Diabetes and Humor: A Preliminary Investigation.

Diabetes can take a tremendous toll on physical and psychological health. Given the growing evidence of the benefits of humor, this study examined the association between diabetes and humor. The sample consisted of 249 participants: 72.3% with type 1 diabetes, 70.3% female, 89.5% Caucasian, and 70.9% college educated. Participants completed the Humor Styles Questionnaire (HSQ) and were compared with HSQ norms. On the affiliative humor scale, the diabetes group did not differ from the norm (P >0.05), nor did those with type 1 diabetes (P >0.05). Scores of those with type 2 diabetes were lower than the norm (P <0.05). On the self-enhancing humor scale, the diabetes group did not differ from the norm (P >0.05), nor did the subgroups with type 1 diabetes (P >0.05) or type 2 diabetes (P >0.05). The diabetes group was lower than the norm on aggressive humor (P <0.01), as were the subgroups with type 1 diabetes (P <0.01) and type 2 diabetes (P <0.05). The diabetes group was higher than the norm on self-defeating humor (P <0.01), as were the subgroups with type 1 diabetes (P <0.01) and type 2 diabetes (P <0.01). Results suggest that people with either type of diabetes are more inclined toward self-enhancing humor, are less inclined toward aggressive humor, and score higher on self-defeating humor, and those with type 1 diabetes are also inclined toward affiliative humor. Results are discussed relative to the sample being comprised of individuals with good glycemic control (mean A1C 7.06 ± 1.39%). This study offers a preliminary comparison of humor among people with diabetes versus those in a healthy norm group without diabetes.

Orthopaedic Physical Therapy: Update to the Description of Specialty Practice.

STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive, cross-sectional observational study. BACKGROUND: In the physical therapist profession, the outcomes of specialty practice analyses are used to determine content areas for specialty board examinations and for American Physical Therapy Association (APTA)-accredited residency curricula. To maintain currency for specialty practices, the American Board of Physical Therapy Specialties (ABPTS) requires any approved specialty area to revalidate its Description of Specialty Practice (DSP) a minimum of every 10 years. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this article was to describe the most recent practice analysis process and to report revisions to the DSP for orthopaedic physical therapists. METHODS: A survey instrument was developed by a group of subject matter experts, following guidelines established by the ABPTS. The survey was sent electronically to a random sample of 800 orthopaedic certified specialists (OCSs). The survey contained 5 sections: (1) knowledge areas (eg, human anatomy and physiology); (2) professional roles, responsibilities, and values (eg, consultation); (3) patient/client management model (eg, examination); (4) percentage of body regions treated; and (5) demographic information. RESULTS: A total of 224 completed surveys and 43 partially completed surveys were submitted, for a response rate of 33.4%. Based on a priori decision rules regarding survey data, consensus of the group of subject matter experts, and ABPTS suggestions, the DSP for orthopaedic physical therapy was revised. CONCLUSION: The revised DSP will be used to reconstruct the blueprint for future OCS examinations, APTA-accredited orthopaedic residency program curricula, as well as professional development activities related to recertification in orthopaedic physical therapy.