Radiotherapy for metastatic spinal cord compression with increased radiation doses (RAMSES-01): a prospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) and favorable survival prognoses can benefit from radiation doses greater than 30Gy in 10 fractions in terms of improved local progression-free survival (LPFS) and overall survival (OS). METHODS/DESIGN: This prospective study mainly investigates LPFS after precision radiotherapy (volumetric modulated arc therapy or stereotactic body radiotherapy) with 18 × 2.33Gy in 3.5 weeks. LPFS is defined as freedom from progression of motor deficits during radiotherapy and an in-field recurrence of MSCC following radiotherapy. The maximum relative dose allowed to the spinal cord is 101.5% of the prescribed dose, resulting in an equivalent dose in 2Gy-fractions (EQD2) for radiation myelopathy is 45.5Gy, which is below the tolerance dose of 50Gy according to the Quantitative Analyses of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC). The EQD2 of this regimen for tumor cell kill is 43.1Gy, which is 33% higher than for 30Gy in 10 fractions (EQD2 = 32.5Gy). Primary endpoint is LPFS at 12 months after radiotherapy. Secondary endpoints include the effect of 18 × 2.33Gy on motor function, ambulatory status, sensory function, sphincter dysfunction, LPFS at other follow-up times, overall survival, pain relief, relief of distress and toxicity. Follow-up visits for all endpoints will be performed directly and at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after radiotherapy. A total of 65 patients are required for the prospective part of the study. These patients will be compared to a historical control group of at least 235 patients receiving conventional radiotherapy with 10x3Gy in 2 weeks. DISCUSSION: If precision radiotherapy with 18 × 2.33Gy results in significantly better LPFS than 10x3Gy of conventional radiotherapy, this regimen should be strongly considered for patients with MSCC and favorable survival prognoses. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04043156. Registered 30-07-2019.

High-precision radiotherapy of motor deficits due to metastatic spinal cord compression (PRE-MODE): a multicenter phase 2 study.

BACKGROUND: For metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC), conventional radiotherapy with 10 × 3 Gy in 2 weeks results in better local progression-free survival (LPFS) than 5 × 4 Gy in 1 week. Since patients with MSCC are often significantly impaired, an overall treatment time of 1 week would be preferable if resulting in similar outcomes as longer programs. This may be achieved with 5 × 5 Gy in 1 week, since the biologically effective dose is similar to 10 × 3 Gy. It can be expected that 5 × 5 Gy (like 10 × 3) Gy results in better LPFS than 5 × 4 Gy in 1 week. METHODS/DESIGN: This phase 2 study investigates LPFS after high-precision RT with 5 × 5 Gy in 1 week. LPFS is defined as freedom from both progression of motor deficits during RT and new or progressive motor deficits dur to an in-field recurrence of MSCC following RT. Considering the tolerance dose of the spinal cord, 5 × 5 Gy can be safely administered with high-precision radiotherapy such as volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Maximum dose to the spinal cord should not exceed 101.5% of the prescribed dose to keep the risk of radiation myelopathy below 0.03%. Primary endpoint is LPFS at 6 months following radiotherapy; secondary endpoints include motor function/ability to walk, sensory function, sphincter dysfunction, LPFS directly and 1 and 3 months following radiotherapy, overall survival, pain relief, quality of life and toxicity. Follow-up visits will be performed directly and at 1, 3 and 6 months following radiotherapy. After completion of this phase 2 study, patients will be compared to a historical control group receiving conventional radiotherapy with 5 × 4 Gy in 1 week. Forty-four patients will be included assuming 5 × 5 Gy will provide the same benefit in LPFS when compared to 5 × 4 Gy as reported for 10 × 3 Gy. DISCUSSION: If superiority regarding LPFS is shown for high-precision radiotherapy with 5 × 5 Gy when compared to conventional radiotherapy with 5 × 4 Gy, patients with MSCC would benefit from 5 × 5 Gy, since high LPFS rates could be achieved with 1 week of radiotherapy instead of 2 weeks (10 × 3 Gy). TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov NCT03070431 . Registered 27 February 2017.

Excellent outcomes after radiotherapy alone for malignant spinal cord compression from myeloma.

BACKGROUND: Uncertainty exists whether patients with spinal cord compression (SCC) from a highly radiosensitive tumor require decompressive spinal surgery in addition to radiotherapy (RT). This study addressed the question by evaluating patients receiving RT alone for SCC from myeloma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data of 238 patients were retrospectively analyzed for response to RT and local control of SCC. In addition, the effect of RT on motor function (improvement, no further progression, deterioration) was evaluated. Overall response was defined as improvement or no further progression of motor dysfunction. Prior to RT, patients were presented to a neurosurgeon for evaluation whether upfront decompressive surgery was indicated (e.g. vertebral fracture or unstable spine). RESULTS: In the entire cohort, the overall response rate was 97% (53% improvement plus 44% no further progression). Following RT, 88% of the patients were able to walk. Of the 69 non-ambulatory patients 44 patients (64%) regained the ability to walk. Local control rates at 1, 2 and 3 years were 93%, 82% and 82%, respectively. A trend towards better local control was observed for patients who were ambulatory before starting RT (p = 0.08) and those with a more favorable performance status (p = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: RT alone provided excellent response rates, functional outcomes and local control in patients with SCC from myeloma. These results should be confirmed in a prospective randomized trial.

A Phase II Trial of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Androgen Deprivation for Oligometastases in Prostate Cancer (SBRT-SG 05).

PURPOSE: SBRT-Spanish Group-05 (ClinicalTrials.gov.Identifier: NCT02192788) is a collaborative (SBRT-SG, Grupo de Investigación Clínica en Oncología Radioterápica, and Sociedad Española de Oncología Radioterápica) prospective multicenter phase II trial testing stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in patients with oligorecurrent prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two cohorts of patients with prostate cancer in an oligorecurrent stage (hormone-sensitive in the principal cohort and castration-resistant in the exploratory cohort) were assigned to receive ADT and SBRT for at least 24 months from the time of the enrollment. Concomitant treatment with chemotherapy, abiraterone, or enzalutamide was not allowed. Oncologic outcomes were assessed in both cohorts. Toxicity was prospectively analyzed. RESULTS: From 2014 to 2019, 81 patients with a total of 126 lesions from 14 centers met the inclusion criteria, 14 of whom were castration-resistant. With a median follow-up of 40 months (12-58 months), 3-year local recurrence-free survival was 92.5% (95% CI, 79.9%-96.3%) and 85.7% (95% CI, 48.2%-95.6%) in the principal and exploratory cohorts, respectively. In the principal cohort, biochemical relapse-free survival and metastasis progression-free survival at 1, 2, and 3 years were 91% (95% CI, 81%-95.8%), 73.7% (95% CI, 61.1%-82.8%), 50.6% (95% CI, 36.2%-63.3%), and 92% (95% CI, 83%-97%), 81% (95% CI, 70%-89%), and 67% (95% CI, 53%-77%), respectively. In the exploratory cohort, metastasis progression-free survival at 1, 2, and 3 years was 64% (95% CI, 34%-83%), 43% (95% CI, 18%-66%), and 26% (95% CI, 7%-51%), respectively. None of the patients developed grade III or higher toxicity or symptoms related to local progression, and only 2 (2.4%) patients developed grade II toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of SBRT and ADT is safe and shows favorable clinical outcomes in patients with hormone-sensitive and castration-resistant prostate cancer. Validation studies are needed in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer.

A New and Easy-to-Use Survival Score for Patients Irradiated for Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression.

PURPOSE: A survival score was created in 2008 to improve treatment personalization of patients irradiated for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC). Since then, targeted therapies improved survival of patients with cancer, which may decrease this score's predictive value. A new score appears necessary. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two hundred sixty-four patients receiving radiation therapy without surgery in prospective trials (2010-2021) were included. A dose-fractionation regimen plus 15 factors were analyzed: age, sex, tumor type, interval tumor diagnosis to MESCC, MESCC sites, affected vertebrae, additional bone lesions, other distant lesions (yes or no), number of organs involved by metastases, time developing motor deficits, ambulatory status, sensory function, sphincter dysfunction, pain, and distress. Six-month survival rates (%) of independent prognostic factors were divided by 10 and summed for each patient. The score was compared with the previous tool for predicting death ≤6 months and survival ≥6 months. RESULTS: In a multivariate analysis, tumor type (P = .001), other distant lesions (P < .001), and ambulatory status (P < .001) were significant. Based on 6-month survival rates, 4 groups (8-9, 10-13, 14-17, and 18 points) were created with 6-month survival rates of 12.8%, 34.7%, 62.8%, and 90.0%, respectively (version A). For version B, "other distant lesions" was replaced by "number of organs involved by metastases." Version B included 4 groups (8-10, 11-14, 15-16, and 17 points) with 6-month survival rates of 11.1%, 42.0%, 68.6%, and 91.7%, respectively. Positive predictive values to predict death ≤6 months were 87.2% (version A) and 88.9% (version B) versus 76.6% (3 groups) and 84.6% (5 groups) for the previous score. Positive predictive values to predict survival ≥6 months were 90.0% and 91.7% versus 59.0% and 64.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Both versions of the new score were more precise than the previous tool. Version B appears slightly superior to version A but requires more extensive diagnostic staging that may not be readily available when emergently treating.

A New Clinical Instrument for Estimating the Ambulatory Status after Irradiation for Malignant Spinal Cord Compression.

Estimating post-treatment ambulatory status can improve treatment personalization of patients irradiated for malignant spinal cord compression (MSCC). A new clinical score was developed from data of 283 patients treated with radiotherapy alone in prospective trials. Radiotherapy regimen, age, gender, tumor type, interval from tumor diagnosis to MSCC, number of affected vertebrae, other bone metastases, visceral metastases, time developing motor deficits, ambulatory status, performance score, sensory deficits, and sphincter dysfunction were evaluated. For factors with prognostic relevance in the multivariable logistic regression model after backward stepwise variable selection, scoring points were calculated (post-radiotherapy ambulatory rate in % divided by 10) and added for each patient. Four factors (primary tumor type, sensory deficits, sphincter dysfunction, ambulatory status) were used for the instrument that includes three prognostic groups (17-21, 22-31, and 32-37 points). Post-radiotherapy ambulatory rates were 10%, 65%, and 97%, respectively, and 2-year local control rates were 100%, 75%, and 88%, respectively. Positive predictive values to predict ambulatory and non-ambulatory status were 97% and 90% using the new score, and 98% and 79% using the previous instrument. The new score appeared more precise in predicting non-ambulatory status. Since patients with 32-37 points had high post-radiotherapy ambulatory and local control rates, they may not require surgery.

Comparison of 5 × 5 Gy and 10 × 3 Gy for metastatic spinal cord compression using data from three prospective trials.

BACKGROUND: In a palliative situation like metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC), overall treatment time of radiotherapy should be as short as possible. This study compared 5 × 5 Gy in 1 week to 10 × 3 Gy in 2 weeks in a prospective cohort. METHODS: Forty patients receiving 5 × 5 Gy in a phase II trial were matched 1:2 to 213 patients receiving 10 × 3 Gy in two previous prospective studies for tumor type, ambulatory status, time developing motor deficits, interval between tumor diagnosis and MSCC and visceral metastases. These factors were consistent in all three patients (triple) used for each 1:2 matching. Groups were compared for local progression-free survival (LPFS), motor function, ambulatory status, and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: After matching, 32 triples remained for analyses (N = 96 in total). Six-month LPFS-rates were 94% after 5 × 5 Gy and 87% after 10 × 3 Gy (p = 0.36), 6-month OS-rates 43% and 35% (p = 0.74). Improvement of motor function was achieved in 59% and 34% of patients (p = 0.028); overall response rates (improvement or no further progression of motor deficits) were 94% and 89% (p = 0.71). Post-treatment ambulatory rates were 81% after 5 × 5 Gy and 85% after 10 × 3 Gy (p = 0.61). Of non-ambulatory patients, 50% (6/12) and 46% (11/24) regained the ability to walk (p = 1.00). CONCLUSIONS: 5 × 5 Gy in 1 week appeared similarly effective as 10 × 3 Gy in 2 weeks. These results may not be applicable to long-term survivors and should be confirmed in a randomized trial directly comparing 5 × 5 Gy and 10 × 3 Gy. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov NCT03070431. Registered 27 February 2017.

Radiotherapy-related skin toxicity (RAREST-02): A randomized trial testing the effect of a mobile application reminding head-and-neck cancer patients to perform skin care (reminder app) on radiation dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy of head-and-neck cancer can be associated with significant toxicities including dermatitis and oral mucositis. Severe toxicities may require interruptions of the radiation treatment associated with impairment of the patients' prognoses. This study will investigate whether the addition of a reminder app to standard care can reduce dermatitis and oral mucositis rates during radiotherapy in these patients. METHODS: This randomized trial compares standard care supported by a reminder app (Arm A) to standard care alone (Arm B) with respect to grade ≥ 2 radiation dermatitis and oral mucositis at 60 Gy of radiotherapy, the minimum planned dose for patients receiving definitive or adjuvant radiotherapy for locally advanced head- and-neck cancer. Moreover, radiation-induced dermatitis and oral mucositis grade ≥ 3 at 60 Gy and both grade ≥ 2 and grade ≥ 3 at the end of radiation treatment (EOT) will be evaluated, as well as quality of life and pain. According to sample size calculations, 80 patients are required per arm within the full analysis set. Taking into account that 5% of patients will not qualify for full analysis set, 168 patients should be randomized. The impact of the reminder app will be considered clinically relevant, if the rates of grade ≥ 2 radiation dermatitis (primary endpoint) and oral mucositis (secondary endpoint) can be reduced by 20%. DISCUSSION: If the addition of a reminder app to standard care will lead to a significant reduction of radiation dermatitis and oral mucositis, it could become a helpful tool for patients with head-and-neck cancer during radiotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04110977). Registered on September 27, 2019. First patient is planned to be included in December 2019.

Precision Radiation Therapy for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression: Final Results of the PRE-MODE Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate precision radiation therapy for metastatic spinal cord compression and compare it to conventional radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In a multicenter phase 2 study, 40 patients received 5 Gy × 5 fractions of precision radiation therapy (38 volume modulated arc therapy, 2 intensity modulated radiation therapy) for metastatic spinal cord compression and were evaluated for local progression-free survival (LPFS), motor function, ambulatory status, sensory function, sphincter dysfunction, pain, distress, overall survival (OS), and toxicity. Maximum spinal cord dose was 101.5% (myelopathy risk, <0.03%) of the prescription dose. Patients were compared with a historical control group conventionally irradiated with 4 Gy × 5 fractions (propensity score analysis). The equivalent dose in 2 Gy-fractions of 5 Gy × 5 fractions is similar to 3 Gy × 10 fractions, which results in better LPFS than 4 Gy × 5 fractions. It was assumed that 5 Gy × 5 fractions is also superior to 4 Gy × 5 fractions for LPFS. (ClinicalTrials.gov-identifier: NCT03070431) RESULTS: Six-month rates of LPFS and OS were 95.0% and 42.6%, respectively. Improvement of motor function occurred in 24 patients (60%). Thirty-three patients (82.5%) were ambulatory after radiation therapy. Eight of 16 patients (50.0%) with sensory deficits improved. Pain and distress relief were reported by 61.9% and 54.2% of patients 1 month after radiation therapy. Grade 3 toxicities occurred in 1 patient and grade 2 toxicities in another 3 patients. Of the control group, 664 patients qualified for the propensity score analysis; 5 Gy × 5 fractions was significantly superior to 4 Gy × 5 fractions with regard to LPFS (P = .026) but not motor function (P = .51) or OS (P = .82). CONCLUSIONS: Precision radiation therapy with 5 Gy × 5 fractions was well tolerated and effective and appeared superior to 4 Gy × 5 fractions in terms of LPFS. The retrospective nature of the historic control group, which might have led to a hidden selection bias, needs to be considered when interpreting the results.

Patient-Reported Outcomes-Secondary Analysis of the SCORE-2 Trial Comparing 4 Gy × 5 to 3 Gy × 10 for Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression.

PURPOSE: To compare 4 Gy × 5 (1 week) to 3 Gy × 10 (2 weeks) in relieving pain and distress in patients with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: The randomized SCORE-2 trial compared 4 Gy × 5 (n = 101) to 3 Gy × 10 (n = 102) for MESCC. In this additional analysis, these regimens were compared for their effect in relieving pain and distress. Distress was evaluated with the distress-thermometer (0 = no distress, 10 = extreme distress) and pain on a linear scale (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain). Relief of distress was defined as decrease of ≥2 points; complete and partial pain relief were defined as achieving a score of 0 points and a decrease ≥2 points, respectively, without increase of analgesic use. This prospective secondary analysis of the SCORE-2 trial aimed to show that 4 Gy × 5 was not inferior to 3 Gy × 10 regarding distress and pain relief. Analyses were performed using the unconditional test of noninferiority for binomial differences based on restricted maximum likelihood estimates (noninferiority margin: -20%). Evaluations were performed before, directly after, and 1, 3, and 6 months after radiation therapy. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02189473). RESULTS: At baseline, median distress scores were 8 (2-10) points in the 4 Gy × 5 group and 8 (2-10) points in the 3 Gy × 10 group. At 1 month, distress relief rates were 58.1% (43/74) and 62.7% (47/75) (difference: -4.6%; 95% confidence interval, -20.0% to +11.1%; P = .025). At baseline, median pain scores were 7 (2-10) and 7 (2-10) points, respectively. At 1 month, complete pain relief rates were 23.5% (16/68) versus 20.0% (14/70) (difference, +3.5%; 95% confidence interval, -10.4% to +17.5%; P < .001), and overall pain relief rates were 52.9% (36/68) versus 57.1% (40/70) (difference, -4.2%; 95% confidence interval, -20.5% to +12.3%; P = .029). Distress and pain relief rates after 4 Gy × 5 were largely comparable to 3 Gy × 10 at all time points. Associated 95% confidence intervals did not point toward any relevant differences. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with MESCC and poor to intermediate survival prognoses, 4 Gy × 5 appeared noninferior to 3 Gy × 10 regarding pain and distress relief.

A scoring system to predict local progression-free survival in patients irradiated with 20 Gy in 5 fractions for malignant spinal cord compression.

BACKGROUND: Local progression-free survival (LPFS = stable or improved motor function/resolution of paraplegia during RT without in-field recurrence following RT) is important when treating metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC). An instrument to estimate LPFS was created to identify patients appropriately treated with short-course RT instead of longer-course RT plus/minus decompressive surgery. METHODS: In 686 patients treated with 20 Gy in 5 fractions alone, ten characteristics were retrospectively analyzed for LPFS including age, interval between tumor diagnosis and RT of MSCC, visceral metastases, other bone metastases, primary tumor type, gender, time developing motor deficits, pre-RT gait function, number of vertebrae affected by MSCC, and performance score. Characteristics significantly (p < 0.05) associated with LPFS on multivariate analyses were incorporated in the scoring system. Six-month LPFS rates for significant characteristics were divided by 10, and corresponding points were added. RESULTS: On multivariate analyses, visceral metastases (p < 0.001), tumor type (p = 0.009), time developing motor deficits (p < 0.001) and performance score (p = 0.009) were associated with LPFS and used for the scoring system. Scores for patients ranged between 24 and 35 points. Three groups were designed: 24-28 (A), 29-31 (B) and 32-35 (C) points. Six-month LPFS rates were 46, 69 and 92%, 12-month LPFS rates 46, 63 and 83%. Median survival times were 2 months (61% died within 2 months), 4 months and ≥ 11 months (median not reached). CONCLUSIONS: Most group A patients appeared sub-optimally treated with 20 Gy in 5 fractions. Patients with survival prognoses ≤2 months may be considered for best supportive care or single-fraction RT, those with prognoses ≥3 months for longer-course RT plus/minus upfront decompressive surgery. Many group B and most group C patients achieved long-time LPFS and appeared sufficiently treated with 20 Gy in 5 fractions. However, based on previous data, long-term survivors may benefit from longer-course RT.

Comparison of Two Radiotherapy Regimens for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression: Subgroup Analyses from a Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND/AIM: According to our randomized trial, 5×4Gy was comparable to 10×3Gy for metastatic spinal cord compression. Since it remained unclear whether findings applied to poor and intermediate prognoses patients, subgroup analyses were performed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In patients with poor prognoses, 58 received 5×4Gy, 53 received 10×3Gy. In intermediate-prognoses patients, numbers were 43 and 49. RESULTS: In patients with poor prognoses, 1-month overall response (OR) was 85% after 5×4Gy and 10×3Gy (p=0.99), improvement 38% vs. 42%, ambulatory status 60% vs. 64% (p=0.83), 6-month local progression-free survival (LPFS) 75% vs. 69% (p=0.74) and 6-month overall survival (OS) 26% vs. 19% (p=0.43). In patients with intermediate prognoses, 1-month OR was 89% after 5×4Gy and 93% after 10×3Gy (p=0.85), improvement 39% vs. 45%, ambulatory status 84% vs. 82% (p=0.90), 6-month LPFS 79% vs. 92% (p=0.17) and 6-months OS 65% vs. 58% (p=0.65). CONCLUSION: 5×4Gy was not significantly inferior to 10x3Gy in both subgroups.

1x8 Gy versus 5x4 Gy for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression: a matched-pair study of three prognostic patient subgroups.

BACKGROUND: This study provides separate comparisons of 1 × 8 Gy to 5 × 4 Gy for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) in patients with poor, intermediate and favorable survival prognoses. METHODS: Patients receiving 1 × 8 Gy were matched to patients receiving 5 × 4 Gy for age, gender, performance status, tumor type, involved vertebrae, other bone metastases, visceral metastases, interval between tumor diagnosis and MESCC, ambulatory status and time developing motor deficits. From a study including patients with poor (N = 156) or intermediate (N = 86) survival prognoses, subgroup analyses were performed. Furthermore, 232 new patients with favorable prognoses matched the same way were included. RESULTS: In poor prognoses patients, 6-month survival rates were 10% after 1 × 8 Gy and 6% after 5 × 4 Gy (p = 0.38); in-field reRT rates in few patients alive at 6 months were 15 and 2% (p = 0.16). In intermediate prognoses patients, 6-month survival rates were 49% after 1 × 8 Gy and 58% after 5 × 4 Gy (p = 0.30). ReRT rates at 6 months were 23 and 13% (p = 0.25). In favorable prognoses patients, 6-month survival rates were 89% after 1 × 8 Gy and 91% after 5 × 4 Gy. ReRT rates at 6 months were 14 and 3% (p = 0.007). In no subgroup, RT regimen had a significant impact on motor function. CONCLUSIONS: Since in patients with poor prognoses, outcomes after 1 × 8 Gy and 5 × 4 Gy were not significantly different, 1 × 8 Gy may be an option. In patients with intermediate prognoses, a trend was found in favor of 5 × 4 Gy. In patients with favorable prognoses, need for in-field reRT was greater after 1 × 8 Gy.

Results of a multicenter study investigating the potential impact of the overall treatment time on outcomes of radiation therapy alone with 5×4 Gy for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: A 5×4 Gy program is commonly used for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC). It is unclear whether an overall treatment time (OTT) of 5 days (5 consecutive fractions) results in better outcomes than an OTT of 7 days (ie, no irradiation during the weekend). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 111 patients who received 5×4 Gy over 5 consecutive days were retrospectively compared with 277 patients treated with 5×4 Gy over 7 days (no irradiation during the weekend) for effect on motor function, local control of MESCC, and overall survival (OS). Ten further characteristics were evaluated: age, gender, interval tumor diagnosis to MESCC, visceral metastases, other bone metastases, primary tumor type, time developing motor deficits, walking ability, vertebrae involved, and performance status. RESULTS: On multivariate analysis regarding post-radiation therapy motor function, primary tumor type (P = .011) and time developing motor weakness (P < .001) were significant, whereas the OTT did not even achieve significance on univariate analysis (P = .99). On multivariate analysis of local control, visceral metastases (P = .006) were significant. Again, the OTT was not even significant on univariate analysis (P = .81). On multivariate analysis of OS, interval tumor diagnosis to MESCC (P = .015), visceral metastases (P .001), tumor type (P = .003), walking ability (P < .001), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score (P < .001) achieved significance. Even on univariate analysis, OTT did not have an effect on OS (P = .79). CONCLUSIONS: Longer OTT did not impair outcomes of irradiation with 5×4 Gy for MESCC; thus, no compensation (for example an additional radiation fraction) is necessary if the radiation treatment is not continued during the weekend.

A Prognostic Instrument to Estimate the Survival of Elderly Patients Irradiated for Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression From Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Elderly patients with lung cancer need personalized treatment in palliative situations such as metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC). It is crucial to know a patient's survival prognosis to be able to provide optimal and individualized care. Therefore, a prognostic instrument enabling physicians to estimate a patient's survival time is required. We created such an instrument in the present study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The data from 201 elderly patients with lung cancer irradiated for MESCC were retrospectively evaluated. The radiation regimen used plus 10 factors were analyzed for associations with survival, including age, gender, histologic features, performance status, interval from lung cancer diagnosis until irradiation of MESCC, interval to developing motor weakness before irradiation, number of affected vertebrae, visceral metastases, other bone metastases, and the ability to walk before irradiation. The factors significant on multivariate analysis were included in the predictive instrument. The factor scores were obtained by dividing the 6-month survival rate by 10, and the patient scores were determined from the sum of the factor scores. RESULTS: Performance status (P = .003), interval to developing motor weakness (P = .006), visceral metastases (P < .001), and the ability to walk (P = .002) were associated with survival. Taking into account the 6-month survival rates of these factors, the patient scores ranged from 5 to 19 points. Thus, 4 groups were designated: those with 5 to 10 points (n = 95), 11 to 13 points (n = 46), 14 to 16 points (n = 33), and 18 to 19 points (n = 27). The corresponding 6-month survival rates were 4%, 26%, 58%, and 81% (P < .001). The corresponding median survival times were 2, 4, 7, and 10 months. CONCLUSION: This new instrument will enable physicians to predict the survival prognosis of elderly patients with lung cancer-related MESCC, facilitating individualized treatment care.

Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Subtype Is Associated with a Favorable Survival Prognosis in Patients Irradiated for Spinal Cord Compression from Myeloma.

AIM: This study was performed to investigate the prognostic impact of the myeloma subtype on the survival prognosis of patients with spinal cord compression (SCC) from myeloma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 238 patients irradiated for SCC from myeloma, the myeloma subtype and 10 additional characteristics were evaluated for survival. These characteristics were fractionation of radiotherapy, age, time from myeloma diagnosis to SCC, presence of extra-osseous lesions, additional osseous lesions, gender, time to developing motor weakness, ability to walk, number of vertebrae affected by SCC and performance status. RESULTS: Immunoglobulin G subtype was associated with significantly better survival than other subtypes both at 1 year (80% vs. 50%) and at 2 years (56% vs. 30%) following radiotherapy of SCC (p<0.001). In the subsequent Cox regression analysis, myeloma subtype maintained significance (risk ratio=2.44; 95% confidence interval=1.56-3.85; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: This study identified myeloma subtype as being an independent prognostic factor of survival in patients with SCC from myeloma.

Estimating the Survival of Elderly Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma Presenting with Malignant Spinal Cord Compression.

AIM: To develop a tool for predicting survival of elderly patients with malignant spinal cord compression (MSCC) from renal cell carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 71 elderly patients, 10 factors were analyzed. Predictive scores were generated based on 6-month survival rates. RESULTS: Longer interval from renal cell carcinoma diagnosis to MSCC (p=0.019), lack of visceral metastases (p<0.001), slower progression of motor deficits (p<0.001), ambulation (p<0.001) and better performance status (p=0.002) were positive predictors. On multivariate analysis, interval from renal cell carcinoma diagnosis to MSCC (p=0.022), visceral metastases (p<0.001), time to developing motor dysfunction (p=0.041), gait function (p=0.002) and performance status (p=0.017) remained significant. Predictive scores were 17 to 36 points. Four groups were created: 17-23, 24-26, 27-29 and 30-36 points. Six-month survival rates were 8%, 30%, 69% and 100%, respectively (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: This tool improves estimation of survival and personalized treatment options in elderly patients with MSCC from renal cell carcinoma.

Radiation Therapy Alone Provides Excellent Outcomes for Spinal Cord Compression from Vertebral Lymphoma.

AIM: Malignant spinal cord compression (SCC) is treated with radiotherapy (RT). Additional neurosurgery has become more widely used since a trial showed a benefit for selected patients. Although lymphomas were excluded from that trial, neurosurgery is also increasingly being performed in these patients. This study investigated whether neurosurgery is actually required for this group. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients receiving RT alone for SCC from vertebral lymphoma were analyzed for motor function, walking ability, in-field recurrence and survival. RESULTS: Overall response was 100% (72% improvement, 28% stable). At 1, 6 and 12 months after RT, 83%, 100% and 100% of patients were able to walk; 64%, 100%, and 100% of non-ambulatory patients regained their walking ability. Freedom from in-field recurrence was 100% at 6 and 12 months. Survival rates at 6 and 12 months were 79% and 75%. CONCLUSION: RT alone resulted in excellent outcomes for SCC from lymphoma. These patients may not require surgery.

Radiotherapy With 4 Gy × 5 Versus 3 Gy × 10 for Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression: Final Results of the SCORE-2 Trial (ARO 2009/01).

PURPOSE: To compare short-course radiotherapy (RT) (4 Gy × 5) to longer-course RT (3 Gy × 10) for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two-hundred three patients with MESCC and poor to intermediate expected survival were randomly assigned to 4 Gy × 5 in 1 week (n = 101) or 3 Gy × 10 in 2 weeks (n = 102). Patients were stratified according to ambulatory status, time developing motor deficits, and primary tumor type. Seventy-eight and 77 patients, respectively, were evaluable for the primary end point, 1-month overall response regarding motor function defined as improvement or no further progression of motor deficits. Other study end points included ambulatory status, local progression-free survival, and overall survival. End points were evaluated immediately after RT and at 1, 3, and 6 months thereafter. RESULTS: At 1 month, overall response rates regarding motor function were 87.2% after 4 Gy × 5 and 89.6% after 3 Gy × 10 (P = .73). Improvement rates were 38.5% and 44.2%, respectively, no further progression rates 48.7% and 45.5%, respectively, and deterioration rates 12.8% and 10.4%, respectively (P = .44). Ambulatory rates at 1 month were 71.8% and 74.0%, respectively (P = .86). At other times after RT, the results were also not significantly different. Six-month local progression-free survival was 75.2% after 4 Gy × 5 and 81.8% after 3 Gy × 10 (P = .51); 6-month overall survival was 42.3% and 37.8% (P = .68). CONCLUSION: Short-course RT with 4 Gy × 5 was not significantly inferior to 3 Gy × 10 in patients with MESCC and poor to intermediate expected survival.

Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression: A Survival Score Particularly Developed for Elderly Prostate Cancer Patients.

AIM: Metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) is an oncological emergency. Many elderly patients cannot tolerate intensive treatment and need individual approaches accounting for a patient's remaining lifetime. The goal of the present study was to develop a survival score for elderly prostate cancer patients with MSCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nine characteristics were analyzed in 243 patients: age, performance status, interval from prostate cancer diagnosis until MSCC, affected vertebrae, ambulatory status, further bone lesions, visceral metastases, time developing motor deficits, fractionation schedule. RESULTS: Pre-radiotherapy ambulatory status (p<0.001), visceral metastases (p<0.001) and time developing motor deficits (p<0.001) were significant for survival on Cox regression analysis and included in the survival score. Four groups were defined: 9-12, 13-16, 17-19 and 21-23 points. Six-month survival rates were 7%, 28%, 71% and 95%, respectively (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The present study identified four groups with different survival probabilities that require treatment strategies with different priorities ranging from symptom control to prolongation of life.