Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 20(1): 206, 2020 04 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32345217

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In recent years, the field of cardio-oncology has grown worldwide, bringing benefits to cancer patients in terms of survival and quality of life. This study reports the experience of a pioneer cardio-oncology programme at University Cancer Hospital in Brazil over a period of 10 years, describing the clinical profile of patients and the clinical outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on a cohort of patients treated at the cardio-oncology programme from April 2009 to February 2019. We analysed the characteristics of patients and outcomes, including mortality, according to the type of clinical indication for outpatient care (general cardiology, perioperative evaluation and follow-up and treatment cardiotoxicity). RESULTS: From a total of 26,435 medical consultations, we obtained the data of 4535 individuals among the medical care outpatients. When we analysed the clinical characteristics of patients considering the clinical indication - general cardiology, perioperative evaluation and cardiotoxicity outpatient clinics, differences were observed with respect to age (59 [48-66], 66 [58-74] and 69 [62-76], p < 0.001), diabetes (67 [15%], 635 [22.6%] and 379 [29.8%]; p < 0.001), hypertension (196 [43.8%], 1649 [58.7%] and 890 [70.1%], p < 0.001) and dyslipidaemia (87 [19.7%), 735 [26.2%] and 459 [36.2%], p < 0.001). A similar overall mortality rate was observed in the groups (47.5% vs. 45.7% vs. 44.9% [p = 0.650]). CONCLUSION: The number of oncologic patients in the Cardio-Oncology Programme has grown in the last decade. A well-structured cardio-oncology programme is the key to achieving the true essence of this area, namely, ongoing care for cancer patients throughout the disease treatment process, optimizing their cardiovascular status to ensure they can receive the best therapy against cancer.


Assuntos
Sobreviventes de Câncer , Cardiologia , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde , Cardiopatias/terapia , Oncologia , Neoplasias/terapia , Lesões por Radiação/terapia , Idoso , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Brasil , Cardiotoxicidade , Cardiopatias/induzido quimicamente , Cardiopatias/diagnóstico , Cardiopatias/mortalidade , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Qualidade de Vida , Lesões por Radiação/diagnóstico , Lesões por Radiação/etiologia , Lesões por Radiação/mortalidade , Radioterapia/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Especialização , Fatores de Tempo
2.
Struct Heart ; 8(4): 100298, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39100582

RESUMO

Background: Tricuspid valve repair during mitral valve replacement surgery remains a controversial topic. The risk-benefit ratio in some populations remains uncertain, especially in rheumatic heart disease patients. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the impact of concomitant tricuspid repair on surgical mortality in patients undergoing cardiac surgery due to rheumatic mitral valve disease who have moderate to severe functional tricuspid regurgitation. Methods: This is a prospective cohort study from January 1, 2017, to December 30, 2022. All patients over 18 years of age who underwent cardiac surgery to correct rheumatic mitral valve disease with concomitant moderate to severe tricuspid regurgitation were included. The primary outcome was a surgical death. In an exploratory analysis, clinical and echocardiographic data were obtained 2 years after the procedure. Results: Of the 144 patients included, 83 (57.6%) underwent tricuspid valve repair. The mean age was 46.2 (±12.3) years with 107 (74.3%) female individuals, the median left ventricular ejection fraction was 61.0% (55-67), and systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) was 55.0 mmHg (46-74), with 45 (31.3%) individuals with right ventricular dysfunction. The total in-hospital mortality was 15 (10.4%) individuals, and there was no difference between the groups submitted or not to tricuspid repair: 10 (12.0%) vs. 5 (7.5%); p = 0.46, respectively. There was an association with one variable independently: the sPAP value, relative risk 1.04 (1.01-1.07), p = 0.01. The estimated cut-off value of sPAP that indicates higher early mortality through the receiver operating characteristic curve (area 0.70, p = 0.012) was 73.5 mmHg. Conclusions: Performing tricuspid repair in individuals who were undergoing cardiac surgery to correct rheumatic mitral valve disease was not associated with increased surgical mortality. Our results suggest the safety of tricuspid repair even in this high-risk population, reinforcing the recommendations in current guidelines.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa