Development and Validation of a Ready-to-Talk Measure for Use in Adolescents and Young Adults Living With Advanced Cancer.

BACKGROUND: In the era of evolving and emerging therapies, adolescents and young adults (AYAs) living with advanced cancer experience a high degree of uncertainty, making palliative care and end-of-life (PCEOL) discussions difficult. Clinical conversations determine values/preferences that guide shared decision-making and goals of treatment, including end-of-life care when cancer progresses. Initiating PCEOL conversations is challenging for clinicians. OBJECTIVE: This study describes the development and validation of an instrument that measures AYA readiness to engage in PCEOL clinical conversations. METHODS: A Ready-to-Talk Measure (R-T-M) was developed, guided by the revised conceptual model of readiness across 3 domains (awareness, acceptance, and willingness). Content experts evaluated validity, and 13 AYAs with advanced cancer participated in cognitive interviews. Acceptability (item applicability, clarity, interpretation, sensitivity, missingness) and experiences (benefit, burden) were analyzed. RESULTS: The scale content validity index was ≥0.90 for each domain. Forty-two of the 55 R-T-M items were acceptable without any change. Three items were deleted. Ten items were modified, and 3 were added. Adolescents and young adults wanted more items about friends/siblings and about AYA unique qualities for clinicians to know them better. Adolescents and young adults acknowledged benefit through talking about difficult, relevant topics. CONCLUSION: Ready-to-Talk Measure validity was strengthened by deleting or modifying unclear or misinterpreted items and by adding items. Next steps include psychometric analysis to determine reliability/dimensionality and stakeholder input to make the R-T-M a clinically useful tool. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Ready-to-Talk Measure assessment of readiness to engage in PCEOL conversations while identifying unique preferences of AYAs holds promise for facilitating ongoing discussions.

COVID-19 Disease in Children With ALL Receiving Maintenance Therapy: Do Not Discount the Risk.

PURPOSE: Unlike most childhood cancers, therapy for ALL includes a prolonged maintenance phase during which children typically resume regular activities. Physicians need data regarding the persistent impact of COVID-19 in this population to help guide families after the pandemic. METHODS: The Pediatric Oncology COVID-19 Case Report (POCC) collects deidentified data (sociodemographics, clinical data [cancer, COVID-19 course]) on children, adolescents, and young adults with cancer and COVID-19 from 104 US pediatric oncology institutions. The analysis presented here compares children (≤21 years) with ALL in maintenance (ALL-MTN) with all other children with cancer and COVID-19. Multivariable analyses adjust for age, race/ethnicity, insurance, absolute neutrophil count at the time of infection, vaccination, and comorbidities. RESULTS: Compared with other children reported to POCC (n = 1,190), those in ALL-MTN (n = 481) were less often hospitalized (23% v 29%, P = .01) or admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU: 3% v 5%, P = .01); these findings persisted in multivariable analysis (hospitalization: odds ratio [OR], 0.7 [95% CI, 0.6 to 0.9]; ICU: OR, 0.5 [95% CI, 0.2 to 0.8]). However, cancer-directed therapy was changed more often for children in ALL-MTN (50% v 33%, P ≤ .01; OR, 2.0 [95% CI, 1.6 to 2.5[). Vaccination was an independent prognostic factor in our multivariable model, decreasing odds of hospitalization (OR, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.5 to 0.9]). CONCLUSION: Children in ALL-MTN required fewer hospitalizations and ICU admissions but more therapy modifications than other children with cancer. Vaccination against COVID-19 reduced the odds of hospitalization.

Adolescents and young adults with cancer: the clinical course of COVID-19 infections.

Adolescents and young adults (ie, individuals aged 15-39 years, known as AYAs) with cancer face unique vulnerabilities yet remain underrepresented in clinical trials, including adult registries of COVID-19 in cancer (AYAs: 8%-12%). We used the Pediatric Oncology COVID-19 Case Report to examine the clinical course of COVID-19 among AYAs with cancer. The Pediatric Oncology COVID-19 Case Report collects deidentified clinical and sociodemographic data regarding individuals aged from birth to 39 years with cancer (37%) and COVID-19 from more than 100 institutions. Between April 1, 2020, and November 28, 2023, 191 older AYAs (individuals 22-39 years of age) and 640 younger AYAs (individuals 15-21 years of age) were captured. Older AYAs were less often hospitalized (P < .001), admitted to the intensive care unit (P = .02), and required respiratory support (P = .057). In multivariable analyses, older AYAs faced 80% lower odds of intensive care unit admission but 2.3-times greater odds of changes to cancer-directed therapy. Unvaccinated patients had 5.4-times higher odds of intensive care unit admission. Among AYAs with cancer, the COVID-19 course varies by age. These findings can inform oncology teams directing COVID-19 management and prevention in AYA patients with cancer.

Menin Inhibition With Revumenib for KMT2A-Rearranged Relapsed or Refractory Acute Leukemia (AUGMENT-101).

PURPOSE: Revumenib, an oral, small molecule inhibitor of the menin-lysine methyltransferase 2A (KMT2A) interaction, showed promising efficacy and safety in a phase I study of heavily pretreated patients with KMT2A-rearranged (KMT2Ar) acute leukemia. Here, we evaluated the activity of revumenib in individuals with relapsed/refractory (R/R) KMT2Ar acute leukemia. METHODS: AUGMENT-101 is a phase I/II, open-label, dose-escalation and expansion study of revumenib conducted across 22 clinical sites in five countries (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04065399). We report results from the phase II, registration-enabling portion. Individuals age ≥30 days with R/R KMT2Ar acute leukemia or with AML and nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1) mutation were enrolled. Revumenib was administered once every 12 hours, at 163 mg (95 mg/m2 if weight <40 kg) with a strong cytochrome P450 inhibitor, in 28-day cycles. The primary end points were the rate of complete remission (CR) or CR with partial hematologic recovery (CR + CRh) and safety. At a prespecified interim analysis, safety was assessed in all KMT2Ar treated patients; efficacy was assessed in those with centrally confirmed KMT2Ar. The separate NPM1 cohort of the trial is ongoing. RESULTS: From October 1, 2021, to July 24, 2023, N = 94 patients (median [range] age, 37 [1.3-75] years) were treated. Grade ≥3 adverse events included febrile neutropenia (37.2%), differentiation syndrome (16.0%), and QTc prolongation (13.8%). In the efficacy-evaluable patients (n = 57), the CR + CRh rate was 22.8% (95% CI, 12.7 to 35.8), exceeding the null hypothesis of 10% (P = .0036). Overall response rate was 63.2% (95% CI, 49.3 to 75.6), with 15 of 22 patients (68.2%) having no detectable residual disease. CONCLUSION: Revumenib led to high remission rates with a predictable safety profile in R/R KMT2Ar acute leukemia. To our knowledge, this trial represents the largest evaluation of a targeted therapy for these patients.