[4D-CT-based plan target volume (PTV) definition compared with conventional PTV definition using general margin in radiotherapy for lung cancer].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the dosimetric benefit of 4D-CT in the planning target volume (PTV) definition process compared with conventional PTV definition using general margin in radiotherapy of lung cancer. METHODS: A set of 4D-CT images and multiphase helical CT scans were obtained in 10 patients with lung cancer. The radiotherapeutic plans based on PTV determined by 4D-CT and in addition of general margin were performed, respectively. The 3D motion of the centroid of GTV and the 3D spatial motion vectors were calculated. The differences of the two kinds of PTVs, mean lung dose (MLD), V5,V10,V15,V20 of total lung, mean heart dose (MHD), V30 and V40 of heart, D99 and D95 were compared, and the correlation between them and the 3D spatial motion vector was analyzed. RESULTS: The PTV4D in eight patients were smaller than PTVconv, with a mean reduction of (13.0 ± 8.0)% (P = 0.018). In other two patients, whose respiration motion was great, PTV4D was larger than PTVconv. The mean 3D spatial motion vector of GTV centroid was (0.78 ± 0.72)cm. By using 4D-CT, the mean reduction of MLD was (8.6 ± 9.9)% (P = 0.037). V5, V10, V15, V20 of total lung were decreased averagely by (7.2 ± 10.5)%, (5.5 ± 8.9)%, (6.5 ± 8.4)% and (5.7 ± 7.4)%, respectively (P < 0.05 for all). There was a significant positive correlation between PTV4D/PTVconv and the 3D spatial motion vector of the GTV centroid (P = 0.008). A significant inverse correlation was found between D994D/D99conv and the 3D spatial motion vector of the GTV centroid (P = 0.002). D994D/D99conv, (MLDconv-MLD4D) /MLDconv, total lung (V5conv-V54D)/V5conv, total lung (V10conv-V104D)/V10conv, (MHDconv-MHD4D)/MHDconv, heart (V30conv-V304D)/V30conv were inversely correlated with PTV4D/PTVconv (P < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: 4D-CT can be used to evaluate the respiration motion of lung tumor accurately. The 4D-CT-based PTV definition and radiotherapeutic planing can reduce the volume of PTV in patients with small respiration motion, increase the intra-target dose, and decrease the dose of normal tissue sequentially. For patients with large respiration motion, especially those more than 1.5-2 cm, this method can avoid target miss, meanwhile, not increase the dose of normal tissue significantly.

Evaluating and modeling of photon beam attenuation by a standard treatment couch.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate beam attenuation by treatment couch and build a treatment couch model in TPS to check for beam-couch intersection at the planning stage and deal with beam attenuation by treatment couch in dose calculation. In this study, a standard treatment couch, Siemens ZXT couch, has been incorporated into Pinnacle3 8.0 TPS, based on an existing TPS tool, model-based segmentation (MBS). This was done by generating the couch's model from contours of the couch, together with the density information. Both the geometric and dosimetric accuracy of the couch model were evaluated. The test of beam-couch intersection prediction showed good agreement between predicted and measured results, and the differences were within 1° gantry rotation. For individual posterior oblique beams, the attenuation by metallic frames and PMMA couch top could reach nearly as high as 60% and 10%, respectively. For several posterior oblique beams (180°, 220°, 235°) that attenuated by the PMMA couch top, the calculated and measured dose distributions were compared. The dose differences at central axis were within 1%, and almost all points agreed with the calculations when the DD and DTA criteria of 3%/3 mm were adopted. The difference between calculated and measured attenuation factors were within 0.5%. This study demonstrates that the couch model created by MBS, which contains geometric and density information of the couch, can be used to detect the beam-couch intersection, and also is able to provide an accurate representation of the couch top attenuation properties in patient dose calculation.

Evaluation of MLC leaf transmission on IMRT treatment plan quality of patients with advanced lung cancer.

The purpose of this paper was to evaluate the impact of leaf treatment of multileaf collimator (MLC) in plan quality of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) of patients with advanced lung cancer. Five MLCs with different leaf transmissions (0.01%, 0.5%, 1.2%, 1.8%, and 3%) were configured for an accelerator in a treatment planning system. Correspondingly, 5 treatment plans with the same optimization setting were created and evaluated quantitatively for each patient (11 patients total) who was diagnosed with advanced lung cancer. All of the 5 plans for each patient met the dose requirement for the planning treatment volumes (PTVs) and had similar target dose homogeneity and conformity. On average, the doses to selected organs were as follows: (1) V5, V20, and the mean dose of total lung; (2) the maximum and mean dose to spinal cord planning organ-at-risk volume (PRV); and (3) V30 and V40 of heart, decreased slightly when MLC transmission was decreased, but with no statistical differences. There is a clear grouping of plans having total quality score (SD) value, which is used to evaluate plan quality: (1) more than 1 (patient nos. 1 to 3, 5, and 8), and more than 2.5 (patient no. 6); (2) less than 1 (patient nos. 7 and 10); (3) around 1 (patient nos. 4, 9, and 11). As MLC transmission increased, overall SD values increased as well and plan dose requirement was harder to meet. The clinical requirements were violated increasingly as MLC transmission became large. Total SD with and without normal tissue (NT) showed similar results, with no statistically significant differences. Therefore, decrease of MLC transmission did have minimum impact on plan, and it improved target coverage and reduced normal tissue radiation slightly, with no statistical significance. Plan quality could not be significantly improved by MLC transmission reduction. However, lower MLC transmission may have advantages on lung sparing to low- and intermediate-dose exposure. Besides conventional fraction, hyperfraction, or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), the reduction on lung sparing is still essential because it is highly relevant to radiation pneumonitis (RP). It has potential to diminish incidence of RP and improve patient's quality of life after irradiation with lowered MLC transmission.

Tomotherapy as an adjuvant treatment for gastroesophageal junction and stomach cancer may reduce bowel and bone marrow toxicity compared to intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy.

PURPOSE: To compare dosimetric parameters of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and tomotherapy (TOMO) in the adjuvant treatment of gastroesophageal junction (GEJ)/stomach cancer. The planning goal was to maintain high target coverage while keeping the dose to the bowel and bone marrow (BM) as low as possible. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After curative surgery, 16 patients with GEJ/stomach cancer were re-planned by coplanar IMRT (five fixed beam), VMAT (double-arc), and TOMO. The dose to the planning target volume (PTV) was 45 Gy in 25 fractions. The target parameters, including the homogeneity index (HI) and conformity index (CI), and doses to the organs at risk (OARs) were analyzed. RESULTS: Dosimetric parameters for PTV and OARs were comparable among the three techniques. However, TOMO provided improved conformity (CI = 0.92±0.03) and homogeneity (HI = 1.07±0.02) than IMRT (CI = 0.87±0.03; HI = 1.09±0.02; p < 0.05) and VMAT (CI = 0.86±0.03; HI = 1.09±0.02; p < 0.01). TOMO also improved dose sparing of the bowel (percentage of the volume receiving a dose of ≥ 30 Gy [V30] = 23.24±9.85) and BM (V30 = 71.66±6.15) compared with IMRT (bowel V30 = 30.02±11.74; BM V30 = 83.74±8.42; p < 0.01) and VMAT (bowel V30 = 31.88±11.59; BM V30 = 79.51±9.07; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: TOMO is a good option for adjuvant treatment of GEJ/stomach cancer in patients undergoing radical surgery due to its superior bowel and BM dose sparing, dose conformity and dose homogeneity; however, future studies are required to validate its clinical efficacy.

A dosimetric evaluation of flattening filter-free volumetric modulated arc therapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To explore the dosimetric effects of flattening filter-free (FFF) beams in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) of nasopharyngeal carcinoma via a retrospective planning study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A linear accelerator (LINAC) was prepared to operate in FFF mode and the beam data were collected and used to build a model in TPS. For 10 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) cases, VMAT plans of FFF beams and normal flattened (FF) beams were designed. Differences of plan quality and delivery efficiency between FFF-VMAT plans and filter filtered VMAT (FF-VMAT) plans were analyzed using two-tailed paired t-tests. RESULTS: Removal of the flattening filter increased the dose rate. Averaged beam on time (BOT) of FFF-VMAT plans was decreased by 24.2%. Differences of target dose coverage between plans with flattened and unflattened beams were statistically insignificant. For dose to normal organs, up to 4.9% decrease in V35 of parotid grand and 4.5% decrease in averaged normal tissue (NT) dose was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The TPS used in our study was able to handle FFF beams. The FFF beam prone to improve the normal tissue sparing while achieving similar target dose distribution. Decreasing of BOT in NPC cases was valuable in terms of patient's comfort.

Critical structure sparing in stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for central lung lesions: helical tomotherapy vs. volumetric modulated arc therapy.

BACKGROUND: Helical tomotherapy (HT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) are both advanced techniques of delivering intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Here, we conduct a study to compare HT and partial-arc VMAT in their ability to spare organs at risk (OARs) when stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is delivered to treat centrally located early stage non-small-cell lung cancer or lung metastases. METHODS: 12 patients with centrally located lung lesions were randomly chosen. HT, 2 & 8 arc (Smart Arc, Pinnacle v9.0) plans were generated to deliver 70 Gy in 10 fractions to the planning target volume (PTV). Target and OAR dose parameters were compared. Each technique's ability to meet dose constraints was further investigated. RESULTS: HT and VMAT plans generated essentially equivalent PTV coverage and dose conformality indices, while a trend for improved dose homogeneity by increasing from 2 to 8 arcs was observed with VMAT. Increasing the number of arcs with VMAT also led to some improvement in OAR sparing. After normalizing to OAR dose constraints, HT was found to be superior to 2 or 8-arc VMAT for optimal OAR sparing (meeting all the dose constraints) (p = 0.0004). All dose constraints were met in HT plans. Increasing from 2 to 8 arcs could not help achieve optimal OAR sparing for 4 patients. 2/4 of them had 3 immediately adjacent structures. CONCLUSION: HT appears to be superior to VMAT in OAR sparing mainly in cases which require conformal dose avoidance of multiple immediately adjacent OARs. For such cases, increasing the number of arcs in VMAT cannot significantly improve OAR sparing.