Isolation unit for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis patients in a low endemic country, a step towards the World Health Organization End TB Strategy.

Tuberculosis (TB) remains a threat to public health and is the second cause of death due to a single infectious agent after HIV/AIDS. The worldwide distribution of TB is heterogeneous. The incidence is decreasing in most high-income regions, but the situation remains worrying in many parts of the world. The emergence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains resistant to key agents used in treatment (rifampin and isoniazid) contributes to TB transmission around the world. To achieve TB elimination, both high and low endemic countries must upscale their efforts to decrease disease transmission and improve cure rates. Management of drug-resistant TB is of particular importance. In this paper, we discuss the different models of care of multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB), the ethical considerations and the specific constraints present in high income countries. The management model chosen by the Belgian TB specialists in accordance with public health authorities as well as building of a specific MDR/XDR-TB isolation unit are also discussed.

[Professional fatigue syndrome (burnout). Part 1 : identification by the general practitioner]. / Syndrome de fatigue professionnelle (burnout) 1ère partie : de l'identification par le médecin généraliste.

Burnout or professional fatigue syndrome has never been more talked about than in recent times. It is the result of exposure to a situation in which the strategies of the subject who are supposed to manage the stresses of the environment become outdated and inoperative. An imbalance is created between the demands and the material, operational and psychological resources to cope with them. Many health professions are confronted with the challenge of managing burnout. Among them, the general practitioner is very often on the front line. This paper is dedicated to him in priority. In its first part, it deals successively with the classification of the pathology (ICD-10 and DSM-5), its prevalence, its socio-economic impacts, its clinical picture (three stages), its diagnosis (by clinic and questionnaires), its causes, its evolution (from denial to acceptance), and its long-term consequences in the absence of treatment.

Le burnout ou syndrome de fatigue professionnelle n'a jamais autant fait parler de lui que ces derniers temps. Il est le résultat de l'exposition à une situation durant laquelle les stratégies du sujet, qui sont censées gérer les stress de l'environnement, deviennent dépassées et inopérantes. Un déséquilibre se crée entre l'exigence des demandes et les ressources matérielles, opérationnelles et psychologiques pour y faire face. De nombreuses professions de santé se trouvent confrontées au défi de la prise en charge du burnout. Parmi celles-ci, le médecin généraliste est très souvent en première ligne. Cet article s'adresse à lui en priorité. Dans ce premier volet, il traite successivement de la classification de la pathologie (ICD-10 et DSM-5), de sa prévalence, de ses impacts socio-économiques, de son tableau clinique (trois stades), de son diagnostic (par la clinique et les questionnaires), de ses causes, de son évolution (du déni à l'acceptation) et de ses conséquences à long terme en l'absence de traitement.

[Professional fatigue syndrome (burnout) : Part 2 : from therapeutic management]. / Syndrome de fatigue professionnelle (burnout) 2ème partie : de la prise en charge thérapeutique.

Burnout or professional fatigue syndrome is the result of exposure to a situation in which the strategies of the subject who are supposed to manage the stresses of the environment become outdated and inoperative. An imbalance is created between the demands and the material, operational and psychological resources to cope with them. Many health professions are confronted with the challenge of managing burnout, but the general practitioner is very often on the front line. After a first article devoted to the epidemiology, diagnosis, causes and consequences of the burnout, this second article is focusing on its therapeutic management, through listening, sick leave, dietary supplements, antidepressants, behavioural and cognitive therapy, professional coaching and multidisciplinary approach.

on disponible Résumé : Le burnout ou syndrome de fatigue professionnelle est le résultat de l'exposition à une situation durant laquelle les stratégies du sujet, qui sont censées gérer les stress de l'environnement, deviennent dépassées et inopérantes. Un déséquilibre se crée entre l'exigence des demandes et les ressources matérielles, opérationnelles et psychologiques pour y faire face. De nombreuses professions de santé se trouvent confrontées au défi de la prise en charge du burnout, dont le médecin généraliste. Après un premier article dédié à l'épidémiologie, au diagnostic, aux causes et aux conséquences du burnout, ce second article est consacré à la prise en charge de ce syndrome. Il se centre sur la prise en charge thérapeutique par l'écoute, l'interruption du temps de travail, les compléments alimentaires, les antidépresseurs, la thérapie comportementale et cognitive, le coaching professionnel et l'approche multidisciplinaire.

Week 96 analysis of rilpivirine or efavirenz in HIV-1-infected patients with baseline viral load ≤ 100 000 copies/mL in the pooled ECHO and THRIVE phase 3, randomized, double-blind trials.

OBJECTIVES: These 96-week, ECHO/THRIVE pooled analyses evaluated data for antiretroviral treatment-naïve, HIV-1-infected adults with viral load (VL) ≤ 100 000 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL receiving rilpivirine or efavirenz. METHODS: ECHO and THRIVE were phase 3, randomized, double-blind trials. Patients received rilpivirine 25 mg once daily (qd) or efavirenz 600 mg qd, with a fixed (ECHO) or investigator-chosen (THRIVE) nucleoside/tide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (N[t]RTI) background regimen. Response rate (the percentage of patients with VL < 50 copies/mL, using an intent-to-treat-population, time-to-loss-of-virological-response algorithm), virological failure (VF), resistance development, safety and tolerability were evaluated. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable between the rilpivirine (n = 368) and efavirenz (n = 329) groups. At week 96, response rates [84% for rilpivirine vs. 80% for efavirenz; difference 4.0%; 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.7% to 9.7%] and incidences of VF for the resistance analysis (VFres) (8% for rilpivirine vs. 6% for efavirenz; P = 0.46) were similar in the two groups. Among patients with VFres , a comparable proportion in each group developed nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) resistance-associated mutations (RAMs). Among those with VFres , more patients in the rilpivirine group than in the efavirenz group developed N[t]RTI RAMs, mostly M184I/V. The mean (95% CI) CD4 cell count increased from baseline to week 96 by 224 (208-240) cells/µL in the rilpivirine group and by 206 (188-225) cells/µL in the efavirenz group. Treatment-related grade 2-4 overall adverse events, any rash and dizziness were less frequent for rilpivirine than for efavirenz (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Rilpivirine demonstrated antiviral efficacy similar to that of efavirenz in antiretroviral treatment-naïve adults with baseline VL ≤ 100 000 copies/mL over 96 weeks. Frequencies of VFres and emergent NNRTI RAMs in each group were similar. More patients with VFres in the rilpivirine group than in the efavirenz group developed N[t]RTI RAMs (mostly M184I/V). Rilpivirine had a more favourable safety/tolerability profile than efavirenz.

Feasibility and acceptability of HIV screening through the use of rapid tests by general practitioners in a Brussels area with a substantial African community.

OBJECTIVES: To assess:1) if HIV screening with rapid tests in neighbourhoods with a substantial African community is feasible and acceptable among GPs and patients; 2) HIV seroprevalence. METHODS: Multicenter prospective study with 10 trained physicians. Use of HIV standard test and INSTI Ultrarapid test. INCLUSION CRITERIA: MSM, sex worker, multiple sexual partners, having returned or coming from a country with high HIV prevalence, IVDU, Indicator conditions as defined by HIV Indicator Diseases across Europe Study, having an AIDS-defining illness, having had a recent pregnancy or abortion; or presenting other risks. RESULTS: From August 2010 to August 2011, 10 trained GPs offered an HIV test to 224 patients: 51% ♀, 48% ♂, 43% Caucasians, 45% Africans. INCLUSION CRITERIA: 32% "high risk group", 9% returning from an endemic country, 29% with an indicator condition; 12 patients (6%) refused the standard test. The INSTI was offered to 217(97%), 197 performed with 2 reactive rapid tests confirmed. The seroprevalence according to ethnic origin was 0% among Caucasians and 2.2% among Africans and was 1.5% among patients with an indicator condition. 1087 consecutive consultations of the same GPs were recorded: 42% patients had ≥ 1 inclusion criteria among which 41% of offered tests, that is to say 59% of "missed opportunities". The reasons for not offering the test as recorded for 55% of patients:"not indicated" 44.5%, "no time" 33%, "impossible to propose" 15%, test completed previously 11%, known HIV-positive 4%. CONCLUSIONS: Standard and rapid tests are well received by patients but were usually not offered by doctors who have been trained.

The MONET trial: week 144 analysis of the efficacy of darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) monotherapy versus DRV/r plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, for patients with viral load < 50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL at baseline.

BACKGROUND: In the MONotherapy in Europe with Tmc114 (MONET) trial, darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) monotherapy showed noninferior efficacy vs. two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) plus DRV/r at the primary 48-week analysis. The trial was continued to week 144 to assess the durability of the results. METHODS: A total of 256 patients with viral load < 50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL on current highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) for at least 6 months switched to DRV/r 800/100 mg once daily, either as monotherapy (n=127) or with two NRTIs (n=129). Treatment failure was defined as two consecutive HIV RNA levels above 50 copies/mL [time to loss of virological response (TLOVR)] by week 144, or discontinuation of study drugs. RESULTS: Eighty-one per cent of patients were male and 91% were Caucasian, and they had a median baseline CD4 count of 575 cells/uL. More patients in the DRV/r monotherapy arm had hepatitis C virus coinfection at baseline than in the control arm (18% vs. 12%, respectively). By week 144, the percentage of patients with HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL [intent to treat (ITT), TLOVR, switch=failure method] was 69% vs. 75% in the DRV/r monotherapy and triple therapy arms [difference= -5.9%; 95% confidence interval (CI) -16.9%, +5.1%]; by a strict ITT analysis (switches not considered failures), the percentage of patients with HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL was 84% vs. 83.5%, respectively (difference= +0.5%; 95% CI -8.7%, +9.7%). Twenty-one and 13 patients had two consecutive HIV RNA results above 50 copies/mL in the DRV/r monotherapy arm and triple therapy arm, respectively, of whom 18 of 21 (86%) and 10 of 13 (77%) had HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL at week 144. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, for patients with HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL at baseline, switching to DRV/r monotherapy showed noninferior efficacy to DRV/r plus two NRTIs in a strict ITT (switches not considered failures) analysis, but not in a TLOVR switch equals failure analysis.

[The struggle against AIDS: between new paradigms and inertia]. / La lutte contre le Sida; entre nouveaux paradigmes et inerties.

Recent statistics on the global HIV epidemic illustrate that HIV incidence continues to increase and provide stark reminders of the urgent need for new and more effective HIV prevention tools. The new paradigm of HIV prevention strategies consists on a biomedical approach including circumcision, vaginal microbicides, pre and post exposure prophylaxis and the treatment of the infected individual. The goal of the ARV therapy is to reach level of plasma HIV indetectability. At less than 20c/ml the risk of sexual transmission is equal to zero. A mathematical model shows that by universal testing associated with immediate therapy the epidemic could be driven towards elimination by the year 2020. It is anticipated that there will be substantial barriers to making biomedical HIV prevention tools available to individuals who are the highest risk of infection. Operationalizing biomedical approaches will require tight links between HIV testing and treatment programs, as HIV testing will be the common entry point for people to receive either biomedical prevention tools or treatment.

Dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positivity and seroprevalence among high-risk healthcare workers and hospital staff.

Staff working in units that were highly exposed to coronavirus disease 2019 were invited to participate in a 6-month study on the carriage and seroprevalence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). The results from visits on Day 1 and Day 15 show that 41 cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection were confirmed by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and/or serology in 326 participants (overall infection rate 12.6%). The presence of comorbidities or symptoms at the time of sample collection was a risk factor for infection, but working as a physician/nurse was not a risk factor. Universal screening in high-risk units, irrespective of symptoms, allowed the identification of asymptomatic and potentially contagious infected workers, enabling them to self-isolate for 7 days.

CD4+ count-guided interruption of antiretroviral treatment.

BACKGROUND: Despite declines in morbidity and mortality with the use of combination antiretroviral therapy, its effectiveness is limited by adverse events, problems with adherence, and resistance of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). METHODS: We randomly assigned persons infected with HIV who had a CD4+ cell count of more than 350 per cubic millimeter to the continuous use of antiretroviral therapy (the viral suppression group) or the episodic use of antiretroviral therapy (the drug conservation group). Episodic use involved the deferral of therapy until the CD4+ count decreased to less than 250 per cubic millimeter and then the use of therapy until the CD4+ count increased to more than 350 per cubic millimeter. The primary end point was the development of an opportunistic disease or death from any cause. An important secondary end point was major cardiovascular, renal, or hepatic disease. RESULTS: A total of 5472 participants (2720 assigned to drug conservation and 2752 to viral suppression) were followed for an average of 16 months before the protocol was modified for the drug conservation group. At baseline, the median and nadir CD4+ counts were 597 per cubic millimeter and 250 per cubic millimeter, respectively, and 71.7% of participants had plasma HIV RNA levels of 400 copies or less per milliliter. Opportunistic disease or death from any cause occurred in 120 participants (3.3 events per 100 person-years) in the drug conservation group and 47 participants (1.3 per 100 person-years) in the viral suppression group (hazard ratio for the drug conservation group vs. the viral suppression group, 2.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9 to 3.7; P<0.001). Hazard ratios for death from any cause and for major cardiovascular, renal, and hepatic disease were 1.8 (95% CI, 1.2 to 2.9; P=0.007) and 1.7 (95% CI, 1.1 to 2.5; P=0.009), respectively. Adjustment for the latest CD4+ count and HIV RNA level (as time-updated covariates) reduced the hazard ratio for the primary end point from 2.6 to 1.5 (95% CI, 1.0 to 2.1). CONCLUSIONS: Episodic antiretroviral therapy guided by the CD4+ count, as used in our study, significantly increased the risk of opportunistic disease or death from any cause, as compared with continuous antiretroviral therapy, largely as a consequence of lowering the CD4+ cell count and increasing the viral load. Episodic antiretroviral therapy does not reduce the risk of adverse events that have been associated with antiretroviral therapy. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00027352 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Bovine leukemia virus-related antigens in lymphocyte cultures infected with AIDS-associated viruses.

An earlier finding that lymphocytes from African patients with the acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) react with rabbit antiserum to purified antigens of bovine leukemia virus (BLV) prompted a study of the possible cross-reactions between a BLV-infected ovine cell line and human lymphocytes inoculated with a strain of lymphadenopathy syndrome-associated virus (LAV). A solid-phase radioimmunoassay was used to detect antigenic markers of the retroviruses. Crude extracts from short-term cultures of lymphocytes infected with LAV bound rabbit antisera to the LAV glycoprotein gp13 (molecular weight 13,000) and the BLV proteins p24 and gp51, but did not bind antibodies to the p24 of human T-cell leukemia virus type I (HTLV-I). Antiserum to LAV gp13 reacted with an ovine cell line producing BLV but also weakly with virus-free ovine cells. Lymphocyte cultures from four African patients with AIDS expressed BLV-related antigens within 6 to 10 days of culture, at the moment when particle-bound reverse transcriptase was produced. BLV-related antigens were induced in lymphocyte cultures from healthy individuals by addition of filtered supernatant or irradiated cells of the original culture. The antisera to BLV used in this study may prove useful for the detection of AIDS-associated viruses in short-term cultures of lymphocytes from AIDS patients or their contacts.

Normalisation of CD4 counts in patients with HIV-1 infection and maximum virological suppression who are taking combination antiretroviral therapy: an observational cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) has been shown to reduce mortality and morbidity in patients with HIV. As viral replication falls, the CD4 count increases, but whether the CD4 count returns to the level seen in HIV-negative people is unknown. We aimed to assess whether the CD4 count for patients with maximum virological suppression (viral load <50 copies per mL) continues to increase with long-term cART to reach levels seen in HIV-negative populations. METHODS: We compared increases in CD4 counts in 1835 antiretroviral-naive patients who started cART from EuroSIDA, a pan-European observational cohort study. Rate of increase in CD4 count (per year) occurring between pairs of consecutive viral loads below 50 copies per mL was estimated using generalised linear models, accounting for multiple measurements for individual patients. FINDINGS: The median CD4 count at starting cART was 204 cells per microL (IQR 85-330). The greatest mean yearly increase in CD4 count of 100 cells per microL was seen in the year after starting cART. Significant, but lower, yearly increases in CD4 count, around 50 cells per microL, were seen even at 5 years after starting cART in patients whose current CD4 count was less than 500 cells per microL. The only groups without significant increases in CD4 count were those where cART had been taken for more than 5 years with a current CD4 count of more than 500 cells per microL, (current mean CD4 count 774 cells per microL; 95% CI 764-783). Patients starting cART with low CD4 counts (<200 cells per microL) had significant rises in CD4 counts even after 5 years of cART. INTERPRETATION: Normalisation of CD4 counts in HIV-infected patients for all infected individuals might be achievable if viral suppression with cART can be maintained for a sufficiently long period of time.

Indicator disease-guided testing for HIV--the next step for Europe?

HIV should preferably be diagnosed in its earlier stages. To optimize the chances of doing so, HIV testing in patients presenting with one of several indicator diseases and conditions is recommended. Patients presenting with tuberculosis and other AIDS-defining conditions should be tested. Patients with sexually transmitted diseases should be offered an HIV test, as should patients with certain types of cancers and laboratory abnormalities. Governments should consider adopting opt-out testing for pregnant women. These recommendations should be considered for implementation by all types of health professionals across Europe, and audits to study the extent of their being followed, conducted and reported to the European AIDS Clinical Society webpage (http://www.eacs.eu).

Meropenem-clavulanate for drug-resistant tuberculosis: a follow-up of relapse-free cases.

BACKGROUND: Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB), defined as TB caused by a Mycobacterium strain resistant to at least rifampicin, isoniazid, any fluoroquinolone and one of the injectable anti-tuberculosis drugs, remains a worldwide public health threat. Among repurposed drugs empirically used for XDR-TB cases, carbapenems have been studied in vitro and in animal models, with encouraging results. However, only short-term follow-up data from clinical studies are currently available. OBJECTIVES: To study the long-term follow-up of XDR-TB cases treated with a regimen containing meropenem-clavulanate (M/Clav). DESIGN: Retrospective observational case series study at a single hospital. METHODS: All hospitalised drug-resistant TB patients who received M/Clav as part of their treatment from 2009 to 2016 were included. Demographic and clinical data were extracted from medical records. RESULTS: Eighteen XDR-TB patients were included in the analysis. The successful outcome and mortality rates were respectively 83.3% and 11.1%. No relapses were observed in cured patients after a median follow-up of 4 years. No specific adverse events were attributed to treatment with M/Clav. CONCLUSION: The rate of sustained successful treatment outcome observed here is far higher than the 26% observed in the 2014 World Health Organization XDR-TB cohort, suggesting that carbapenems may be beneficial for the treatment of difficult-to-treat TB cases.

Auditing HIV Testing Rates across Europe: Results from the HIDES 2 Study.

European guidelines recommend the routine offer of an HIV test in patients with a number of AIDS-defining and non-AIDS conditions believed to share an association with HIV; so called indicator conditions (IC). Adherence with this guidance across Europe is not known. We audited HIV testing behaviour in patients accessing care for a number of ICs. Participating centres reviewed the case notes of either 100 patients or of all consecutive patients in one year, presenting for each of the following ICs: tuberculosis, non-Hodgkins lymphoma, anal and cervical cancer, hepatitis B and C and oesophageal candidiasis. Observed HIV-positive rates were applied by region and IC to estimate the number of HIV diagnoses potentially missed. Outcomes examined were: HIV test rate (% of total patients with IC), HIV test accepted (% of tests performed/% of tests offered) and new HIV diagnosis rate (%). There were 49 audits from 23 centres, representing 7037 patients. The median test rate across audits was 72% (IQR 32-97), lowest in Northern Europe (median 44%, IQR 22-68%) and highest in Eastern Europe (median 99%, IQR 86-100). Uptake of testing was close to 100% in all regions. The median HIV+ rate was 0.9% (IQR 0.0-4.9), with 29 audits (60.4%) having an HIV+ rate >0.1%. After adjustment, there were no differences between regions of Europe in the proportion with >0.1% testing positive (global p = 0.14). A total of 113 patients tested HIV+. Applying the observed rates of testing HIV+ within individual ICs and regions to all persons presenting with an IC suggested that 105 diagnoses were potentially missed. Testing rates in well-established HIV ICs remained low across Europe, despite high prevalence rates, reflecting missed opportunities for earlier HIV diagnosis and care. Significant numbers may have had an opportunity for HIV diagnosis if all persons included in IC audits had been tested.

Zidovudine twice daily in asymptomatic subjects with HIV infection and a high risk of progression to AIDS: a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study. The European-Australian Collaborative Group (Study 017)

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of zidovudine given twice daily in subjects with asymptomatic HIV-1 infection and a high risk of progression to AIDS. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Multicentre study in five European countries and Australia. PATIENTS: Asymptomatic subjects (n = 329) with CD4 cell counts between 200 and 400 x 10(6)/l, or if > 400 x 10(6)/l, subjects with HIV p24 antigenaemia (> 10 pg/ml). INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly assigned to receive zidovudine 500 mg or placebo twice daily for 104 weeks, following a 250 mg four times daily dose regimen for the first 4 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end-point was the development of AIDS or severe AIDS-related complex (ARC). Before unblinding the study other end-points were defined: the development of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) group IV disease (AIDS, severe ARC and other CDC stage IV disease) and the development of symptomatic HIV disease (AIDS, severe ARC, other CDC stage IV disease and minor HIV disease). Changes in CD4+ cell counts, p24 antigenaemia and toxicity were also reviewed. RESULTS: Median treatment duration was 57 weeks for the placebo and 60 weeks for the zidovudine group, respectively. Progression to AIDS or severe ARC occurred in 17 placebo and 12 zidovudine recipients (log-rank P = 0.26). However, in the first of the 2 study years the rate of progression to AIDS or severe ARC was significantly higher in the placebo than in the zidovudine group. Zidovudine delayed progression to symptomatic HIV disease (P = 0.01); a trend in a delay in progression to CDC stage IV disease was observed (P = 0.08). Zidovudine recipients maintained CD4+ cell counts at or above baseline levels for longer than placebo recipients (P = 0.04). HIV p24-antigen levels decreased in the zidovudine group and returned to pretreatment levels by week 36. Substantial toxicity was not observed. CONCLUSIONS: Zidovudine twice daily is effective in delaying progression to symptomatic HIV disease in high-risk, asymptomatic HIV-infected subjects. Modified definitions of clinical end-points may be useful for evaluating Phase III trials in comparable patient groups in the light of changes in the definition of AIDS and the increasing use of primary prophylaxis against opportunistic infections.

The efficacy and safety of zidovudine with or without acyclovir in the treatment of patients with AIDS-related complex. The European-Australian Collaborative Group.

Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of zidovudine (250 mg every 6 h) alone or in combination with acyclovir (800 mg every 6 h) as treatment for AIDS-related complex (ARC). A double-blind, controlled clinical trial of 6 months therapy was conducted at teaching hospital ambulatory clinics in eight European countries and Australia; 199 patients were studied. Time to development of AIDS-defining opportunistic infections (OI) and AIDS-associated neoplasms, survival, performance status, body weight and CD4+ cell counts were measured. During the study six (9%) zidovudine recipients, five (7%) combination recipients and 12 (18%) placebo recipients developed AIDS-defining OI; the probability of developing an OI was 0.23, 0.09 and 0.08 for the placebo, zidovudine and combination recipients, respectively. Four patients in the placebo group, three in the zidovudine group and one in the combination group died during the study. Patients receiving zidovudine with or without acyclovir had moderate increases in CD4+ cell counts compared with placebo recipients and serum HIV p24 antigen level decreased significantly in all those receiving zidovudine. Fourteen (21%) patients in the zidovudine group and 16 (24%) in the combination group experienced bone-marrow suppression compared with three (5%) placebo recipients. Red-cell transfusions were administered to 6, 19 and 13% of placebo, zidovudine and combination recipients, respectively. These data confirm the efficacy of zidovudine therapy after 4 weeks' treatment in the reduction of development of OI in patients with ARC and support the use of a maintenance dose of 250 mg zidovudine 6-hourly. Given the increased development of OI in the treated groups compared with placebo during the first 4 weeks of therapy, we cannot exclude an initial adverse effect of zidovudine and recommend caution in the use of a loading dose of zidovudine. At 6 months there was no apparent difference in efficacy between the combination of zidovudine and acyclovir compared with zidovudine alone. Moreover, the addition of high-dose acyclovir resulted in a minimal increase in the risk of toxicity.

Simplification with abacavir-based triple nucleoside therapy versus continued protease inhibitor-based highly active antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1-infected patients with undetectable plasma HIV-1 RNA.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the antiviral efficacy, safety and adherence in patients switched to an abacavir-containing nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) regimen after long-term HIV-1 RNA suppression with a dual NRTI/protease inhibitor (PI) combination. METHODS: In an open-label, multicentre study, patients receiving 2NRTI plus PI for at least 6 months, with a history of undetectable plasma HIV-1 RNA since the initiation of therapy and plasma HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/ml at screening, were randomly assigned to replace the PI with abacavir (n = 105) or continue the same treatment (n = 106). Clinical assessments included plasma HIV-1 RNA, chemistry, haematology, lymphocyte counts, and adverse event reports. Adherence to treatment was assessed by patient self-report. RESULTS: A significantly longer time to treatment failure was demonstrated in the abacavir arm compared with the PI arm (P = 0.03) while treatment failure was experienced by significantly more patients in the PI arm: 24 (23%) versus 12 (12%) (P = 0.03). Therapy-limiting toxicity led to treatment failure in eight versus 14 cases in the abacavir and PI arms, respectively, whereas virological rebound was the cause in four versus two cases. Significant reductions in cholesterol and non-fasting triglyceride plasma levels at 48 weeks were observed in the abacavir arm (P < 0.001 andP = 0.035, respectively). The number of patients reporting no difficulty in taking their therapy showed a marked increase from baseline in the abacavir arm. CONCLUSION: The replacement of PI by abacavir in a triple combination regimen following prolonged suppression of plasma HIV-1 RNA provides continued virological suppression, significant improvements in lipid abnormalities and enhanced ease of dosing.

Treatment of HIV-related fluconazole-resistant oral candidosis with D0870, a new triazole antifungal.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of D0870 in the treatment of HIV-related fluconazole-resistant oro-oesophageal candidosis. DESIGN: Multicentre open study. PATIENTS: HIV-seropositive patients with oro-oesophageal candidosis despite at least 7 days of treatment with fluconazole at doses of 100 mg per day or more. METHODS: Patients received an initial dose of D0870 (150 mg), then 25 mg per day for 6 days. Symptoms and signs of candidosis were compared at entry and on days 3 and 7 of treatment. At each visit, samples were taken for safety monitoring and for in vitro susceptibility testing of Candida isolates. Limited pharmacokinetic samples were taken on days 1 and 7. RESULTS: Of 26 evaluable patients, 16 showed partial improvement, nine showed no improvement, and only one had full clearance of thrush by day 7. In vitro testing of the cleared patient's isolate suggested that it was susceptible to fluconazole. Symptoms of dysphagia cleared in 14 and improved in five of the 22 patients with presumptive oesophageal involvement at entry. Pharmacokinetic measurement showed wide variability in maximum D0870 levels recorded on day 1 (range, 0.07-0.34 mg/l) and susceptibility testing of isolates also showed a range of minimal inhibitory concentration values to D0870 (range, < 0.06-8 mg/l; median, 0.25 mg/l). When these data were combined with clinical response there was a strong suggestion that lack of symptomatic improvement was related to low plasma D0870 levels or to the presence of less D0870-susceptible isolates. Six patients were noted to have a fall in haemoglobin, three of whom were receiving concomitant therapy known to suppress bone marrow. Three patients reported headaches as adverse events that were attributed to study medication, but D0870 was well tolerated overall. CONCLUSIONS: D0870 shows promise in the treatment of fluconazole-resistant oro-oesophageal candidosis and was well tolerated, although efficacy in this difficult-to-treat patient group was probably limited due to the inadequate plasma levels achieved in this pilot study with the low doses of D0870 administered.

Survival of European patients with Kaposi's sarcoma as AIDS-defining condition during the first decade of AIDS. AIDS in Europe Study Group.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the survival of patients with Kaposi's sarcoma as first manifestation of AIDS has changed between 1979 and 1989; and to define whether prognosis factors could be identified. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a multicentric retrospective cohort study from 52 centers in 17 European countries involving adults AIDS patients diagnosed between 1979 and 1989. Variables such as age, sex, geographical regions, transmission groups, date of Kaposi's sarcoma diagnosis, zidovudine use, CD4+ cell count and concomitant opportunistic infections or AIDS-related malignancies were evaluated by using uni- and multivariable proportional hazard models. Log-rank tests were used to determine which variables were associated with survival. RESULTS: From the 6,546 AIDS patients recruited in the database of the AIDS in Europe Study Group, 1,394 were diagnosed with Kaposi's sarcoma at the time of AIDS diagnosis, from 1979 and 1989. A total of 1,047 Kaposi's sarcoma patients died during the follow-up period. By Kaplan-Meier analyses, the median and mean survival for these Kaposi's sarcoma patients were 17 and 25 months, respectively, with no change over time. However, age, sex (female), geographic region, low CD4+ cell count (< 150 x 10(6)/l) and some opportunistic infections and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were associated with a poorer prognosis. Zidovudine use, year of diagnosis and risk factor for HIV-1 infection brought no additional information as predictor of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the survival of patients with Kaposi's sarcoma as first manifestation of AIDS has remained poor during the last decade in contrast with the overall AIDS survival which had significantly improved from a median of 13-18 months during the same period of observation. There is a need for further prospective information to explain the worse prognosis in women and the geographical variations.

Epidemiology of AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma in Europe over 10 years. AIDS in Europe Study Group.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence and risk factors associated with Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) occurrence as an AIDS-defining condition or after the diagnosis of AIDS. DESIGN: Multicentre retrospective cohort study of AIDS in Europe database from 52 clinical centres in 17 European countries. METHODS: Patients' charts (n = 6546) were reviewed and collected in the database of the AIDS in Europe Study Group from 1979 to 1989. At the time of AIDS diagnosis 1394 patients had KS, whereas an additional 525 others developed KS after AIDS diagnosis. Univariate analysis and development of multivariate models determined factors associated with KS occurrence. RESULTS: Frequency of KS as an AIDS-defining condition significantly declined over time (P < 0.0001). In our cohort of patients, homo-/bisexual men from central Europe with CD4 cell counts > 150 x 10(6)/l were statistically more likely to develop KS at the time of AIDS diagnosis (P < 0.0001). For patients with an AIDS diagnosis other than KS, the probability of developing KS during the follow-up was 10 and 24% after 12 and 36 months, respectively. Variables significantly associated with a further KS development were transmission group, central European residence, previous herpes simplex infection other than ulcers, and low CD4 cells (< 150 x 10(6)/l). Previous zidovudine therapy had no influence on KS appearance. For patients who developed KS subsequent to AIDS diagnosis, there was no significant decline of the incidence over the 10-year time period. CONCLUSIONS: This large cohort study clearly shows that demographic data such as sex, transmission group and region of Europe have a major influence on KS development. It also suggests that KS as an AIDS-defining disease occurs earlier in the course of the chronic HIV infection than other opportunistic diseases. Reasons for geographical variations and its declining frequency as an initial AIDS diagnosis remain undetermined.