The impact of a fourteen-gene molecular assay on physician treatment decisions in non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Five-year survival in early-stage, non-squamous, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains poor compared with other solid tumors, even after complete resection. Post-operative management depends on prognostic staging to identify individuals at highest risk for death, and therefore with the greatest need for further intervention. A 14-gene quantitative RT-PCR test successfully differentiates stage I-III NSCLC patients who are at high-, intermediate-, or low-risk for 5-year mortality. This study assesses the impact of the assay's prognostic information on physician decisions regarding adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: We invited 115 physicians who ordered the test to participate in an on-line survey. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients with different pre- and post-test chemotherapy recommendations. RESULTS: Fifty-eight physicians (50 %) completed the survey on 120 stage I or II NSCLC patients. Ninety-one patients (76 %) had stage I lung cancer; 27 (23 %), 39 (33 %), and 54 (45 %) patients had low-, intermediate-, and high-risk scores, respectively. Physicians' chemotherapy recommendations were changed post-testing in 37 patients (30.8 %, 95 % CI 22.7-39.9 %). High-risk patients were more likely to have a change in treatment recommendation (44.4 %, 95 % CI 30.9-58.6 %) than low risk patients (3.7 %, 95 % CI 0.1-19.0 %); a substantial number of changes were observed in both stage I (33.0 %, 95 % CI 23.5-43.6 %) and stage II (24.1 %, 95 % CI 10.3-43.5 %). CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that the assay resulted in a significant impact on physician treatment decisions in early-stage NSCLC, and that the nature of treatment changes generally correlated with the test's assessment of risk.

Compromised Outcomes in Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With Actionable Mutations Initially Treated Without Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: A Retrospective Analysis of Real-World Data.

PURPOSE: Identification and targeting of actionable oncogenic drivers (AODs) in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has dramatically improved outcomes. However, genomic testing uptake is variable and hampered by factors including slow turnaround time, frequently resulting in initial non-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment. We investigate how this behavior affects outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective analysis of real-world, deidentified data from the Integra Connect Database included adults with stage IV NSCLC newly diagnosed from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2020, with mutations of EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAF, MET, RET, ERBB2, or NTRK. Outcomes were reported as time to next treatment or death (TTNT) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Five hundred ten patients harboring AODs were identified and grouped as follows: group A (n = 379) were treated after the AOD was reported and served as the comparator. One hundred thirty-one patients treated before their AOD report were divided into group B (n = 47) who were initially started on chemotherapy and/or checkpoint inhibitor but switched to appropriate TKI within 35 days and group C (n = 84) who were also started empirically on non-TKI and did not switch within 35 days. Survival (OS) was significantly superior in group A compared with group C; TTNT was significantly superior in group A compared with groups B and C. CONCLUSION: For patients harboring AODs in advanced NSCLC, initial treatment before receipt of genomic test results yields significantly inferior outcomes and should be avoided. Molecular profiling panels with rapid turnaround times are essential to optimize patient outcomes and should be standard of care.