RESUMO
PURPOSE: To determine, in women with primary operable breast cancer, if preoperative doxorubicin (Adriamycin) and cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan; AC) therapy yields a better outcome than postoperative AC therapy, if a relationship exists between outcome and tumor response to preoperative chemotherapy, and if such therapy results in the performance of more lumpectomies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women (1,523) enrolled onto National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-18 were randomly assigned to preoperative or postoperative AC therapy. Clinical tumor response to preoperative therapy was graded as complete (cCR), partial (cPR), or no response (cNR). Tumors with a cCR were further categorized as either pathologic complete response (pCR) or invasive cells (pINV). Disease-free survival (DFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and survival were estimated through 5 years and compared between treatment groups. In the preoperative arm, proportional-hazards models were used to investigate the relationship between outcome and tumor response. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in DFS, DDFS, or survival (P = .99, .70, and .83, respectively) among patients in either group. More patients treated preoperatively than postoperatively underwent lumpectomy and radiation therapy (67.8% v 59.8%, respectively). Rates of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after lumpectomy were similar in both groups (7.9% and 5.8%, respectively; P = .23). Outcome was better in women whose tumors showed a pCR than in those with a pINV, cPR, or cNR (relapse-free survival [RFS] rates, 85.7%, 76.9%, 68.1%, and 63.9%, respectively; P < .0001), even when baseline prognostic variables were controlled. When prognostic models were compared for each treatment group, the preoperative model, which included breast tumor response as a variable, discriminated outcome among patients to about the same degree as the postoperative model. CONCLUSION: Preoperative chemotherapy is as effective as postoperative chemotherapy, permits more lumpectomies, is appropriate for the treatment of certain patients with stages I and II disease, and can be used to study breast cancer biology. Tumor response to preoperative chemotherapy correlates with outcome and could be a surrogate for evaluating the effect of chemotherapy on micrometastases; however, knowledge of such a response provided little prognostic information beyond that which resulted from postoperative therapy.
RESUMO
Demonstration by a combined histochemical and electron-microscopic technique of the ultrastructure of and acid phosphatase within the juxtaglomerular granules in kidneys of normal man and rat and in those from members of both species with renal Hypertension indicate the identity of Juxtaglomerular granules as lysosomes.
Assuntos
Fosfatase Ácida , Grânulos Citoplasmáticos , Sistema Justaglomerular/citologia , Lisossomos , Animais , Histologia Comparada , Humanos , Hipertensão Renal/patologia , Técnicas In Vitro , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , RatosRESUMO
When either V2, Brown-Pearce, or Walker tumor cells were perfused at low pressure into the afferent lymphatic of popliteal lymph nodes or were injected into the foot pads of rabbits, they rapidly appeared in lymph draining from the node. This finding indicates that lymph nodes are not the effective barrier to dissemination of tumor cells they had previously been assumed to be.
Assuntos
Linfonodos/fisiologia , Metástase Neoplásica/etiologia , Neoplasias Experimentais , Animais , Carcinoma 256 de Walker , Carcinoma de Brown-Pearce , Técnicas In Vitro , Linfa , CoelhosRESUMO
It was demonstrated, by use of extracorporeal cross-circulation, that a humoral factor responsible for liver regeneration does not arise from the liver remnant. While intact livers of normal rats incorporated [methyl-(3)H]- thymidine in proportion to the amount of liver removed in the partner, the greatest response occurred after a total hepatectomy. Evidence from portacaval-shunted,partially hepatectomized animals connected to normal members indicates that the factor is in portal blood and that the onset of regeneration is the result of a quantitative imbalance between the available portal blood factor and the number of liver cells present.
Assuntos
Sangue , Circulação Hepática , Regeneração Hepática , Animais , DNA/biossíntese , Feminino , Hepatectomia , Fígado/metabolismo , Parabiose , Derivação Portocava Cirúrgica , Ratos , Timidina/metabolismo , TrítioRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Tamoxifen is advantageous in treating all stages of breast cancer. However, studies have suggested that incidence and severity of endometrial cancer increase in women treated with tamoxifen. PURPOSE: We compared rates of endometrial and other cancers in tamoxifen- and non-tamoxifen-treated patients and described the pathologic characteristics of the endometrial cancers. METHODS: Data were analyzed on 2843 patients with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive, invasive breast cancer randomly assigned to placebo or tamoxifen (20 mg/d) and on 1220 tamoxifen-treated patients registered in NSABP B-14 subsequent to randomization. Average time on study is 8 years for randomly assigned patients and 5 years for registered patients. RESULTS: The incidence rates of liver, gastrointestinal, urinary tract, and nonuterine genital tumors were not increased by tamoxifen treatment. Twenty-five endometrial cancers were originally reported, one of which was reclassified after subsequent review. Two cases occurred in the placebo group in patients whose medical status subsequent to random assignment had required tamoxifen treatment. Twenty-three occurred in the tamoxifen groups. Twenty-one of the 24 originally reported endometrial cancers were FIGO stage 1; 18 of 23 gradable cases were of good to moderate histologic grade. Four tamoxifen-treated women died of uterine cancer. The average annual hazard rate of endometrial cancer as a first event within the first 5 years of follow-up in the randomized, tamoxifen-treated group was 1.2/1000 patient-years; the cumulative hazard rate was 6.3/1000. Findings for the registered, tamoxifen-treated group were similar. Including all originally reported endometrial cancers, the annual hazard rate through all follow-up was 0.2/1000 in the placebo group and 1.6/1000 in the randomized, tamoxifen-treated group; the relative risk of endometrial cancer for the latter versus the former group was 7.5. Again for the latter group, using population-based rates of endometrial cancer from SEER data and information from another NSABP (B-06) trial, relative risks were 2.2 and 2.3, respectively. The 5-year cumulative hazard rate for disease-free survival in the randomized tamoxifen group was 38% less than that in the placebo group. Some data in this paper were provided by an investigator who submitted fraudulent data to the NSABP [see the "News" section]; therefore, the reader must read the entire text including Table 10 and the Editor's notes. In brief, data on 182 of the 2843 randomly assigned patients and 37 of the 1220 registered patients were provided by the investigator in question. After review, 24 of the 182 records showed falsification, all involving characteristics of patients prior to random assignment. Of the 37 registered-patient records, 8 showed falsification. CONCLUSIONS: Risk of endometrial cancer increases following tamoxifen therapy for invasive breast cancer; however, net benefit greatly outweighs risk. Endometrial cancers occurring after tamoxifen therapy do not appear to be of a different type with a worse prognosis than are such tumors in non-tamoxifen-treated patients. IMPLICATIONS: Tamoxifen treatment for breast cancer should continue. In addition, the relative risk of endometrial cancer observed in B-14 tamoxifen-treated patients is consistent with the twofold relative risk used in the initial risk-benefit computation for the NSABP breast cancer prevention trial.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias do Endométrio/induzido quimicamente , Segunda Neoplasia Primária/induzido quimicamente , Má Conduta Científica , Tamoxifeno/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Neoplasias do Endométrio/epidemiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Segunda Neoplasia Primária/epidemiologia , Razão de Chances , Análise de SobrevidaRESUMO
A rat brain tumor model (Fischer 344 rats) with the clinical and pathological features of dissemination via the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pathways was used to demonstrate the efficacy of 5-iodo-2-deoxyuridine (IUDR) as a radiosensitizer when it is administered directly into the CSF. Stereotaxic implantation of 9L gliosarcoma cells (5 X 10(5) into the CSF of the lateral cerebral ventricle resulted in widespread dissemination and median survival of 18.5 and 20 days (range, 10-22) in two experiments. A continuous 7-day infusion of IUDR into the CSF starting on the day of tumor implantation did not provide any beneficial effect. Irradiation of the cranial spinal axis with 800 rad on days 4, 6, and 7 after implantation achieved an increase in survival time that was modest but statistically significant. However, the combination of IUDR infusion and radiotherapy resulted in marked improvement in survival time and a 10% cure rate (two of 20 rats). This is the first demonstration in vivo that IUDR administered into the CSF can be a potent radiosensitizer.
Assuntos
Neoplasias do Ventrículo Cerebral/radioterapia , Glioma/radioterapia , Idoxuridina/administração & dosagem , Animais , Neoplasias do Ventrículo Cerebral/mortalidade , Glioma/mortalidade , Idoxuridina/uso terapêutico , Injeções Intraventriculares , Radiossensibilizantes/administração & dosagem , Radiossensibilizantes/uso terapêutico , Ratos , Ratos Endogâmicos F344 , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Uncertainty about prognosis and treatment of axillary lymph node-negative patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-negative or ER-positive invasive breast tumors of 1 cm or less prompted the analysis of data from five National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project randomized clinical trials. METHODS: Two hundred thirty-five patients with ER-negative tumors and 1024 patients with ER-positive tumors were identified in these trials. Patients with ER-negative tumors received surgery alone or surgery and chemotherapy. Patients with ER-positive tumors received surgery alone; surgery and tamoxifen; or surgery, tamoxifen, and chemotherapy. End points were relapse-free survival (RFS), event-free survival, and overall survival. A result was considered to be statistically significant with a P value of.05 or less; all statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: The 8-year RFS of women with ER-negative tumors who received surgery alone or with chemotherapy was 81% and 90%, respectively (P = .06). Survival was similar in both groups (93% and 91%; P = .65). The 8-year RFS of women with ER-positive tumors was 86% after surgery alone, 93% when tamoxifen was added (P = .01), and 95% after the addition of tamoxifen and chemotherapy (P = .07 compared with tamoxifen). Survival in the three groups was 90%, 92% (P = .41), and 97%, respectively. The difference between the latter two groups was significant (P = .01). Regardless of ER status or treatment, overall mortality was 8%; one half of the deaths were related to breast cancer. Several covariates affected the risk of recurrence in ER-negative and ER-positive patients. Risk was greater in women with tumors of 1 cm than in those with tumors of less than 1 cm, in women aged 49 years or younger than in those aged 50 years or older, and in women with infiltrating ductal or lobular carcinoma than in those with other histologic tumor types. CONCLUSIONS: Chemotherapy and/or tamoxifen should be considered for the treatment of women with ER-negative or ER-positive tumors of 1 cm or less and negative axillary lymph nodes.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Antineoplásicos Hormonais/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/química , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Canadá , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Moduladores de Receptor Estrogênico/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Metástase Linfática , Mastectomia/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Prognóstico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Receptores de Estrogênio/análise , Receptores de Progesterona/análise , Fatores de Risco , Análise de Sobrevida , Tamoxifeno/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Information is presented from 555 patients with Dukes B and C rectal cancers treated by curative resection who were entered into the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) protocol R-01 between November 1977 and October 1986. Their average time on study was 64.1 months. The patients were randomized to receive no further treatment (184 patients), postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, semustine, and vincristine (MOF) (187 patients), or postoperative radiation therapy (184 patients). The chemotherapy group, when compared with the group treated by surgery alone, demonstrated an overall improvement in disease-free survival (P = .006) and in survival (P = .05). Employing the proportional hazards model, a global test was used to determine the presence of treatment interactions. Investigation of stratification variables employed in this study indicated that sex, and to a lesser extent age and Dukes stage, made individual contributions to the disease-free survival and the survival benefit from chemotherapy. When evaluated according to sex, the benefit for chemotherapy at 5 years, both in disease-free survival (29% vs. 47%; P less than .001; relative odds, 2.00) and in survival (37% vs. 60%; P = .001; relative odds, 1.93), was restricted to males. When males were tested for age trend with the use of a logistic regression analysis, chemotherapy was found to be more advantageous in younger patients. When the group receiving post-operative radiation (4,600-4,700 rad in 26-27 fractions; 5,100-5,300 rad maximum at the perineum) was compared to the group treated only by surgery, there was an overall reduction in local-regional recurrence from 25% to 16% (P = .06). No significant benefit in overall disease-free survival (P = .4) or survival (P = .7) from the use of radiation has been demonstrated. The global test for interaction to identify heterogeneity of response to radiation within subsets of patients was not significant. In conclusion, this investigation has demonstrated a benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (MOF) for the management of rectal cancer. The observed advantage was restricted to males. Postoperative radiation therapy reduced the incidence of local-regional recurrence, but it failed to affect overall disease-free survival and survival.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Retais/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Fluoruracila/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Período Pós-Operatório , Prognóstico , Distribuição Aleatória , Neoplasias Retais/radioterapia , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Semustina/administração & dosagem , Semustina/efeitos adversos , Fatores Sexuais , Vincristina/administração & dosagem , Vincristina/efeitos adversosRESUMO
Data are presented from 1,166 patients with Dukes B and C carcinoma of the colon who were entered into the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) Protocol C-01 between November 1977 and February 1983. Patients were randomized to one of three therapeutic categories: 1) no further treatment following curative resection (394 patients); 2) postoperative chemotherapy consisting of 5-fluorouracil, semustine, and vincristine (379 patients); or 3) postoperative BCG (393 patients). The average time on study was 77.3 months. A comparison between patients receiving postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy and those treated with surgery alone indicated that there was an overall improvement in disease-free survival (P = .02) and survival (P = .05) in favor of the chemotherapy-treated group. At 5 years of follow-up, patients treated with surgery alone were at 1.29 times the risk of developing a treatment failure and at 1.31 times the likelihood of dying as were similar patients treated with combination adjuvant chemotherapy. Comparison of the BCG-treated group with the group treated with surgery alone indicated that there was no statistically significant difference in disease-free survival (P = .09). There was, however, a survival advantage in favor of the BCG-treated group (P = .03). At 5 years of follow-up, patients randomized to the surgery-alone arm were at 1.28 times the risk of dying as were similar patients treated with BCG. Further investigation disclosed that this survival advantage in favor of BCG was a result of a diminution in deaths that were non-cancer related. When analyses were conducted on which events not related to cancer recurrence were eliminated, the survival difference between the BCG and control groups became nonsignificant (P = .40); the cumulative odds at 5 years decreased from 1.28 to 1.10. The findings from this study are the first from a randomized prospective clinical trial to demonstrate that a significant disease-free survival and survival benefit can be achieved with postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with Dukes B and C carcinoma of the colon who have undergone curative resection.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Vacina BCG/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias do Colo/terapia , Idoso , Vacina BCG/efeitos adversos , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Neoplasias do Colo/cirurgia , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Fluoruracila/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Período Pós-Operatório , Prognóstico , Distribuição Aleatória , Semustina/administração & dosagem , Semustina/efeitos adversos , Vincristina/administração & dosagem , Vincristina/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Overexpression of the erbB-2 protein by breast cancer cells has been suggested to be a predictor of response to doxorubicin. A retrospective study was designed to test this hypothesis. METHODS: In National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project protocol B-11, patients with axillary lymph node-positive, hormone receptor-negative breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive either L-phenylalanine mustard plus 5-fluorouracil (PF) or a combination of L-phenylalanine mustard, 5-fluorouracil, and doxorubicin (PAF). Tumor cell expression of erbB-2 was determined by immunohistochemistry for 638 of 682 eligible patients. Statistical analyses were performed to test for interaction between treatment and erbB-2 status (positive versus negative) with respect to disease-free survival (DFS), survival, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and distant disease-free survival (DDFS). Reported P values are two-sided. RESULTS: Overexpression of erbB-2 (i.e., positive immunohistochemical staining) was observed in 239 (37.5%) of the 638 tumors studied. Overexpression was associated with tumor size (P=.02), lack of estrogen receptors (P=.008), and the number of positive lymph nodes (P=.0001). After a mean time on study of 13.5 years, the clinical benefit from doxorubicin (PAF versus PF) was statistically significant for patients with erbB-2-positive tumors--DFS: relative risk of failure (RR)=0.60 (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.44-0.83), P=.001; survival: RR=0.66 (95% CI=0.47-0.92), P =.01; RFS: RR=0.58 (95% CI=0.42-0.82), P=.002; DDFS: RR=0.61 (95% CI=0.44-0.85), P=.003. However, it was not significant for patients with erbB-2-negative tumors-DFS: RR=0.96 (95% CI=0.75-1.23), P=.74; survival: RR =0.90 (95% CI=0.69-1.19), P=.47; RFS: RR=0.88 (95% CI=0.67-1.16), P=.37; DDFS: RR=1.03 (95% CI=0.79-1.35), P=.84. Interaction between doxorubicin treatment and erbB-2 overexpression was statistically significant for DFS (P=.02) and DDFS (P=.02) but not for survival (P= .15) or RFS (P=.06). CONCLUSIONS: These data support the hypothesis of a preferential benefit from doxorubicin in patients with erbB-2-positive breast cancer.
Assuntos
Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Biomarcadores Tumorais/análise , Neoplasias da Mama/química , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Doxorrubicina/uso terapêutico , Regulação Neoplásica da Expressão Gênica/efeitos dos fármacos , Neoplasias Hormônio-Dependentes/química , Neoplasias Hormônio-Dependentes/tratamento farmacológico , Receptor ErbB-2/análise , Adulto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Metástase Linfática , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Regulação para Cima/efeitos dos fármacosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The conviction that postoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy represent an acceptable standard of care for patients with Dukes' B (stage II) and Dukes' C (stage III) carcinoma of the rectum evolved in the absence of data from clinical trials designed to determine whether the addition of radiotherapy results in improved disease-free survival and overall survival. This study was carried out to address this issue. An additional aim was to determine whether leucovorin (LV)-modulated 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is superior to the combination of 5-FU, semustine, and vincristine (MOF) in men. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients (n = 694) with Dukes' B or C carcinoma of the rectum were enrolled in National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) Protocol R-02 from September 1987 through December 1992 and were followed. They were randomly assigned to receive either postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy alone (n = 348) or chemotherapy with postoperative radiotherapy (n = 346). All female patients (n = 287) received 5-FU plus LV chemotherapy; male patients received either MOF (n = 207) or 5-FU plus LV (n = 200). Primary analyses were carried out by use of a stratified log-rank statistic; P values are two-sided. RESULTS: The average time on study for surviving patients is 93 months as of September 30, 1998. Postoperative radiotherapy resulted in no beneficial effect on disease-free survival (P =.90) or overall survival (P =.89), regardless of which chemotherapy was utilized, although it reduced the cumulative incidence of locoregional relapse from 13% to 8% at 5-year follow-up (P =.02). Male patients who received 5-FU plus LV demonstrated a statistically significant benefit in disease-free survival at 5 years compared with those who received MOF (55% versus 47%; P =.009) but not in 5-year overall survival (65% versus 62%; P =.17). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of postoperative radiation therapy to chemotherapy in Dukes' B and C rectal cancer did not alter the subsequent incidence of distant disease, although there was a reduction in locoregional relapse when compared with chemotherapy alone.
Assuntos
Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Fluoruracila/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Retais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Retais/radioterapia , Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Terapia Combinada , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Fluoruracila/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Leucovorina/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Retais/patologia , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Semustina/administração & dosagem , Fatores Sexuais , Análise de Sobrevida , Fatores de Tempo , Vincristina/administração & dosagemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In 1982, the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project initiated a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial (B-14) to determine the effectiveness of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy in patients with primary operable breast cancer who had estrogen receptor-positive tumors and no axillary lymph node involvement. The findings indicated that tamoxifen therapy provided substantial benefit to patients with early stage disease. However, questions arose about how long the observed benefit would persist, about the duration of therapy necessary to maintain maximum benefit, and about the nature and severity of adverse effects from prolonged treatment. PURPOSE: We evaluated the outcome of patients in the B-14 trial through 10 years of follow-up. In addition, the effects of 5 years versus more than 5 years of tamoxifen therapy were compared. METHODS: In the trial, patients were initially assigned to receive either tamoxifen at 20 mg/day (n = 1404) or placebo (n = 1414). Tamoxifen-treated patients who remained disease free after 5 years of therapy were then reassigned to receive either another 5 years of tamoxifen (n = 322) or 5 years of placebo (n = 321). After the study began, another group of patients who met the same protocol eligibility requirements as the randomly assigned patients were registered to receive tamoxifen (n = 1211). Registered patients who were disease free after 5 years of treatment were also randomly assigned to another 5 years of tamoxifen (n = 261) or to 5 years of placebo (n = 249). To compare 5 years with more than 5 years of tamoxifen therapy, data relating to all patients reassigned to an additional 5 years of the drug were combined. Patients who were not reassigned to either tamoxifen or placebo continued to be followed in the study. Survival, disease-free survival, and distant disease-free survival (relating to failure at distant sites) were estimated by use of the Kaplan-Meier method; differences between the treatment groups were assessed by use of the logrank test. The relative risks of failure (with 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) were determined by use of the Cox proportional hazards model. Reported P values are two-sided. RESULTS: Through 10 years of follow-up, a significant advantage in disease-free survival (69% versus 57%, P < .0001; relative risk = 0.66; 95% CI = 0.58-0.74), distant disease-free survival (76% versus 67%, P < .0001; relative risk = 0.70; 95% CI = 0.61-0.81), and survival (80% versus 76%, P = .02; relative risk = 0.84; 95% CI = 0.71-0.99) was found for patients in the group first assigned to receive tamoxifen. The survival benefit extended to those 49 years of age or younger and to those 50 years of age or older. Tamoxifen therapy was associated with a 37% reduction in the incidence of contralateral (opposite) breast cancer (P = .007). Through 4 years after the reassignment of tamoxifen-treated patients to either continued-therapy or placebo groups, advantages in disease-free survival (92% versus 86%, P = .003) and distant disease-free survival (96% versus 90%, P = .01) were found for those who discontinued tamoxifen treatment. Survival was 96% for those who discontinued tamoxifen compared with 94% for those who continued tamoxifen treatment (P = .08). A higher incidence of thromboembolic events was seen in tamoxifen-treated patients (through 5 years, 1.7% versus 0.4%). Except for endometrial cancer, the incidence of second cancers was not increased with tamoxifen therapy. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The benefit from 5 years of tamoxifen therapy persists through 10 years of follow-up. No additional advantage is obtained from continuing tamoxifen therapy for more than 5 years.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Hormonais/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Antagonistas de Estrogênios/administração & dosagem , Receptores de Estrogênio , Tamoxifeno/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos Hormonais/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Mama/metabolismo , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Método Duplo-Cego , Neoplasias do Endométrio/etiologia , Antagonistas de Estrogênios/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Metástase Linfática , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Risco , Tamoxifeno/efeitos adversos , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
A new tissue culture cell line, SHP-77, has been established from explant cultures of a primary human lung cancer. Although the latter exhibited histological features of the so-called large or polygonal cell undifferentiated variant, neurosecretory granules were detected ultrastructurally in cells of the original tumor, culture line, and neoplasms developing after transplantation of the latter in nude mice. These features attest to the identity of the original tumor as a large-cell variant of oat cell cancer. In addition, electron microscopy revealed the presence of gland formation and intracytoplasmic lamellar bodies in the cells of SHP-77. This information indicates the potential for varied differentiation and morphological expression of so-called undifferentiated lung cancer cells and is pertinent to nosological considerations concerning human lung cancer. The cell line has maintained its morphological, karyotypic, chromosomal, and growth characteristics after transplantation to nude mice. Because of this stability, SHP-77 appears to represent a propitious cell line for in vitro and in vivo biological and therapeutic studies of this type of lung cancer.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Pequenas/patologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Animais , Carcinoma de Células Pequenas/genética , Diferenciação Celular , Linhagem Celular , Aberrações Cromossômicas , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Masculino , Camundongos , Camundongos Nus , Microscopia Eletrônica , Transplante de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Experimentais/patologia , Transplante HeterólogoRESUMO
Between 1972 and 1974, patients were entered into a National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) trial to evaluate L-phenylalanine mustard (L-PAM) as an adjuvant to mastectomy in patients with primary breast cancer and pathologically positive axillary nodes. Overall, findings through 10 years of observation indicate an 8% difference in disease-free survival (DFS) (P = .06) and a 5% difference in survival (P = .4). Women less than or equal to 49 years of age who received L-PAM demonstrate a significant (P = .03) prolongation of DFS and a significant (P = .05) survival benefit compared with those who received a placebo. There is a 37% reduction in their mortality and a cumulative odds of survival of 1.67. In that age group, both those with one to three and greater than or equal to 4 positive nodes benefited, but the advantage was greater when there were fewer positive nodes. There was a significant (P = .009) reduction in mortality (64%) and a cumulative odds of survival of 3.25 in patients less than or equal to 49 years old with one to three positive nodes. No advantage from L-PAM was observed in patients greater than or equal to 50 years old. When L-PAM response is related to nuclear grade, a marker of tumor differentiation, there is a highly significant improvement in DFS (less than .001), distant DFS (.001), and survival (.004) through 10 years of observation for all patients with tumors classified as nuclear grade poor (poorly differentiated), regardless of age and nodal status. Mortality was reduced by 32% and the cumulative odds of survival was 2.10 at 10 years. Of singular importance is the observation of a benefit in those greater than or equal to 50 years of age as well as in those less than or equal to 49 years of age with poorly differentiated tumors. There is a significant (P = .003) survival benefit for those in the older age group with a 37% reduction in mortality, and a cumulative odds of survival of 2.75. Patients in both age groups with well-differentiated tumors demonstrated no benefit from L-PAM. Those who are older seem to do less well following chemotherapy. We conclude that tumor differentiation is a better discriminant of response to chemotherapy than is age, and that both younger and older women are responsive to adjuvant chemotherapy when they have poorly differentiated tumors.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Mastectomia , Melfalan/uso terapêutico , Análise Atuarial , Fatores Etários , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Núcleo Celular/patologia , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Linfonodos/patologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , América do Norte , Placebos , Distribuição AleatóriaRESUMO
This study correlates the disease-free survival (DFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and survival (S) of 1,157 histologically node negative breast cancer patients with the estrogen and/or progesterone receptor (ER, PR) and with the nuclear or histologic grade (NG, HG) of their tumors. All were treated by operation without systemic adjuvant therapy. The DFS, DDFS, and S were significantly greater (P = .005, .004, less than .001) in patients with ER positive than ER negative tumors but the magnitude of the differences after 5 years of follow-up was slight (8% in both DFS and DDFS and 10% in S). Differences of that magnitude are insufficient to discriminate clearly between patients who should or should not receive systemic therapy. As with ER, there were outcome differences in favor of PR positive tumors but only in S was the difference significant (8% at 5 years; P = .002). When combined with ER, PR made no independent contribution in the outcome prediction. Regression analysis indicated that NG was the most important single marker of outcome. The prognosis of women with unknown ER or PR was equivalent to or better than that in those with ER or PR positive tumors. This finding seems to be related to tumor size in that a higher proportion of tumors with unknown receptors were less than 1.0 cm, thus having insufficient tissue for analysis. Our findings disclose that in node negative breast cancer patients, NG is a better marker of prognosis than is tumor ER, and that PR is of little or no value. Tumor NG may also be useful for selecting the type of systemic therapy to be used in these patients.
Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/análise , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Receptores de Estrogênio/análise , Receptores de Progesterona/análise , Neoplasias da Mama/química , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , PrognósticoRESUMO
Since 1971, 8,483 women with primary breast cancer participated in seven trials evaluating adjuvant chemotherapy. Leukemia occurred in only three of 2,068 patients treated by operation alone. The cumulative risk was 0.06% after 10 years in those free of metastases or a second primary tumor, and 0.27% in those with tumor. Thus, leukemia is not an important factor in the natural history of breast cancer. Five of 646 women receiving postoperative regional radiation developed leukemia, an overall risk of 1.39 +/- .49% at 10 years. Twenty-seven cases of leukemia (0.5%) and seven of myeloproliferative syndrome (0.1%) were recorded in 5,299 patients who received L-phenylalanine mustard (L-PAM)-containing regimens. The maximum cumulative risk of leukemia in chemotherapy recipients (leukemia of any type and myeloproliferative syndrome) was 1.68 +/- .33% at 10 years following operation. The risk excluding those with myeloproliferative syndrome was 1.29 +/- .28%. The risk of leukemia in patients free of metastases or a second primary was 1.11 +/- .30% at 10 years, and when combined with myeloproliferative syndrome, it was 1.54 +/- .36%; risks not significantly greater than observed following radiation (P = .58 and .29). No cases of leukemia were observed during the 2 years of chemotherapy and none have occurred after the seventh postoperative year. Comparisons with the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results tumor registries (SEER) data indicate an increased relative risk of acute myelogenous leukemia following postoperative regional radiation (P less than .01) and adjuvant chemotherapy (P less than .001). The findings indicate that hematologic disorders are side effects of both radiation and alkylating agents used in the adjuvant treatment of primary breast cancer. The risk of such events is lower than that reported following treatment of other solid tumors and hematologic malignancies by chemotherapy. The benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer exceeds the risk of leukemia. Since chemotherapy is not uniformly beneficial, efforts should be directed toward identifying responders so that only those who will benefit are exposed to the risk.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Leucemia Induzida por Radiação/etiologia , Leucemia/induzido quimicamente , Análise Atuarial , Adulto , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/radioterapia , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Leucemia/sangue , Leucemia/patologia , Leucemia Induzida por Radiação/sangue , Leucemia Induzida por Radiação/patologia , Mastectomia/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtornos Mieloproliferativos/etiologia , Metástase Neoplásica , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Distribuição Aleatória , Sistema de Registros , RiscoRESUMO
Despite numerous reports of findings obtained following the use of doxorubicin (Adriamycin [A]; Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH) for the postoperative treatment of patients with primary breast cancer and positive axillary nodes, no clear consensus exists regarding its worth when used in that setting. In June 1981, the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) implemented two randomized clinical trials aimed at evaluating the worth of doxorubicin when administered in conjunction with melphalan (L-PAM) and fluorouracil (5-FU) (PF). A prior NSABP study identified cohorts of patients who did or did not benefit from tamoxifen (TAM, T) when used with chemotherapy. That information was employed in the design of the present studies. Women considered responsive to TAM (1,106) were randomized between PFT and PAFT, and those nonresponsive to TAM (707) were randomized between PF and PAF. Findings through 6 years of follow-up (mean duration of potential time on study, 64 months and 63 months, respectively) indicate that non-TAM-responsive patients who received PAF had a significantly better disease-free survival (DFS) (P = .003) and survival (P = .05) than did those receiving PF. By contrast, there was no significant difference in DFS (P = .6) or survival (P = .7) between PFT- and PAFT-treated patients. No disparity in the amount of drug received, whether related to the median amount or to dose-intensity, is present to account for the difference in findings between the studies. Aside from alopecia and emesis, the toxicity from the doxorubicin-containing regimens was similar to those in which doxorubicin was omitted. Cardiomyopathy was not a significant finding; there were no deaths from cardiac toxicity. The incidence of arterial and venous complications in patients receiving TAM was less than reported by others.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Protocolos Clínicos , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Terapia Combinada , Doxorrubicina/administração & dosagem , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Melfalan/administração & dosagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Distribuição Aleatória , Tamoxifeno/administração & dosagemRESUMO
Between March 1984 and July 1988, 1,158 patients with Dukes' A, B, and C carcinoma of the colon were entered into National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) Protocol C-02. Patients were randomized to either no further treatment following curative resection or to postoperative fluorouracil (5-FU) and heparin administered via the portal vein. Therapy began on day of operation and consisted of constant infusion for 7 successive day. Average time on study was 41.8 months. A comparison between the two groups of patients indicated both an improvement in disease-free survival (74% v 64% at 4 years, overall P = .02) and a survival advantage (81% v 73% at 4 years, overall P = .07) in favor of the chemotherapy-treated group. When compared with the treated group, patients who received no further treatment had 1.26 times the risk of developing a treatment failure and 1.25 times the likelihood of dying after 4 years. Particularly significant was the failure to demonstrate an advantage from 5-FU in decreasing the incidence of hepatic metastases. The liver was the first site of treatment failure in 32.9% of 82 patients with documented recurrences in the control group and in 46.3% of 67 patients who received additional treatment. Therapy is administered via a regional route to affect the incidence of recurrence within the perfused anatomic boundary. Since, in this study, adjuvant portal-vein 5-FU infusion failed to reduce the incidence of hepatic metastases, it may be concluded that its use thus far is not justified. It may also be speculated that the disease-free survival and survival advantages (the latter of borderline significance) are a result of the systemic effects of 5-FU.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias do Colo/tratamento farmacológico , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Idoso , Neoplasias do Colo/patologia , Neoplasias do Colo/cirurgia , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Feminino , Fluoruracila/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Veia Porta , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Análise de SobrevidaRESUMO
In this National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) clinical trial, 1,891 women with primary operable breast cancer and positive axillary nodes were randomized between Jan, 1977 and May 1980 to receive L-phenylalanine mustard (L-PAM) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) either with or without tamoxifen (TAM)-PFT. This report presents life table probabilities, cumulative odds ratios, and P values for disease-free survival (DFS) and survival at yearly intervals through 5 years of observation (mean time on study, 72 months). When patients were examined overall without regard for any discriminant associated with outcome, ie, age, number of positive nodes, or tumor receptor status, there was a significant prolongation of DFS (P = .002), but not survival through the fifth postoperative year. The benefit was almost entirely restricted to those greater than or equal to 50 years with greater than or equal to 4 positive nodes. In that group there was a 66% greater chance of remaining disease free if PFT was received (P less than .001), and there was also a significant survival benefit (P = .02). The advantage from PFT was found to be associated with tumor estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) as well as patient age and nodal status. Overall there was a significant improvement in DFS from PFT in those having tumors with an ER or PR level greater than or equal to 10 femtomole (fmol) (P = .01 and .009, respectively). No significant benefit in DFS or survival has been observed in patients less than or equal to 49 years old related either to nodes or tumor receptor status. Survival continues to be adversely affected by TAM in those patients (less than or equal to 49 years old), particularly when their tumors have a PR of 0 to 9 fmol (P = .007). In patients greater than or equal to 50 years old with four or more positive nodes, a significant DFS benefit persisted through the fifth year of observation in those having tumor ER or PR levels greater than 10 fmol (P less than .001 and .002). The advantage was observed in patients 50 to 59 years old as well as those 60 to 70. Women in the older decade demonstrated some advantage from PFT when their tumor ER or PR was 0 to 9 fmol. The most likely explanation for this finding is analytical error in receptor analyses.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Tamoxifeno/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Seguimentos , Humanos , Melfalan/administração & dosagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Receptores de Estrogênio/análise , Receptores de Progesterona/análiseRESUMO
In order to investigate the prognostic significance of erbB-2 overexpression, immunohistochemical staining for the erbB-2 protein was performed on sections from paraffin blocks of 292 primary invasive breast cancers obtained from women enrolled in the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) protocol B-06. Positive reaction indicative of erbB-2 overexpression was observed on tumor cells in 62 (21%) samples. Women whose cancers were judged to have erbB-2 overexpression had a significantly worse overall survival (P = .0012) with twice the mortality rate of women without detectable erbB-2 expression. No statistically significant effect was evident for disease-free survival (P = .22). In multivariate analysis, detection of erbB-2 overexpression was the second most predictive independent variable for survival after nodal status. Overexpression of erbB-2 was more common among tumors of poor nuclear grade (29%) than those of good nuclear grade (12%). The association of erbB-2 overexpression with decreased survival was evident only among women with tumors of good nuclear grade. In this subgroup, erbB-2 overexpression was associated with an approximately fivefold increase in mortality rate (P = .00001). The combined predictive value of erbB-2 overexpression and nuclear grade was evident regardless of their lymph node status. These results provide evidence that detection of erbB-2 overexpression may be an independent prognostic variable for patient survival. Moreover, when combined with evaluation of nuclear grade, it may be possible to use immunostaining for erbB-2 protein to identify patients at increased risk from within a relatively low-risk group.