Analysis of chromatin structure of genes silenced by heterochromatin in trans.

While heterochromatic gene silencing in cis is often accompanied by nucleosomal compaction, characteristic histone modifications, and recruitment of heterochromatin proteins, little is known concerning genes silenced by heterochromatin in trans. An insertion of heterochromatic satellite DNA in the euchromatic brown (bw) gene of Drosophila melanogaster results in bwDominant (bwD), which can inactivate loci on the homolog by relocation near the centric heterochromatin (trans-inactivation). Nucleosomal compaction was found to accompany trans-inactivation, but stereotypical heterochromatic histone modifications were mostly absent on silenced reporter genes. HP1 was enriched on trans-inactivated reporter constructs and this enrichment was more pronounced on adult chromatin than on larval chromatin. Interestingly, this HP1 enrichment in trans was unaccompanied by an increase in the 2MeH3K9 mark, which is generally thought to be the docking site for HP1 in heterochromatin. However, a substantial increase in the 2MeH3K9 mark was found on or near the bwD satellite insertion in cis, but did not spread further. These observations suggest that the interaction of HP1 with chromatin in cis is fundamentally different from that in trans. Our molecular data agree well with the differential phenotypic effect on bwD trans-inactivation of various genes known to be involved in histone modification and cis gene silencing.

Interplay of developmentally regulated gene expression and heterochromatic silencing in trans in Drosophila.

The brown(Dominant) (bw(D)) allele of Drosophila contains a heterochromatic block that causes the locus to interact with centric heterochromatin. This association silences bw(+) in heterozygotes (trans-inactivation) and is dependent on nuclear organizational changes later in development, suggesting that trans-inactivation may not be possible until later in development. To study this, a P element containing an upstream activating sequence (UAS)-GFP reporter was inserted 5 kb from the bw(D) insertion site. Seven different GAL4 driver lines were used and GFP fluorescence was compared in the presence or the absence of bw(D). We measured silencing in different tissues and stages of development and found variable silencing of GFP expression driven by the same driver. When UAS-GFP was not expressed until differentiation in the eye imaginal disc it was more easily trans-inactivated than when it was expressed earlier in undifferentiated cells. In contrast to some studies by other workers on silencing in cis, we did not find consistent correlation of silencing with level of expression or evidence of relaxation of silencing with terminal differentiation. We suggest that such contrasting results may be attributed to a potentially different role played by nuclear organization in cis and trans position-effect variegation.

Sequence elements in cis influence heterochromatic silencing in trans.

The brown(Dominant) (bw(D)) allele contains a large insertion of heterochromatin, which causes the locus to aberrantly associate with heterochromatin in interphase nuclei and silences the wild-type allele in heterozygotes. Transgenes placed near the bw(+) locus, in trans to bw(D), can also be silenced. The strength of silencing (called trans inactivation) varies with the regulatory sequences of the transgene and its distance away from the bw(D) insertion site in trans. In this study, we examine endogenous sequences in cis that influence susceptibility of a reporter gene to trans inactivation. Flanking deletions were induced in two parental lines containing P-element transgenes showing trans inactivation of the mini-white reporter. These new lines, which have mini-white under the influence of different endogenous sequence elements, now show varied ability to be silenced by bw(D). Determination of the deleted regions and the levels of mini-white expression and trans inactivation has allowed us to explore the correlation between cis sequence elements and susceptibility to trans inactivation and to identify a 301-bp sequence that acts as an enhancer of trans inactivation. Intriguingly, this region encompasses the upstream regions of two divergently transcribed genes and contains a sequence motif that may bind BEAF, a protein involved in delimiting chromatin boundaries.

Heterochromatic self-association, a determinant of nuclear organization, does not require sequence homology in Drosophila.

Chromosomes of higher eukaryotes contain blocks of heterochromatin that can associate with each other in the interphase nucleus. A well-studied example of heterochromatic interaction is the brown(Dominant) (bwD) chromosome of D. melanogaster, which contains an approximately 1.6-Mbp insertion of AAGAG repeats near the distal tip of chromosome 2. This insertion causes association of the tip with the centric heterochromatin of chromosome 2 (2h), which contains megabases of AAGAG repeats. Here we describe an example, other than bwD, in which distally translocated heterochromatin associates with centric heterochromatin. Additionally, we show that when a translocation places bwD on a different chromosome, bwD tends to associate with the centric heterochromatin of this chromosome, even when the chromosome contains a small fraction of the sequence homology present elsewhere. To further test the importance of sequence homology in these interactions, we used interspecific mating to introgress the bwD allele from D. melanogaster into D. simulans, which lacks the AAGAG on the autosomes. We find that D. simulans bwD associates with 2h, which lacks the AAGAG sequence, while it does not associate with the AAGAG containing X chromosome heterochromatin. Our results show that intranuclear association of separate heterochromatic blocks does not require that they contain the same sequence.

Differential gene silencing by trans-heterochromatin in Drosophila melanogaster.

The brown(Dominant) (bw(D)) allele contains a large insertion of heterochromatin leading to the trans-inactivation of the wild-type allele in bw(D)/bw(+) heterozygous flies. This silencing is correlated with the localization of bw(+) to a region of the interphase nucleus containing centric heterochromatin. We have used a series of transgene constructs inserted in the vicinity of the bw locus to demarcate both the extent of bw(D) influence along the chromosome and the relative sensitivities of various genes. Examples of regulatory regions that are highly sensitive, moderately sensitive, and insensitive were found. Additionally, by using the same transgene at increasing distances from the bw(D) insertion site in trans we were able to determine the range of influence of the heterochromatic neighborhood in terms of chromosomal distance. When the transgene was farther away from bw, there was, indeed, a tendency for it to be less trans-inactivated. However, insertion site also influenced silencing: a gene 86 kb away was trans-inactivated, while the same transgene 45 kb away was not. Thus location, distance, and gene-specific differences all influence susceptibility to trans-silencing near a heterochromatic neighborhood. These results have important implications for the ability of nuclear positioning to influence the expression of large blocks of a chromosome.

Dynamics and anchoring of heterochromatic loci during development.

Positioning a euchromatic gene near heterochromatin can influence its expression. To better understand expression-relevant changes in locus positioning, we monitored in vivo movement of centromeres and a euchromatic locus (with and without a nearby insertion of heterochromatin) in developing Drosophila tissue. In most undifferentiated nuclei, the rate of diffusion and step size of the locus is unaffected by the heterochromatic insertion. Interestingly, although the movement observed here is non directional, the heterochromatic insertion allows the flanking euchromatic region to enter and move within the heterochromatic compartment. This study also finds that a constraint on chromatin movement is imposed which is a factor of distance from the centric heterochromatic compartment. This restraint prevents the heterochromatic locus from moving away from the centric heterochromatin compartment. Therefore, because of the constraint, even distinct and non-random nuclear organizations can be attained from random chromatin movements. We also find a general constraint on chromatin movement is imposed during differentiation, which stabilizes changes in nuclear organization in differentiated nuclei.

Changing chromatin dynamics and nuclear organization during differentiation in Drosophila larval tissue.

Global changes in gene expression and exit from the cell cycle underlie differentiation. Therefore, understanding chromatin behavior in differentiating nuclei and late G1 is key to understanding this developmental event. A nuclear event that has been shown to specifically occur in late G1 is the association of two heterochromatic blocks in Drosophila. The brown(Dominant) (bw(D)) chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster contains a large block of heterochromatin near the end of 2R. This distal block associates with centric heterochromatin (2Rh), but not until at least 5 hours into G1. We used the bw(D) allele as a model for nuclear organization to determine whether its association with the heterochromatic compartment of the second chromosomes (2Rh) strictly requires differentiation or if this change is a stochastic event, its occurrence being proportional to time spent in G1/G0 phase of the cell cycle. Fluorescence in situ hybridization on eye imaginal discs showed increased association between the bw locus and 2Rh in differentiated cells. Interestingly, an increase in the number of nuclei showing bw(D)-2Rh association in the brains of developmentally delayed larvae that were compromised for differentiation was also observed. Live fluorescence imaging showed that the kinetics of chromatin movement remains unchanged in the developmentally arrested nuclei. These observations suggest that nuclear reorganization is not directly controlled by specific inductive signals during differentiation and that this nuclear reorganization can happen in a cell, regardless of differentiation state, that is arrested in the appropriate cell cycle stage. However, we did see changes that appear to be more directly correlated with differentiation. Dynamic imaging in eye imaginal discs showed that the movement of chromatin is more constrained in differentiated cells, implying that confinement of loci to a smaller nuclear space may help to maintain the changed organization and the transcription profile that accompanies differentiation.