Neuropsychological impairment in deficit vs. non-deficit schizophrenia.

This study aimed to assess the severity and specificity of cognitive impairments that affect individuals with deficit versus non-deficit schizophrenia. We compared 26 patients with the deficit subtype of schizophrenia (SZ-D) and 79 with non-deficit schizophrenia (SZ-ND) to 316 healthy adults (NC). All study participants completed a battery with 19 individual cognitive measures. After adjusting their test performance for age, sex, race, education and estimated premorbid IQ, we derived regression-based T-scores for each measure and the six derived cognitive domains including attention, psychomotor speed, executive function, verbal fluency, visual memory, and verbal memory. Multivariate analyses of variance revealed significant group effects for every individual measure and domain of cognitive functioning (all ps<0.001). Post hoc comparisons revealed that patients with SZ-D performed significantly worse than NCs in every cognitive domain. They also produced lower scores than the SZ-ND group in every domain, but only the difference for verbal fluency reached statistical significance. The correlations of the effect sizes shown by the SZ-D and SZ-ND patients were of intermediate magnitude for the individual tests (r=0.56, p<0.01) and higher, but not statistically significant for the cognitive domains (r=0.79, p=0.06). Patients with SZ-D demonstrate cognitive deficits that are both common and distinct from those shown by patients with SZ-ND. Their impairment of verbal fluency is consistent with the observation that poverty of speech is a clinically significant feature of patients with SZ-D.

Neuropsychological functioning in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: Some patients with bipolar disorder (BD) demonstrate neuropsychological deficits even when stable. However, it remains unclear whether these differ qualitatively from those seen in schizophrenia (SZ). METHODS: We compared the nature and severity of cognitive deficits shown by 106 patients with SZ and 66 patients with BD to 316 healthy adults (NC). All participants completed a cognitive battery with 19 individual measures. After adjusting their test performance for age, sex, race, education, and estimated premorbid IQ, we derived regression-based T-scores for each measure and the six cognitive domains. RESULTS: Both patient groups performed significantly worse than NCs on most (BD) or all (SZ) cognitive tests and domains. The resulting effect sizes ranged from .37 to 1.32 (mean=.97) across tests for SZ patients and from .23 to .87 (mean=.59) for BD patients. The Pearson correlation of these effect sizes was .71 (p<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with bipolar disorder suffer from cognitive deficits that are milder but qualitatively similar to those of patients with schizophrenia. These findings support the notion that schizophrenia and bipolar disorder show greater phenotypic similarity in terms of the nature than severity of their neuropsychological deficits.

Factor analysis of neurocognitive tests in a large sample of schizophrenic probands, their siblings, and healthy controls.

Large batteries of neuropsychological tests are typically necessary to identify cognitive deficits in schizophrenia and routinely examine multiple cognitive processes, with many tests often yielding more than one measure of interest. This study investigates the feasibility of a partial solution to the problem of multiple comparisons: the use of factor analysis to reduce the number of phenotypic variables and to better understand the underlying cognitive architecture in schizophrenia. Using a principle components analysis followed by a varimax rotation, we identified factor structures for schizophrenic patients (n=99), their unaffected siblings (n=167), and control subjects (n=131), both separately and as a composite group. Exploratory factor analysis of the full sample yielded a 7-factor model that included verbal memory, working memory, visual memory, IQ/speed/fluency, executive function, attention and digit span. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) with maximum likelihood estimation revealed that the 7-factor model fit observed data from the three groups adequately. Since we identified a factor structure representative of all groups that reduced 24 original variables to 7 variables of interest, factor analysis was useful in reducing the complexity of large batteries of cognitive measures to more manageable numbers of phenotypic variables. Furthermore, these findings provide the first confirmation that cognitive structure is comparable in family members of schizophrenia patients, as well as in patients themselves and controls.

Genetic variation in catechol-O-methyltransferase: effects on working memory in schizophrenic patients, their siblings, and healthy controls.

BACKGROUND: Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) val(108/158)met (rs4680) is thought to affect dopamine regulated prefrontal cortical activity during working memory (WM) tasks, and to weakly increase risk for developing schizophrenia. Recently, other single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across the gene have emerged as additional risk factors for schizophrenia: namely rs737865, rs165599, and rs2097603. In a large sample, we examined whether these SNPs affect WM. METHODS: Schizophrenic probands (n = 325), their nonpsychotic siblings (n = 359), and normal control subjects (n = 330) completed tests of WM function. Data were analyzed with a series of mixed model analyses of variance (ANOVAs). RESULTS: Val homozygotes performed most poorly on all conditions of the n-back, irrespective of diagnosis. Additionally, there was a trend towards a disease-only val(108/158)met effect on a test of attentional set-shifting; val homozygote probands performed most poorly. Significant or near-significant effects of rs737865 were found on all conditions of the n-back, with G homozygotes performing worst. There also was a disease-only COMT rs737865 effect on the 0-back. None of the other SNPs showed main effects by themselves. A haplotype constructed from promoter and val(108/158)met SNPs showed main effects on WM parameters, consistent with inverted U models of dopamine signaling. CONCLUSIONS: We extended earlier findings of a val(108/158)met effect on WM function, and suggest that combinations of alleles within COMT may modulate the val(108/158)met effect in a nonlinear manner.

Catechol-O-methyltransferase polymorphisms and some implications for cognitive therapeutics.

Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) is a gene involved in the degradation of dopamine and may both increase susceptibility to develop schizophrenia and affect neuronal functions involved in working memory. A common variant of the COMT gene (val(108/158)met) has been widely reported to affect pre-frontally mediated working memory function, with the high-activity val allele associated with poorest performance across a number of tests sensitive to updating and target detection. Pharmacological manipulations of COMT val(108/158)met also have reliably produced alterations in cognitive function, in line with an inverted U function of prefrontal dopamine signaling. Furthermore, there is accumulating evidence that COMT val(108/158)met genotype may influence the cognitive response to antipsychotic treatment in schizophrenia patients, with met allele load predicting the greatest improvement with medication. Recently, other single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across the COMT gene have emerged as possible risk alleles for schizophrenia, although little is known about whether they affect prefrontal cognition in a manner similar to COMT val(108/158)met. Preliminary evidence suggests a modest role for a SNP in the 5' region of the gene on select tests of attention and target detection. Haplotype effects also may account for a modest percentage of the variance in test performance, and are an important area for future study.

Spatial memory following temporal lobe resection.

The present study sought a clearer understanding of spatial memory function consequent to temporal lobe resection, and, in particular, of spatial memory function with respect to two- as well as three-dimensional frames of reference. Relative to a group of 15 control participants, a group of 15 epilepsy patients with right temporal resections demonstrated deficits of memory for locations in a two-dimensional display. A group of 13 epilepsy patients with left temporal resections did not demonstrate such deficits. The right and the left resection groups both demonstrated deficits of memory for item-location relationships in a two-dimensional display. The right but not the left resection group demonstrated deficits of memory for item-location relationships in a three-dimensional display. The differing results that were observed for item-location relationships in two- and three-dimensional displays were attributed to differences in the way item information is bound with location information concerning two- and three-dimensional domains.

How well does IQ predict neuropsychological test performance in normal adults?

The strength and nature of the association between IQ and performance on other cognitive tests has both practical and conceptual significance for clinical neuropsychology. In this study, 28 measures derived from 16 cognitive tests were analyzed as a function of IQ in 221 adults. Participants were grouped by their IQ scores as having below average (BA), average (A), or above average (AA) intelligence. Planned comparisons revealed that A adults performed significantly better than BA adults on 25 of the 28 cognitive measures, and that AA adults performed significantly better than A adults on 19 of 28 measures. Effect sizes averaged.74 for BA-A comparisons and.41 for A-AA comparisons. Linear, quadratic, and cubic functions described the relationships between IQ and cognitive test performance equally well for most individual test measures and for a composite index of test performance, whereas quadratic and cubic functions explained the proportion of abnormal performances better than a linear function. These findings confirm that IQ predicts concurrent neuropsychological performance across the entire spectrum of intelligence, but more so among persons of average IQ or less than among those with above average IQ.