The utility of prescreening transesophageal echocardiograms: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Recent emphasis on the judicious use of imaging prompted the publication of the 2007 ACC/ASE Appropriateness Use Criteria (AUC) for Echocardiography. However, the intersection of the AUC with the safety and clinical use of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is not well established. METHODS: We reviewed 490 consecutive orders for TEEs for appropriateness, significant findings, and reasons for cancellation. RESULTS: We found that 79% (389/490) of ordered studies were performed and 21% (101/490) were not. The number of TEEs cancelled for safety reasons (n = 29) was similar to that cancelled for inappropriateness (n = 36). Only 2% (6/389) of those performed were inappropriate vs. 16% of those that were cancelled. New or unsuspected findings were obtained in half of all performed TEEs; the majority of which were ordered to detect cardiac source of embolism (CSE). CONCLUSIONS: The AUC should specifically consider the utility of clinician-based prescreening of TEEs to encourage appropriate use and safety. Furthermore, given the incremental value of TEE over transthoracic echocardiography in detection of CSE, in some cases, TEE may be considered an appropriate initial test for this indication.

Application of appropriateness criteria in outpatient transthoracic echocardiography.

BACKGROUND: Appropriateness criteria were applied to outpatient transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) studies. METHODS: Indications were rated as appropriate, inappropriate, or unclassifiable, considering provider-stated indications, previous TTE studies, symptom changes, and patient-stated indications. Clinically important new or unexpected findings were recorded. RESULTS: Of 368 TTE studies, 206 (56%) were appropriate, 31 (8%) were inappropriate, and 131 (35%) were unclassifiable. Appropriateness was not correlated with patient or provider demographics. In 288 cases with prior TTE studies, there were 92 (32%) important new findings and 63 (22%) unexpected findings, of which 20% were from inappropriately ordered and 31% from unclassifiable TTE studies. Appropriateness was not associated with new (odds ratio, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-3.18) or unexpected (odds ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-3.52) findings. Provider type and level of training were not correlated with new or unexpected findings. CONCLUSIONS: Many indications for TTE studies were unclassifiable. A high percentage of inappropriately ordered TTE studies yielded important information. Care must be taken in judging the value of TTE studies solely on the basis of appropriateness criteria.

Echocardiography-guided interventions.

A major advantage of echocardiography over other advanced imaging modalities (magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomographic angiography) is that echocardiography is mobile and real time. Echocardiograms can be recorded at the bedside, in the cardiac catheterization laboratory, in the cardiovascular intensive care unit, in the emergency room-indeed, any place that can accommodate a wheeled cart. This tremendous advantage allows for the performance of imaging immediately before, during, and after various procedures involving interventions. The purpose of this report is to review the use of echocardiography to guide interventions. We provide information on the selection of patients for interventions, monitoring during the performance of interventions, and assessing the effects of interventions after their completion. In this document, we address the use of echocardiography in commonly performed procedures: transatrial septal catheterization, pericardiocentesis, myocardial biopsy, percutaneous transvenous balloon valvuloplasty, catheter closure of atrial septal defects (ASDs) and patent foramen ovale (PFO), alcohol septal ablation for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and cardiac electrophysiology. A concluding section addresses interventions that are presently investigational but are likely to enter the realm of practice in the very near future: complex mitral valve repairs, left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion devices, 3-dimensional (3D) echocardiographic guidance, and percutaneous aortic valve replacement. The use of echocardiography to select and guide cardiac resynchronization therapy has recently been addressed in a separate document published by the American Society of Echocardiography and is not further discussed in this document. The use of imaging techniques to guide even well-established procedures enhances the efficiency and safety of these procedures.