Comprehensive assessment of nine target prediction web services: which should we choose for target fishing?

Identification of potential targets for known bioactive compounds and novel synthetic analogs is of considerable significance. In silico target fishing (TF) has become an alternative strategy because of the expensive and laborious wet-lab experiments, explosive growth of bioactivity data and rapid development of high-throughput technologies. However, these TF methods are based on different algorithms, molecular representations and training datasets, which may lead to different results when predicting the same query molecules. This can be confusing for practitioners in practical applications. Therefore, this study systematically evaluated nine popular ligand-based TF methods based on target and ligand-target pair statistical strategies, which will help practitioners make choices among multiple TF methods. The evaluation results showed that SwissTargetPrediction was the best method to produce the most reliable predictions while enriching more targets. High-recall similarity ensemble approach (SEA) was able to find real targets for more compounds compared with other TF methods. Therefore, SwissTargetPrediction and SEA can be considered as primary selection methods in future studies. In addition, the results showed that k = 5 was the optimal number of experimental candidate targets. Finally, a novel ensemble TF method based on consensus voting is proposed to improve the prediction performance. The precision of the ensemble TF method outperforms the individual TF method, indicating that the ensemble TF method can more effectively identify real targets within a given top-k threshold. The results of this study can be used as a reference to guide practitioners in selecting the most effective methods in computational drug discovery.

Reducing false positive rate of docking-based virtual screening by active learning.

Machine learning-based scoring functions (MLSFs) have become a very favorable alternative to classical scoring functions because of their potential superior screening performance. However, the information of negative data used to construct MLSFs was rarely reported in the literature, and meanwhile the putative inactive molecules recorded in existing databases usually have obvious bias from active molecules. Here we proposed an easy-to-use method named AMLSF that combines active learning using negative molecular selection strategies with MLSF, which can iteratively improve the quality of inactive sets and thus reduce the false positive rate of virtual screening. We chose energy auxiliary terms learning as the MLSF and validated our method on eight targets in the diverse subset of DUD-E. For each target, we screened the IterBioScreen database by AMLSF and compared the screening results with those of the four control models. The results illustrate that the number of active molecules in the top 1000 molecules identified by AMLSF was significantly higher than those identified by the control models. In addition, the free energy calculation results for the top 10 molecules screened out by the AMLSF, null model and control models based on DUD-E also proved that more active molecules can be identified, and the false positive rate can be reduced by AMLSF.

Improved GNNs for Log D7.4 Prediction by Transferring Knowledge from Low-Fidelity Data.

The n-octanol/buffer solution distribution coefficient at pH = 7.4 (log D7.4) is an indicator of lipophilicity, and it influences a wide variety of absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET) properties and druggability of compounds. In log D7.4 prediction, graph neural networks (GNNs) can uncover subtle structure-property relationships (SPRs) by automatically extracting features from molecular graphs that facilitate the learning of SPRs, but their performances are often limited by the small size of available datasets. Herein, we present a transfer learning strategy called pretraining on computational data and then fine-tuning on experimental data (PCFE) to fully exploit the predictive potential of GNNs. PCFE works by pretraining a GNN model on 1.71 million computational log D data (low-fidelity data) and then fine-tuning it on 19,155 experimental log D7.4 data (high-fidelity data). The experiments for three GNN architectures (graph convolutional network (GCN), graph attention network (GAT), and Attentive FP) demonstrated the effectiveness of PCFE in improving GNNs for log D7.4 predictions. Moreover, the optimal PCFE-trained GNN model (cx-Attentive FP, Rtest2 = 0.909) outperformed four excellent descriptor-based models (random forest (RF), gradient boosting (GB), support vector machine (SVM), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost)). The robustness of the cx-Attentive FP model was also confirmed by evaluating the models with different training data sizes and dataset splitting strategies. Therefore, we developed a webserver and defined the applicability domain for this model. The webserver (http://tools.scbdd.com/chemlogd/) provides free log D7.4 prediction services. In addition, the important descriptors for log D7.4 were detected by the Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) method, and the most relevant substructures of log D7.4 were identified by the attention mechanism. Finally, the matched molecular pair analysis (MMPA) was performed to summarize the contributions of common chemical substituents to log D7.4, including a variety of hydrocarbon groups, halogen groups, heteroatoms, and polar groups. In conclusion, we believe that the cx-Attentive FP model can serve as a reliable tool to predict log D7.4 and hope that pretraining on low-fidelity data can help GNNs make accurate predictions of other endpoints in drug discovery.