Cost of care using prophylactic negative pressure wound vacuum on closed laparotomy incisions.

OBJECTIVE: We wished to determine the reduction in the rate of wound complications that would render the use of prophylactic negative pressure wound vacuum therapy (NPWT) cost saving compared to routine incision care (RC) following laparotomy for gynecologic malignancy. METHODS: A decision tree was designed from a payer perspective to compare strategies for incision management following laparotomy for gynecologic malignancy: (1) RC; (2) prophylactic NPWT. Rates of wound complication, antibiotic use, re-hospitalization, re-operation, and home health use were obtained from a published cohort of 431 women who underwent laparotomy for endometrial cancer 2002-2007. Costs were estimated using Medicare reimbursements; cost of NPWT ($200) was obtained from hospital financial department. A 50% reduction in wound complications using NPWT was assigned initially and varied for sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: The mean BMI was 36. The wound complication rate was 31% (37% for BMI>30, 41% for BMI>40). The overall cost of incision care was $104 lower for NPWT than for RC. At the lowest cost of NPWT ($200), the risk of wound complication must be reduced by 33% (relative risk=0.67) for NPWT to achieve cost savings in this cohort. Modeling obese and morbidly obese cohorts, the NPWT resulted in overall cost savings of $163 and $203, respectively, and the risk of wound complication must be reduced by 28% and 25%, respectively, for NPWT to achieve cost savings. CONCLUSION: If the wound complication rate can be reduced by one-third, prophylactic NPWT is potentially cost saving in high-risk women undergoing laparotomy for gynecologic malignancy.

Retrospective review of an intraoperative algorithm to predict lymph node metastasis in low-grade endometrial adenocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To validate the Mayo algorithm to intraoperatively identify women with endometrial cancer in whom lymphadenectomy may be safely omitted. METHODS: A multi-center retrospective chart review 1977-2010 was completed using two independent institutional endometrial cancer databases. Eligibility criteria were grade 1 or 2 endometrial carcinoma, low-risk histology, and myometrial invasion ≤ 50% on intraoperative pathology consultation; patients were considered to satisfy the Mayo criteria if, in addition to these, tumor diameter on the final pathology report was ≤ 2 cm. Analysis of nodal metastases, recurrent disease, and progression-free survival (PFS) using the Kaplan-Meier method was performed. RESULTS: Six hundred and two patients met inclusion criteria for the study. Of 110 patients satisfying the Mayo algorithm with an adequate lymphadenectomy, 2 (1.8%) were diagnosed with lymph node metastasis and 4 (3.6%) subsequently developed recurrent disease. The Mayo algorithm identified with a 98.2% negative predictive value women who would not benefit from a lymphadenectomy. There was no significant difference in recurrence rate or PFS between women who underwent lymphadenectomy and those who did not when the Mayo algorithm was satisfied. CONCLUSIONS: The Mayo algorithm intraoperatively identifies tumor characteristics of low-risk disease in endometrial carcinoma that predict a very low likelihood of nodal metastasis and recurrence. Although a small number of patients with advanced stage disease may be missed when applying the Mayo criteria, there is no apparent survival benefit to lymphadenectomy for patients satisfying this algorithm, and these data support its use at other institutions.