Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Ann Neurol ; 73(1): 95-103, 2013 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23378325

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To identify early predictors of long-term outcomes in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) treated with intramuscular (IM) interferon beta-1a (IFNß-1a). METHODS: A multicenter, observational, 15-year follow-up study of patients who completed ≥2 years in the pivotal trial of IM IFNß-1a for RRMS was conducted. One hundred thirty-six patients participated in the 15-year follow-up (69 originally randomized to IM IFNß-1a and 67 to placebo). After the 2-year clinical trial, treatment was not regulated by study protocol. Disease activity during the 2-year trial was defined as: ≥2 gadolinium-enhancing lesions (cumulative) on year 1 and/or year 2 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); ≥3 new T2 lesions on year 2 MRI compared to baseline; and ≥2 relapses over 2 years. Odds ratios were calculated for early disease activity predicting severe Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) worsening (worst quartile of change, ≥4.5 EDSS points) during the 15-year interval. RESULTS: The proportion of patients experiencing early disease activity was lower in patients on IM IFNß-1a than placebo for all disease activity markers (range, 23.5-29.0% vs 41.0-45.5%). In the IM IFNß-1a group, persistent disease activity predicted severe EDSS worsening: gadolinium-enhancing lesions (odds ratio [OR], 8.96; p < 0.001); relapses (OR, 4.44; p = 0.010); and new T2 lesions (OR, 2.90; p = 0.080). In placebo patients, early disease activity was not as strongly associated with long-term outcomes (OR range, 1.53-2.62; p = 0.069-0.408). INTERPRETATION: Disease activity despite treatment with IFNß is associated with unfavorable long-term outcomes. Particular attention should be paid to gadolinium-enhancing lesions on IFNß therapy, as their presence strongly correlates with severe disability 15 years later. The results provide rationale for monitoring IFNß-treated patients with MRI, and for changing therapy in patients with active disease.


Assuntos
Interferon beta/administração & dosagem , Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Injeções Intramusculares , Interferon beta-1a , Masculino , Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente/diagnóstico , Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente/epidemiologia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
BMC Neurol ; 11: 144, 2011 Nov 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22074056

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Interferon beta (IFNß) and glatiramer acetate (GA) are administered by subcutaneous (SC) or intramuscular (IM) injection. Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) often report injection-site reactions (ISRs) as a reason for noncompliance or switching therapies. The aim of this study was to compare the proportion of patients on different formulations of IFNß or GA who experienced ISRs and who switched or discontinued therapy because of ISRs. METHODS: The Swiss MS Skin Project was an observational multicenter study. Patients with MS or clinically isolated syndrome who were on the same therapy for at least 2 years were enrolled. A skin examination was conducted at the first study visit and 1 year later. RESULTS: The 412 patients enrolled were on 1 of 4 disease-modifying therapies for at least 2 years: IM IFNß-1a (n = 82), SC IFNß-1b (n = 123), SC IFNß-1a (n = 184), or SC GA (n = 23). At first evaluation, ISRs were reported by fewer patients on IM IFNß-1a (13.4%) than on SC IFNß-1b (57.7%; P < 0.0001), SC IFNß-1a (67.9%; P < 0.0001), or SC GA (30.4%; P = not significant [NS]). No patient on IM IFNß-1a missed a dose in the previous 4 weeks because of ISRs, compared with 5.7% of patients on SC IFNß-1b (P = 0.044), 7.1% of patients on SC IFNß-1a (P = 0.011), and 4.3% of patients on SC GA (P = NS). Primary reasons for discontinuing or switching therapy were ISRs or lack of efficacy. Similar patterns were observed at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Patients on IM IFNß-1a had fewer ISRs and were less likely to switch therapies than patients on other therapies. This study may have implications in selecting initial therapy or, for patients considering switching or discontinuing therapy because of ISRs, selecting an alternative option.


Assuntos
Fatores Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Fatores Imunológicos/efeitos adversos , Interferon beta/administração & dosagem , Interferon beta/efeitos adversos , Esclerose Múltipla/tratamento farmacológico , Peptídeos/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Feminino , Acetato de Glatiramer , Humanos , Injeções Intramusculares/efeitos adversos , Injeções Subcutâneas/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Peptídeos/administração & dosagem , Prevalência
4.
J Atheroscler Thromb ; 24(4): 402-411, 2017 Apr 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28154305

RESUMO

AIM: There is an unmet need in Japan for more optimal lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) for patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) who respond inadequately to available drug therapies and/or apheresis, to achieve goals of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction by 50% or to <100 mg/dL. METHODS: In this study, Japanese patients with HoFH on stable LLT and diet were treated with lomitapide, initiated at 5 mg/day and escalated to maximum tolerated dose (up to 60 mg/day) over 14 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was mean percentage change from baseline to Week 26 in LDL-C. Secondary endpoints included changes in other lipid parameters and safety throughout the 56-week study (including follow-up). RESULTS: Nine patients entered the efficacy phase of the study and, of these, eight completed 56 weeks. Mean LDL-C was reduced by 42% (p<0.0001) at 26 weeks, from 199 mg/dL (95% CI: 149-250) at baseline to 118 mg/dL (95% CI: 70-166). A 50% reduction in LDL-C and LDL-C <100 mg/dL was achieved by five and six of nine patients, respectively, at 26 weeks. After 56 weeks, LDL-C was reduced by 38% (p=0.0032) from baseline. Significant reductions in non-HDL-C, VLDL-C, triglycerides, and apolipoprotein B were also reported at Week 26. There were no new safety signals and, similar to previous studies, gastrointestinal adverse events were the most common adverse events. CONCLUSION: Lomitapide, added to ongoing treatment with other LLTs, was effective in rapidly and significantly reducing the levels of LDL-C and other atherogenic apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins in adult Japanese patients with HoFH.


Assuntos
Anticolesterolemiantes/uso terapêutico , Benzimidazóis/uso terapêutico , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Homozigoto , Humanos , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/metabolismo , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/patologia , Japão , Masculino , Dose Máxima Tolerável , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Segurança
5.
J Clin Pharmacol ; 56(1): 47-55, 2016 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26120010

RESUMO

Lomitapide is a microsomal triglyceride transfer protein inhibitor approved as an adjunctive treatment for adult patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Lomitapide is extensively metabolized via cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) and is a weak CYP3A inhibitor. Two phase 1 open-label, randomized (1:1), 2-arm drug interaction studies in healthy subjects assessed the effects of atorvastatin and ethinyl estradiol (EE)/norgestimate, both weak CYP3A inhibitors, on lomitapide pharmacokinetics with staggered (separated by 12 hours) or simultaneous administration. All subjects received a single dose of lomitapide (20 mg) in the evening on day 1. Atorvastatin (80 mg once daily, n = 32) or EE/norgestimate (0.035/0.25 mg once daily, n = 32) dosing was initiated on days 11 or 8, respectively, with evening (arm 1) or morning (arm 2) dosing; at steady state (days 15 or 22), a single lomitapide dose was administered; CYP3A inhibitor dosing continued for 6 days. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were taken until 168 hours postdose. With atorvastatin, lomitapide exposure was increased by approximately 2-fold and 1.3-fold, respectively, with simultaneous and staggered administration, respectively. Simultaneous and staggered EE/norgestimate and lomitapide administration resulted in an approximately 1.3-fold increase in lomitapide exposure. Reductions in lomitapide dose may be required for some patients when administered concomitantly with a weak CYP3A inhibitor.


Assuntos
Anticolesterolemiantes/farmacocinética , Benzimidazóis/farmacocinética , Inibidores do Citocromo P-450 CYP3A/farmacologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticolesterolemiantes/efeitos adversos , Anticolesterolemiantes/sangue , Atorvastatina/efeitos adversos , Atorvastatina/farmacologia , Benzimidazóis/efeitos adversos , Benzimidazóis/sangue , Anticoncepcionais Orais Combinados/efeitos adversos , Anticoncepcionais Orais Combinados/farmacologia , Inibidores do Citocromo P-450 CYP3A/efeitos adversos , Combinação de Medicamentos , Interações Medicamentosas , Etinilestradiol/efeitos adversos , Etinilestradiol/farmacologia , Feminino , Voluntários Saudáveis , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Norgestrel/efeitos adversos , Norgestrel/análogos & derivados , Norgestrel/farmacologia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa