Cognitive profiles of extremely preterm children: Full-Scale IQ hides strengths and weaknesses.

AIM: To study whether a specific cognitive profile can be identified for children born extremely preterm (EPT) by investigating: 1) strengths and weaknesses not revealed by Full-Scale IQ, 2) overlap between different cognitive deficits and 3) proportion of EPT children with multiple deficits. METHODS: We analysed data from the 4th version of Wechsler Intelligence Scales for Children in EPT children (n = 359) and matched controls (n = 367), collected within the 6.5-year follow-up of a population-based prospective cohort study. RESULTS: Extremely preterm children performed worse than controls on all measures. Group differences were the largest in Perceptual Reasoning (PRI) and Working Memory (WMI), but differences between indices were small. However, when conducting categorical analyses, deficits in PRI and/or WMI were not more common than other combinations. Many EPT children had no or mild cognitive deficits, although often in multiple domains. CONCLUSION: Extremely preterm children had greater weaknesses in working memory and perceptual abilities. However, detailed analyses of cognitive subscales showed large heterogeneity and provided no support for a specific cognitive profile. In conclusion, Full-Scale IQ scores hide strengths and weaknesses and individual profiles for EPT children need to be considered in order to provide appropriate support.

Structured Observation of Motor Performance in Infants: Level and quality associated with later motor development.

AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the level of motor development and the quality of motor performance during the first 10 months in relation to the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-third edition (Bayley-III) motor index at 2.5 years. METHODS: Children born very preterm from a population-based study (n = 113) were assessed with the Structured Observation of Motor Performance in Infants (SOMP-I) at 2, 4, 6 and 10 months corrected age and the Bayley-III motor index at 2.5 years corrected age (n = 98). Logistic regressions were performed to investigate the independent association of each SOMP-I domain to Bayley-III motor index. RESULTS: There were significant associations between the SOMP-I-scores and Bayley-III motor index per every assessment age. At 4 months, both level and quality were independently associated with a later motor outcome, OR for level was 1.26 (95% CI = 1.08-1.50, P = .002) and for quality, 0.75 (95% CI = 0.63-0.90, P = .002). Quality was independently associated with the Bayley-III motor index at 6 and 10 months: OR 0.080 (95% CI = 0.67-0.95 P = .010) and 0.79 (95% CI = 0.64-0.97, P = .026). CONCLUSION: Both SOMP-I domains, level and quality, are markers to identify motor problems early. Quality became more important with age.