Reproductive Decision-Making in MMR Mutation Carriers After Results Disclosure: Impact of Psychological Status in Childbearing Options.

Reproductive techniques such as prenatal diagnosis (PND) or preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), although debated, are legally forbidden in France in case of Lynch syndrome. The preference of mutation carriers about their reproductive options is not systematically considered in France. We aimed to prospectively assess the reproductive preferences of mismatch repair mutation carriers consulting in our institution (2003-2010, n = 100). We also considered the short- and long-term post-disclosure psychological impact using the Impact of Events Scale-Revised questionnaire to measure the prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in those patients. Complete data were obtained for 34 respondents (17 males, 17 females, median age of 33.5 years [22-59]). Seventeen respondents (57 %) preferred spontaneous natural conception versus 28 % and 35 % choosing PND and PGD, respectively. At results disclosure, respondents mainly explained their distress by fear of premature death (43 %) and transmitting mutated genes (42 %). One year later, this last fear remained predominant in 55 % of subjects. None of the main socio-demographical, psychological or medical variables (including fear of transmitting mutations) was significantly associated with the reproductive preferences. Results disclosure had a real and time-decreasing psychological impact on mutation carriers. Reproductive techniques, expected to decrease the hereditary risk, were not significantly preferred to natural conception.

MR volumetric measurement of low rectal cancer helps predict tumor response and outcome after combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively determine whether magnetic resonance (MR) volumetry of rectal cancer is a reproducible method for predicting disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with locally advanced low or midrectal tumors who undergo combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy (CRT) before total mesorectal excision. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board does not require approval for the use of patient data obtained for an observational retrospective study. Fifty-eight patients were included in the study; 42 patients had low-lying tumors. Two radiologists independently measured tumor volumes before and after CRT with use of semiautomated software. The radiologists were blinded to the clinical information for each patient. The tumor volume reduction ratio, circumferential resection margin, T stage, and occurrence of downstaging were compared with the histopathologic response and DFS. The threshold of tumor volume reduction for predicting DFS was assessed with receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. DFS was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between groups with the log-rank test. RESULTS: The interobserver correlation coefficient between the two radiologists was 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76, 0.93) for pre-CRT volumetry and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.74, 0.90) for post-CRT volumetry. A tumor volume reduction of at least 70% was significantly associated with good histologic regression (tumor regression grade [TRG], 3 or 4) (P <.0001) compared with a volume reduction rate of less than 70%. DFS was studied in 51 patients. The mean follow-up of survivors at the time of analysis was 52 months ± 20 (standard deviation). Patients with a volume reduction ratio of at least 70% had a higher DFS (P <.0001). Tumor volume reduction was an independent prognostic parameter in multivariate analysis for DFS (P = .003; 95% CI: 0.01, 0.4). CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate that volumetric measurements are reliable markers of rectal cancer prognosis, enabling the prediction of DFS and TRG. The cutoff of 70% is an easy parameter to use as a surrogate for clinical response to predict both TRG and outcome.

Cancer risks associated with germline mutations in MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 genes in Lynch syndrome.

CONTEXT: Providing accurate estimates of cancer risks is a major challenge in the clinical management of Lynch syndrome. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the age-specific cumulative risks of developing various tumors using a large series of families with mutations of the MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 genes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Families with Lynch syndrome enrolled between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2009, from 40 French cancer genetics clinics participating in the ERISCAM (Estimation des Risques de Cancer chez les porteurs de mutation des gènes MMR) study; 537 families with segregating mutated genes (248 with MLH1; 256 with MSH2; and 33 with MSH6) were analyzed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Age-specific cumulative cancer risks estimated using the genotype restricted likelihood (GRL) method accounting for ascertainment bias. RESULTS: Significant differences in estimated cumulative cancer risk were found between the 3 mutated genes (P = .01). The estimated cumulative risks of colorectal cancer by age 70 years were 41% (95% confidence intervals [CI], 25%-70%) for MLH1 mutation carriers, 48% (95% CI, 30%-77%) for MSH2, and 12% (95% CI, 8%-22%) for MSH6. For endometrial cancer, corresponding risks were 54% (95% CI, 20%-80%), 21% (95% CI, 8%-77%), and 16% (95% CI, 8%-32%). For ovarian cancer, they were 20% (95% CI, 1%-65%), 24% (95% CI, 3%-52%), and 1% (95% CI, 0%-3%). The estimated cumulative risks by age 40 years did not exceed 2% (95% CI, 0%-7%) for endometrial cancer nor 1% (95% CI, 0%-3%) for ovarian cancer, irrespective of the gene. The estimated lifetime risks for other tumor types did not exceed 3% with any of the gene mutations. CONCLUSIONS: MSH6 mutations are associated with markedly lower cancer risks than MLH1 or MSH2 mutations. Lifetime ovarian and endometrial cancer risks associated with MLH1 or MSH2 mutations were high but do not increase appreciably until after the age of 40 years.

A Truncated NRIP1 Mutant Amplifies Microsatellite Instability of Colorectal Cancer by Regulating MSH2/MSH6 Expression, and Is a Prognostic Marker of Stage III Tumors.

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is related to the alteration of mismatch repair (MMR) genes and plays a key role in colorectal cancer (CRC) pathogenesis. We previously reported that the transcription factor Nuclear Receptor Interacting Protein 1 (NRIP1) is involved in sporadic intestinal tumorigenesis. The aim of this study was to decipher its role in MSI CRC. By using different mouse models and engineered cell lines, we demonstrated that NRIP1 increased MSH2 and MSH6 MMR gene transcription and mRNA/protein levels. In human CRC cells, NRIP1 expression was associated with decreased MSI and the hypermutator phenotype, and with resistance to chemotherapy drugs. Using a cohort of 194 CRC patients, we detected in 22% of the cases a MSI-induced frameshift mutation in the NRIP1 coding sequence. This genetic alteration generates a truncated protein with a dominant negative activity that increased human CRC cell proliferation and impaired the regulation of MSH2 and MSH6 gene expression. Moreover, the NRIP1 mutant correlated with a decreased overall survival of patients with advanced CRC, especially when MLH1-deficient. By decreasing the expression of MSH2 and MSH6 gene expression, the NRIP1 variant may amplify MLH1-dependent CRC progression and behave as a new prognostic marker of advanced MSI CRC.

Multicentre phase II study using increasing doses of irinotecan combined with a simplified LV5FU2 regimen in metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Irinotecan at 180 mg/m2 combined with an infusional 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) regimen (FOLFIRI) is a standard first line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This phase II study aimed to assess whether increasing the irinotecan dose in the first line FOLFIRI regimen would benefit mCRC patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received FOLFIRI every 2 weeks for up to six cycles, comprising a 5-FU/LV regimen combined with irinotecan at 180 mg/m2 (cycle 1), increasing to 220 mg/m2 (cycle 2) and 260 mg/m2 (cycle 3 and subsequent cycles) dependent on toxicity. Efficacy and safety were determined in the intention to treat (ITT) population and in patients able to receive irinotecan at 260 mg/m2 for at least four cycles [high-dose (HD) population]. RESULTS: Fifty-four eligible patients were included. Among them, 44 (81.5%) formed the HD population. The ITT objective response rate was 48% (90%CI: 36-60) with 25/26 of the responses in the HD population. The disease control rate was 76% (90%CI: 65-85) and median overall survival was 20.4 months (90%CI: 6.4-27.1). The main grade 3/4 toxicities (ITT/HD populations) were neutropenia (61%/59%), and diarrhoea (18%/11%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the feasibility of increasing the standard dose of the irinotecan component of FOLFIRI to 260 mg/m2, for more than 80% of patients but does not support a clear advantage of this strategy on unselected mCRC patients.

A limited sampling strategy to estimate the pharmacokinetic parameters of irinotecan and its active metabolite, SN-38, in patients with metastatic digestive cancer receiving the FOLFIRI regimen.

In this study we propose for the first time a limited sampling strategy to estimate the individual pharmacokinetic parameters of both irinotecan and SN-38 in patients treated with the irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil (FOLFIRI) regimen. The pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and SN-38 were studied in 74 patients with advanced inoperable digestive cancer. Plasma concentrations were taken during and up to the 42 h following a 90-min infusion of irinotecan (180-225 mg/m(2)). Data splitting was used to create model-building and validation data sets, and data were analysed with the NONMEM program. The disposition of SN-38 was dependent on the disposition of irinotecan. The estimated pharmacokinetic parameters of irinotecan [terminal half-life (t(1/2)), 11.5 h; total clearance (CL), 25.0 l h(-1); area under curve (AUC), 14.9 mg x h l(-1)] and SN-38 (terminal t(1/2), 32.2 h; AUC, 0.42 mg x h l(-1)) were similar to those determined in other studies. The protocol involving two sampling times, at 1 and 24 h following the beginning of the infusion, allowed for a precise and accurate determination of the individual pharmacokinetic parameters of the two drugs. The limited sampling strategy developed in this study ought to facilitate future studies on the pharmacology and toxicity of irinotecan-based therapy.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of irinotecan and its metabolites from plasma and saliva data in patients with metastatic digestive cancer receiving Folfiri regimen.

PURPOSE: Irinotecan is extensively metabolized into at least four compounds and previous pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic studies have given varying results. We hypothesized that saliva, a noninvasive, safe and painless biological sampling process, could be a good predictor of the behavior of irinotecan and its metabolites. METHODS: Thirty-five patients with metastatic digestive cancer were treated with a Folfiri regimen every 2 weeks. The irinotecan-administered dose was 180 mg/m(2); 17 patients participated in a dose-escalating study. Irinotecan and its metabolites (SN-38, SN-38G, APC, NPC) were quantified in plasma and saliva by high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. RESULTS: The mean irinotecan systemic clearance and steady-state volume of distribution values were 14.3 l/h/m(2) and 211 l/m(2), respectively. The intrapatient variability (22-28%) was far lower than the interindividual variability (33-88%). Age and weight were the two physiological parameters that influenced drug disposition. For irinotecan, SN-38, APC and NPC, similar pharmacokinetic profiles were observed from plasma and saliva data. The saliva/plasma AUC ratios averaged 1 for irinotecan, 0.3 for SN-38, 0.17 for APC and 0.27 for NPC. Neutropenia, diarrhea and nausea were the main toxicities encountered. From both plasma and saliva data, the percentage decrease in neutrophil count appeared to be related to irinotecan and SN-38 AUCs. CONCLUSIONS: All these findings provide a rationale for an individual adaptation of irinotecan dosing. In case of difficult venous access, the titration of irinotecan and of its active metabolite SN-38 in saliva may prove relevant.

Safety of cisplatin combined with continuous 5-FU versus bolus 5-FU and leucovorin, in metastatic gastrointestinal cancer (FFCD 9404 randomised trial).

BACKGROUND: The objective of this phase III study was to compare the safety and efficacy of FLP (modulation of 5-FU (Fluorouracil) by folinic acid or leucovorin (LV) and cisplatin vs. FP (5-FU combined with Cisplatin) as a first line chemotherapy in advanced oesophageal, gastric and pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 232 patients with measurable lesions were randomised to receive at the first cycle either FP (arm A: 5-FU 800 mg/m2/d in continuous infusion 5 days and cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1 or 2), or FLP (arm B: LV, 100 mg/m2/d in bolus 5 days, followed by 5-FU 350 mg/m2/d in 1 h infusion 5 days and cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1 or 2). In case of no grade 3-4 haematological and diarrhoea toxicity, the dose of 5-FU was increased to 1000 mg/m2/d and 400 mg/m2/d in the two arms respectively, for the subsequent cycles until disease progression. RESULTS: The distribution of primary tumours was: 19 squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus, 19 oesophageal adenocarcinoma, 91 gastric and 97 pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Safety remained acceptable and comparable in the two arms except for the severe grade 3-4 mucositis, which was lower in arm B (4.5 vs. 16.4%, p < 0.009). Efficacy in terms of tumour response and survival was similar in the two arms, showing an objective response rate (after external review) of 18.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 11.4-25.8%) in arm A vs. 15% (95% CI 8.5-21.6%) in arm B, an overall median survival of 24 weeks in arm A vs. 24.7 in arm B (p = 0.83) and a progression-free median survival of 12.4 weeks vs. 12.1 in arms A and B, respectively (p = 0.91). CONCLUSION: The FLP regimen is substantially equivalent to FP in terms of safety and quality of life, as well as for antitumour efficacy in these carcinomas; the only slight advantage of FLP in this study concerns mucositis. Based on these results, FLP could be used as an alternative to FP when appropriate.

Immunohistochemical staining for p16 and BRAFV600E is useful to distinguish between sporadic and hereditary (Lynch syndrome-related) microsatellite instable colorectal carcinomas.

DNA mismatch repair (MMR) protein analysis by immunohistochemistry (IHC) can identify colorectal cancer (CRC) with microsatellite instability (MSI). As MLH1-deficient CRC can be hereditary or sporadic, markers to distinguish between them are needed. MLH1 promoter methylation assay is the reference method; however, sometimes, it is challenging on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples. We assessed by IHC the expression of BRAFV600E, p16, MGMT, and CDX2 in 55 MLH1-deficient MSI CRC samples (of which 8 had a germline MLH1 mutation) to determine whether this panel differentiates between sporadic and hereditary CRCs. We also analyzed MLH1 promoter methylation by methylation-specific PCR and pyrosequencing and BRAF status by genotyping. None of the hereditary CRCs showed MLH1 methylation, BRAF mutation, BRAFV600E-positive immunostaining, or loss of p16 expression. We detected MLH1 promoter methylation in 67 % and a BRAF mutation in 42 % of CRC, all showing MLH1 promoter methylation. BRAFV600E IHC and BRAF genotyping gave concordant results in all but two samples. Loss of expression of p16 was found in 30 % of CRC with methylation of the MLH1 promoter, but its expression was retained in all non-methylated and part of MLH1-methylated tumors (100 % specificity, 30 % sensitivity). CDX2 and MGMT expression was not associated with MLH1 status. Thus, BRAFV600E and p16 IHC may help in differentiating sporadic from hereditary MLH1-deficient CRC with MSI. Specifically, p16 IHC might be used as a surrogate marker for MLH1 promoter methylation, because all p16-negative CRCs displayed MLH1 methylation, whereas hereditary CRCs were all p16-positive.

Clinical relevance of 8q23, 15q13 and 18q21 SNP genotyping to evaluate colorectal cancer risk.

To determine if the at-risk single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) alleles for colorectal cancer (CRC) could contribute to clinical situations suggestive of an increased genetic risk for CRC, we performed a prospective national case-control study based on highly selected patients (CRC in two first-degree relatives, one before 61 years of age; or CRC diagnosed before 51 years of age; or multiple primary CRCs, the first before 61 years of age; exclusion of Lynch syndrome and polyposes) and controls without personal or familial history of CRC. SNPs were genotyped using SNaPshot, and statistical analyses were performed using Pearson's χ(2) test, Cochran-Armitage test of trend and logistic regression. We included 1029 patients and 350 controls. We confirmed the association of CRC risk with four SNPs, with odds ratio (OR) higher than previously reported: rs16892766 on 8q23.3 (OR: 1.88, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.30-2.72; P=0.0007); rs4779584 on 15q13.3 (OR: 1.42, CI: 1.11-1.83; P=0.0061) and rs4939827 and rs58920878/Novel 1 on 18q21.1 (OR: 1.49, CI: 1.13-1.98; P=0.007 and OR: 1.49, CI: 1.14-1.95; P=0.0035). We found a significant (P<0.0001) cumulative effect of the at-risk alleles or genotypes with OR at 1.62 (CI: 1.10-2.37), 2.09 (CI: 1.43-3.07), 2.87 (CI: 1.76-4.70) and 3.88 (CI: 1.72-8.76) for 1, 2, 3 and at least 4 at-risk alleles, respectively, and OR at 1.71 (CI: 1.18-2.46), 2.29 (CI: 1.55-3.38) and 6.21 (CI: 2.67-14.42) for 1, 2 and 3 at-risk genotypes, respectively. Combination of SNPs may therefore explain a fraction of clinical situations suggestive of an increased risk for CRC.

Individual 5-FU dose adaptation in metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a phase II study using a bimonthly pharmacokinetically intensified LV5FU2 regimen.

AIM: The aim of this phase II study was to determine the efficacy and tolerability of the bimonthly, pharmacokinetically intensified LV5FU2 regimen in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancers. METHODS: A total of 53 patients (23% second-line; 25 male/28 female; mean age 67 years; WHO performance status 0 in 38, 1 in 10 and 2 in 5) were treated in cycle 1 with the standard LV5FU2 regimen (leucovorin 200 mg/m2 per day followed by a 5-FU bolus 400 mg/m2 per day and a 22-h 5-FU continuous infusion 600 mg/m2 per day for two consecutive days every 2 weeks), and the AUC in mg.h/l.m2 was calculated. For cycle 2, according to a predefined schedule depending on the cycle-1 AUC value, in the absence of grade 3 toxicity, the 5-FU infusion dose was increased by 150% for AUC < or =5, by 100% for AUC >5-10, by 50% for AUC >10-15, and by 25% for AUC >15-20. 5-FU plasma concentrations were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography. A Bayesian methodology was used to assess individual pharmacokinetic parameters using the NONMEM computer program. RESULTS: Among the 53 eligible patients, 87% (per-protocol population) received an increased dose in cycle 2 and 72% received the same dose. The median relative dose intensity was 1.28 (range 0.5-1.54) compared with the non-adapted theoretical total 5-FU dose. The objective response rate was 37% (95% CI 23-50%) in the intention-to-treat population and 47% (95% CI 29-65%) in the first-line per-protocol population. The median response duration was 10.4 months. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were, respectively, 7 and 18.6 months. PFS and OS in first-line per-protocol patients were, respectively, 9.2 and 20 months. No deaths were attributed to toxicity of 5-FU despite the high doses administered. Of the 53 patients, 19% experienced gastrointestinal and 30% haematological grade 3/4 toxicities. Hand-foot syndrome was common but mild (grade 3 in one patient). CONCLUSIONS: This strategy could be compared in a phase III trial with the standard LV5FU2 regimen.

Characterization of an adaptive immune response in microsatellite-instable colorectal cancer.

Sporadic or hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC) with microsatellite instability (MSI) is frequently characterized by inflammatory lymphocytic infiltration and tends to be associated with a better outcome than microsatellite stable (MSS) CRC, probably reflecting a more effective immune response. We investigated inflammatory mechanisms in 48 MSI CRCs and 62 MSS CRCs by analyzing: (1) the expression of 48 cytokines using Bio-Plex multiplex cytokine assays, and (2) the in situ immune response by immunohistochemical analysis with antibodies against CD3 (T lymphocytes), CD8 (cytotoxic T lymphocytes), CD45RO (memory T lymphocytes), T-bet (Th1 CD4 cells), and FoxP3 (regulatory T cells). MSI CRC exhibited significantly higher expression of CCL5 (RANTES), CXCL8 (IL-8), CXCL9 (MIG), IL-1ß, CXCL10 (IP-10), IL-16, CXCL1 (GROα), and IL-1ra, and lower expression of MIF, compared with MSS CRC. Immunohistochemistry combined with image analysis indicated that the density of CD3+, CD8+, CD45RO+, and T-bet+ T lymphocytes was higher in MSI CRC than in MSS CRC, whereas the number of regulatory T cells (FoxP3+) was not statistically different between the groups. These results indicate that MSI CRC is associated with a specific cytokine expression profile that includes CCL5, CXCL10, and CXCL9, which are involved in the T helper type 1 (Th1) response and in the recruitment of memory CD45RO+ T cells. Our findings highlight the major role of adaptive immunity in MSI CRC and provide a possible explanation for the more favorable prognosis of this CRC subtype.

Inter-observer agreement between dermatologists and oncologists in assessing dermatological toxicities in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated by cetuximab-based chemotherapies: a pilot comparative study.

The aim of this study was to measure the inter-observer agreement between two teams of three dermatologists and oncologists in labelling and grading the cetuximab-induced dermatological toxicities from 98 photographs performed in a cohort of 15 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving cetuximab-based chemotherapy. Kappa coefficient (κ) assessed inter-observer grading agreement. Both teams defined by the same terms eight of the 13 (62%) toxic effects reported together. Discrepancies concerned the labelling of rash desquamation, hand-foot syndrome and xerosis and the grading (different and often going in the opposite direction) of various toxicities such as paronychia, xerosis, desquamation and hand-foot syndrome (κ value less than 0.40). Acneiform eruption was recognised by both teams, but the grading allocated by oncologists was lower. Our results suggested the need for a real consensus between oncologists and dermatologists for labelling and grading these dermatological toxicities. Better training of oncologists by using a dermatological atlas would improve inter-observer agreement.

[Irinotecan for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer]. / Modalités d'administration de l'irinotecan dans le traitement du cancer colorectal métastatique.

In a dozen years of development, irinotecan (CPT11) became one of major therapeutics in the taking care of the metastatic colorectal cancer (CCRM). First used in monotherapy every three weeks, irinotecan has been later developed in association with 5FU and folinic acid according to two modalities of administration (bolus schedule administred weekly or infused schedule every two weeks). This association is now validated both in first and second line. Infused schedule (Folfiri) seems to introduce the best ratio of efficacy/tolerance. The association with the anti VEGF antibody (Avastin), bevacizumab) is promising. Moreover the association of the irinotecan with the anti EGFR antibody (Erbitux)), cetixumab) has show a efficacy in third line after progression under an protocol with irinotecan. Combinations with oxaliplatine (Irox, Irinox) or (Folfoxiri, Folfirinox) still remain in the course of appreciation notably in neoadjuvant context. An increment of dose seems accomplishable in monotherapy or in combination with/AF (high Folfiri doses) with a notable increment of responses rates. Nevertheless this strategy must again show a true clinical interest. Finally they are at promising developments in the fields of the irinotecan pharmacogenetic and pharmacogenomic.

[Clinical Practice Guidelines 2004. Standards, Options and Recommendations for the management of patient with adenocarcinoma of the stomach: radiotherapy (therapeutic evaluation)]. / Recommandations pour la pratique clinique. Standards, Options et Recommandations 2004 pour la prise en charge des patients atteints d'adénocarcinomes de l'estomac, cancers du cardia, autres types histologiques exclus (évaluation des thérapeutiques).

CONTEXT: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of French Cancer Centers (FNCLCC), the 20 French regional cancer centers, and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and the outcome of cancer patients. OBJECTIVES: To elaborate clinical practice guidelines for patients with stomach adenocarcinoma. These recommendations cover the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of these tumors. METHODS: The methodology is based on a literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery. The Standards, Options and Recommendations are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. RESULTS: This guidelines presents the synthesis of the data concerning the evaluation of the therapeutic ones. The main questions concern the type of gastrectomy to realize (Total Gastrectomy or gastrectomy subtotal), the extent of the lymphadenectomy (D2, D3 versus D1, D3, D2 versus D4) and the role of postoperative chemotherapy and adjuvant concomitant chemoradiotherapy.