18 Years of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: A Single Center Experience.

PURPOSE: We report our experience with long-term outcomes of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate during a period of 18 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed a prospectively collected database from March 1998 through June 2016 for patients who underwent holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia as performed or supervised by a single expert surgeon. Demographic and perioperative data were collected, including scores on the I-PSS (International Prostate Symptom Score), quality of life, peak flow rate, post-void residual urine and prostate specific antigen. Perioperative and late adverse events were also assessed. RESULTS: At a median followup of 9.1 years 1,476 patients with a mean age of 70.7 years were included in study. Mean catheter time and hospital stay were 1.2 and 1.3 days, respectively. Mean ± SD I-PSS and quality of life scores (15.9 ± 6.5 vs 6.8 ± 5.6 and 3.1 ± 1.4 vs 1.5 ± 1.4, respectively, each p <0.001) were significantly improved after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate compared to preoperative values. Likewise the mean peak flow rate and post-void residual urine were significantly improved (mean 7.2 ± 4.0 vs 17.7 ± 10.4 ml per second and 204 ± 258 vs 43 ± 73 ml, respectively, each p <0.001) in the 132 patients who could be followed more than 10 years. Perioperative blood transfusion was required in 0.8% of patients. Prostate specific antigen was significantly reduced by 66.7% at the most recent followup (p <0.001). Postoperative complications included urethral stricture and bladder neck contracture in 21 (1.4%) and 30 patients (2.1%), respectively. Repeat holmium laser enucleation of the prostate was required in 21 patients (1.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate is a safe, effective and durable procedure to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia during long-term followup.

Is multichannel urodynamic assessment necessary before considering a surgical treatment of BPH? Pros and cons.

PURPOSE: Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) are common in middle-aged men and could be consequences of multiple etiologies responsible for bladder outlet obstruction (BOO), detrusor underactivity (DUA) and/or overactive bladder. When LUTS are suggestive of BOO secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia, a surgical treatment can sometimes be consider. Even if multichannel urodynamic study (UDS) is currently the gold standard to properly assess LUTS, its use in non-neurogenic men is still a matter of controversy. Here, we aim to explore the evidence supporting or not the use of systematic multichannel UDS before considering an invasive treatment in men LUTS. METHODS: The debate was presented with a "pro and con" structure. The "pro" side supported the systematic use of a multichannel UDS before considering a surgical treatment in men LUTS. The "con" side successively refuted the "pro" side arguments. RESULTS: The "pro" side mainly based their argumentation on the poor correlation of LUTS and office-based tests with BOO or DUA. Furthermore, since a multichannel UDS could allow selecting men that will most benefit of a surgical procedure, they hypothesized that such an approach could reduce the overall morbidity rate and cost associated with. The "con" side considered that, in most cases, medical history and symptoms were reliable enough to consider surgery. Finally, they underlined the UDS limitations and the frequent lack of alternative to surgery in this context. CONCLUSIONS: Randomized clinical trials are being conducted to compare these two approaches. Their results would help the urological community to override this debate.

Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Larger than 100 ml: Simple Open Enucleation Versus Transurethral Laser Prostatectomy.

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is one of the most common causes of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in aging men. Over the age of 60, more than a half of men have BPH and/or bothersome LUTS. Contemporary guidelines advocate surgery as the standard of care for symptomatic BPH after failure of medical therapy, where the choice of the appropriate surgical procedure depends on the prostate size. Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and simple open prostatectomy (OP) have been considered for decades the reference-standard techniques for men with prostate smaller and larger than 80 ml, respectively. However, both procedures are potentially associated with considerable perioperative morbidity which prompted the introduction of a variety of minimally invasive surgical techniques with comparable long-term outcomes compared to TURP and OP. Nevertheless, the management of prostates larger than 100 ml remains a clinical challenge. Transurethral anatomical enucleation of the prostate utilizing different laser energy represents an excellent alternative concept in transurethral BPH surgery. These procedures gained popularity and demonstrated similar outcomes to OP with the advantages of favorable morbidity profiles and shorter catheter time and hospital stay. Despite the fact that OP remains a viable treatment option for patients with bothersome LUTS secondary to very large prostates, this procedure has been to a large extent replaced by these emerging enucleation techniques. Given the advent of surgical alternatives, the current review presents an evidence-based comparison of the efficacy and safety profile of the currently available transurethral laser techniques with the standard OP for the management of BPH due to adenomas larger than 100 ml.

Pyelocystostomy for treatment of recurrent nephrolithiasis and ureteropelvic junction obstruction in a pelvic kidney.

Patients with pelvic kidneys are at an increased risk of developing ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) and nephrolithiasis with limited endourologic options. A 54-year-old man with a left pelvic kidney, recurrent nephrolithiasis, and 12 previous ureteroscopies presented with left UPJO and lower pole calyceal stones. After two failed ureteroscopic attempts, an open pyelolithotomy and pyelocystostomy were performed. After 30 months, he continues to be asymptomatic without recurrence of nephrolithiasis. This constitutes the fifth such reported case. Therefore, pyelocystotomy is a good option for patients with pelvic kidneys, UPJO and recurrent nephrolithiasis refractory to endourologic procedures.

GreenLight™ laser (XPS) photoselective vapo-enucleation versus holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized controlled study.

PURPOSE: After the advent of the GreenLight XPS™ (180 W) 532 nm laser, photoselective vapo-enucleation of the prostate could compete with holmium laser enucleation of the prostate as a size independent procedure. We assessed whether photoselective vapo-enucleation of the prostate-XPS is not less effective than holmium laser enucleation of prostate for improvement of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized controlled noninferiority trial comparing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate to photoselective vapo-enucleation of the prostate-XPS 180 W was conducted. I-PSS, flow rate, residual urine, prostate specific antigen and prostate volume changes as well as perioperative and late adverse events were compared. Noninferiority of I-PSS at 1 year was evaluated using a 1-sided test at 5% level of significance. The statistical significance of other comparators was assessed at the (2-sided) 5% level. RESULTS: Overall 50 and 53 patients were included in the holmium laser enucleation and photoselective vapo-enucleation of the prostate groups, respectively. Operative time, hospital stay and time to catheter removal were comparable between the groups. There was significant, comparable improvement in I-PSS and post-void residual urine volume at 1, 4 and 12 months. After 4 months prostate size reduction was significantly higher in the holmium laser enucleation of prostate group (74.3% vs 43.1%, p=0.001). At 12 months maximum urine flow rate was significantly higher in the holmium laser enucleation of prostate group (26.4 ±11.5 vs 18.4 ±7.5 ml per second, p=0.03). Re-intervention was needed in 2 and 3 cases in the holmium laser enucleation and photoselective vapo-enucleation of the prostate groups, respectively (p=1.0). Mean estimated cost per holmium laser enucleation of prostate procedure was significantly lower than per photoselective vapo-enucleation of the prostate procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to holmium laser enucleation of prostate, GreenLight XPS laser photoselective vapo-enucleation of the prostate is safe, noninferior and effective in treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Global GreenLight Laser Study: Outcomes from a contemporary series of 713 patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcome in patients undergoing photoselective vaporization of the prostate for benign prostatic obstruction as part of the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Global GreenLight Laser Study. METHODS: Data were collected on 713 patients with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction undergoing photoselective vaporization of the prostate at 25 centers worldwide, between April 2010 and April 2012. Three types of GreenLight laser powers were used: 80 W, 120 W or 180 W. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded. Outcome parameters measured at baseline, 6-12 weeks, 6 months and 12 months were: uroflow measurements, International Prostate Symptom Score; prostate-specific antigen and International Index of Erectile Function. RESULTS: Operating time was shortest with the 180-W laser at 53.8 min. Intraoperatively, bleeding occurred in 3.1% of patients. Statistically significant changes were reported in maximum flow rate, postvoid residual urine, International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life score and prostate-specific antigen (P < 0.01) at each time-point assessed for the 80- and 120-W lasers as well as for the 180-W laser, with the exception of prostate-specific antigen at 6 months and 12 months. There were 14 Clavien-Dindo grade III-A complications and two grade III-B. The incontinence rate at 12 months was 6.3%, 4.5%, and 2.6% for the 80, 120 and 180 W lasers, respectively. The overall blood transfusion rate was 0.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Objective and subjective improvement after GreenLight laser treatment worldwide was significant at 1-year follow up. Morbidity and complications were low. Although not a randomized control study, the data can provide an indication of the outcome of the different GreenLight laser powers.

Holmium:YAG transurethral incision versus laser photoselective vaporization for benign prostatic hyperplasia in a small prostate.

PURPOSE: We assess the perioperative, short-term and long-term functional outcomes of treating bladder outlet obstruction secondary to a small prostate by 1 of 2 laser techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review using a prospectively maintained database was performed of patients treated for bladder outlet obstruction secondary to a prostate smaller than 40 ml. Patients who were treated with GreenLight™ photoselective vaporization of the prostate or holmium laser transurethral incision of the prostate were included in the study. RESULTS: From January 2002 through December 2010, 191 cases of 1,682 laser prostate surgeries were described. GreenLight photoselective vaporization of the prostate was performed in 144 (75.4%) cases and holmium laser transurethral incision of the prostate was performed in 47 (24.6%) cases. A significantly shorter mean operating time, hospital stay and catheter duration were observed in the holmium laser transurethral incision of the prostate group (30.3 ± 16 minutes, 0.8 ± 0.8 days and 1.3 ± 1.9 days, respectively) than in the photoselective vaporization of the prostate group (45.8 ± 22 minutes, 0.3 ± 0.4 days and 0.4 ± 0.6 days, respectively, p <0.05). At 1 and 5 years after photoselective vaporization of the prostate there were reductions in mean International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life score and residual urine with improvement in mean maximal flow rate of 57.7% and 62.8%, 58.3% and 57.2%, 65.4% and 73%, and 127.6% and 167.1%, respectively. At 1 and 5 years after holmium laser transurethral incision of the prostate there were reductions in mean International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life score and residual urine with improvement of mean maximal flow rate of 55.3% and 52.8%, 49.2% and 49%, 45% and 78.1%, and 67.4% and 35.4%, respectively. Subjective and objective urine flow parameters were comparable at different followup points. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of early and late complications (p >0.05). Reoperation rates were 10.4% and 6.4% in the photoselective vaporization of the prostate and holmium laser transurethral incision of the prostate groups, respectively (p >0.05). The mean estimated cost per holmium laser transurethral incision of the prostate procedure was significantly lower than per photoselective vaporization of the prostate procedure (509.34CAD vs 1,765.92CAD, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Holmium laser transurethral incision of the prostate and GreenLight photoselective vaporization of the prostate seem to be equally effective, safe and durable surgical treatment options for small prostates even in high risk patients.

Prospective, randomized, double-blind, vehicle controlled, multicenter phase IIb clinical trial of the pore forming protein PRX302 for targeted treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia.

PURPOSE: We conducted a safety and efficacy evaluation of intraprostatic injection of PRX302, a modified pore forming protein (proaerolysin) activated by prostate specific antigen, as a highly targeted, localized approach to treat lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 92 patients with I-PSS (International Prostate Symptom Score) 15 or greater, peak urine flow 12 ml or less per second and prostate volume 30 to 100 ml were randomized 2:1 to a single ultrasound guided intraprostatic injection of PRX302 vs vehicle (placebo) in this phase IIb double-blind study. Injection was 20% of prostate volume and 0.6 µg PRX302 per gm prostate. Peak urine flow was determined by a blinded reviewer. Benign prostatic hyperplasia medications were prohibited. The primary data set of efficacy evaluable patients (73) was analyzed using last observation carried forward. RESULTS: PRX302 treatment resulted in an approximate 9-point reduction in I-PSS and 3 ml per second increase in peak urine flow that were statistically significant changes from baseline compared to vehicle. Efficacy was sustained for 12 months. Early withdrawal for other benign prostatic hyperplasia treatment was more common for patients in the vehicle group. Relative to vehicle, PRX302 apparent toxicity was mild, transient, and limited to local discomfort/pain and irritative urinary symptoms occurring in the first few days, with no effect on erectile function. CONCLUSIONS: A single administration of PRX302 as a short, outpatient based procedure was well tolerated in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia. PRX302 produced clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement in patient subjective (I-PSS) and quantitative objective (peak urine flow) measures sustained for 12 months. The side effect profile is favorable with most effects attributed to the injection itself and not related to drug toxicity.

Endoscopic vascular targeted photodynamic therapy with the photosensitizer WST11 for benign prostatic hyperplasia in the preclinical dog model.

PURPOSE: Vascular targeted photodynamic therapy with WST11 (TOOKAD® Soluble) is in phase III clinical trials of an interstitial transperineal approach for focal therapy of prostate cancer. We investigated the safety and efficacy of the endourethral route in the context of benign prostatic hyperplasia in the dog model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An optical laser fiber was positioned in the prostatic urethra of 34 dogs, including 4 controls. It was connected to a 753 nm diode laser at 200 mW/cm fluence, delivering 200 to 300 J. WST11 (5 to 15 mg/kg) was infused intravenously in 2 modes, including continuous, starting 5 to 15 minutes before and during illumination, or a bolus 5 to 10 minutes before illumination. Prostate ultrasound, cystourethrogram, urodynamics and histopathology were performed. Followup was 1 week to 1 year. RESULTS: Endourethral WST11 vascular targeted photodynamic therapy was uneventful in all except 1 dog, which experienced urinary retention but reached the 1-week end point. All prostates except those in controls showed hemorrhagic lesions. They consisted of 2 levels of concentric alterations, including periurethral necrosis with endothelial layer destruction and adjacent inflammation/atrophy with normal blood vessels. Prostatic urethral width increased as early as 6 weeks after treatment, while prostatic volume decreased, reaching 25% by 18 to 26 weeks. A parallel decrease in urethral pressure at 6 weeks lasted up to 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed the vascular effect of endourethral WST11 vascular targeted photodynamic therapy. To our knowledge we report for the first time that the resulting periurethral necrosis led to significant, sustained widening of the prostatic urethra, accompanied by long-term improvement in urodynamic parameters. These findings support future clinical applications of this minimally invasive approach to benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Can we predict the outcome of 532 nm laser photoselective vaporization of the prostate? Time to event analysis.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the safety, efficacy and predictability of the long-term outcome of GreenLight™ (532 nm laser) photoselective vaporization of the prostate to treat patients with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a longitudinal study of patients who underwent GreenLight (532 nm laser) photoselective vaporization of the prostate at our center between June 2002 and November 2011. All patient data were prospectively maintained in the prostate unit database. Two types of laser equipment were used, including the KTP in 91 cases (31.6%) and the GreenLight HPS™ in 197 (68.4%). RESULTS: Larger glands were treated with HPS and KTP photoselective vaporization (mean ± SD volume 45.6 ± 22.5 and 39.6 ± 15.2 ml, respectively, p <0.05). After photoselective vaporization with the KTP laser, we noted a 59.1% and 61.8% decrease in the International Prostate Symptom Score, and a 140.7% and 118.4% improvement in the maximal urine flow rate at 1 and 5 years, respectively. Similarly, after prostate vaporization with the HPS we observed a 65.1% and 62.1% decrease in the International Prostate Symptom Score, and a 123.1% and 107.3% improvement in the maximal urine flow rate at 1 and 4 years, respectively. At a mean of 40.5 months (range 3 to 114) of followup reoperation was indicated in 7.6% of cases. The overall rates of bladder neck contracture, de novo urethral stricture and residual/recurrent adenoma were 3.4% (10 cases), 2.1% (6) and 2.1% (6) with no statistically significant difference between vaporization with the KTP and HPS lasers. Most adverse events occurred during year 1 postoperatively. More bladder neck contractures developed after vaporization was done in smaller glands (p <0.05). More cases with residual prostatic adenoma had a prostate volume of 50 ml or greater vs less than 50 ml (4 of 71 or 5.6% vs 2 of 207 or 0.96%). CONCLUSIONS: GreenLight (532 nm laser) photoselective vaporization of the prostate seems to be safe and effective for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. A long lasting, successful outcome is predictable. With careful surveillance during year 1 postoperatively and early intervention for adverse events, a sustainable functional outcome could be achieved without re-treatment.

Holmium laser enucleation versus photoselective vaporization for prostatic adenoma greater than 60 ml: preliminary results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial.

PURPOSE: To our knowledge we report the first single center, prospective, randomized study comparing holmium laser enucleation and high performance GreenLight™ prostate photoselective vaporization as surgical treatment of prostatic adenomas greater than 60 ml. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 80 patients with a large prostatic adenoma were randomly assigned to surgical treatment with holmium laser enucleation or photoselective vaporization. International Prostate Symptom Score, International Index of Erectile Function-15, maximum flow rate, post-void residual urine, serum prostate specific antigen and transrectal ultrasound volume were recorded. RESULTS: Patient baseline characteristics were similar for holmium laser enucleation and photoselective vaporization. Operative time and catheter removal time were almost equal in the 2 groups (p = 0.7 and 0.2, respectively). Eight vaporization cases were converted to transurethral prostate resection or holmium laser enucleation intraoperatively due to bleeding. A significantly higher maximum flow rate and lower post-void residual urine were noted in holmium laser cases during the entire followup (at 1 year each p = 0.02). However, no significant difference in International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life or International Index of Erectile Function-15 was detected. Prostate volume and serum PSA decreased 78% and 88% in the holmium laser group, and 52% and 60% in the vaporization group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Holmium laser enucleation and photoselective vaporization are effective for lower urinary tract symptoms due to a large prostatic adenoma. Early subjective functional results (maximum flow rate and post-void residual urine) of holmium laser enucleation appear to be superior to those of photoselective vaporization. In our hands cases intended to be treated with photoselective vaporization were at 22% risk of conversion to another modality. This could reflect our determination to vaporize to the capsule in all vaporization cases.

Feasibility of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for recurrent/residual benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

UNLABELLED: Study Type--Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4. What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? The major advantage of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) depends on the ability to use the native anatomical plane between the prostate adenoma and surgical capsule, peeling each prostatic lobe from the capsule. HoLEP is associated with less catheterisation time, hospital stay and blood loss than transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) or open prostatectomy. Urodynamic relief of obstruction has been reported to be better with HoLEP than TURP. However, surgical treatment of recurrent prostatic obstruction after previous transurethral surgery for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia is more challenging because of loss of anatomical landmarks resulting in either incomplete removal or incontinence. HoLEP for recurrent symptoms due to residual or re-growing prostatic adenoma seems to be as safe, feasible and efficient as HoLEP for de novo cases. The surgical plane between the adenoma and the surgical capsule was still accessible resulting in a durable long-term outcome with minimal side-effects. Previous transurethral prostatic surgery is not a contraindication for HoLEP. OBJECTIVE: • To assess the technical feasibility, functional outcome and morbidity of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in patients with previous transurethral prostate surgery. 'Redo' surgery for recurrent or residual BPH poses a technical challenge with uncertain outcome as a result of disturbed anatomical landmarks with no clear surgical limits. PATIENTS AND METHODS: • We retrospectively reviewed 1054 patients who underwent HoLEP for symptomatic BPH. • Patients were stratified into two groups, group-I with no previous prostate surgery or primary-HoLEP (978 patients) and group-II with history of previous prostate surgery or secondary-HoLEP (76). • All patients' variables as well as follow-up data were assessed and compared. RESULTS: • There were no significant differences in baseline criteria between the two groups (P > 0.05). • In group-II, HoLEP was done after a median (range) of 66 (13-121) months from previous prostate surgeries, including transurethral resection of the prostate (48 patients), HoLEP (eight), transurethral incision of the prostate (nine), photoselective vaporization of the prostate (four) and other procedures (seven). • In both groups, routine HoLEP technique was adopted, the plane of enucleation could be identified without extra difficulty. However, more energy per gram of prostate tissue was needed in group-II (P < 0.05). • Operative auxiliary procedures were indicated in 1.9% of group-I, and 1.3% of group-II (P > 0.05). There were no operative complications or blood transfusion in group-II. The mean hospital stay and catheter time was similar in both groups. Early and late postoperative complications were not statistically different (P > 0.05). • At 1 month the mean maximum urinary flow rate (Q(max) ) was 22.3 and 18.8 mL/s, postvoid residual urine volume (PVR) was 46 and 45 mL, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) was 7.04 and 7.08, and the health-related quality of life (HRQL) score was 1.57 and 1.56, in group-I and II, respectively. At 1 year the mean Q(max) was 23.4 and 25.9 mL/s, PVR was 32.5 and 24.1 mL, IPSS was 4.5 and 4.4, and the HRQL score was 1.2 and 1.1,) in group-I and II, respectively (P > 0.05). • Reoperation for recurrent obstruction was indicated in 4% in group-I and 5.2% in group-II (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: • Secondary-HoLEP procedures seem to be safe and technically feasible with comparable functional outcomes as those of primary-HoLEP.

Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: long-term durability of clinical outcomes and complication rates during 10 years of followup.

PURPOSE: We assessed the long-term durability of subjective and objective outcomes and complication rates after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 949 evaluable patients treated with holmium laser enucleation of the prostate between March 1998 and September 2010 at a single center. Study variables included International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life, maximum urinary flow rate, post-void residual urine volume and prostate specific antigen. RESULTS: Mean followup was 62 months. Mean preoperative post-void residual volume, maximal flow rate, International Prostate Symptom Score and quality of life were 311 ml, 7.9 ml per second, 19 and 3.8, respectively. Postoperatively all variables showed significant improvement starting at month 1 of followup and remained improved for the entire followup period. Patients with acute urinary retention represented 36% (343) of the cohort. Postoperative mean post-void residual volume was 45, 25.7 and 52 ml, mean maximal flow rate was 21.5, 24.3 and 23.4 ml per second, mean International Prostate Symptom Score was 7.3, 4.4 and 3.8, and mean quality of life was 1.7, 1 and 0.7 at 1 month, 1 year and 10 years, respectively. Persistent urge and stress incontinence were found in 1% and 0.5% of patients, respectively. Bladder neck contracture, urethral stricture and reoperation due to residual adenoma developed in 0.8%, 1.6% and 0.7% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate represents an effective treatment modality for men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia with a low rate of complications during a long followup. Patients who experience improvement from baseline to early followup maintain improvement at later followup.

Is there a way to predict stress urinary incontinence after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate?

PURPOSE: In this study we defined high risk patients at high risk of stress urinary incontinence after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis during a 10-year period of 949 consecutive patients treated with holmium laser enucleation of the prostate by a single surgeon. Patients were divided into group 1--those without postoperative stress urinary incontinence (902) and group 2--those with stress urinary incontinence (47). All preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative clinical variables were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: Patient age, preoperative and postoperative prostate specific antigen, preoperative medications, preoperative acute retention and duration of postoperative catheter time were not associated with postoperative stress urinary incontinence. The presence of diabetes mellitus was significantly associated with a higher incidence of stress urinary incontinence (p <0.001). Using medians of the whole cohort, prostate volume greater than 81 gm, operative time greater than 96 minutes and reduction in prostate specific antigen greater than 84% were significantly associated with stress urinary incontinence. On multivariate analysis prostate volume greater than 81 gm, the presence of diabetes mellitus and greater than 84% reduction in prostate specific antigen remained statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate results in stress urinary incontinence at a rate comparable to that of other surgical techniques for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. The presence of diabetes mellitus, large prostate volume and a greater reduction in postoperative prostate specific antigen remained statistically significant for the development of stress urinary incontinence. Patients with diabetes, especially those with a large prostate, should be encouraged to start Kegel exercises in the immediate postoperative period.

Preclinical study of the novel vascular occluding agent, WST11, for photodynamic therapy of the canine prostate.

PURPOSE: Vascular targeted photodynamic therapy with WST09 shows promise for recurrent prostate cancer after radiation but hydrophobicity in aqueous solutions limited application. We tested the safety and efficacy of WST11, a novel water soluble vascular occluding agent, for vascular targeted photodynamic therapy of the dog prostate and compared it to WST09 vascular targeted photodynamic therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Optical fibers were inserted in the prostate and connected to diode lasers. WST11 (Steba Biotech, Cedex, France) at varying doses, including a drug control with no light in 34 dogs, and WST09 (Steba Biotech) (2 mg/kg) in 3 dogs were infused during 10 minutes. Illumination was initiated at 5 or 10 minutes, and lasted up to 33.2 minutes based on laser fluence and delivered energy. Blood was collected for analysis and pharmacokinetics. The end point was at 1 week. RESULTS: No vascular targeted photodynamic therapy associated change was observed in blood pressure or blood test values. Circulating WST11 increased with drug infusion and decreased rapidly during 1 hour to reach undetectable levels by 24 hours. All except 1 dog with bowel intussusception did well after vascular targeted photodynamic therapy with only mild urinary symptoms that resolved within 24 to 48 hours. Lung and liver were normal. Hemorrhage was present in all prostates except controls. This translated into necrosis at a WST11 threshold and within a window of doses at fixed illumination. Necrosis was associated with loss of the vessel endothelial layer. Fluence highly impacted necrosis. WST11 vascular targeted photodynamic therapy was advantageously comparable to WST09 vascular targeted photodynamic therapy, and optimally ablated about 5.0 cm(3) of tissue per lobe and about 10 cm(3) of the whole prostate. CONCLUSIONS: The safety and efficacy of WST11 vascular targeted photodynamic therapy in the dog prostate support clinical applications for prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Holmium laser ablation versus photoselective vaporization of prostate less than 60 cc: long-term results of a randomized trial.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the long-term results and durability of photoselective vaporization and holmium laser ablation as surgical treatment of small to medium prostates in a prospective, randomized study in men with obstructive benign prostatic hyperplasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From March 2005 to April 2007 we randomly allocated 109 patients with a prostate gland of less than 60 cc to prostate photoselective vaporization (52) or holmium laser ablation (57) and evaluated them 1, 2 and 3 years postoperatively. Functional followup included measurement of maximum urinary flow rate, post-void residual urine, International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life, International Index of Erectile Function and prostate specific antigen. RESULTS: Mean ± SD preoperative prostate volume was 33.1 ± 14.5 and 37.3 ± 13.6 in the laser ablation and vaporization groups, respectively. All functional parameters improved significantly compared to baseline values in each group. There was no difference in International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life, maximum urinary flow rate, post-void residual urine or percent of prostate specific antigen decrease between the 2 groups 1, 2 and 3 years postoperatively. At 3-year followup International Prostate Symptom Score had improved by 70.5%, quality of life had improved by 69.4%, maximum urinary flow rate had increased by 164% and post-void residual urine had decreased by 81% in the holmium laser ablation group. In the photoselective vaporization group International Prostate Symptom Score improved by 64.1%, quality of life improved by 65.5%, maximum urinary flow rate increased by 189% and post-void residual urine decreased by 79.5%. The overall re-treatment rate was 15.8% for holmium laser ablation vs 19.3% for photoselective vaporization. CONCLUSIONS: Prostate photoselective vaporization and holmium laser ablation are effective surgical treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Postoperative functional improvements were significant and durable, and equivalent in the 2 groups. The 2 techniques have a similar complication rate.

The use of a novel reverse thermosensitive polymer to prevent ureteral stone retropulsion during intracorporeal lithotripsy: a randomized, controlled trial.

PURPOSE: We present the first randomized clinical study using BackStop, a novel reverse thermosensitive water-soluble polymer that is dispensed above the stone(s) and temporarily occludes the ureter to prevent retropulsion of stone fragments during ureteroscopic lithotripsy. After fragmentation is completed and concretions are extracted, conventional irrigation with saline dissolves the polymer, which is then flushed out. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 68 subjects with a single stone in the proximal ureter and an indication for ureteroscopic lithotripsy were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, single-blind, controlled, multisite clinical study. Each subject was randomly assigned to the BackStop group (34) or the control group (34 with no antiretropulsion device). For subjects in the experimental group BackStop was dispensed into the ureter above the stone using a 3Fr or 5Fr catheter. Ureteroscopic lithotripsy was performed in all subjects using pneumatic or laser energy. Measured end points included the retropulsion rate, the need for subsequent procedures, the stone-free rate at followup, the occurrence of adverse events and ureteral occlusion, if any, and post-stone fragmentation and extraction. RESULTS: Subjects randomized to the BackStop group experienced a statistically significant (p = 0.0002) lower rate of retropulsion (8.8%, 3 of 34) vs the control group (52.9%, 18/34). There were no adverse events in the BackStop group and BackStop was successfully dissolved in every subject, resulting in a patent ureter. CONCLUSIONS: BackStop appears to be a novel, safe and effective means of preventing stone fragment retropulsion during ureteroscopic lithotripsy for the management of ureteral stones.