those without insurance, older patients, and patients with limited English proficiency. CONCLUSION: There are clear inequities in the treatment of hyperparathyroidism. Current research is in an early "identification" phase of disparities research; a new conceptual model based on established socioecological frameworks is provided to help move the field forward to "understanding" and "intervening" in surgical disparities.
Assuntos
Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Hiperparatireoidismo Primário , Humanos , Hiperparatireoidismo Primário/cirurgia , Hiperparatireoidismo Primário/terapia , Hiperparatireoidismo Primário/diagnóstico , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Paratireoidectomia/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
Importance: Medical overutilization contributes to significant health care expenditures and exposes patients to questionably beneficial surgery and unnecessary risk. Objectives: To understand public attitudes toward medical utilization and the association of these attitudes with beliefs about cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cross-sectional survey study conducted from August 26 to October 28, 2020, US-based, English-speaking adults were recruited from the general public using Prolific Academic, a research participant platform. Quota-filling was used to obtain a sample demographically representative of the US population. Adults with a personal history of cancer other than nonmelanoma skin cancer were excluded. Statistical analysis was completed in July 2022. Main Outcome and Measures: Medical utilization preferences were characterized with the validated, single-item Maximizer-Minimizer Elicitation Question. Participants preferring to take action in medically ambiguous situations (hereafter referred to as "maximizers") were compared with those who leaned toward waiting and seeing (hereafter referred to as "nonmaximizers"). Beliefs and emotions about cancer incidence, survivability, and preventability were assessed using validated measures. Logistic regression modeled factors associated with preferring to maximize medical utilization. Results: Of 1131 participants (mean [SD] age, 45 [16] years; 568 women [50.2%]), 287 (25.4%) were classified as maximizers, and 844 (74.6%) were classified as nonmaximizers. Logistic regression revealed that self-reporting very good or excellent health status (compared with good, fair, or poor; odds ratio [OR], 2.01 [95% CI, 1.52-2.65]), Black race (compared with White race; OR, 1.88 [95% CI, 1.22-2.89]), high levels of cancer worry (compared with low levels; OR, 1.62 [95% CI, 1.09-2.42]), and overestimating cancer incidence (compared with accurate estimation or underestimating; OR, 1.58 [95% CI, 1.09-2.28]) were significantly associated with maximizing preferences. Those who believed that they personally had a higher-than-average risk of developing cancer were more likely to be maximizers (23.6% [59 of 250] vs 17.4% [131 of 751]; P = .03); this factor was not significant in regression analyses. Conclusions and Relevance: In this survey study of US adults, those with medical maximizing tendencies more often overestimated the incidence of cancer and had higher levels of cancer-related worry. Targeted and personalized education about cancer and its risk factors may help reduce overutilization of oncologic care.
Assuntos
Neoplasias , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Neoplasias/psicologia , Estudos Transversais , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Preferência do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Preferência do Paciente/psicologia , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , IdosoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The treatment of low-risk thyroid cancer is controversial. We evaluated the importance of treatment outcomes to surgeons' recommendations. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey asked thyroid surgeons for their treatment recommendations for a healthy 45-year-old patient with a solitary, low-risk, 2-cm papillary thyroid cancer. The importance of the 10 treatment outcomes (survival, recurrence, etc.) to their recommendation was evaluated using constant sum scaling, a method where 100 points are allocated among the treatment outcomes; more points indicate higher importance. The distribution of points was compared between surgeons recommending total thyroidectomy and surgeons recommending lobectomy using Hottelling's T2 test. RESULTS: Of 165 respondents (74.3% response rate), 35.8% (n = 59) recommended total thyroidectomy and 64.2% (n = 106) lobectomy. The importance of the 10 treatment outcomes was significantly different between groups (P < .05). Surgeons recommending total thyroidectomy were most influenced by the risk of recurrence (19.1 points; standard deviation 16.5) and rated this 1.6-times more important than those recommending lobectomy. Conversely, surgeons recommending lobectomy placed high emphasis on need for hormone replacement (14.3 points; standard deviation 15.4), rating this 3.1-times more important than those recommending total thyroidectomy. CONCLUSION: Surgeons who recommend total thyroidectomy and those who recommend lobectomy differently prioritize the importance of cancer recurrence and thyroid hormone replacement. Understanding how surgeons' beliefs influence their recommendations is important for ensuring patients receive treatment aligned with their values.
Assuntos
Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Transversais , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide/cirurgia , Tireoidectomia/métodos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Diverticulitis is one of the most diagnosed gastrointestinal diseases in the country, and its incidence has risen over time, especially among younger populations, with increasing attempts at non-operative management. We elected to look at acute diverticular disease from the lens of a failure analysis, where we could estimate the hazard of requiring operative intervention based upon several clinical factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) was queried between 2010 and 2015 for unplanned admissions among adults with a primary diagnosis of diverticulitis. We used a proportional hazards regression to estimate the hazard of failed non-operative management from multiple clinical covariates, measured as the number of inpatient days from admission until colonic resection. We also evaluated patients who received percutaneous drainage, to investigate whether this was associated with decreasing the failure rate of non-operative management. RESULTS: A total of 830,993 discharges over the study period, of whom 83,628 (10.1%) underwent operative resection during the hospitalization, and 35,796 (4.3%) patients underwent percutaneous drainage. Half of all operations occurred by hospital day 1. Among patients treated with percutaneous drainage, 11% went on to require operative intervention. The presence of a peritoneal abscess (HR 3.20, P < .01) and sepsis (HR 4.16, P < .01) were the strongest predictors of failing non-operative management. Among the subset of patients with percutaneous drains, the mean time from admission to drain placement was 2.3 days. CONCLUSION: Overall 10.1% of unplanned admissions for diverticulitis result in inpatient operative resection, most of which occurred on the day of admission. Percutaneous drainage was associated with an 11% operative rate.
Assuntos
Doença Diverticular do Colo , Diverticulite , Adulto , Humanos , Doença Diverticular do Colo/cirurgia , Doença Diverticular do Colo/complicações , Estudos Retrospectivos , Diverticulite/complicações , Fatores de Risco , Hospitalização , DrenagemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Sexual harassment is a known problem in surgical training and a focus of growing attention in recent years. However, the environments where sexual harassment in surgical training most commonly takes place are not yet described. METHODS: An anonymous, voluntary, electronic survey was distributed to surgical trainees, and all programs nationally were invited to participate. RESULTS: Sixteen general surgery training programs elected to participate, and the survey achieved a response rate of 30%. 48.9% of respondents reported experiencing sexual harassment. The most common location for harassment was in the operating room (OR) (74% of harassed respondents). The second most common location for harassment was the wards (67.4% of harassed respondents). In the OR, attendings and nurses were the most common harassers. The most common harassment in the OR was being called a sexist slur or intimate nickname. DISCUSSION: Surgical trainees report that the OR was the most common location for trainee harassment. Given that harassment is most commonly perpetrated by both attendings and nurses, harassment in surgical training may not entirely be due to hierarchies but may also be attributed to a flawed and permissive OR culture. Surgical training programs should vigilantly eliminate the circumstances that permit sexual harassment in the OR.
Assuntos
Internato e Residência , Médicas , Assédio Sexual , Humanos , Salas Cirúrgicas , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
Background: The use of thyroid ultrasound increases yearly, adding to costs and overdetection of clinically irrelevant nodules. We investigated which indications most commonly prompt referral for thyroid ultrasound and the diagnostic utility by indication. Methods: We performed a retrospective observational cohort study of adults (≥18 years) undergoing an initial dedicated thyroid ultrasound between 2017 and 2019 at a tertiary academic center. Indicated reasons for referral were categorized into suspected palpable nodule (SPN), compressive symptoms (CS), metabolic symptoms (MS), screening due to high-risk factors, follow-up of incidental finding on other imaging, and combination of factors. Percentage of ultrasounds with an identifiable nodule and with a nodule recommended for biopsy was compared by indication. Separate logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with finding any nodule and a biopsy-recommended nodule. Results: Among the 1739 patients included, the most common indication for thyroid ultrasound was SPN (40%), followed by incidental imaging (28%), CS (13%), combination (11%), MS (6%), and high-risk factors (2%). Overall, 62% of ultrasounds identified a nodule. Ultrasounds performed for incidental findings had the highest rate of nodule identification (94%), compared with 55%, 39%, and 43%, for SPN, CS, and MS, respectively (p < 0.05). Only 27% of ultrasounds identified a biopsy-recommended nodule. Nodules found incidentally had the highest rate of biopsy-recommended nodules at 55%. Rates of biopsy-recommended nodules for SPN, CS, and MS were 21%, 6%, and 10%, respectively. Logistic regression demonstrated that compared with patients referred for an SPN, those with incidental nodules were 10 times more likely to have a nodule found on ultrasound (odds ratio [OR] = 10.6 [CI 7.0-16.0]), while those referred for CS were half as likely to have a nodule (OR = 0.5 [CI 0.4-0.7]). Similar factors were associated with identification of biopsy-recommended nodules. Conclusions: Of all new dedicated thyroid ultrasounds, only a quarter find biopsy-recommended nodules, and nearly 40% do not identify a nodule at all. Notably, only 55% of ultrasounds done for SPN found a nodule. Ultrasound for CS and MS had the lowest rates of detecting nodules. Providing clear guidance on when to order thyroid ultrasounds can help reduce unnecessary health care utilization and potential overtreatment.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide , Nódulo da Glândula Tireoide , Adulto , Humanos , Nódulo da Glândula Tireoide/patologia , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Biópsia , UltrassonografiaRESUMO
Importance: Papillary thyroid microcarcinomas (PTMCs) have been associated with increased thyroid cancer incidence in recent decades. Total thyroidectomy (TT) has historically been the primary treatment, but current guidelines recommend hemithyroidectomy (HT) for select low-risk cancers; however, the risk-benefit ratio of the 2 operations is incompletely characterized. Objective: To compare surgical complication rates between TT and HT for PTMC treatment. Data Sources: SCOPUS, Medline via the PubMed interface, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); through January 1, 2021, with no starting date restriction. Terms related to papillary thyroid carcinoma and its treatment were used for article retrieval. This meta-analysis used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline and was written according to the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) proposal. Study Selection: Original investigations of adults reporting primary surgical treatment outcomes in PTMC and at least 1 complication of interest were included. Articles evaluating only secondary operations or non-open surgical approaches were excluded. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed by 2 independent reviewers and conflicts resolved by a senior reviewer. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Pooled effect estimates were calculated using a random-effects inverse-variance weighting model. Main Outcomes and Measures: Cancer recurrence and site, mortality (all-cause and disease-specific), vocal fold paralysis, hypoparathyroidism, and hemorrhage/hematoma. Risk of bias was assessed using the McMaster Quality Assessment Scale of Harms scale. Results: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, 17 studies were analyzed and included 1416 patients undergoing HT and 2411 patients undergoing TT (HT: pooled mean [SD] age, 47.0 [10.0] years; 1139 [84.6%] were female; and TT: pooled mean [SD] age, 48.8 [10.0] years; 1671 [77.4%] were female). Patients undergoing HT had significantly lower risk of temporary vocal fold paralysis compared with patients undergoing TT (3.3% vs 4.5%) (weighted risk ratio [RR], 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.7), temporary hypoparathyroidism (2.2% vs 21.3%) (weighted RR, 0.1; 95% CI, 0.0-0.4), and permanent hypoparathyroidism (0% vs 1.8%) (weighted RR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.0-0.8). Contralateral lobe malignant neoplasm recurrence was 2.3% in the HT group, while no such events occurred in the TT group. Hemithyroidectomy was associated with a higher overall recurrence rate (3.8% vs 1.0%) (weighted RR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.3-5.4), but there was no difference in recurrence in the thyroid bed or neck. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis help characterize current knowledge of the risk-benefit ratio of HT vs TT for treatment of PTMC and provide data that may have utility for patient counseling surrounding treatment decisions.
Assuntos
Hipoparatireoidismo , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide , Paralisia das Pregas Vocais , Carcinoma Papilar , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide/patologia , Tireoidectomia/efeitos adversos , Tireoidectomia/métodos , Paralisia das Pregas Vocais/epidemiologia , Paralisia das Pregas Vocais/etiologia , Paralisia das Pregas Vocais/cirurgiaRESUMO
Importance: Fine-needle biopsy (FNB) became a critical part of thyroid nodule evaluation in the 1970s. It is not clear how diagnostic accuracy of FNB has changed over time. Objective: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis estimating the accuracy of thyroid FNB for diagnosis of malignancy in adults with a newly diagnosed thyroid nodule and to characterize changes in accuracy over time. Data Sources: PubMed, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from 1975 to 2020 using search terms related to FNB accuracy in the thyroid. Study Selection: English-language reports of cohort studies or randomized trials of adult patients undergoing thyroid FNB with sample size of 20 or greater and using a reference standard of surgical histopathology or clinical follow-up were included. Articles that examined only patients with known thyroid disease or focused on accuracy of novel adjuncts, such as molecular tests, were excluded. Two investigators screened each article and resolved conflicts by consensus. A total of 36 of 1023 studies met selection criteria. Data Extraction and Synthesis: The MOOSE guidelines were used for data abstraction and assessing data quality and validity. Two investigators abstracted data using a standard form. Studies were grouped into epochs by median data collection year (1975 to 1990, 1990 to 2000, 2000 to 2010, and 2010 to 2020). Data were pooled using a bivariate mixed-effects model. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was accuracy of FNB for diagnosis of malignancy. Accuracy was hypothesized to increase in later time periods, a hypothesis formulated prior to data collection. Results: Of 16â¯597 included patients, 12â¯974 (79.2%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 47.3 (12.9) years. The sensitivity of FNB was 85.6% (95% CI, 79.9-89.5), the specificity was 71.4% (95% CI, 61.1-79.8), the positive likelihood ratio was 3.0 (95% CI, 2.3-4.1), and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.2 (95% CI, 0.2-0.3). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 86.1%. Epoch was not significantly associated with accuracy. None of the available covariates could explain observed heterogeneity. Conclusions and Relevance: Accuracy of thyroid FNB has not significantly changed over time. Important developments in technique, preparation, and interpretation may have occurred too heterogeneously to capture a consistent uptrend over time. FNB remains a reliable test for thyroid cancer diagnosis.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide , Nódulo da Glândula Tireoide , Feminino , Masculino , Humanos , Nódulo da Glândula Tireoide/diagnóstico , Biópsia por Agulha Fina/métodos , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide/patologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In academic hospitals, surgical residents write most of the postoperative prescriptions; yet, few residents are trained on postoperative analgesia. This leads to wide variability in practices and often excess opioid prescribing. We sought to create an opioid guideline pocket card for surgical residents to access when prescribing opioids postoperatively and to evaluate the impact of this initiative. METHODS: A comprehensive literature review was conducted to generate evidence-based procedure-specific opioid recommendations; additional recommendations were formulated via consensus opinion from surgical divisions at an academic institution. A pocket-sized guideline card was developed to include these procedure-specific recommendations as well as opioid guidelines for discharges after inpatient stays, non-opioid analgesic recommendations, access to opioid safety and disposal instructions for patients discharge, an equianalgesic dosing chart, and instructions for naloxone use. The card was distributed to all General Surgery house staff at a university-affiliated hospital in the spring of 2018. Following the distribution, trainees were surveyed on their use of the card. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the survey. RESULTS: Of 85 trainees, 62 (72.9%) responded to the survey in full; 58% use the card regularly. Of the 27 junior resident respondents, 70.4% use the card at least monthly including 48.1% who use the card daily-to-weekly. Overall, 81.6% of residents changed their opioid-prescribing practices because of this initiative and 89.8% believe the card should continue to be distributed and used. DISCUSSION: An evidence-based guideline card for postoperative analgesia is highly valued and utilized by surgical trainees, especially those most junior in their training.
Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Cirurgia Geral/educação , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Prescrição Inadequada/prevenção & controle , Internato e Residência/normas , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Adulto , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Connecticut , Cálculos da Dosagem de Medicamento , Feminino , Humanos , Prescrição Inadequada/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/normas , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Fatigued driving is a known contributor to adverse motor vehicle events (AMVEs), defined as crashes and near misses. Surgical trainees work long and irregular hours; the safety of work-related driving since the introduction of work hour regulations has not yet been studied in this population. We aimed to assess the impact of fatigue on driving safety and explore perceptions of a funded rideshare program. DESIGN: An electronic survey was delivered and inquired in retrospective fashion about fatigue and sleepiness while driving, occurrences of AMVEs, and projected use of a funded rideshare program as a potential solution to unsafe driving. Chi-square testing determined categorical differences between response choices. SETTING: Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, New Haven, CT-a general surgery program with 4 urban clinical sites positioned along a roughly twenty mile stretch of interstate highway in Southeastern Connecticut. PARTICIPANTS: General Surgery residents at the Yale University School of Medicine. RESULTS: Of 58 respondents (81% response rate), 97% reported that fatigue compromised their safety while driving to or from work. Eighty-three percent reported falling nearly or completely asleep, and 22% reported AMVEs during work-related driving. Junior residents were more likely than Seniors to drive fatigued on a daily-to-weekly basis (69% vs 47%, pâ¯=â¯0.02) and twice as likely to fall asleep on a weekly-to-monthly basis (67% vs 33%, pâ¯=â¯0.02). Despite this, only 7% of residents had ever hired a ride service when fatigued, though 88%, would use a free rideshare service if provided. CONCLUSIONS: Work-related fatigue impairs the driving safety of nearly all residents, contributing to frequent AMVEs. Currently, few residents hire rideshare services. Eliminating the cost barrier by funding a rideshare and encouraging its routine use may protect surgical trainees and other drivers.
Assuntos
Internato e Residência , Connecticut , Fadiga/epidemiologia , Humanos , Admissão e Escalonamento de Pessoal , Estudos Retrospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Tolerância ao Trabalho Programado , Carga de TrabalhoRESUMO
Objective: Overprescribing of opioids has contributed to the opioid epidemic. Electronic medical records systems can auto-populate a default number of opioid pills that are prescribed at time of discharge. The aim of this study was to examine the association between lowered default pill counts with changed prescribing practices after cardiac surgery. Methods: On May 18, 2017, the default number of pills prescribers see in electronic medical records in the Yale New Haven Health System was lowered from 30 to 12. Patients undergoing coronary artery grafts, valve surgeries, and thoracic aortic aneurysm surgeries were included in this study. Data were gathered and stratified into 2 groups: 1 year before and 1 year following the default change. The amount of opioid prescribed was compared between the 2 groups. Results: A total of 1741 patient charts were reviewed, 832 before the change and 909 after the change. Significant changes were seen in prescribing practices, where the average amount of opioid prescribed was about 25% lower after the change. This amounted to about 15 fewer pills of 5 mg morphine for each patient. A linear regression model adjusting for other factors determined a prescribing difference of 75.2 morphine milligram equivalents per prescription (P < .01). In addition, a significant decrease in opioids prescribed was found for each type of procedure. Conclusions: Lowering the default opioid pill count in electronic medical record systems is a simple intervention that may modify prescribing behavior to promote judicious prescribing of opioids after cardiac surgery.