Molecular matched targeted therapies for primary brain tumors-a single center retrospective analysis.

PURPOSE: Molecular diagnostics including next generation gene sequencing are increasingly used to determine options for individualized therapies in brain tumor patients. We aimed to evaluate the decision-making process of molecular targeted therapies and analyze data on tolerability as well as signals for efficacy. METHODS: Via retrospective analysis, we identified primary brain tumor patients who were treated off-label with a targeted therapy at the University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University. We analyzed which types of molecular alterations were utilized to guide molecular off-label therapies and the diagnostic procedures for their assessment during the period from 2008 to 2021. Data on tolerability and outcomes were collected. RESULTS: 413 off-label therapies were identified with an increasing annual number for the interval after 2016. 37 interventions (9%) were targeted therapies based on molecular markers. Glioma and meningioma were the most frequent entities treated with molecular matched targeted therapies. Rare entities comprised e.g. medulloblastoma and papillary craniopharyngeoma. Molecular targeted approaches included checkpoint inhibitors, inhibitors of mTOR, FGFR, ALK, MET, ROS1, PIK3CA, CDK4/6, BRAF/MEK and PARP. Responses in the first follow-up MRI were partial response (13.5%), stable disease (29.7%) and progressive disease (46.0%). There were no new safety signals. Adverse events with fatal outcome (CTCAE grade 5) were not observed. Only, two patients discontinued treatment due to side effects. Median progression-free and overall survival were 9.1/18 months in patients with at least stable disease, and 1.8/3.6 months in those with progressive disease at the first follow-up MRI. CONCLUSION: A broad range of actionable alterations was targeted with available molecular therapeutics. However, efficacy was largely observed in entities with paradigmatic oncogenic drivers, in particular with BRAF mutations. Further research on biomarker-informed molecular matched therapies is urgently necessary.

[Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer]. / Das metastasierte kastrationsresistente Prostatakarzinom.

Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is considered as the final stage of the disease with limited therapeutic options to date. In this article, we review recent histopathologic and molecular pathologic findings that may expand our understanding of the disease and may lay, or have already laid the groundwork for the development of novel and individualized therapies. These include the detection of pathogenic mutations in the DNA repair genes BRCA1/2, androgen receptor splice variant 7 (AR-V7), deletion of the tumor suppressor gene PTEN, and evidence of neuroendocrine prostate cancer (t-NEPC) arising under antiandrogenic therapy. The theoretical and diagnostic basis behind the increasing relevance of pathology for therapeutic guidance in this stage of disease are presented.

Development, testing and validation of a targeted NGS-panel for the detection of actionable mutations in lung cancer (NSCLC) using anchored multiplex PCR technology in a multicentric setting.

Lung cancer is a paradigm for a genetically driven tumor. A variety of drugs were developed targeting specific biomarkers requiring testing for tumor genetic alterations in relevant biomarkers. Different next-generation sequencing technologies are available for library generation: 1) anchored multiplex-, 2) amplicon based- and 3) hybrid capture-based-PCR. Anchored multiplex PCR-based sequencing was investigated for routine molecular testing within the national Network Genomic Medicine Lung Cancer (nNGM). Four centers applied the anchored multiplex ArcherDX-Variantplex nNGMv2 panel to re-analyze samples pre-tested during routine diagnostics. Data analyses were performed by each center and compiled centrally according to study design. Pre-defined standards were utilized, and panel sensitivity was determined by dilution experiments. nNGMv2 panel sequencing was successful in 98.9% of the samples (N = 90). With default filter settings, all but two potential MET exon 14 skipping variants were identified at similar allele frequencies. Both MET variants were found with an adapted calling filter. Three additional variants (KEAP1, STK11, TP53) were called that were not identified in pre-testing analyses. Only total DNA amount but not a qPCR-based DNA quality score correlated with average coverage. Analysis was successful with a DNA input as low as 6.25 ng. Anchored multiplex PCR-based sequencing (nNGMv2) and a sophisticated user-friendly Archer-Analysis pipeline is a robust and specific technology to detect tumor genetic mutations for precision medicine of lung cancer patients.

Indirect comparison of capmatinib treatment from GEOMETRY mono-1 trial to SOC in German patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC harboring METex14 skipping mutations.

BACKGROUND: This study provides comparative evidence of the selective MET inhibitor capmatinib versus standard of care (SOC) in first-line (1 L) and second-line (2 L) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with METex14 mutations in German routine care. METHODS: SOC data were collected from German routine care via retrospective chart review. Analyses were conducted as naive and propensity score adjusted (PSA) comparisons to capmatinib-treated patients within the GEOMETRY mono-1 trial. Effectiveness endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), time to CNS progression (CNSprog), and exploratory safety endpoints. RESULTS: The SOC arm included 119 patients in 1 L and 46 in 2 L versus 60 patients in 1 L and 81 in 2 L treated with capmatinib, with balanced baseline characteristics after PSA. In 1 L, the naive comparison showed a significant benefit of capmatinib versus SOC for OS (median: 25.49 vs 14.59 months; HR 0.58; 95 % CI 0.39-0.87; P = 0.011), PFS (median: 12.45 vs 5.03 months; HR: 0.44; 95 % CI: 0.31-0.63; P < 0.001), and ORR (event rate: 68.3 vs 26.9 %; RR 2.54; 95 % CI 1.80-3.58; P < 0.001). In 2 L, OS, PFS, and ORR showed positive trends favoring capmatinib over SOC. Capmatinib treatment in the 1 L and 2 L led to significant benefit in CNSprog. PSA analyses showed consistent results to naive analysis. Exploratory safety endpoints indicated a manageable safety profile for capmatinib. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates the important role of capmatinib in providing robust clinically meaningful benefit to patients with NSCLC harboring METex14 mutations and its significant role in preventing the development of brain metastases.

NTRK fusion events and targeted treatment of advanced radioiodine refractory thyroid cancer.

PURPOSE: Pathogenic fusion events involving neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase (NTRK) have been described in ~ 2% of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). The selective tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitors entrectinib and larotrectinib have been approved in a tumor agnostic manner based on phase 1/2 clinical trials. In a real-world setting at five referral centers, we aimed to describe the prevalence of NTRK gene fusions and the efficacy and safety of TRK inhibitor treatment for non-medullary, advanced thyroid cancer (TC). METHODS: A total of 184 TC patients with testing for NTRK gene fusions were included. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method in six patients with NTRK fusion-positive TC who underwent TRK inhibitor therapy. RESULTS: 8/184 (4%) patients harbored NTRK gene fusions. Six patients with radioiodine (RAI)-refractory TC harboring NTRK1 (n = 4) and NTRK3 (n = 2) gene fusions were treated with larotrectinib. Five patients (83%) had received ≥ 1 prior systemic therapy and one patient did not receive prior systemic therapy. All patients had morphologically progressive disease before treatment initiation. Objective response rate was 83%, including two complete remissions. Median PFS from start of TRK inhibitor treatment was 23 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 0-57.4) and median OS was not reached (NR) (95% CI, NR). Adverse events were of grade 1-3. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of NTRK gene fusions in our cohort of RAI-refractory TC is slightly higher than reported for all TC patients. Larotrectinib is an effective treatment option in the majority of NTRK gene fusion-positive advanced TC patients after prior systemic treatment and has a favorable safety profile.

Multicenter Evaluation of the Idylla GeneFusion in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Targeted therapy in lung cancer requires the assessment of multiple oncogenic driver alterations, including fusion genes. This retrospective study evaluated the Idylla GeneFusion prototype, an automated and ease-of-use (<2 minutes) test, with a short turnaround time (3 hours) to detect fusions involving ALK, ROS1, RET, and NTRK1/2/3 genes and MET exon 14 skipping. This multicenter study (18 centers) included 313 tissue samples from lung cancer patients with 97 ALK, 44 ROS1, 20 RET, and 5 NTRKs fusions, 32 MET exon 14 skipping, and 115 wild-type samples, previously identified with reference methods (RNA-based next-generation sequencing/fluorescence in situ hybridization/quantitative PCR). Valid results were obtained for 306 cases (98%), overall concordance between Idylla and the reference methods was 89% (273/306); overall sensitivity and specificity were 85% (165/193) and 96% (108/113), respectively. Discordances were observed in 28 samples, where Idylla did not detect the alteration identified by the reference methods; and 5 samples where Idylla identified an alteration not detected by the reference methods. All of the ALK-, ROS1-, and RET-specific fusions and MET exon 14 skipping identified by Idylla GeneFusion were confirmed by reference method. To conclude, Idylla GeneFusion is a clinically valuable test that does not require a specific infrastructure, allowing a rapid result. The absence of alteration or the detection of expression imbalance only requires additional testing by orthogonal methods.