RESUMO
A 33-year-old woman presented with recurring pruritic, erythematous papules around the mouth and on the hands, of 1.5 years' duration. These flares typically began several days before her menstrual cycle and persisted for approximately 1 week. Physical examination revealed urticarial plaques on the neck. Due to the nature of the eruption, which corresponded with her menstrual cycle, a diagnosis of autoimmune progesterone urticaria was considered and workup pursued.
Assuntos
Doenças Autoimunes/imunologia , Dermatoses Faciais/imunologia , Dermatoses da Mão/imunologia , Progesterona/imunologia , Urticária/imunologia , Adulto , Dermatoses Faciais/patologia , Feminino , Dermatoses da Mão/patologia , Humanos , Ciclo Menstrual , Neutrófilos/imunologia , Urticária/patologiaRESUMO
A 60-year-old African American man presented to the dermatology clinic for evaluation of skin and nail changes associated with docetaxel therapy for adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Previous treatment cycles ofdocetaxel had resulted in hyperpigmented patches and linear streaks on his arms where he received infusions, as well as nail changes, including longitudinal melanonychia and onycholysis of his great toenails. At his latest visit, he reported recently noticing a new bluish discoloration of his lunulae that had developed during the past 3 months, the time corresponding to his most recent docetaxel treatment cycle (Figure). The patient's history did not reveal any recent medication changes, ingestion of known lunula-discoloring agents, or any silver-containing compounds. On examination, the patient's observation was confirmed, as the lunulae on both his right and left thumb were found to have a marked blue discoloration to them. The patient was treated with observation as the discoloration was not bothersome to him, and on routine follow-up for an unrelated skin complaint, the patient's nail beds had returned to their normal color, approximately 3 months after discontinuation of the docetaxel therapy, according to the patient.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Doenças da Unha/induzido quimicamente , Taxoides/efeitos adversos , Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Docetaxel , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias da Próstata/tratamento farmacológico , Taxoides/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
The presence of a true melanoma epidemic has been a controversial topic for the past decade. A dramatic increase in the incidence of cutaneous malignant melanoma in developed countries is well documented, but mortality rates have not risen as rapidly. This has generated much discussion about whether there is a true increase in disease, or more of an apparent phenomenon that may be explained by multiple biases and other factors. The increase in incidence may be due to aggressive surveillance with increased detection of melanomas that are histologically worrisome but biologically benign. This argument, however, does not account for increased incidence of both thin and thicker melanomas. The controversy lies in the interpretation of these facts. This contribution reviews epidemiologic studies from the United States and worldwide to summarize the arguments for and against the debate about whether a melanoma epidemic exists.
Assuntos
Surtos de Doenças , Melanoma/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Viés , Feminino , Saúde Global , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Melanoma/mortalidade , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vigilância da População/métodos , Fatores de Risco , Distribuição por Sexo , Neoplasias Cutâneas/mortalidade , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The treatment of melanoma in situ (MIS), particularly the lentigo maligna (LM) subtype, has been a controversial subject in the literature for over a decade. Surgical excision with 5 mm margins is the standard of care in the USA, while several variations of Mohs surgery are frequently used to treat clinically ill-defined lesions. Radiation is much less frequently used. Topical imiquimod has also been more recently proposed, in small case reports in the literature, as a therapy for MIS. However, controversies exist with all approaches. OBJECTIVE: To review the current literature regarding topical imiquimod, radiation therapy, surgical excision, and the various forms of Mohs surgery for MIS, focusing on the LM subtype. METHODS: A literature search was performed in the PubMed database using the following terms: "melanoma in situ,""lentigo maligna,""excisional surgery,""Mohs micrographic surgery,""radiation therapy," and "imiquimod." Articles relevant to the treatment of MIS were reviewed and reported herein. RESULTS: Studies of imiquimod therapy for MIS are hampered by small study numbers and short follow-up periods. The few, better-designed studies reveal relatively low cure rates. In addition, literature review reveals that a significant percentage of cases of MIS that are initially diagnosed as in situ disease by biopsy subsequently prove to have an invasive component upon complete excision. This finding suggests that topical therapy of any kind may be problematic. Studies of radiation therapy for MIS have relatively small numbers of patients and short follow-up. Multiple studies of excisional surgery have shown that 5 mm margins are often insufficient to clear the LM subtype of MIS due to unseen subclinical extension, accounting for this treatment's reported 8-20% recurrence rate. Finally, a number of variants of traditional frozen section Mohs surgery have been utilized to try and achieve complete peripheral margin assessment of clinically ill-defined LM lesions. All studies are retrospective, and most are single-institution and frequently single-operator, limiting the meaningfulness of their results. Nevertheless, they involve moderate numbers of patients, and many have at least a five year follow-up. Collectively, they suggest recurrence rates in the range of 0.5-3.0%. CONCLUSION: Topical imiquimod therapy appears to provide relatively low cure rates for MIS, and because some of these lesions contain an unrecognized invasive component, should be used with extreme caution to treat this disease. Radiation therapy may be a useful second-line therapy if surgery is contraindicated. Excisional surgery is an appropriate therapy for clinically well-defined MIS; however, margins larger than 5 mm may be required when treating larger or indistinct lesions. Finally, for clinically ill-defined LM arising on sun-damaged skin, especially in regions of aesthetic concern, some form of complete peripheral margin assessment - one of the various forms of Mohs surgery - may provide the highest cure rate and create the smallest surgical defect.