Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
2.
Middle East J Anaesthesiol ; 20(4): 565-70, 2010 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20394255

RESUMO

In a prospective randomized double-blind study, we compared the effectiveness of dexamethasone 8 mg with either granisetron 1 mg or ondansetron 4 mg in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Hundred ASA I and II patients scheduled for laparoscopic surgery were enrolled in the study and 84 patients completed it. Following induction of anesthesia, group I (n=42) received granisetron 1 mg and dexamethasone 8 mg, group II (n=42) received ondansetron 4 mg and dexamethasone 8 mg. Nausea and vomiting episodes, pain scores as well as side effects were recorded during the first hour and subsequently during the first 6 and 24 hours postoperatively. Satisfaction scores were obtained at discharge. There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups during the 1st 24 hours following surgery in regards to pain scores, satisfaction and side effects manifestations. At 0-1 hour interval, 100% of patients in group I and 97.6% in group II had no vomiting. Total response (no moderate or severe nausea and no rescue antiemetics) was 83.3% in group I and 80.95% in group II, and metoclopramide was used in 7.1% of patients in both groups. At 1-6 hours interval, 97.6% of patients in group I and 100% in group II had no vomiting. Total response was 92.8% in group I and 90.9% in group II, and metoclopramide was used in 4.76% of patients in group I and 2.38% in group II. At 6-24 hours no vomiting occurred in 97.6% of patients in group I and 100% in group II. Total response was 95.2% in both groups, and metoclopramide was used in 2.38% of patients in both groups. In conclusion, the combination of dexamethasone 8 mg with either granisetron 1 mg or ondansetron 4 mg following induction of anesthesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery showed no statistically significant difference in antiemetic efficacy with minimal side effects and excellent patient satisfaction.


Assuntos
Antieméticos/uso terapêutico , Dexametasona/uso terapêutico , Laparoscopia/métodos , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Antieméticos/efeitos adversos , Dexametasona/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Granisetron/efeitos adversos , Granisetron/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Metoclopramida/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ondansetron/efeitos adversos , Ondansetron/uso terapêutico , Satisfação do Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Avicenna J Med ; 9(2): 75-77, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31143700

RESUMO

Kyphoplasty is a minimally invasive procedure intended to stabilize the fractured bone and restore bone height. It involves percutaneous introduction of an inflatable bone tamp into a fractured vertebral body, followed by injection of bone cement into the ballooned pocket. Anesthetic options typically considered for this procedure include intravenous sedation or general anesthesia. These patients are often elderly, frail, in significant pain, and may poorly tolerate sedation or general anesthesia in the prone position. Spinal anesthesia has been suggested as an alternative method. However, it has major limitations. We would like to report a case of a 79-year-old patient with multiple comorbidities, who presented for kyphoplasty, where epidural anesthesia was conducted and successfully provided adequate analgesia as well as optimal surgical conditions.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa