R-DHA-oxaliplatin (R-DHAOx) versus R-DHA-cisplatin (R-DHAP) regimen in B-cell lymphoma treatment: A eight-year trajectory study.

BACKGROUND: The R-DHAP regimen (rituximab, cisplatin, dexamethasone, and high-dose cytarabine) is standardly used to treat relapsed Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Despite scarce data, cisplatin is frequently substituted with oxaliplatin (R-DHAOx) to avoid nephrotoxicity. We compared nephrotoxicity of cisplatin and oxaliplatin based on creatinine-based trajectory modeling. METHODS: All patients with NHL treated by R-DHAP or R-DHAOx in Angers hospital between January 01, 2007, and December 31, 2014, were included. Patients received cisplatin 100 mg/m2 or oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 (d1) with cytarabine (2000 mg/m2 , two doses, d2), dexamethasone (40 mg, d1-4), and rituximab (375 mg/m2 , d1). Creatinine levels were recorded before each cycle. Individual profiles of trajectories were clustered to detect homogeneous patterns of evolution. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients received R-DHAP, 35 R-DHAOx, 6 switched from R-DHAP to R-DHAOx due to nephrotoxicity. Characteristics of patients were similar between two groups. Patients receiving R-DHAP experienced more severe renal injury than patients receiving R-DHAOx (68% vs. 7.7%, P < .001). Two homogeneous clusters appeared: cluster A, with a majority of R-DHAOx (32, 91.4%), was less nephrotoxic than B, with a majority of R-DHAP (19, 86.4%), with a decreased average serum creatinine level (P < .0001). There were no other differences between clusters. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms that R-DHAOx regimen causes less nephrotoxicity than R-DHAP regimen.

Nutritional assessment of critically ill patients: validation of the modified NUTRIC score.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: In order to identify critically ill patients with high nutritional risk the modified NUTrition Risk in the Critically ill (mNUTRIC)-score was developed. This score aims to identify patients that will benefit from nutritional interventions. Few data are available on its validity. In The Netherlands, the MUST-score, a nutritional assessment tool for non-ICU patients, is commonly used in the ICU. To validate the mNUTRIC-score in Dutch ICU patients and compare its prognostic performance with the MUST-score. SUBJECTS/METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort study among 475 mechanically ventilated patients. Prognostic performance of the mNUTRIC and MUST-scores were assessed and compared for discriminative abilities for 28-day mortality and prolonged mechanical ventilation (>2 days). RESULTS: The discriminative ability of the mNUTRIC-score for 28-day mortality is (ROC-AUC) 0.768 (95% CI 0.722-0.814) with an associated LR+ of 1.73 (95% CI 1.53-1.95) and LR- of 0.24 (95% CI 0.14-0.39) when comparing low with high (>4) scores. Comparing low with high MUST-scores (>1) a ROC-AUC of 0.513 (95% CI 0.445-0.587) and LR+ of 1.05 (95%CI 0.77-1.45) and LR- of 0.97 (95% CI 0.71-1.17) for mortality were found. The discriminative ability for prolonged ventilation was 0.666 (95% CI 0.616-0.716) and 0.532 (95% CI 0.469-0.594) for the mNUTRIC and MUST-scores, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The prognostic performance of the mNUTRIC-score for 28-day mortality is fair and comparable to other validation studies. The association with prolonged ventilation was not confirmed by our results. The mNUTRIC-score has better performance than the commonly used MUST-score. Therefore, we suggest abandoning use of the MUST-score and to recommend introduction of the mNUTRIC-score for the nutritional risk assessment of critically ill patients.

[Thrombus in a patent foramen ovale]. / Een trombus in een persisterend foramen ovale.

BACKGROUND: A "thrombus in transit" is a relatively rare diagnosis involving a thrombus in a patent foramen ovale. Patent foramen ovale occurs in about 25% of the population. A thrombus in transit may lead to paradoxical arterial emboli in the cerebral circulatory system and the extremities, as well as other locations. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 60-year-old male patient with severe pneumonia sepsis appeared to have a thrombus in the right atrium, extending into the left atrium through a patent foramen ovale. The patient was treated with therapeutic anticoagulants. Cerebral embolization occurred despite this, with extensive cerebral ischaemia. The patient ultimately died from multiple organ failure. CONCLUSION: A thrombus in transit may be treated with heparins, thrombolysis or by surgical removal of the thrombus. The optimum treatment must be decided for each individual patient. The mortality rate of this condition is high (16-36%).