3D quantification of the lacunocanalicular network on human femoral diaphysis through synchrotron radiation-based nanoCT.

Osteocytes are the major actors in bone mechanobiology. Within bone matrix, they are trapped close together in a submicrometric interconnected network: the lacunocanalicular network (LCN). The interstitial fluid circulating within the LCN transmits the mechanical information to the osteocytes that convert it into a biochemical signal. Understanding the interstitial fluid dynamics is necessary to better understand the bone mechanobiology. Due to the submicrometric dimensions of the LCN, making it difficult to experimentally investigate fluid dynamics, numerical models appear as a relevant tool for such investigation. To develop such models, there is a need for geometrical and morphological data on the human LCN. This study aims at providing morphological data on the human LCN from measurement of 27 human femoral diaphysis bone samples using synchrotron radiation nano-computed tomography with an isotropic voxel size of 100 nm. Except from the canalicular diameter, the canalicular morphological parameters presented a high variability within one sample. Some differences in terms of both lacunar and canalicular morphology were observed between the male and female populations. But it has to be highlighted that all the canaliculi cannot be detected with a voxel size of 100 nm. Hence, in the current study, only a specific population of large canaliculi that could be characterize. Still, to the authors knowledge, this is the first time such a data set was introduced to the community. Further processing will be achieved in order to provide new insight on the LCN permeability.

OPN, BSP, and Bone Quality-Structural, Biochemical, and Biomechanical Assessment in OPN-/-, BSP-/-, and DKO Mice.

Osteopontin (OPN) and Bone Sialoprotein (BSP), abundantly expressed by osteoblasts and osteoclasts, appear to have important, partly overlapping functions in bone. In gene-knockout (KO, -/-) models of either protein and their double (D)KO in the same CD1/129sv genetic background, we analyzed the morphology, matrix characteristics, and biomechanical properties of femur bone in 2 and 4 month old, male and female mice. OPN-/- mice display inconsistent, perhaps localized hypermineralization, while the BSP-/- are hypomineralized throughout ages and sexes, and the low mineralization of young DKO mice recovers with age. The higher contribution of primary bone remnants in OPN-/- shafts suggests a slow turnover, while their lower percentage in BSP-/- indicates rapid remodeling, despite FTIR-based evidence in this genotype of a high maturity of the mineralized matrix. In 3-point bending assays, OPN-/- bones consistently display higher Maximal Load, Work to Max. Load and in young mice Ultimate Stress, an intrinsic characteristic of the matrix. Young male and old female BSP-/- also display high Work to Max. Load along with low Ultimate Stress. Principal Component Analysis confirms the major role of morphological traits in mechanical competence, and evidences a grouping of the WT phenotype with the OPN-/- and of BSP-/- with DKO, driven by both structural and matrix parameters, suggesting that the presence or absence of BSP has the most profound effects on skeletal properties. Single or double gene KO of OPN and BSP thus have multiple distinct effects on skeletal phenotypes, confirming their importance in bone biology and their interplay in its regulation.

Inter-laboratory reproduction and sensitivity study of a finite element model to quantify human femur failure load: Case of metastases.

INTRODUCTION: Metastases increase the risk of fracture when affecting the femur. Consequently, clinicians need to know if the patient's femur can withstand the stress of daily activities. The current tools used in clinics are not sufficiently precise. A new method, the CT-scan-based finite element analysis, gives good predictive results. However, none of the existing models were tested for reproducibility. This is a critical issue to address in order to apply the technique on a large cohort around the world to help evaluate bone metastatic fracture risk in patients. The aim of this study is then to evaluate 1) the reproducibility 2) the transposition of the reproduced model to another dataset and 3) the global sensitivity of one of the most promising models of the literature (original model). METHODS: The model was reproduced based on the paper describing it and discussion with authors to avoid reproduction errors. The reproducibility was evaluated by comparing the results given in the original model by the original first team (Leuven, Belgium) and the reproduced model made by another team (Lyon, France) on the same dataset of CT-scans of ex vivo femurs. The transposition of the model was evaluated by comparing the results of the reproduced model on two different datasets. The global sensitivity analysis was done by using the Morris method and evaluates the influence of the density calibration coefficient, the segmentation, the orientations and the length of the femur. RESULTS: The original and reproduced models are highly correlated (r2 = 0.95), even though the reproduced model gives systematically higher failure loads. When using the reproduced model on another dataset, predictions are less accurate (r2 with the experimental failure load decreases, errors increase). The global sensitivity analysis showed high influence of the density calibration coefficient (mean variation of failure load of 84 %) and non-negligible influence of the segmentation, orientation and length of the femur (mean variation of failure load between 7 and 10 %). CONCLUSION: This study showed that, although being validated, the reproduced model underperformed when using another dataset. The difference in performance depending on the dataset is commonly the cause of overfitting when creating the model. However, the dataset used in the original paper (Sas et al., 2020a) and the Leuven's dataset gave similar performance, which indicates a lesser probability for the overfitting cause. Also, the model is highly sensitive to density parameters and automation of measurement may minimize the uncertainty on failure load. An uncertainty propagation analysis would give the actual precision of such model and improve our understanding of its behavior and is part of future work.

Finite element models with automatic computed tomography bone segmentation for failure load computation.

Bone segmentation is an important step to perform biomechanical failure load simulations on in-vivo CT data of patients with bone metastasis, as it is a mandatory operation to obtain meshes needed for numerical simulations. Segmentation can be a tedious and time consuming task when done manually, and expert segmentations are subject to intra- and inter-operator variability. Deep learning methods are increasingly employed to automatically carry out image segmentation tasks. These networks usually need to be trained on a large image dataset along with the manual segmentations to maximize generalization to new images, but it is not always possible to have access to a multitude of CT-scans with the associated ground truth. It then becomes necessary to use training techniques to make the best use of the limited available data. In this paper, we propose a dedicated pipeline of preprocessing, deep learning based segmentation method and post-processing for in-vivo human femurs and vertebrae segmentation from CT-scans volumes. We experimented with three U-Net architectures and showed that out-of-the-box models enable automatic and high-quality volume segmentation if carefully trained. We compared the failure load simulation results obtained on femurs and vertebrae using either automatic or manual segmentations and studied the sensitivity of the simulations on small variations of the automatic segmentation. The failure loads obtained using automatic segmentations were comparable to those obtained using manual expert segmentations for all the femurs and vertebrae tested, demonstrating the effectiveness of the automated segmentation approach for failure load simulations.