Serologic and genetic markers of celiac disease: a sequential study in the screening of first degree relatives.

OBJECTIVES: The prevalence of celiac disease (CD) among the relatives and the complications of an undiagnosed CD prompted us to identify a useful disease screening strategy. METHODS: We studied 441 first degree relatives of 208 CD patients by immunoglobulin (Ig)A antiendomysium antibodies (EMA) and radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIA) IgA antitransglutaminase autoantibodies (TGAA). Of these, 364 were typed for human leukocyte antigen-DRB1, -DQA1, and -DQB1 genes by the polymerase chain reaction sequence specific primers method. It was suggested to the autoantibody-positive subjects that they should undergo intestinal biopsy. RESULTS: TGAA were positive in 46 of 439 relatives, EMA in 38; intestinal lesions related to CD were present in 40 subjects. We also found two immunodeficient fathers with duodenal villous atrophy. In three serology-positive subjects, permission for intestinal biopsy was refused; for another three serology-positive cases, duodenal mucosa was normal. Thus, the strict CD prevalence resulted 9.5%, the enlarged prevalence 10.9%. The DQ2/DQ8 heterodimers were carried in 231 of 364 subjects and in 38 of 40 biopsy-proven celiac patients. Three DQ2-positive parents became positive to the serology during a long-lasting follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of a carefully conducted study, CD prevalence in our series was seen as very high. These data suggest an accurate algorithm to select candidates for intestinal biopsy among CD high-risk subjects. First, an evaluation of the sensitive RIA TGAA and of total IgA (in IgA deficiency RIA IgG anti-tissue transglutaminase assay) should be performed. Then, an evaluation of the TGAA and the genetic study would be advisable 2 to 3 years later in negative subjects. Those carrying the DQ2/DQ8 heterodimers should continue the serologic follow-up; the others need a clinical follow-up.

IA-2 combined epitope assay: a new, highly sensitive approach to evaluate IA-2 humoral autoimmunity in type 1 diabetes.

Islet tyrosine phosphatase 2 (IA-2) is one of the major autoantigens in type 1 diabetes. The aim of this work was to evaluate which IA-2 construct(s) among those usually employed has the highest sensitivity and specificity for detecting IA-2 autoantibodies in autoimmune diabetes and whether the combination of different IA-2 constructs into a single assay allows the detection of immunoreactivities otherwise not detectable by a single construct. For this purpose, we tested the single immunoreactivities of IA-2 FL(aa 1-979), IA-2(BDC)(aa 256-556:630-979), IA-2 IC(aa 605-979), IA-2(aa 256-760), IA-2(aa 761-928), and of 7 combinations of these fragments in the sera of 203 newly diagnosed type 1 diabetic patient (DM: 109 males,94 females, mean age 12.9 +/- 7.5 years) and 43 prediabetic subject (PDM: 20 males, 23 females, mean age 10.3 +/- 6.0 years) sera. IA-2 IC was the single construct that showed the highest sensitivity and specificity both in DM and PDM subjects; however, all of the other IA-2 constructs investigated detected additional immunoreactivities with respect to it. The combined use into the same assay of IA-2 IC, IA-2 FL, and IA-2 (256-760) constructs allowed detection of IA-2 Abs in additional 13.3% DM and 30.4% PDM subjects compared to the single IA-2 IC construct, suggesting this methodology as a new, highly sensitive approach to the study of IA-2 autoimmunity in type 1 diabetes.