RESUMO
Many health professions programmes have begun integrating interprofessional learning into their curricula; however, community-based interprofessional education (IPE) initiatives are relatively scarce. The Meharry-Vanderbilt Alliance IPE Faculty Collaborative, comprised of faculty from five institutions, developed a community-based IPE programme that allowed students to engage in meaningful interprofessional activities while exposing them to social determinants of health. Thirty students from ten professions were divided into six teams and paired with three community organisations. Each team engaged community organisation staff and clients to develop practical solutions to their priorities. Teams participated in debriefings and team-building exercises to further support interprofessional learning. Students' comfort working with others (CWO), value in working with others (VWO), and self-perceived ability (SPA) to work with others were assessed using the Interprofessional Socialisation and Valuing Scale (ISVS). Mean rank scores in all three subcategories increased significantly from baseline (CWO: z = -4.11, p < 0.0001; VWO: z = -3.41. p = 0.001; SPA: z = -2.79, p = 0.005). In addition, programme evaluations suggest the programme improved students' understanding of social determinants of health. Our findings align with those of two other community-based IPE initiatives and support the expansion of IPE efforts beyond traditional settings.
Assuntos
Comportamento Cooperativo , Processos Grupais , Ocupações em Saúde/educação , Relações Interinstitucionais , Relações Interprofissionais , Adulto , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Projetos Piloto , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Socialização , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Significant health disparities exist between limited English proficient and English-proficient patients. Little is known about the impact of language services on chronic disease outcomes such as for diabetes. METHODS/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: To determine whether the amount and type of language services received during primary care visits had an impact on diabetes-related outcomes (hospitalization, emergency room utilization, glycemic control) in limited English proficient patients, a retrospective cohort design was utilized. Hospital and medical record data was examined for 1425 limited English proficient patients in the Cambridge Health Alliance diabetes registry. We categorized patients receiving usual care into 7 groups based on the amount and combination of language services (language concordant providers, formal interpretation and nothing) received at primary care visits during a 9 month period. Bivariate analyses and multiple logistic regression were used to determine relationships between language service categories and outcomes in the subsequent 6 months. Thirty-one percent of patients (445) had no documentation of interpreter use or seeing a language concordant provider in any visits. Patients who received 100% of their primary care visits with language concordant providers were least likely to have diabetes-related emergency department visits compared to other groups (p<0001) in the following 6 months. Patients with higher numbers of co-morbidities were more likely to receive formal interpretation. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Language concordant providers may help reduce health care utilization for limited English proficient patients with diabetes. However, given the lack of such providers in sufficient numbers to meet patients' communication needs, strategies are needed to both increase their numbers and ensure that the highest risk patients receive the most appropriate language services. In addition, systems serving diverse populations must clarify why some limited English proficient patients do not receive language services at some or all of their visits and whether this has an impact on quality of care.
Assuntos
Comunicação , Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Idioma , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Demografia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Despite the persistent belief that Asians are the "model minority" there is accumulating evidence of health concerns within Asian subgroups. In this study, we implemented a cross-sectional participatory community health assessment in an urban city in Massachusetts, to understand differences and similarities in demographics, health and healthcare access in Chinese and Vietnamese adults. We gathered qualitative data from community stakeholders to inform the development of a community health assessment tool. The tool elicited information on healthcare access, health status, behavioral health and chronic disease history and treatment. Healthcare access issues and poor health status, particularly among Chinese participants and mental health symptomotology in both groups were areas of concern. These findings revealed important health concerns in two Asian ethnic groups. Studies are needed to better understand these concerns and inform programs and policies to improve health outcomes in these Asian ethnic groups.
Assuntos
Asiático , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde/etnologia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Nível de Saúde , Saúde Mental/etnologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , China/etnologia , Doença Crônica/etnologia , Pesquisa Participativa Baseada na Comunidade , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Masculino , Massachusetts/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Vietnã/etnologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Reducing racial and ethnic disparities in the quality of health care is a national policy priority; collecting race and ethnicity data from patients is a necessary first step in identifying and addressing these disparities. Recognizing this, Boston and Massachusetts recently enacted race and ethnicity data collection regulations affecting all acute care hospitals in the city and state. This paper describes the regulations and early lessons learned from implementing these data collection efforts in three areas: the design of data collection tools, uses of the data for eliminating disparities, and the role of the policy process in such efforts.