Diabetes and Total Joint Arthroplasty: Infection Risk May Not Be Predictable by Markers of Glycemic Control.

With an increasing prevalence of diabetes, there is a need to risk stratify arthroplasty patients preoperatively and characterize postoperative infections. This study sought to determine if perioperative markers of diabetic control were associated with infection and to further characterize diabetic periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). A retrospective analysis of 506 diabetic patients and 900 nondiabetic patients who underwent primary total hip and knee arthroplasty was performed. In this cohort, an infection rate of 4.7% and 2.0% for diabetic and nondiabetic patients, respectively, was observed. There was no association between infection at 1 year and preoperative hemoglobin A1C or postoperative blood glucose; however, diabetic infections were significantly more likely to be deep (HR = 4.6; p < .001) and present >6 weeks postoperatively (HR = 8.0; p = .001). This study concluded that common markers of glycemic control are not predictive of the increased risk of diabetic PJI and alternative markers should be investigated. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 28(2):127-131, 2019).

Conversion vs Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Increased Cost of Care and Perioperative Complications.

BACKGROUND: With the increasing incidence of hip fractures and hip preservation surgeries, there has been a concomitant rise in the number of conversion total hip arthroplasties (THAs) performed. Prior studies have shown higher complication rates in conversion THA. However, there is a paucity of data showing differences in cost between these 2 procedures. Currently, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services bundles primary and conversion THA in the same Medicare Severity-Diagnosis Related Group for hospital reimbursement. More evidence is needed to support the reclassification of conversion THA. METHODS: The cohort provided by the institutional database included 163 conversion THAs between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2015. Intraoperative complications, estimated blood loss, operative time, postoperative complications, and perioperative cost data were analyzed for 163 primary THA patients matched to the conversion THA cohort. RESULTS: Compared with primary THA, conversion THA had significantly (P < .05) greater cost for direct labor, other direct costs, intermediate nursing services, other diagnostic/therapy, surgery services, physical/occupational/speech therapy, radiology, laboratories, blood, medical/surgical supply, and total direct costs. In addition, the conversion THA group had significantly greater operative times, estimated blood loss, length of stay, intraoperative complications, and postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: Conversion THA, as compared with primary THA, is associated with greater costs (approximately 19% greater), increased surgical times, and perioperative complications. To prevent these additional expenses from creating patient selection bias and a barrier to care, the conversion THA Medicare Severity-Diagnosis Related Group should be reclassified, or modifiers created.

Short and Long-Term Postoperative Complications Following Total Joint Arthroplasty in Patients With Human Immunodeficiency Virus, Hepatitis B, or Hepatitis C.

INTRODUCTION: Due to advancement in treatment against human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV), the prevalence of this patient population electing to undergo total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is increasing. Current literature is scarce and conflicting especially when evaluating long-term surgical complications. The purpose of this study is to assess the postoperative medical and surgical complications following TJA in these patient populations. METHODS: Using a nationwide database between 2005 and 2012, 4 cohorts were created: patients with HIV, HCV, HBV, and HIV and HBV or HCV who underwent TJA. Cohorts were matched to a control group by age, gender, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Thirty-day and 90-day medical complications and 90-day and 2-year surgical complications were evaluated using odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Following TJA, patients with HCV or HBV had increased risk of pneumonia, sepsis, joint infection, and revision surgery at 90 days and 2 years. Patients with HIV did not have increased risk of infection at 90 days and 2 years but did have increased risk of revision at 90 days (odds ratio 3.21, 95% confidence interval 1.31-7.84) following total hip arthroplasty. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HIV, HBV, or HCV have an overall increased risk of postoperative medical and surgical complications following TJA. Patients with HBV or HCV are at risk of more complications than patients with HIV especially for infection within 90 days after TJA. Patients with HIV are at risk of mechanical complications but do not appear to be at significant risk for infection following total hip arthroplasty.

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Surgical Risk Calculator Has a Role in Predicting Discharge to Post-Acute Care in Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Patient demand and increasing cost awareness have led to the creation of surgical risk calculators that attempt to predict the likelihood of adverse events and to facilitate risk mitigation. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Surgical Risk Calculator is an online tool available for a wide variety of surgical procedures, and has not yet been fully evaluated in total joint arthroplasty. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective review was performed on 909 patients receiving a unilateral primary total knee (496) or hip (413) arthroplasty between January 2012 and December 2014. Patient characteristics were entered into the risk calculator, and predicted outcomes were compared with observed results. Discrimination was evaluated using the receiver-operator area under the curve (AUC) for 90-day readmission, return to operating room (OR), discharge to skilled nursing facility (SNF)/rehab, deep venous thrombosis (DVT), and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). RESULTS: The risk calculator demonstrated adequate performance in predicting discharge to SNF/rehab (AUC 0.72). Discrimination was relatively limited for DVT (AUC 0.70, P = .2), 90-day readmission (AUC 0.63), PJI (AUC 0.67), and return to OR (AUC 0.59). Risk score differences between those who did and did not experience discharge to SNF/rehab, 90-day readmission, and PJI reached significance (P < .01). Predicted length of stay performed adequately, only overestimating by 0.2 days on average (rho = 0.25, P < .001). CONCLUSION: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Surgical Risk Calculator has fair utility in predicting discharge to SNF/rehab, but limited usefulness for 90-day readmission, return to OR, DVT, and PJI. Although length of stay predictions are similar to actual outcomes, statistical correlation remains relatively weak.

Extensor Mechanism Reconstruction Using Achilles Tendon Allograft With Suture Tape Augmentation.

The management of chronic extensor mechanism injuries represents a significant challenge for orthopaedic surgeons, with numerous options for graft choice and fixation construct, but no clear consensus on which technique achieves optimal outcomes. Although there is little published data regarding outcomes of different fixation methods, small case series have demonstrated modest success using Achilles tendon bone block allografts and transverse patellar screw fixation. In this technical note, we describe a surgical technique for the treatment of a chronic inferior pole patella fracture, with extensor mechanism reconstruction using an Achilles tendon allograft with suture tape augmentation. Our technique describes the use of vertical cannulated screws in the patella for passing tape augmentation sutures, increased construct security by suturing of the Achilles graft directly to the quadriceps tendon, and the use of a post screw in the proximal tibia for suture tape augmentation.

Virtual Reality as a Learning Tool for Trainees in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

INTRODUCTION: The efficacy of virtual reality (VR) as a teaching augment for arthroplasty has not been well examined for unfamiliar multistep procedures such as unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). This study sought to determine whether VR improves surgical competence over traditional procedural preparation when performing a UKA. METHODS: Twenty-two orthopaedic surgery trainees were randomized to two surgical preparation cohorts: (1) "Guide" group (control) with access to manufacture's technique guide and surgical video and (2) "VR" group with access to an immersive commercially available VR learning module. Surgical performance of UKA on a SawBone model was assessed through time and the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) validated rating system. RESULTS: Participants were equally distributed among all training levels and previous exposure to UKA. No difference in mean surgical times was observed between Guide and VR groups (Guide = 42.4 minutes versus VR = 43.0 minutes; P = 0.9) or mean total OSATS (Guide = 15.7 versus VR = 14.2; P = 0.59). Most trainees felt VR would be a useful tool for resident education (77%) and would use VR for case preparation if available (86.4%). CONCLUSION: In a randomized controlled trial of trainees at a single, large academic center performing a complex, multistep, unfamiliar procedure (UKA), VR training demonstrated equivalent surgical competence compared with the use of traditional technique guides, as measured by surgical time and OSATS scores. Most of the trainees found the VR technology beneficial. This study suggests that VR technology may be considered as an adjunct to traditional surgical preparation/training methods.

Osteoarthritis and ACL Reconstruction-Myths and Risks.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is one of the most common ligamentous injuries suffered by athletes participating in cutting sports. A common misperception is that ACL reconstruction can prevent osteoarthritis (OA). The goal of this paper is to review and discuss the contributing factors for the development of OA following ACL injury. RECENT FINDINGS: There has been interesting new research related to ACL reconstruction. As understanding of knee biomechanics following ACL injury and reconstruction has changed over time, many surgeons have changed their surgical techniques to low anterior drilling to position their femoral tunnel in an attempt to place the ACL in a more anatomic position. Even with this change in the femoral tunnel position, 85% of knees following ACL reconstruction have abnormal tibial motion compared to contralateral non-injured knees. Studies have shown increases in inflammatory cytokines in the knee following ACL injury, and newer MRI sequences have allowed for earlier objective detection of degenerative changes to cartilage following injury. Recent studies have shown that injecting IL-1 receptor antagonist and corticosteroids can modulate the post-injury inflammatory cascade. ACL reconstruction does not prevent the development of OA but can improve knee kinematics and reduce secondary injury to the cartilage and meniscus. Advancements in imaging studies has allowed for earlier detection of degenerative changes in the knee, which has allowed researchers to study how new interventions can alter the course of degenerative change in the knee following ACL injury.