Phase I/II trial of pemetrexed plus nab-paclitaxel in advanced solid tumor patients with emphasis on non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in targeted therapies, there is an ongoing need to develop new and effective cytotoxic drug combinations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Based on preclinical demonstration of additive cytotoxicity, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of combining pemetrexed and nanoparticle albumin bound (nab) paclitaxel with a focus on NSCLC for phase II expansion. METHODS: A 3 + 3 dose-escalation design was used to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Three dose levels were tested: pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) day 1 and nab-paclitaxel day 1 at 180, 220, & 260 mg/m(2) every 21 days. Phase II eligibility included advanced NSCLC, ≤2 line prior therapy, PS 0-1, adequate organ function. Primary endpoint for further study was response rate (RR) ≥ 25%. RESULTS: Planned dose escalation was completed without reaching the MTD. The RP2D was pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) and nab-paclitaxel 260 mg/m(2). The phase II portion accrued 37 pts before early closure due to increasing first-line pemetrexed/platinum doublet use in non-squamous NSCLC. In 31 assessable phase II patients there were 5 partial responses, 12 stable disease, 14 progressive disease. The median overall survival was 8.8 months; progressive disease 4.4 months and disease control 15.6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) day 1 with nab-paclitaxel 260 mg/m(2) was feasible and well tolerated. The phase II component demonstrated activity in second/third-line therapy of advanced NSCLC; response rate 14% and disease control rate 46%. Treatment practice patterns of advanced NSCLC have evolved; further trials of this regimen are not planned.

Co-clinical Modeling of the Activity of the BET Inhibitor Mivebresib (ABBV-075) in AML.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The therapeutic potential of bromodomain and extra-terminal motif (BET) inhibitors in hematological cancers has been well established in preclinical and early-stage clinical trials, although as of yet, no BETtargeting agent has achieved approval. To add insight into potential response to mivebresib (ABBV-075), a broadspectrum BET inhibitor, co-clinical modeling of individual patient biopsies was conducted in the context of a Phase I trial in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Co-clinical modeling involves taking the patient's biopsy and implanting it in mice with limited passage so that it closely retains the original characteristics of the malignancy and allows comparisons of response between animal model and clinical data. Procedures were developed, initially with neonate NOD/Shi-scid-IL2rγnull (NOG) mice and then optimized with juvenile NOG-EXL as host mice, eventually resulting in a robust rate of engraftment (16 out of 26, 62%). RESULTS: Results from the co-clinical AML patient-derived xenograft (PDX) modeling (6 with >60% inhibition of bone marrow blasts) were consistent with the equivalent clinical data from patients receiving mivebresib in monotherapy, and in combination with venetoclax. The modeling system also demonstrated the activity of a novel BD2-selective BET inhibitor (ABBV-744) in the preclinical AML setting. Both agents were also highly effective in inhibiting blast counts in the spleen (10/10 and 5/6 models, respectively). CONCLUSION: These findings confirm the validity of the model system in the co-clinical setting, establish highly relevant in vivo models for the discovery of cancer therapy, and indicate the therapeutic value of BET inhibitors for AML and, potentially, myelofibrosis treatment.

Escalating weekly doses of cetuximab and correlation with skin toxicity: a phase I study.

BACKGROUND: Cetuximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). The recommended dosage is an initial load of 400 mg/m² intravenously (IV) followed by a weekly maintenance dose of 250 mg/m². It has been reported retrospectively that cetuximab efficacy was correlated with dose-related severity of skin rash. This study was prospectively designed to examine the safety and feasibility of escalating weekly doses of cetuximab, testing the hypothesis of the relationship of dose-dependent skin toxicity and efficacy. Methods Four dose levels were tested: Cetuximab 400 mg/m² IV loading dose and 250, 300, 350, 400 mg/m² weekly IV maintenance. There was no intra-patient dose escalation. Standard dose limiting toxicity criteria were used. Rash was evaluated using two additional validated dermatology methods: global acne grading scale (GAGS) and acne lesion counting (ALC). Tumor specimens and blood samples were obtained for correlative analyses. RESULTS: Twenty seven patients with solid tumors were enrolled: five head and neck, three pancreas, four gall bladder, two each of prostate, breast, colorectal, lung, and esophagus, and five others. Planned dose escalation was completed without reaching dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) or the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). The highest dose level was expanded to a total of 17 patients. Gr 3/4 toxicities included: lymphopenia (2), fatigue (2), and hypomagnesemia (2). One patient experienced a grade 3 rash (350 mg/m²). Sixty five percent of pts had a ≥ Gr 2 rash that was not dose dependent. In 22 evaluable patients, there was one partial response (PR) in a patient with cholangiocarcinoma (400 mg/m²) and seven patients had stable disease (SD). ALC and GAGS demonstrated no correlation with dose or response. Correlative studies evaluating k-ras, EGFR FISH status and immunologic correlatives were conducted on available tumor samples. CONCLUSIONS: Cetuximab administered at 400 mg/m² IV as a loading dose with weekly maintenance dose of 400 mg/m² is feasible and well tolerated. There was no direct correlation of the grade of rash with dose in this group of patients with heterogenous solid tumors.

Preclinical rationale for entinostat in embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common soft tissue sarcoma in the pediatric cancer population. Survival among metastatic RMS patients has remained dismal yet unimproved for years. We previously identified the class I-specific histone deacetylase inhibitor, entinostat (ENT), as a pharmacological agent that transcriptionally suppresses the PAX3:FOXO1 tumor-initiating fusion gene found in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (aRMS), and we further investigated the mechanism by which ENT suppresses PAX3:FOXO1 oncogene and demonstrated the preclinical efficacy of ENT in RMS orthotopic allograft and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. In this study, we investigated whether ENT also has antitumor activity in fusion-negative eRMS orthotopic allografts and PDX models either as a single agent or in combination with vincristine (VCR). METHODS: We tested the efficacy of ENT and VCR as single agents and in combination in orthotopic allograft and PDX mouse models of eRMS. We then performed CRISPR screening to identify which HDAC among the class I HDACs is responsible for tumor growth inhibition in eRMS. To analyze whether ENT treatment as a single agent or in combination with VCR induces myogenic differentiation, we performed hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining in tumors. RESULTS: ENT in combination with the chemotherapy VCR has synergistic antitumor activity in a subset of fusion-negative eRMS in orthotopic "allografts," although PDX mouse models were too hypersensitive to the VCR dose used to detect synergy. Mechanistic studies involving CRISPR suggest that HDAC3 inhibition is the primary mechanism of cell-autonomous cytoreduction in eRMS. Following cytoreduction in vivo, residual tumor cells in the allograft models treated with chemotherapy undergo a dramatic, entinostat-induced (70-100%) conversion to non-proliferative rhabdomyoblasts. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the targeting class I HDACs may provide a therapeutic benefit for selected patients with eRMS. ENT's preclinical in vivo efficacy makes ENT a rational drug candidate in a phase II clinical trial for eRMS.

Early clinical trial experience with vaccine therapies in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Cancer immunotherapy has made great progress because of advances in immunology and molecular biology. Increased understanding of mechanisms by which lung cancer cells escape the immune system and recognition of key tumor antigens and immune system components involved in tumor ignorance have led to the development of a variety of lung cancer vaccines. Immunotherapy has advanced from using nonspecific immunomodulatory agents to lung cancer-specific tumor antigens and tumor cell-derived vaccines. While understanding of immune processes and malignancy has improved, there is great opportunity for further research of vaccine therapies in non-small-cell lung cancer. Herein, we review the development and evolution of early lung cancer vaccine trials.

Incorporating bortezomib into the treatment of lung cancer.

Bortezomib, a small-molecule proteasome inhibitor, has activity in lung cancer both as a single agent and in combination with agents commonly used in lung cancer. The ability of bortezomib to favorably modulate the expression of apoptosis-associated proteins, along with its moderate toxicity as a single agent, provides the basis for its combination with cytotoxic agents in the treatment of lung cancer. In non-small cell lung cancer, bortezomib as a single agent has limited activity but in combination with chemotherapy has shown encouraging activity without significantly adding to toxicity. Bortezomib as a single agent has shown minimal activity in small cell lung cancer. Although the role of bortezomib in lung cancer is uncertain, it is likely to have its greatest clinical benefit when given in combination with other therapeutics. Ongoing studies are focused on optimizing the scheduling of bortezomib with chemotherapy, investigating its combination with targeted agents and radiation, and examining its efficacy in a specific subgroup, bronchioloalveolar carcinoma.

Novel agents in the treatment of lung cancer: Fourth Cambridge Conference.

The Fourth Cambridge Conference on Novel Agents in the Treatment of Lung Cancer was held in Cambridge, Massachusetts on September 29 to 30, 2006, to discuss ongoing clinical research of novel targeted agents for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer, along with supportive basic and translational research into the molecular pathways implicated in cancer growth and resistance. New information, conclusions, and recommendations considered significant for the field by the program faculty are summarized below and presented at greater length in the individual articles and accompanying discussions that comprise the full conference proceedings.

Efficacy and safety of single-agent pertuzumab, a human epidermal receptor dimerization inhibitor, in patients with non small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Pertuzumab, a first-in-class human epidermal receptor 2 (HER2) dimerization inhibitor, is a humanized monoclonal anti-HER2 antibody that binds HER2's dimerization domain and inhibits HER2 signaling. Based on supporting preclinical studies, we undertook a Phase II trial of pertuzumab in patients with recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with previously treated NSCLC accessible for core biopsy and naive to HER pathway inhibitors were treated with pertuzumab i.v. once every 3 weeks. Tumor assessments were done at 6 and 12 weeks and then every 3 months thereafter. The primary efficacy end point was overall response rate by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Measurement of tumor glucose metabolism (SUVmax) by F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography was used as an exploratory pharmacodynamic marker of drug activity. RESULTS: Of 43 patients treated with pertuzumab, no responses were seen; 18 of 43 (41.9%) and 9 of 43 (20.9%) patients had stable disease at 6 and 12 weeks, respectively. The median and 3-month progression-free survival rates (PFS) were 6.1 weeks (95% confidence interval, 5.3-11.3 weeks) and 28.4% (95% confidence interval, 14.4-44.2%), respectively. Of 22 patients who underwent F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, six (27.3%) had a metabolic response to pertuzumab as evidenced by decreased SUV max. These patients had prolonged PFS (HR = 0.11, log-rank P value = 0.018) compared with the 16 patients who had no metabolic response. Four patients (9.3%) experienced a grade 3/grade 4 adverse event judged related to pertuzumab; none exhibited grade 3/grade 4 cardiac toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Pertuzumab is well tolerated as monotherapy. Pharmacodynamic activity correlated with prolonged PFS was detected in a moderate percentage of patients (27.3%). Further clinical development of pertuzumab should focus on rational combinations of pertuzumab with other drugs active in NSCLC.

The HDAC3-SMARCA4-miR-27a axis promotes expression of the PAX3:FOXO1 fusion oncogene in rhabdomyosarcoma.

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common soft tissue sarcoma of childhood with an unmet clinical need for decades. A single oncogenic fusion gene is associated with treatment resistance and a 40 to 45% decrease in overall survival. We previously showed that expression of this PAX3:FOXO1 fusion oncogene in alveolar RMS (aRMS) mediates tolerance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy and that the class I-specific histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor entinostat reduces PAX3:FOXO1 protein abundance. Here, we established the antitumor efficacy of entinostat with chemotherapy in various preclinical cell and mouse models and found that HDAC3 inhibition was the primary mechanism of entinostat-induced suppression of PAX3:FOXO1 abundance. HDAC3 inhibition by entinostat decreased the activity of the chromatin remodeling enzyme SMARCA4, which, in turn, derepressed the microRNA miR-27a. This reexpression of miR-27a led to PAX3:FOXO1 mRNA destabilization and chemotherapy sensitization in aRMS cells in culture and in vivo. Furthermore, a phase 1 clinical trial (ADVL1513) has shown that entinostat is tolerable in children with relapsed or refractory solid tumors and is planned for phase 1B cohort expansion or phase 2 clinical trials. Together, these results implicate an HDAC3-SMARCA4-miR-27a-PAX3:FOXO1 circuit as a driver of chemoresistant aRMS and suggest that targeting this pathway with entinostat may be therapeutically effective in patients.

Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors plus chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer: biologic rationale for combination strategies.

Chemotherapy continues to play an essential role in the treatment of most stages of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In fact, within the past 5 years, this role has greatly expanded into adjuvant therapy for early-stage resected disease. Likewise, agents targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), particularly the tyrosine kinase inhibitors gefitinib and erlotinib, have proven to be clinically active in patients with advanced-stage NSCLC. Because of these findings, it is logical to expect that combinations of these 2 classes of antineoplastic agents would prove more efficacious than either one alone. Yet 4 large randomized phase III trials of chemotherapy with or without an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor in unselected patients with advanced-stage NSCLC, altogether totaling > 4000 patients, did not demonstrate improvement in clinical outcomes with the combination. Whether these negative results will be reproduced in ongoing combination studies of chemotherapy plus monoclonal antibodies directed against EGFR remain to be determined. Herein, we review recent preclinical and clinical data addressing this topic and explore the biologic rationale for developing new combination strategies based on patient selection by molecular and clinical factors, or by pharmacodynamic parameters.

Schedule-dependent apoptosis in K-ras mutant non-small-cell lung cancer cell lines treated with docetaxel and erlotinib: rationale for pharmacodynamic separation.

BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) given concurrently with chemotherapy in 4 large randomized clinical trials did not improve patient outcomes compared with chemotherapy alone in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We hypothesized that the lack of benefit resulted from a negative interaction between chemotherapy and EGFR TKIs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Herein, we report the cell cycle and apoptotic effects of treatment with erlotinib and docetaxel in the NSCLC cell lines A549 and Calu-1, both of which are mutant for K-ras and wild-type for EGFR. RESULTS: Treatment with erlotinib resulted in accumulation of cells in G(1) phase in A549 cells, with no evidence of apoptosis. Docetaxel treatment led to apoptosis as assessed by increased sub-G1 DNA content and cleavage of caspase 3 and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase. The sequence of docetaxel followed by erlotinib resulted in significantly enhanced apoptosis compared with single-agent docetaxel in both cell lines. However, in the reverse sequence of erlotinib followed by docetaxel, a reduction of apoptosis was observed. We hypothesize that cell cycle arrest induced by erlotinib accounts for these findings in the presence of wild-type EGFR and that pharmacodynamic separation of the 2 drug classes will ameliorate these effects. CONCLUSION: These studies provide a rationale for intermittent dosing of EGFR TKIs with chemotherapy in order to enhance cytotoxicity.

Second-line treatment for advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: current and future options.

Non-small-cell lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in men and women. Because of its frequent presentation as advanced disease, most non-small-cell lung cancers are treated with palliative systemic therapy. Multiple trials have established the benefit of chemotherapy for palliation and disease control. Of the patients treated with first-line therapy, approximately 30%-40% will subsequently be candidates for second-line treatment. In the past year, pemetrexed and erlotinib have joined docetaxel as the only Food and Drug Administration-approved second-line therapies. Recent phase III trials have also evaluated the use of oral topotecan, polyglutamated paclitaxel, and gefitinib in this setting. In addition, multiple novel agents, including bortezomib, cetuximab, and bevacizumab, are being investigated as single agents or in combination with approved second-line therapies. With the increasing number of therapeutic options for this patient population, patient characteristics and side effect profiles are influencing the therapeutic choices made by physicians. The use of molecular markers to assist in therapeutic decision-making has yet to come to fruition. Research efforts continue to focus on identifying molecular markers and corresponding clinical features that will allow physicians to individualize patients' therapy.

Pharmacodynamic separation of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors and chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) given concurrently with chemotherapy do not improve patient outcomes compared with chemotherapy alone in advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). One potential explanation for this lack of benefit is a negative interaction or antagonism between chemotherapy and EGFR TKIs when delivered concomitantly. Support for this line of reasoning is provided by preclinical data demonstrating that EGFR TKIs induce primarily a cytostatic effect resulting from a G1 cell cycle arrest in cell lines with wild-type EGFR, reducing cell cycle phase-dependent activity of chemotherapy, whereas they induce apoptotic cell death in tumors with EGFR-activating mutations. Because the great majority of NSCLC tumors consist of wild-type EGFR, sequence-specific interactions of EGFR TKI/chemotherapy combinations might negatively influence the efficacy of these regimens in patients with NSCLC. Further evidence is provided by EGFR mutational analysis in patient tumor specimens from the TRIBUTE study. Herein we provide the preclinical and clinical rationale for studies examining the concept of pharmacodynamic separation as a means for overcoming hypothesized antagonism of EGFR TKIs and chemotherapy.

Aurora kinase inhibitors: a new class of targeted drugs in cancer.

Aurora kinases (A, B, and C) are essential for spindle assembly, centrosome maturation, chromosomal segregation, and cytokinesis. Aurora kinases A and B are overexpressed in many cancers, including non-small-cell lung cancer and mesothelioma. Small-molecule inhibitors selective for aurora kinases have shown promising activity in preclinical tumor models. To date, phase I studies with aurora kinase inhibitors have shown that myelosuppression is the dose-limiting toxicity, and disease stabilization was achieved in a number of tumor types, including non-small-cell lung cancer. Phase II trials are under way in selected tumor types. This article reviews the biology of aurora kinases, their potential role in the treatment of lung cancer, and challenges in the clinical development of this unique class of antineoplastic agents.

Reduction in BCL-2 levels by 26S proteasome inhibition with bortezomib is associated with induction of apoptosis in small cell lung cancer.

Overexpression of the anti-apoptotic protein BCL-2 is frequently observed in small cell lung cancers (SCLC) and is associated with chemoresistance. We examined the signaling pathways involved in upregulation of BCL-2 in SCLC, and whether inhibition of NF-kappaB using the 26S proteasome inhibitor bortezomib had any effect on BCL-2 levels or apoptosis. Mutation of a NF-kappaB site in the BCL-2 promoter reduced promoter activity to less than 20% of the wild-type promoter. Treatment with bortezomib resulted in decreased transcription of the BCL-2 promoter, decreased BCL-2 levels, and induced apoptosis. These data provide the necessary laboratory background for further investigation of bortezomib in the treatment of SCLC.

Bortezomib-based combinations in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer.

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related death among men and women in the United States. Current trials are focusing on the integration of novel therapeutic agents into current non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment paradigms. Bortezomib, a small-molecule proteasome inhibitor, has single-agent activity in NSCLC and in combination with agents commonly used in NSCLC. This article will review the rationale and preclinical data supporting bortezomib combinations and the clinical trials with bortezomib alone and in combination in NSCLC to date.

Proteasome inhibition in small-cell lung cancer: preclinical rationale and clinical applications.

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a tobacco-related malignancy that usually presents in an extensive and therefore incurable stage. Although initially sensitive to platinum agent-based therapy, SCLC rapidly becomes refractory to chemotherapy, leading to disease recurrence and ultimately patient death. Treatment options following failure of first-line platinum agent-based therapy are limited. Small-cell lung cancer is characterized by molecular aberrancies such as overexpression of the antiapoptotic protein Bcl-2, which is regulated in part by the inhibitory IkappaB, a target of the ubiquitin-proteasome degradative pathway. Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor that can decrease Bcl-2 expression through diminished IkappaB degradation. Efforts to promote apoptosis in SCLC through the integration of bortezomib into therapy are under way.

Bronchioloalveolar carcinoma: a model for investigating the biology of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition.

Bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC) is a previously uncommon subset of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with unique epidemiology, pathology, clinical features, radiographic presentation, and natural history compared with other NSCLC subtypes. Recent data suggest that the incidence of BAC is increasing, notably in younger nonsmoking women. Despite reports of prolonged survival after repeated surgical resection of multifocal lesions and slow growth kinetics, advanced bilateral or recurrent diffuse BAC remains incurable, with the vast majority of patients dying of respiratory failure or intercurrent pneumonia within 5 years. Limited data suggest that chemotherapy may yield poor results in BAC. However, anecdotal reports of prolonged complete response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), a member of the human epidermal growth factor receptor (erbB) family, have raised considerable interest in studying this NSCLC subset. Here we present clinical data and preliminary results of correlative science studies analyzing human epidermal growth factor receptor pathways from the following two prospective Southwest Oncology Group clinical trials performed in advanced stage BAC: S9714 testing a 96-h continuous infusion of paclitaxel (Taxol) and S0126 evaluating the small molecule EGFR inhibitor gefitinib (ZD1839 or Iressa). These studies provide a biological rationale for investigating BAC as a model of predictive markers of EGFR inhibition.

Proteasome inhibition with PS-341 (bortezomib) in lung cancer therapy.

PS-341 (bortezomib) represents a new class of therapeutics that targets the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. It has broad-spectrum single-agent anticancer activity and can potentiate chemotherapy and radiation in preclinical models. Early phase clinical studies have shown tolerability and activity in multiple myeloma, lymphoma, prostate cancer, and lung cancers. By its mechanism of inhibiting protein degradation, PS-341 targets a wide range of pathways relevant to tumor progression and therapy resistance and can directly modulate expression of cyclins, p27(Kip1), p53, nuclear factor-kappaB, Bcl-2, and Bax. PS-341 is currently in phase I/II clinical development in both non-small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer. This article will review the preclinical and clinical experience with PS-341 as it relates to lung cancer.

Integration of the proteasome inhibitor PS-341 (Velcade) into the therapeutic approach to lung cancer.

PS-341, a potent and selective proteasome inhibitor, is the prototype for a new class of therapeutics that targets the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. It is active as a single agent and potentiates chemotherapy and radiation in pre-clinical models. Early phase clinical studies have demonstrated tolerability and activity in multiple myeloma, lymphoma, prostate cancer and lung cancer. By its mechanism of inhibiting protein degradation, PS-341 targets a wide-range of pathways that are relevant to tumor progression and therapy resistance, and can directly modulate expression of cyclins, p27(Kip1), p53, NF-kappaB, Bcl-2 and Bax. PS-341 is currently in phase I/II clinical development in lung cancer. This paper will review the pre-clinical and clinical experience with PS-341 as it relates to lung cancer.