Directional Leads for Deep Brain Stimulation: Technical Notes and Experiences.

OBJECTIVE: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an approved treatment for movement disorders. Despite high precision in electrode placement, side effects do occur by current spread to adjacent fibers or nuclei. Directional leads (D-leads) are designed to adapt the volume of stimulation relative to the position within the target by horizontal and vertical current steering directions. The feasibility of implanting these new leads, possible difficulties, and complications were the focus of this study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This analysis is based on 31 patients who underwent a DBS procedure with D-leads and an implantable pulse generator (IPG) capable of multiple independent current control and 31 patients who received non-D-leads with a similar IPG. While trajectory planning and most steps of the surgical procedure were identical to conventional DBS lead implantation, differences in indication, electrode handling, lead control, and complications were documented and analyzed in comparison to a control group with ring electrodes. RESULTS: During a consecutive series of 51 patients implanted with a DBS system, 31 patients (60.1%) were selected for implantation of D-leads and received 59 D-leads, 28 bilateral, and 3 unilateral implantations. The control group consisted of a consecutive series of a comparable time period, with 31 patients who received conventional ring electrodes. Indication of D-lead implantation was based on the anatomic conditions of the trajectory and target regions and the results of intraoperative test stimulations. In 1 patient, primary D-lead implantation on both sides was performed without any microelectrode implantation to minimize risk for hemorrhage. In the absence of an externally visible marker, the control of implant depth and of the orientation of the D-lead needs to be controlled by X-ray resulting in a longer fluoroscopy time and, therefore, higher X-ray dose compared to conventional lead implantations (415.53 vs. 328.96 Gy cm2; p = 0.09). Mean procedure duration for complete system implantation did not differ between either type of leads (ring electrodes vs. D-leads, 08:55 vs. 09:02 h:min). Surgical complications were unrelated to the type of electrode: surgical revision was necessary and successfully performed in 1 subcutaneous hematoma and 1 unilateral electrode dislocation. A rather rare complication, symptomatic idiopathic delayed-onset edema, was observed in 4 patients with D-leads. They recovered completely within 1-3 weeks, spontaneously or after short-term cortisone medication. In the control group, in a series of 31 patients (20 implanted with Medtronic 3389 lead and 11 with Boston Scientific Vercise lead), not a single problem of this kind was encountered at any time. CONCLUSION: Precise positioning of D-leads is more challenging than that of conventional DBS leads. By adding an external lead marker, control of optimal lead position and orientation is enhanced. In case of supposed increased risk for hemorrhage because of vessels crossing all possible trajectories in the pre-surgical navigated simulation program, primary D-lead implantation instead of the sharper microelectrodes may be a feasible alternative and it may offer more options than ring electrodes especially in these cases. Prospective studies comparing ring-mode stimulation to directional stimulation to examine the differences of the clinical effects have been started.

Longitudinal Assessment of Rotation Angles after Implantation of Directional Deep Brain Stimulation Leads.

PURPOSE: The risk/benefit-ratio of deep brain stimulation (DBS) depends on focusing the electrical field onto the target volume, excluding side-effect eliciting structures. Directional leads limiting radial current diffusion can target stimulation but add a spatial degree of freedom that requires control to align multimodal imaging datasets and for anatomical interpretation of stimulation. Unpredictable postoperative lead rotations have been reported. The extent and timing of rotation from the surgically intended alignment remain uncertain, as does the time point at which directional stimulation can be safely initiated without risking unexpected shifts in stimulation volume. We present a retrospective analysis of clinically indicated, repeated neuroimaging controls postimplantation in patients with directional DBS systems, which allow estimation of the amount and timing of postoperative lead rotation. METHODS: Data from 67 patients with directional leads and multiple cranial computer tomographies (CCT) and/or rotation fluoroscopies at different postoperative time points were included. Rotation angles were detected based on CCT artifacts (n = 56) or direct visualization of lead segments on rotation fluoroscopies (n = 52). Cross-validation of both methods was conducted in patients who received both imaging modalities (n = 51). RESULTS: Rotation angles deviated significantly (∼30°) from their intended 0° anterior/posterior orientation. Rotation was firmly established within the first postoperative day, with no additional torque in subsequent scans. The two methods highly correlated (right hemisphere: R2 = 0.94, left hemisphere: R2 = 0.91). CONCLUSION: Both methods for measuring rotation angles led to comparable results and can be used interchangeably. Directional stimulation settings can safely be initiated after the first postoperative day, without risking subsequent lead rotation-related anatomical shifts.

Four-Selective Pyridine Alkylation via Wittig Olefination of Dearomatized Pyridylphosphonium Ylides.

Methods to synthesize alkylated pyridines are valuable because these structures are prevalent in pharmaceuticals and agrochemicals. We have developed a distinct approach to construct 4-alkylpyridines using dearomatized pyridylphosphonium ylide intermediates in a Wittig olefination-rearomatization sequence. Pyridine N-activation is key to this strategy, and N-triazinylpyridinium salts enable coupling between a wide variety of substituted pyridines and aldehydes. The alkylation protocol is viable for late-stage functionalization, including methylation of pyridine-containing drugs. This approach represents an alternative to metal-catalyzed sp2 -sp3 cross-coupling reactions and Minisci-type processes.

Site-Selective Switching Strategies to Functionalize Polyazines.

Many drug fragments and therapeutic compounds contain multiple pyridines and diazines. Developing site-selective reactions where specific C-H bonds can be transformed in polyazine structures would enable rapid access to valuable derivatives. We present a study that addresses this challenge by selectively installing a phosphonium ion as a versatile functional handle. Inherent factors that control site-selectivity are described along with mechanistically driven approaches for site-selective switching, where the C-+PPh3 group can be predictably installed at other positions in the polyazine system. Simple protocols, readily available reagents, and application to complex drug-like molecules make this approach appealing to medicinal chemists.

Discovery, Optimization, and Biological Evaluation of Arylpyridones as Cbl-b Inhibitors.

Casitas B-lymphoma proto-oncogene-b (Cbl-b), a member of the Cbl family of RING finger E3 ubiquitin ligases, has been demonstrated to play a central role in regulating effector T-cell function. Multiple studies using gene-targeting approaches have provided direct evidence that Cbl-b negatively regulates T, B, and NK cell activation via a ubiquitin-mediated protein modulation. Thus, inhibition of Cbl-b ligase activity can lead to immune activation and has therapeutic potential in immuno-oncology. Herein, we describe the discovery and optimization of an arylpyridone series as Cbl-b inhibitors by structure-based drug discovery to afford compound 31. This compound binds to Cbl-b with an IC50 value of 30 nM and induces IL-2 production in T-cells with an EC50 value of 230 nM. Compound 31 also shows robust intracellular target engagement demonstrated through inhibition of Cbl-b autoubiquitination, inhibition of ubiquitin transfer to ZAP70, and the cellular modulation of phosphorylation of a downstream signal within the TCR axis.

Feasibility of local field potential-guided programming for deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease: A comparison with clinical and neuro-imaging guided approaches in a randomized, controlled pilot trial.

BACKGROUND: Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) is an effective treatment for advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). Clinical outcomes after DBS can be limited by poor programming, which remains a clinically driven, lengthy and iterative process. Electrophysiological recordings in PD patients undergoing STN-DBS have shown an association between STN spectral power in the beta frequency band (beta power) and the severity of clinical symptoms. New commercially-available DBS devices now enable the recording of STN beta oscillations in chronically-implanted PD patients, thereby allowing investigation into the use of beta power as a biomarker for DBS programming. OBJECTIVE: To determine the potential advantages of beta-guided DBS programming over clinically and image-guided programming in terms of clinical efficacy and programming time. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, blinded, three-arm, crossover clinical trial in eight Parkinson's patients with STN-DBS who were evaluated three months after DBS surgery. We compared clinical efficacy and time required for each DBS programming paradigm, as well as DBS parameters and total energy delivered between the three strategies (beta-, clinically- and image-guided). RESULTS: All three programming methods showed similar clinical efficacy, but the time needed for programming was significantly shorter for beta- and image-guided programming compared to clinically-guided programming (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Beta-guided programming may be a useful and more efficient approach to DBS programming in Parkinson's patients with STN-DBS. It takes significantly less time to program than traditional clinically-based programming, while providing similar symptom control. In addition, it is readily available within the clinical DBS programmer, making it a valuable tool for improving current clinical practice.

Reduced Programming Time and Strong Symptom Control Even in Chronic Course Through Imaging-Based DBS Programming.

Objectives: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) programming is based on clinical response testing. Our clinical pilot trial assessed the feasibility of image-guided programing using software depicting the lead location in a patient-specific anatomical model. Methods: Parkinson's disease patients with subthalamic nucleus-DBS were randomly assigned to standard clinical-based programming (CBP) or anatomical-based (imaging-guided) programming (ABP) in an 8-week crossover trial. Programming characteristics and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Results: In 10 patients, both programs led to similar motor symptom control (MDS-UPDRS III) after 4 weeks (medicationOFF/stimulationON; CPB: 18.27 ± 9.23; ABP: 18.37 ± 6.66). Stimulation settings were not significantly different, apart from higher frequency in the baseline program than CBP (p = 0.01) or ABP (p = 0.003). Time spent in a program was not significantly different (CBP: 86.1 ± 29.82%, ABP: 88.6 ± 29.0%). Programing time was significantly shorter (p = 0.039) with ABP (19.78 ± 5.86 min) than CBP (45.22 ± 18.32). Conclusion: Image-guided DBS programming in PD patients drastically reduces programming time without compromising symptom control and patient satisfaction in this small feasibility trial.

Rescuing Suboptimal Outcomes of Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson Disease by Surgical Lead Revision.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials have established subthalamic deep-brain-stimulation (STN-DBS) as a highly effective treatment for motor symptoms of Parkinson disease (PD), but in clinical practice outcomes are variable. Experienced centers are confronted with an increasing number of patients with partially "failed" STN-DBS, in whom motor benefit doesn't meet expectations. These patients require a complex multidisciplinary and standardized workup to identify the likely cause. OBJECTIVE: To describe outcomes in a series of PD patients undergoing lead revision for suboptimal motor benefit after STN-DBS surgery and characterize selection criteria for surgical revision. METHODS: We investigated 9 PD patients with STN-DBS, who had unsatisfactory outcomes despite intensive neurological management. Surgical revision was considered if the ratio of DBS vs levodopa-induced improvement of UPDRS-III (DBS-rr) was below 75% and the electrodes were found outside the dorsolateral STN. RESULTS: Fifteen electrodes were replaced via stereotactic revision surgery into the dorsolateral STN without any adverse effects. Median displacement distance was 4.1 mm (range 1.6-8.42 mm). Motor symptoms significantly improved (38.2 ± 6.6 to 15.5 ± 7.9 points, P < .001); DBS-rr increased from 64% to 190%. CONCLUSION: Patients with persistent OFFmotor symptoms after STN-DBS should be screened for levodopa-responsiveness, which can serve as a benchmark for best achievable motor benefit. Even small horizontal deviations of the lead from the optimal position within the dorsolateral STN can cause stimulation responses, which are markedly inferior to the levodopa response. Patients with an image confirmed lead displacement and preserved levodopa response are candidates for lead revision and can expect significant motor improvement from appropriate lead replacement.

Selective Brain Cooling after Traumatic Brain Injury: Effects of Three Different Cooling Methods-Case Report.

Background In experimental models of neuronal damage, therapeutic hypothermia proved to be a powerful neuroprotective method. In clinical studies of traumatic brain injury (TBI), this very distinct effect was not reproducible. Several meta-analyses draw different conclusions about whether therapeutic hypothermia can improve outcome after TBI. Adverse side effects of systemic hypothermia, such as severe pneumonia, have been held responsible by some authors to counteract the neuroprotective effect. Selective brain cooling (SBC) attempts to take advantage of the protective effects of therapeutic hypothermia without the adverse side effects of systemic hypothermia. Methods Three different methods of SBC were applied in a patient who had severe TBI with recurrent increases of intracranial pressure (ICP) refractory to conventional forms of treatment: (1) external cooling of the scalp and neck using ice packs prior to hemicraniectomy, (2) external cooling of the craniectomy defect using ice packs after hemicraniectomy, and (3) cooling by epidural irrigation with cold Ringer solution after hemicraniectomy. Results External scalp cooling before hemicraniectomy, external cooling of the craniectomy defect, and epidural irrigation with cold fluid resulted in temperature differences (brain temperature to body temperature) of - 0.2°, - 0.7°, and - 3.6°C, respectively. ICP declined with decreasing brain temperature. Conclusion Previous external cooling attempts for SBC faced the problem that brain temperature could not be lowered without a simultaneous decrease of systemic temperature. After hemicraniectomy, epidural irrigation with cold fluid may be a simple and effective way to lower ICP and apply one of the most powerful methods of cerebroprotection after severe TBI.