GPCRs Are Optimal Regulators of Complex Biological Systems and Orchestrate the Interface between Health and Disease.

GPCRs arguably represent the most effective current therapeutic targets for a plethora of diseases. GPCRs also possess a pivotal role in the regulation of the physiological balance between healthy and pathological conditions; thus, their importance in systems biology cannot be underestimated. The molecular diversity of GPCR signaling systems is likely to be closely associated with disease-associated changes in organismal tissue complexity and compartmentalization, thus enabling a nuanced GPCR-based capacity to interdict multiple disease pathomechanisms at a systemic level. GPCRs have been long considered as controllers of communication between tissues and cells. This communication involves the ligand-mediated control of cell surface receptors that then direct their stimuli to impact cell physiology. Given the tremendous success of GPCRs as therapeutic targets, considerable focus has been placed on the ability of these therapeutics to modulate diseases by acting at cell surface receptors. In the past decade, however, attention has focused upon how stable multiprotein GPCR superstructures, termed receptorsomes, both at the cell surface membrane and in the intracellular domain dictate and condition long-term GPCR activities associated with the regulation of protein expression patterns, cellular stress responses and DNA integrity management. The ability of these receptorsomes (often in the absence of typical cell surface ligands) to control complex cellular activities implicates them as key controllers of the functional balance between health and disease. A greater understanding of this function of GPCRs is likely to significantly augment our ability to further employ these proteins in a multitude of diseases.

Identification of a DLG3 stop mutation in the MRX20 family.

Here, we identified the causal mutation in the MRX20 family, one of the larger X-linked pedigrees that have been described in which no gene had been identified up till now. In 1995, the putative disease gene had been mapped to the pericentromeric region on the X chromosome, but no follow-up studies were performed. Here, whole exome sequencing (WES) on two affected and one unaffected family member revealed the c.195del/p.(Thr66ProfsTer55) mutation in the DLG3 gene (NM_021120.4) that segregated with the affected individuals in the family. DLG3 mutations have been consequently associated with intellectual disability and are a plausible explanation for the clinical abnormalities observed in this family. In addition, we identified two other variants co-segregating with the phenotype: a stop gain mutation in SSX1 (c.358G>T/p.(Glu120Ter)) (NM_001278691.2) and a nonsynonymous SNV in USP27X (c.56 A>G/p.(Gln19Arg)) (NM_001145073.3). RNA sequencing revealed 14 differentially expressed genes (p value < 0.1) in 7 affected males compared to 4 unaffected males of the family, including four genes known to be associated with neurological disorders. Thus, in this paper we identified the c.195del/p.(Thr66ProfsTer55) mutation in the DLG3 gene (NM_021120.4) as likely responsible for the phenotype observed in the MRX20 family.