RESUMO
Background: Chronic total occlusion rotational atherectomy (CTO RA) is an emerging intervention in coronary artery disease (CAD), although data comparing its outcomes and complications with non-CTO RA are scarce. We sought to evaluate the outcomes of RA in CTO lesions compared to those in non-CTO lesions by performing a meta-analysis. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing the clinical outcomes and complications between CTO RA and non-CTO RA in patients with CAD. We searched PUBMED, CINAHL, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials for any studies that compared the outcomes of RA in CTO and non-CTO lesions. The outcomes analyzed included in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), target vessel revascularization (TVR), angiographic success, procedural success, periprocedural complications, coronary perforation, and all-cause mortality. Results: Four studies with a total of 1868 patients were included, spanning from 2018 to 2022, from Germany, Taiwan, and Korea. The median age of included patients was 71. The rate of the pooled results indicated a moderate, non-significant increase in in-hospital MACE and TVR for CTO RA compared to non-CTO RA. There was a small, non-significant decrease in angiographic and procedural success in CTO RA compared to non-CTO RA. CTO RA was associated with a non-significant increase in periprocedural complications and a significant increase in coronary perforation compared to non-CTO RA. All-cause mortality showed a non-significant increase in the CTO RA group. Conclusion: This meta-analysis provides evidence that while CTO RA may be associated with a higher risk of coronary perforation, the risk of other outcomes including MACE, TVR, and all-cause mortality is not significantly different compared to non-CTO RA. More research is needed to further understand these relationships and to optimize treatment strategies in patients with CAD undergoing CTO RA.