What community measurements can be used to predict bone disease in patients with COPD?

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis is common in patients with COPD. Previously we have reported that loss of fat-free mass (FFM), measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is associated with loss of bone mineral density (BMD). In addition, in patients with a low body mass index (BMI) and a low FFM, all had evidence of bone thinning, 50% having osteopenia and 50% osteoporosis. We explored the utility of different anthropometric measures in detecting osteoporosis in a community-based COPD population. METHODS: Patients with confirmed COPD and not on long-term oral corticosteroids (n=58) performed spirometry. They underwent nutritional assessment by skinfold anthropometry, midarm circumference, calculation of both % ideal body weight (IBW) and BMI. All had DXA assessment of BMD. RESULTS: A total of 58 COPD patients had anthropometric measurements taken, with a mean age of 66.8 (SD 8.7) years, 31 (58%) were male, with a forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV(1)) of 54.17 (20.18)% predicted. Osteoporosis was present at either the hip or lumbar region in 14 patients (24%). The useful anthropometric measurements identifying those with osteoporosis were both % IBW and BMI. The adjusted odds ratio for %IBW was 0.93 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87, 0.99), p=0.016 and for BMI: 0.79 (0.64-0.98), p=0.03. The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) score for both was 0.88, indicating a good fit. CONCLUSION: Osteoporosis is common, even in patients with mild airways obstruction. Nutritional assessment, incorporating a calculation of their BMI or %IBW may confer an additional benefit in detecting those at risk of osteoporosis and guide referral for BMD measurement.

Attaining a correct diagnosis of COPD in general practice.

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is common. Diagnosis should include objective evidence of airways obstruction and spirometry is recommended in guidelines and the general medical services contract in the UK. We assessed the impact of spirometry in general practice. METHOD: We determined by questionnaire the availability, staff training, use and the interpretation results of spirometry in 72% of general practices in Wales. We reviewed the diagnosis of COPD previously made in two general practices without spirometry. RESULTS: Most practices had a spirometer (82.4%) and used it (85.6%). Confidence in use and interpretation of results varied widely: 58.1% were confident in use and 33.8% confident in interpretation. Spirometry was performed more often if confident in use and interpretation (both P<0.001) and was related to greater training periods (P<0.001). Spirometric confirmation of COPD varied widely (0-100%, median 37%). Of the 125 patients previously diagnosed with COPD 61 had spirometric confirmation, while 25 had reversible obstruction (range 210-800 mls), 34 had normal and 5 had restrictive spirometry. CONCLUSION: Despite incentives to perform spirometry in general practice, lack of adequate training in use and interpretation suggests use is confounded and the diagnosis of COPD is likely to be made on imprecise clinical grounds.