Statins in pre-eclampsia or fetal growth restriction: A systematic review and meta-analysis on maternal blood pressure and fetal growth across species.

BACKGROUND: Several human randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are investigating the effects of statins on pre-eclampsia (PE) and fetal growth restriction (FGR). This cross-species meta-analysis summarises the preclinical evidence of statin use for PE and FGR. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the effects of statins on maternal blood pressure (MBP) and birthweight (BW) in pregnancies complicated by PE or FGR. SEARCH STRATEGY: PubMed and Embase.com were searched on 10 May 2022 using 'statins' and 'pregnancy'. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included RCTs and cohorts with matched control groups as well as animal studies. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The main outcomes were MBP in mmHg and BW in grams. The standardised mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated. Subgroup analyses on species, statin, dose, timing and route of administration were performed if subgroups included at least three studies. MAIN RESULTS: Our data included one human and 12 animal studies. Prenatal administration of statins significantly reduced MBP during pregnancy (SMD  -2.49 mmHg [95% CI -4.26 to -0.71], p = 0.01). There was no significant effect of statins on BW (SMD 0.69 [95% CI -0.65 to 2.03], p = 0.28). Our subgroup analyses showed no effect on MBP of different doses, species or route of administration. CONCLUSIONS: Our cross-species meta-analyses demonstrate that statins only reduce maternal blood pressure in rodent pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia or fetal growth restriction and have no effect on birthweight across species. The broad confidence intervals, inconsistent direction of the observed effects across the studies and large risk of bias lead us to conclude that a solid base for further human RCTs is lacking.

Telemonitoring for COVID-19 positive pregnant women; feasibility and user experience of SAFE@home Corona: prospective pilot study.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has catalysed digital innovations enabling remote healthcare. Pregnant women are at increased risk for severe course of COVID-19 infection. Also, the pandemic has a negative emotional impact on pregnant women as they worry about their own health and the health of their unborn child. We developed a telemonitoring platform called SAFE@home-corona consisting of a pulse oximeter and an app with symptom checklist. The aim of this study was to examine the feasibility, defined by compliance to the platform and by monitoring the course of COVID-19, patient satisfaction and user experience of a telemonitoring platform in COVID-19 positive pregnant women in the Netherlands. METHODS: We conducted a prospective pilot study among Dutch-speaking COVID-19 symptomatic pregnant women. Women were asked to monitor their oxygen-saturation with a pulse oximeter and COVID-related complaints with an in-app questionnaire daily. Oxygen-saturation and complaints were monitored by the Medical Management Centre with triage protocol. COVID-19, pregnancy, and user experience data were collected. To assess feasibility, compliance of daily self-monitoring and compliance of all intended measurements were calculated. Severity of COVID-19 was assessed via the platform and medical record. Patient satisfaction and user experience were measured through a self-developed questionnaire. RESULTS: Twenty-eight women were eligible of which 27 (93.1%) completed the study. Compliance of daily measurement and all intended measurements was high with 98.9 and 93.9%, respectively. Six women were hospitalized, of whom one to the intensive care unit. Overall, women indicated high satisfaction scores, varying from 8 to 10/10. Women were more concerned for the health of their unborn child or family then for themselves (66.7%). They stated that the platform offered reassurance. Patients would highly recommend the platform to pregnant peers during COVID infection. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrated feasibility of the SAFE@home-corona platform for self-monitoring COVID-19 course in pregnant women. Patients were satisfied, it offered reassurance, women would recommend use to peers. Upscaling the platform is needed to draw conclusions from the early signalling abilities and to keep evaluating patient satisfaction. The platform has great potential for self-monitoring of COVID-19 and possibly other pulmonary infections in pregnant women.

Fluctuations in anti-Müllerian hormone levels throughout the menstrual cycle parallel fluctuations in the antral follicle count: a cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: In this prospective cohort study we aimed to investigate the hypothesis that fluctuations in anti-Müllerian hormone levels stem from fluctuations in the number of antral follicles. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Repeated measurements of anti-Müllerian hormone and antral follicles (follicles 2-8 mm) were performed in 44 women with a regular cycle, during one menstrual cycle. If our hypothesis that anti-Müllerian hormone fluctuations stem from fluctuations in the antral follicles is correct, a fluctuation in the antral follicles would result in an equal and parallel shift in anti-Müllerian hormone. Hence, the difference between antral follicles and anti-Müllerian hormone would remain constant over time. A mixed model analysis, assessing the stability between anti-Müllerian hormone and antral follicles, was performed using the difference between log antral follicles and log anti-Müllerian hormone. Cohen's D was calculated for the largest of fixed effects in order to assess stability in relative distance between antral follicles and anti-Müllerian hormone. To assess if fluctuation in anti-Müllerian hormone or antral follicles originated from between-subject fluctuation, or from within subject fluctuation, the intra-class correlation coefficient was calculated. RESULTS: Mixed model analysis and Cohen's D (0.12) confirmed the stability of the difference between log antral follicles and log anti-Müllerian hormone and so confirmed our hypothesis. The good intra-class correlation coefficient (0.73) indicated a small contribution of within-subject variation to anti-Müllerian hormone fluctuations. CONCLUSIONS: Fluctuations in anti-Müllerian hormone levels parallel fluctuations in antral follicles, suggesting that anti-Müllerian hormone levels are closely linked to variation in the antral follicles. This knowledge adds to the basic understanding of the origin of anti-Müllerian hormone and could aid in interpretation of individual anti-Müllerian hormone levels.

Can we predict age at natural menopause using ovarian reserve tests or mother's age at menopause? A systematic literature review.

OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to appraise data on prediction of age at natural menopause (ANM) based on antimüllerian hormone (AMH), antral follicle count (AFC), and mother's ANM to evaluate clinical usefulness and to identify directions for further research. METHODS: We conducted three systematic reviews of the literature to identify studies of menopause prediction based on AMH, AFC, or mother's ANM, corrected for baseline age. RESULTS: Six studies selected in the search for AMH all consistently demonstrated AMH as being capable of predicting ANM (hazard ratio, 5.6-9.2). The sole study reporting on mother's ANM indicated that AMH was capable of predicting ANM (hazard ratio, 9.1-9.3). Two studies provided analyses of AFC and yielded conflicting results, making this marker less strong. CONCLUSIONS: AMH is currently the most promising marker for ANM prediction. The predictive capacity of mother's ANM demonstrated in a single study makes this marker a promising contributor to AMH for menopause prediction. Models, however, do not predict the extremes of menopause age very well and have wide prediction interval. These markers clearly need improvement before they can be used for individual prediction of menopause in the clinical setting. Moreover, potential limitations for such use include variations in AMH assays used and a lack of correction for factors or diseases affecting AMH levels or ANM. Future studies should include women of a broad age range (irrespective of cycle regularity) and should base predictions on repeated AMH measurements. Furthermore, currently unknown candidate predictors need to be identified.

[Group counselling for the second trimester ultrasound: can group counselling be an alternative for individual counselling?]. / Counseling bij het structureel echoscopisch onderzoek: is groepscounseling een alternatief voor individuele counseling?

OBJECTIVE: To compare group counselling to individual counselling with respect to the second trimester ultrasound. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study at two hospitals. METHOD: At one hospital, 100 pregnant women were counselled on the risks and benefits of the second trimester ultrasound in groups of up to 15 patients. Shortly before the ultrasound they were asked to fill out a questionnaire. Results were compared to 100 women who were counselled individually at another hospital. The primary outcome was the level of informed choice whether or not to undergo the ultrasound, defined as sufficient knowledge and a value-consistent decision. The secondary outcome measures were level of understanding of the second trimester ultrasound and the degree of satisfaction with the counselling. RESULTS: The resulting level of informed choice was 87.0% after group counselling compared to 79.4% after individual counselling (p = 0.47). The mean knowledge score was 8.8 for the women who attended group counselling; women who were individually counselled had a mean score of 7.4 (p < 0.001). Satisfaction with counselling was 7.0 for group counselling and 6.2 for individual counselling (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Although there was no statistically significant difference in the level of informed choice, group counselling was associated with higher post-counselling knowledge and satisfaction scores. Group counselling should therefore be considered as an alternative counselling method.