RESUMO
Two studies evaluated the validity of the interpersonal scales, Dominance (DOM) and Warmth (WRM), from the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI; Morey, 1991, 2007) to measure the 2 dimensions of the interpersonal circumplex (IPC). In Study 1, 114 college freshmen completed the PAI and the Interpersonal Adjectives Scale (IAS; Wiggins, 1995). In Study 2, 170 college students completed the PAI and the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems-Short Circumplex (IIP-SC; Soldz, Budman, Demby, & Merry, 1995). The results of both studies supported the convergent validity of DOM and WRM, although discriminant validity was stronger using the IIP-SC as the criterion. Circumplex projections placed DOM and WRM in the appropriate segments of both the IAS and IIP-SC. These findings provide additional support for the validity of the PAI interpersonal scales as measures of the primary dimensions of the IPC.
Assuntos
Dominação-Subordinação , Relações Interpessoais , Determinação da Personalidade/normas , Inventário de Personalidade/normas , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Transtornos da Personalidade/diagnóstico , Transtornos da Personalidade/psicologia , Psicometria , Estudantes , Universidades , Adulto JovemRESUMO
The Inventory of Interpersonal Problems-Circumplex (IIP-C; Alden, Wiggins, & Pincus, 1990) is a commonly used measure, and the Short Circumplex Version (IIP-SC; Soldz, Budman, Demby, & Merry, 1995) provides a potentially valuable and economical method for personality assessment researchers. However, despite the common use of the IIP-C with college students, the psychometric characteristics of the IIP-SC have not been established in a college student sample. This study provides reliability, structural validity, concurrent validity, and descriptive data for the IIP-SC in two samples of undergraduate students.