Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Idioma
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Huan Jing Ke Xue ; 43(10): 4716-4724, 2022 Oct 08.
Artigo em Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36224157

RESUMO

According to the positioning experiment of straw returning in the continuous field 7a, the effects of straw returning combined with chemical fertilizer on soil total organic carbon (TOC), dissolved organic carbon (DOC), particulate organic carbon (POC), labile organic carbon (LOC), carbon pool management index (CPMI), and crop yield in farmland soil profiles (0-20, 20-50, and 50-80 cm) in the Chaohu Lake area were studied. There were four treatments:no straw returning+no fertilization (CK), conventional fertilization (F), straw returning+conventional fertilization (SF1), and straw returning+80% conventional fertilization (SF2). The changes in soil total organic carbon and component content, CPMI, and rape rice yield in different soil layers were analyzed. Taking CK as a reference, conventional fertilization and straw returning combined with chemical fertilizer increased the content of total organic carbon and components in the soil vertical profile, and the content of total organic carbon and components in different soil layers decreased gradually with the increase in soil depth. In the 0-20 cm soil layer, compared with that in the F treatment, the SF1 and SF2 treatments significantly increased the contents of TOC, DOC, POC, and LOC by 14.23%-28.97%, 7.86%-27.01%, 16.46%-24.24%, and 5.89%-6.64%, respectively (P<0.05). In the 20-50 cm soil layer, the contents of TOC and LOC in SF1 were significantly increased by 9.43% and 8.34%, respectively, compared with those in the F treatment (P<0.05), and the contents of DOC and POC in SF2 were significantly increased by 17.51% and 65.83% compared with those in the F treatment (P<0.05). In the 50-80 cm soil layer, there was no significant difference in the contents of total organic carbon and components among the treatments. The effect of straw returning and chemical fertilizer on the soil carbon pool management index was significant. SF1 significantly improved the CPMI of the 0-50 cm soil layer compared with that in the F treatment, whereas the CPMI of the F treatment was the largest in the 50-80 cm soil layer; however, there was no significant difference among all treatments. Straw returning combined with chemical fertilizer had a significant effect on crop yield, and the yield of the SF1 treatment was the highest; compared with that of the F treatment, the rice, rape, and annual yields were significantly increased by 6.19%, 7.67%, and 6.54%, respectively (P<0.05). In general, straw returning combined with chemical fertilizer was of great significance to improve the soil carbon pool, soil fertility, and crop yield in the Chaohu Lake area.


Assuntos
Fertilizantes , Oryza , Agricultura , Carbono/análise , China , Solo/química
2.
Huan Jing Ke Xue ; 42(8): 3985-3996, 2021 Aug 08.
Artigo em Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34309285

RESUMO

Straw returning is an effective technique for improving soil fertility and maintaining crop productivity in agro-ecosystems. The effects of straw returning, when combined with chemical fertilizer, on soil nutrients, enzyme activity, and microbial community were explored in rice-rape rotation farmland in the Chaohu Area. We carried out a 4-year field experiment (2016-2020) and set up four treatments (no straw+no fertilization, CK; conventional fertilization, F; straw returning+conventional fertilization, SF; and straw returning+conventional fertilization minus 20%, SDF) to explore the key environmental factors affecting soil enzyme activity and microbial and fungal communities. The results showed that straw returning combined with chemical fertilizer could improve soil nutrient content, with the SF treatment resulting in the highest soil nutrient content. Compared with F, the SF treatment significantly increased the organic matter (OM) and total phosphorus (TP) content of the soil, by 7.94% and 24.07%, respectively, in rice seasons (P<0.05), while the alkaline nitrogen (AN) content was significantly increased by 13.62% in rape seasons (P<0.05). Compared with F, the SF treatment also significantly increased soil phosphatase and urease, by 28.54% and 24.13% in rice seasons and 38.97% and 30.70% in rape seasons, respectively (P<0.05). Compared with F, SDF treatments significantly increased urease activity by 20.31% in rice seasons and 24.33% in rape seasons (P<0.05). The results indicated that straw returning increased both the Chao1 and Shannon indices of soil bacteria in rice seasons, whereas decreased these indices in rape seasons. However, the Chao1 and Shannon index of the fungal community increased after straw returning. In terms of microbial community structure, the relative abundance of Proteobacteria in SF and SDF treatments increased by 8.22% and 7.88% in rice seasons and 18.53% and 5.68% in rape seasons, respectively, compared with the F treatment. Compared with F, the relative abundance of Chloroflexi in SF and SDF treatments increased by 12.00% and 11.25% in rice seasons and 15.02% and 8.43% in rape seasons, respectively. Compared with F, the relative abundance of Basidiomycota in SF and SDF treatments in rice seasons increased by 70% and 43.42% (P<0.05), respectively, while ascomycetes in rape seasons increased by 69.79% and 43.72% (P<0.05), respectively. In conclusion, straw returning combined with chemical fertilizer can improve soil nutrient content. Soil urease and phosphatase were more sensitive to straw returning. The compositional changes in the bacterial community of the soil were mainly affected by soil TP and available phosphorus (AP), whereas OM, AN, and pH were the main environmental factors causing changes in the fungal community composition. Consequently, straw returning can improve soil fertility and maintain ecosystem health.


Assuntos
Micobioma , Oryza , Agricultura , Ecossistema , Fertilizantes/análise , Rotação , Solo , Microbiologia do Solo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa