Nab-paclitaxel, cisplatin, and capecitabine versus cisplatin and gemcitabine as first line chemotherapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: randomised phase 3 clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of nab-paclitaxel, cisplatin, and capecitabine (nab-TPC) with gemcitabine and cisplatin as an alternative first line treatment option for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. DESIGN: Phase 3, open label, multicentre, randomised trial. SETTING: Four hospitals located in China between September 2019 and August 2022. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (≥18 years) with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to treatment with either nab-paclitaxel (200 g/m2 on day 1), cisplatin (60 mg/m2 on day 1), and capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 twice on days 1-14) or gemcitabine (1 g/m2 on days 1 and 8) and cisplatin (80 mg/m2 on day 1). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Progression-free survival was evaluated by the independent review committee as the primary endpoint in the intention-to-treat population. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 15.8 months in the prespecified interim analysis (31 October 2022). As assessed by the independent review committee, the median progression-free survival was 11.3 (95% confidence interval 9.7 to 12.9) months in the nab-TPC cohort compared with 7.7 (6.5 to 9.0) months in the gemcitabine and cisplatin cohort. The hazard ratio was 0.43 (95% confidence interval 0.25 to 0.73; P=0.002). The objective response rate in the nab-TPC cohort was 83% (34/41) versus 63% (25/40) in the gemcitabine and cisplatin cohort (P=0.05), and the duration of response was 10.8 months in the nab-TPC cohort compared with 6.9 months in the gemcitabine and cisplatin cohort (P=0.009). Treatment related grade 3 or 4 adverse events, including leukopenia (4/41 (10%) v 13/40 (33%); P=0.02), neutropenia (6/41 (15%) v 16/40 (40%); P=0.01), and anaemia (1/41 (2%) v 8/40 (20%); P=0.01), were higher in the gemcitabine and cisplatin cohort than in the nab-TPC cohort. No deaths related to treatment occurred in either treatment group. Survival and long term toxicity are still being evaluated with longer follow-up. CONCLUSION: The nab-TPC regimen showed a superior antitumoural efficacy and favourable safety profile compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Nab-TPC should be considered the standard first line treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Longer follow-up is needed to confirm the benefits for overall survival. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR1900027112.

Medial retropharyngeal nodal region sparing radiotherapy versus standard radiotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: open label, non-inferiority, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial.

OBJECTIVES: To address whether sparing the medial retropharyngeal lymph node (MRLN) region from elective irradiation volume provides non-inferior local relapse-free survival versus standard radiotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. DESIGN: Open-label, non-inferiority, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial. SETTING: Three Chinese hospitals between 20 November 2017 and 3 December 2018. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (18-65 years) with newly diagnosed, non-keratinising, non-distant metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma without MRLN involvement. INTERVENTIONS: Randomisation was done centrally by the Clinical Trials Centre at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1; block size of four) to receive MRLN sparing radiotherapy or standard radiotherapy (both medial and lateral retropharyngeal lymph node groups), and stratified by institution and treatment modality as follows: radiotherapy alone; concurrent chemoradiotherapy; induction chemotherapy plus radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Non-inferiority was met if the lower limit of the one sided 97.5% confidence interval of the absolute difference in three year local relapse-free survival (MRLN sparing radiotherapy minus standard radiotherapy) was greater than -8%. RESULTS: 568 patients were recruited: 285 in the MRLN sparing radiotherapy group; 283 in the standard radiotherapy group. Median follow-up was 42 months (interquartile range 39-45), intention-to-treat analysis showed that the three year local relapse-free survival of the MRLN sparing radiotherapy group was non-inferior to that of the standard radiotherapy group (95.3% v 95.5%, stratified hazard ratio 1.04 (95% confidence interval 0.51 to 2.12), P=0.95) with a difference of -0.2% ((one sided 97.5% confidence interval -3.6 to ∞), Pnon-inferiority<0.001). In the safety set (n=564), the sparing group had a lower incidence of grade ≥1 acute dysphagia (25.5% v 35.1%, P=0.01) and late dysphagia (24.0% v 34.3%, P=0.008). Patient reported outcomes at three years after MRLN sparing radiotherapy were better in multiple domains after adjusting for the baseline values: global health status (mean difference -5.6 (95% confidence interval -9.1 to -2.0), P=0.002), role functioning (-5.5 (-7.4 to -3.6), P<0.001), social functioning (-6.2 (-8.9 to -3.6), P<0.001), fatigue (7.9 (4.0 to 11.8), P<0.001), and swallowing (11.0 (8.4 to 13.6), P<0.001). The difference in swallowing scores reached clinical significance (>10 points difference). CONCLUSION: Compared with standard radiotherapy, MRLN sparing radiotherapy showed non-inferiority in terms of risk of local relapse with fewer radiation related toxicity and improved patient reported outcomes in patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03346109.

Development and Validation of Web-Based Nomograms to Precisely Predict Survival Outcomes of Non-metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in an Endemic Area.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop web-based nomograms to precisely predict survival outcomes in patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in an endemic area. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 10,126 patients who underwent radical intensity-modulated radiotherapy at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (SYSUCC) from 2009 to 2015 were analyzed. We assigned patients into a training cohort (SYSUCC-A, n=6,751) and an internal validation cohort (SYSUCC-B, n=3,375) based on computer-generated random numbers. Patients collected from Wuzhou Red Cross Hospital (WZRCH) between 2012 and 2015 were used as the independent external validation cohort (WZRCH, n=450). Concordance index (C-index) was used to determine predictive accuracy and discriminative ability for the nomogram. The web-based clinicopathologic prediction models for predicting survival were based on Cox regression. RESULTS: The C-indexes for SYSUCC-A, SYSUCC-B, and WZRCH cohorts for the established nomograms to predict 3-year overall survival (OS) was 0.736, 0.715, and 0.691. Additionally, C-indexes to predict 3-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) was 0.717, 0.706, and 0.686, disease-free survival (DFS) was 0.713, 0.697, and 0.656, local relapse-free survival was 0.695, 0.684, and 0.652, and regional relapse-free survival was 0.672, 0.650, and 0.616. The calibration plots showed great agreement between nomogram-predicted 3-year survival outcomes and actual 3-year survival outcomes. Moreover, C-indexes of the nomograms for OS, DMFS, and DFS were significantly superior than TNM stage (p< 0.001 for all). CONCLUSION: These user-friendly nomograms can precisely predict survival endpoints in patients with non-metastatic NPC. They may serve as a useful tool for providing patient counseling and help physicians to make individual follow-up plans.

Development of a risk classification system combining TN-categories and circulating EBV DNA for non-metastatic NPC in 10,149 endemic cases.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to construct a risk classification system integrating cell-free Epstein-Barr virus (cfEBV) DNA with T- and N- categories for better prognostication in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS: Clinical records of 10,149 biopsy-proven, non-metastatic NPC were identified from two cancer centers; this comprised a training (N = 9,259) and two validation cohorts (N = 890; including one randomized controlled phase 3 trial cohort). Adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) method using a two-tiered stratification by cfEBV DNA and TN-categories was applied to generate the risk model. Primary clinical endpoint was overall survival (OS). Performances of the models were compared against American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control (AJCC/UICC) 8th edition TNM-stage classification and two published recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) models, and were validated in the validation cohorts. RESULTS: We chose a cfEBV DNA cutoff of ⩾2,000 copies for optimal risk discretization of OS, disease-free survival (DFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) in the training cohort. AHR modeling method divided NPC into six risk groups with significantly disparate survival (p < 0.001 for all): AHR1, T1N0; AHR2A, T1N1/T2-3N0 cfEBV DNA < 2,000 (EBVlow); AHR2B, T1N1/T2-3N0 cfEBV DNA ⩾ 2,000 (EBVhigh) and T1-2N2/T2-3N1 EBVlow; AHR3, T1-2N2/T2-3N1 EBVhigh and T3N2/T4N0 EBVlow; AHR4, T3N2/T4 N0-1 EBVhigh and T1-3N3/T4N1-3 EBVlow; AHR5, T1-3N3/T4 N2-3 EBVhigh. Our AHR model outperformed the published RPA models and TNM stage with better hazard consistency (1.35 versus 3.98-12.67), hazard discrimination (5.29 versus 6.69-13.35), explained variation (0.248 versus 0.164-0.225), balance (0.385 versus 0.438-0.749) and C-index (0.707 versus 0.662-0.700). In addition, our AHR model was superior to the TNM stage for risk stratification of OS in two validation cohorts (p < 0.001 for both). CONCLUSION: Herein, we developed and validated a risk classification system that combines the AJCC/UICC 8th edition TN-stage classification and cfEBV DNA for non-metastatic NPC. Our new clinicomolecular model provides improved OS prediction over the current staging system.

An optimal posttreatment surveillance strategy for cancer survivors based on an individualized risk-based approach.

The optimal post-treatment surveillance strategy that can detect early recurrence of a cancer within limited visits remains unexplored. Here we adopt nasopharyngeal carcinoma as the study model to establish an approach to surveillance that balances the effectiveness of disease detection versus costs. A total of 7,043 newly-diagnosed patients are grouped according to a clinic-molecular risk grouping system. We use a random survival forest model to simulate the monthly probability of disease recurrence, and thereby establish risk-based surveillance arrangements that can maximize the efficacy of recurrence detection per visit. Markov decision-analytic models further validate that the risk-based surveillance outperforms the control strategies and is the most cost-effective. These results are confirmed in an external validation cohort. Finally, we recommend the risk-based surveillance arrangement which requires 10, 11, 13 and 14 visits for group I to IV. Our surveillance strategies might pave the way for individualized and economic surveillance for cancer survivors.

Survival impact of radiotherapy interruption in nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy era: A big-data intelligence platform-based analysis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of radiotherapy interruption (RTI) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) receiving intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 7826 patients using the well-established big-data intelligence platform were identified. Computer-generated random numbers were used to assign these patients into a training cohort (n = 3913 patients) and an internal validation cohort (n = 3913 patients). RTI was defined as the difference between radiation treatment time and planned radiation time (assuming a Monday start). Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method for survival, and log-rank test to evaluate difference. Optimal RTI threshold was identified using the recursive partitioning analyses (RPAs). Multivariate analysis was performed using the Weibull model. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The optimal threshold of RTI with respect to OS in the training cohort was 6.5 d based on RPAs. Therefore, a uniform threshold of 7 d (<7 vs. ≥7 d) was selected to classify both training and validation cohorts into high and low RTI groups for survival analysis. RTI of ≥7 d showed significant detrimental effects on OS in both training (5-y OS, 82.4% vs 86.5%; P = 0.001) and validation cohorts (5-y OS, 85.2% vs 86.7%; P = 0.013) than those patients with RTI of <7 d. Consistent with results of the univariate analysis, RTI of ≥7 d was found to be an independent unfavorable prognostic factor for OS in both training (HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.14-1.95; P = 0.003) and validation cohort (HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.07-1.65; P = 0.031). Subgroup analysis showed that RTI of ≥7 d had significant adverse effects on prognosis of NPC patients receiving IMRT, regardless of TNM stage and chemotherapy (P < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: In the IMRT era, RTI independently influences survival. Raising RTI ≥ 7 d was consistently unfavorable for NPC survival. Medical practitioners must remind patients on the importance of minimizing RT interruptions.

Pretreatment MRI radiomics analysis allows for reliable prediction of local recurrence in non-metastatic T4 nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: To identify a radiomics signature to predict local recurrence in patients with non-metastatic T4 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS: A total of 737 patients from Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (training cohort: n = 360; internal validation cohort: n = 120) and Wuzhou Red Cross Hospital (external validation cohort: n = 257) underwent feature extraction from the largest axial area of the tumor on pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging scans. Feature selection was based on the prognostic performance and feature stability in the training cohort. Radscores were generated using the Cox proportional hazards regression model with the selected features in the training cohort and then validated in the internal and external validation cohorts. We also constructed a nomogram for predicting local recurrence-free survival (LRFS). FINDINGS: Eleven features were selected to construct the Radscore, which was significantly associated with LRFS. For the training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts, the Radscore (C-index: 0.741 vs. 0.753 vs. 0.730) outperformed clinical prognostic variables (C-index for primary gross tumor volume: 0.665 vs. 0.672 vs. 0.577; C-index for age: 0.571 vs. 0.629 vs. 0.605) in predicting LRFS. The generated radiomics nomogram, which integrated the Radscore and clinical variables, exhibited a satisfactory prediction performance (C-index: 0.810 vs. 0.807 vs. 0.753). The nomogram-defined high-risk group had a shorter LRFS than did the low-risk group (5-year LRFS: 73.6% vs. 95.3%, P < .001; 79.6% vs 95.8%, P = .006; 85.7% vs 96.7%, P = .005). INTERPRETATION: The Radscore can reliably predict LRFS in patients with non-metastatic T4 NPC, which might guide individual treatment decisions. FUND: This study was funded by the Health & Medical Collaborative Innovation Project of Guangzhou City, China.

Comparing treatment outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with or without nimotuzumab in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Purpose: The benefits of additional use of nimotuzumab (NTZ) in the treatment of locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) is largely unclear. We aim to compare LA-NPC treatment outcomes in patients that received CCRT with nimotuzumab (NTZ) to patients that received CCRT only. Materials and Methods: Between October 2009 and January 2012, 31 previously untreated and newly diagnosed LA-NPC patients were administered CCRT (3 cycles of 100 mg/m2 cisplatin every third week with intensity-modulated radiotherapy) plus NTZ according to an IRB-approved institutional research protocol. A well-balanced cohort of 62 patients who received CCRT alone was created by matching each patient who received CCRT plus NTZ via propensity-matched analysis in a 2:1 ratio. Results: Compared with CCRT only, CCRT plus NTZ was significantly associated with superior overall survival (5-year OS; 96.8% vs. 82.3%; P = 0.001), superior distant metastasis-free survival (5-year DMFS; 90.3% vs. 80.6%, P = 0.012) and superior progression-free survival (5-year PFS; 83.9% vs. 71.0%, P = 0.006). In multivariate analysis, the inclusion of NTZ to CCRT was confirmed to be a favorable factor for OS (HR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.02-0.71; P = 0.027), DMFS (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.13-0.77; P = 0.034), and PFS (HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.11-0.89; P = 0.041). In addition, no significant differences in hematology parameters, dermatitis, nausea, vomiting, xerostomia, nephrotoxicity or neurotoxicity were found between the two arms (all P > 0.05). Conclusion: The inclusion of NTZ to CCRT is more effective for long-term survival among LA-NPC patients than CCRT only.