Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: CT Quantification of Airway Dimensions, Numbers of Airways to Measure, and Effect of Bronchodilation.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of bronchodilation on airway indexes reflecting airway disease in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and to determine the minimum number of segmental and subsegmental airways required. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was approved by the local ethical committee, and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects. Twenty patients with COPD who had undergone pre- and postbronchodilator pulmonary function tests and computed tomographic (CT) examinations were prospectively included. Eight healthy volunteers underwent two CT examinations. Luminal area and wall thickness (WT) of third- and fourth-generation airways were measured twice by three readers. The percentage of total airway area occupied by the wall and the square root of wall area at an internal perimeter of 10 mm (√WAPi10) were calculated. The effects of pathologic status, session, reader, bronchodilation, and CT examination were assessed by using mixed linear model analyses. The number of airways to measure for a definite percentage error of √WAPi10 was computed by using a bootstrap method. RESULTS: There were no significant session, reader, or bronchodilation effects on WT in third-generation airways and √WAPi10 in patients with COPD (P values ranging from .187 to >.999). WT in third-generation airways and √WAPi10 were significantly different in patients with COPD and control subjects (P = .018 and <.001, respectively). Measuring 12 third- or fourth-generation airways ensured a maximal 10% error of √WAPi10. CONCLUSION: WT in third-generation airways and √WAPi10 are not significantly different before and after bronchodilation and are different in patients with COPD and control subjects. Twelve is the minimum number of third- or fourth-generation airways required to ensure a maximal 10% error of √WAPi10. (©) RSNA, 2015 Clinical trial registration no. NCT01142531 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Variability of CT Airways Measurements in COPD Patients Between Morning and Afternoon: Comparisons to Variability of Spirometric Measurements.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Computed tomography (CT) airways measurements can be used as surrogates to spirometric measurements for assessing bronchodilation in a particular patient with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Although spirometric measurements show variations within the opening hours of a hospital department, we aimed to compare the variability of CT airways measurements between morning and afternoon in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease to that of spirometric measurements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients had pulmonary function tests and CT around 8 am and 4 pm. Luminal area (LA) and wall thickness (WT) of third and fourth generation airways were measured twice by three readers. The percentage of airway area occupied by the wall (WA%) and the square root of wall area at an internal perimeter of 10 mm (√WAPi10) were calculated. The effects of examination time, reader, and measurement session on CT airways measurements were assessed, and the variability of these measurements was compared to that of spirometric measurements. RESULTS: Variability of LA3rd and LA4th was greater than that of spirometric measurements (P values ranging from <.001 to .033). There was no examination time effect on √WAPi10, WT3rd, LA4th, or WA%4th (P values ranging from .102 to .712). There was a reader effect on all CT airways measurements (P values ranging from <.001 to .028), except in WT3rd (P> .999). There was no effect of measurement session on any CT airway measurement (P values ranging from .535 to >.999). CONCLUSION: As the variability of LA3rd and LA4th is greater than that of spirometric measurements, clinical studies should include cohorts with larger numbers of patients when considering LA than when considering spirometric measurements as end points.

Asthma control measurement using five different questionnaires: a prospective study.

UNLABELLED: Questionnaires play a key place in the assessment of asthma control. Different questionnaires have been developed. However, it remains largely unknown whether they can be used interchangeably. We wondered whether the panel of frequently used scores would give similar measurement of asthma control. The present study aimed to assess the agreement between five specific questionnaires. METHODS: In this prospective study, ninety-nine patients completed five commonly used asthma control scores: the GINA, the Asthma Control Test™, the Royal College of Physician score, the Asthma Therapy Assessment Questionnaire (ATAQ), and the Asthma Control Questionnaire(©) (ACQ). The kappa coefficient was used to assess the agreement between questionnaires. RESULTS: The agreement between the GINA and other scores was only moderate (kappa coefficients amounted from 0.41 to 0.60). With respect to the "controlled" level, all the other scores gave higher results than GINA. All other scores also tended to underestimate GINA "uncontrolled level". For the "partly controlled level" defined by 3 of the 5 questionnaires, ACQ identified the same percentage of patients than GINA while ATAQ overestimated this percentage. CONCLUSION: This study shows only moderate agreement between five commonly used asthma control scores. The GINA score showed the lowest percentage of controlled and the highest percentage of uncontrolled asthma. As a consequence, all these scores do not seem to evaluate the same symptoms. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01350661.