Relative CTLA-4, PTPN-22, and interleukin 37 mRNA expressions in patients with lupus nephritis.

OBJECTIVES: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease characterized by T-cell immune-dysregulation and loss of tolerance to self-antigens. CTLA-4 and PTPN-22 are involved in the inhibition of T-lymphocytes activation. IL-37 is an anti-inflammatory cytokine that suppresses innate immunity. The relative expression of CTLA-4, IL-37 and PTPN-22 were evaluated as negative regulators of immune response in SLE patients, lupus nephritis (LN) and disease activity. METHODS: Real-Time PCR was performed to determine relative CTLA-4, IL-37, and PTPN-22 mRNA expressions in fifty-eight SLE patients, who were divided into two groups: 29 SLE patients without nephritis and 29 patients with LN, versus fifty controls. RESULTS: There was a significantly high-expression of CTLA-4 and IL-37 genes in SLE patients compared to controls (p=0.005; 0.018 respectively). There was no difference in relative PTPN-22 mRNA expression between the SLE patients and controls. Relative CTLA-4 mRNA expression decreased in LN patients (p=0.044), however, relative IL-37 mRNA over-expressed in LN patients (p=0.001) compared to those without LN. There was a significant over-expression of relative IL-37 andPTPN-22 mRNA in active SLE patients. But, there was a non-significant difference in CTLA-4 expression with disease activity. Regression analysis revealed patients with relative IL-37 mRNA over-expression had two times more to develop lupus nephritis (OR=1.906, 95% CI=1.218-2.983, p=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Relative IL-37mRNA expression was elevated in SLE patients and associated with renal involvement and disease activity. It could be considered as a new promising predicting tool for LN. Relative PTPN-22 mRNA expression was correlated with disease activity only in SLE patients.

Efficacy and safety profile of intravenous tocilizumab versus intravenous abatacept in treating female Saudi Arabian patients with active moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab with those of abatacept in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis not responding to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy. METHODS: A prospective, open-label study was carried out on adult females with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous tocilizumab or abatacept treatment. History taking, clinical examination, and laboratory evaluation were done at baseline and during a 24-week period of follow-up. Disease activity was calculated using the DAS28-ESR score. The incidence of accompanying adverse events was evaluated and all statistical analyses were performed by InStat. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-two patients were enrolled and classified randomly into the tocilizumab (n = 68) and abatacept (n = 64) groups. By week 24, the mean DAS28-ESR was significantly reduced in both groups (P < 0.0001) in association with significant reductions in CRP, ESR, and HAQ scores. No significant difference in the incidence rate of adverse effects appeared between both study groups. However, there were marked declines in the hemoglobin levels (P = 0.003) and neutrophil count (P = 0.002) together with significant elevations in systolic blood pressure (P = 0.002), liver enzymes (P = 0.001), total cholesterol (P = 0.001), and high-density lipoproteins (P = 0.002) in the tocilizumab group compared with the abatacept group. CONCLUSION: Both intravenous abatacept and tocilizumab significantly decreased the disease activity and improved the physical function in rheumatoid arthritis patients who failed to respond to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy. Although the efficacy of both drugs was similar, abatacept showed a more promising short-term safety profile since it was associated with less adverse effects and better laboratory outcomes.