Expression of bile acid transporting proteins in Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a metaplastic lesion characterized by replacement of the normal squamous epithelium by columnar intestinal epithelium containing goblet cells. It is speculated that this process is an adaptation to protect cells from components of refluxate, such as gastric acid and bile acids. In contrast to the normal squamous epithelium, enterocytes of the distal ileum are adapted to transport bile acids from the intestinal lumen. Several bile acid transporters are utilized for effective removal of bile acids, including the apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter (ASBT), the ileal bile acid-binding protein (IBABP), and the multidrug-resistant protein 3 (MRP3). We hypothesized that one of the possible functions of newly arising metaplastic epithelium, in the esophagus, is to transport bile acids. Our major goal was to evaluate the expression of bile acid transporters in normal squamous epithelium, BE with different grades of dysplasia, and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). METHODS: A total of 101 patients were included in this study. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR were used to detect the expression of these transporters at the mRNA and protein levels. RESULTS: Our immunohistochemical studies showed that all three bile acid transporters are expressed in BE glands, but not in squamous epithelium. ASBT was found in the apical border in BE biopsies. The highest frequency of ASBT expression was in patients with nondysplastic BE (9 of 15, 60%), and a progressive loss of ASBT was observed through the stages of dysplasia. ASBT was not detected in EAC (0 of 15). IBABP staining was observed in the cytoplasm of BE epithelial surface cells. Expression of IBABP was found in 100% of nondysplastic BE (14 of 14), in 93% of low-grade dysplasia (LGD, 15 of 16), in 73% of high-grade dysplasia (HGD, 10 of 14), and in 33% of EAC (5 of 15). MRP3 was expressed in the basolateral membrane in 93% of nondysplastic BE (13 of 14), in 60% of LGD (10 of 16), and in 86% of HGD (11 of 13). Only weak MRP3 staining was detected in EAC biopsies (5 of 15, 33%). In addition, RT-PCR studies showed increased expression of mRNA coding for ASBT (6.1x), IBABP (9.1x), and MRP3 (2.4x) in BE (N=13) compared with normal squamous epithelium (N=15). Significantly increased mRNA levels of IBABP (10.1x) and MRP3 (2.5x) were also detected in EAC (N=21) compared with normal squamous epithelium. CONCLUSIONS: We found that bile acid transporters expression is increased in BE tissue at the mRNA and protein levels and that expression of bile acid transporter proteins decreased with progression to cancer.

American Society of Clinical Oncology Technology Assessment: chemotherapy sensitivity and resistance assays.

PURPOSE: To develop a technology assessment of chemotherapy sensitivity and resistance assays in order to define the role of these tests in routine oncology practice. METHODS: The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) established a Working Group to develop the technology assessment. The Working Group collaborated with the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association (BCBSA) Technology Evaluation Center. The Working Group developed independent criteria for selecting articles for inclusion in the ASCO assessment, and developed a structured data abstraction tool to facilitate review of selected manuscripts. One Working Group member and an ASCO staff member independently reviewed the 1,139 abstracts identified by the BCBSA comprehensive literature search, and by an updated literature search performed by ASCO using the BCBSA search strategy (1966 to January 2004). Of the 12 articles included in this technology assessment, eight were identified by the original BCBSA systematic review, one was provided by industry, and three were identified by the ASCO updated literature review. RESULTS: Review of the literature does not identify any CSRAs for which the evidence base is sufficient to support use in oncology practice. RECOMMENDATIONS: The use of chemotherapy sensitivity and resistance assays to select chemotherapeutic agents for individual patients is not recommended outside of the clinical trial setting. Oncologists should make chemotherapy treatment recommendations on the basis of published reports of clinical trials and a patient's health status and treatment preferences. Because the in vitro analytic strategy has potential importance, participation in clinical trials evaluating these technologies remains a priority.

The role of intratumoral therapy with cisplatin/epinephrine injectable gel in the management of advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and efficacy of targeted antitumor therapy with cisplatin/epinephrine injectable gel in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. DESIGN: Two prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trials of identical design. Crossover from blinded to open-label phase was permitted for patients with disease progression. SETTING: Tertiary referral centers in North America and Europe. PATIENTS: One hundred seventy-nine intensively pretreated patients with recurrent or refractory squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. INTERVENTION: Cisplatin/epinephrine injectable or placebo gel was administered by direct intratumoral injection; up to 6 weekly treatments. Dose was 0.25 mL of active or placebo gel per cubic centimeter of tumor up to 10 mL total. Patient benefit after local tumor control of the most symptomatic tumor was assessed by patients and physicians using the Treatment Goals Questionnaire. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Local tumor response and patient benefit attributable to improvements in tumor-related symptoms. RESULTS: Combined results for the 178 patients with evaluable data in the 2 trials confirmed objective tumor responses in 35 (29%) of 119 patients, including 23 (19%) complete responses achieved with cisplatin/epinephrine gel, vs 1 (2%) of 59 for placebo (P<.001). Tumor response and patient benefit were significantly correlated (P=.006): 47% (17/36) of patients with target tumor responses achieved a rigorously defined benefit based on a prospectively selected treatment goal vs 15% (22/142) of nonresponders. CONCLUSION: Cisplatin/epinephrine injectable gel reduces tumor burden, ameliorates tumor symptoms, and provides a new therapeutic option for treating patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Bile acids in combination with low pH induce oxidative stress and oxidative DNA damage: relevance to the pathogenesis of Barrett's oesophagus.

BACKGROUND: Barrett's oesophagus is a premalignant condition associated with an increased risk for the development of oesophageal adenocarcinoma (ADCA). Previous studies indicated that oxidative damage contributes to the development of ADCA. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that bile acids and gastric acid, two components of refluxate, can induce oxidative stress and oxidative DNA damage. METHODS: Oxidative stress was evaluated by staining Barrett's oesophagus tissues with different degrees of dysplasia with 8-hydroxy-deoxyguanosine (8-OH-dG) antibody. The levels of 8-OH-dG were also evaluated ex vivo in Barrett's oesophagus tissues incubated for 10 min with control medium and medium acidified to pH 4 and supplemented with 0.5 mM bile acid cocktail. Furthermore, three oesophageal cell lines (Seg-1 cells, Barrett's oesophagus cells and HET-1A cells) were exposed to control media, media containing 0.1 mM bile acid cocktail, media acidified to pH 4, and media at pH 4 supplemented with 0.1 mM bile acid cocktail, and evaluated for induction of reactive oxygen species (ROS). RESULTS: Immunohistochemical analysis showed that 8-OH-dG is formed mainly in the epithelial cells in dysplastic Barrett's oesophagus. Importantly, incubation of Barrett's oesophagus tissues with the combination of bile acid cocktail and acid leads to increased formation of 8-OH-dG. An increase in ROS in oesophageal cells was detected after exposure to pH 4 and bile acid cocktail. CONCLUSIONS: Oxidative stress and oxidative DNA damage can be induced in oesophageal tissues and cells by short exposures to bile acids and low pH. These alterations may underlie the development of Barrett's oesophagus and tumour progression.

Clinical predictors of Barrett's esophagus length.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of clinical factors associated with Barrett's esophagus (BE) length remained within the realm of anecdotal reports or one center's experience. The aim of this multicenter study was to determine which clinical factors are highly correlated with the length of BE. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with BE were recruited into the study from 5 academic centers in the United States. All patients had an upper endoscopy that documented BE by the presence of intestinal metaplasia in biopsy specimens. All patients were evaluated by a validated demographic questionnaire and the GERD Symptom Checklist. RESULTS: A total of 263 patients with BE were recruited into the study. Mean BE length length for the entire sample was 4 +/- 3.3 cm. A longer hiatal hernia (r = 0.22, p < 0.01), any dysplasia (t = -2.3, p < 0.05), H2 receptor antagonist (H2-RA) consumption (t = 1.98, p < 0.05), and nonsmoking (t = -2.5, p < 0.05) were correlated with a longer segment of BE. Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) (t = 1.96, p < 0.05) were correlated with a shorter segment of BE. CONCLUSIONS: PPIs were correlated with shorter lengths of BE. In contrast, a longer hiatal hernia, any dysplasia, nonsmoking, or use of H2-RAs were correlated with a longer BE segment.

Relationship between rate of change in acid exposure along the esophagus and length of Barrett's epithelium.

OBJECTIVE: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) plays a major role in the development of Barrett's esophagus. Recently, we demonstrated that duration of esophageal acid exposure in the distal esophagus correlates with the length of Barrett's mucosa. The aim of this study was to determine whether there is a relationship between the rate of the change in acid exposure along the esophagus and the length of Barrett's esophagus. METHODS: A total of 17 patients (16 men and one woman; mean age 66 +/- 15 yr, range 41-83 yr) with varying lengths of biopsy-proven Barrett's esophagus were recruited prospectively into the study. Ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH monitoring was performed using a commercially available pH probe with four sensors located 5 cm apart. For each patient, a least squares regression line of the fraction of the study that the pH was <4 against the height of the sensor above the lower esophageal sphincter was fit. The slope of the regression line was used to represent the rate of change in acid exposure. Linear regression analysis was conducted to analyze the relationship between the rate of change in acid exposure and the length of Barrett's mucosa. RESULTS: The mean Barrett's length was 5 +/- 3 cm (range 1-11 cm). Linear regression demonstrated a statistically significant relationship between the rate of change in acid exposure and the length of Barrett's esophagus for the 24-h duration of the study, as well as for the fraction of the study that patients were in the upright position (p = 0.0096 and 0.0076, respectively). For the supine position, the relationship did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.095). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated a significant relationship between the rate of change in acid exposure and the length of Barrett's mucosa. Thus, as the rate at which recorded acid exposure values increases from the proximal to distal esophagus, the length of Barrett's esophagus significantly increases (for percent total time and upright position).

A predictive model for length of Barrett's esophagus with hiatal hernia length and duration of esophageal acid exposure.

BACKGROUND: A significant correlation between the duration and height of esophageal acid exposure and the length of Barrett's mucosa has been demonstrated. The aims of this study were to determine if there is a correlation between hiatal hernia length and Barrett's esophagus length, and to develop a predictive model for Barrett's esophagus length by using hiatal hernia length and duration of esophageal acid exposure. METHODS: Consecutive patients with Barrett's esophagus diagnosed endoscopically were enrolled in the study. Barrett's esophagus was defined by the presence of intestinal metaplasia in biopsy specimens obtained from salmon-colored mucosa extending into the esophagus. Barrett's mucosa 3 cm or greater in length was considered long-segment Barrett's esophagus; and less than 3 cm long was considered short-segment Barrett's esophagus. Hiatal hernia was considered present if the esophagogastric junction was displaced 1 cm or more proximal to the diaphragmatic hiatus. RESULTS: Twenty-four men (mean age 66.1 +/-2.4 [SE]) with Barrett's esophagus were included in this study. Mean Barrett's length was 4.1 +/-0.7 cm. The Pearson correlation coefficient between hiatal hernia length and Barrett's esophagus length was 0.62 (p < 0.01). Similarly, there was a significant correlation between esophageal acid exposure and Barrett's length (r = 0.62; p < 0.01). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that hiatal hernia length and duration of esophageal acid exposure were associated significantly with length of Barrett's mucosa (R(2) = 0.54; p < 0.001). A regression equation was developed expressing mean Barrett's length (cm) = 0.79 + (0.68) hernia length (cm) + (0.075) duration of esophageal acid exposure (% time pH < 4). CONCLUSIONS: The length of Barrett's mucosa correlated with the length of hiatal hernia. A predictive model for Barrett's length by using hiatal hernia length and duration of esophageal acid exposure was developed. This suggested that these two pathophysiologic factors are good predictors of the length of Barrett's mucosa.

Usage of supplemental alternative medicine by community-based patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

There is an increasing trend towards alternative medicine usage by the general US population. However, the extent and type of supplemental alternative medicine used specifically by community-based patients with GERD is unknown. A previously validated questionnaire that included questions about patient demographics, 18 types of alternative medicine, and attitudes towards alternative and conventional medicine was utilized. Consecutive patients seen by community-based physicians in Arizona (Tucson, Phoenix, and Flagstaff) and Wisconsin (Milwaukee) for GERD received the questionnaire during the years 1999 and 2000. Patients completed the questionnaire and returned it to the Tucson VA Medical Center by mail. A total of 185 patients were surveyed (82 men, mean age 55.8 years). Of those, 61.6% used alternative medicine for any reason. However, only 3.8% of patients used supplemental alternative medicine for GERD. Females were twice as likely (95% CI, 1.10-3.67) to use alternative medicines for any reason (including GERD). Patients with daily acid regurgitation were 5.75 times (95% CI, 1.03-32.17) more likely than patients with less frequent acid regurgitation to use alternative medicines specifically for GERD. None of the other demographics, health characteristics, or attitudes were predictive of supplemental alternative medicine use for any reason (or specifically for GERD). In conclusion, only a small percentage of GERD patients seen by community-based practitioners use supplemental alternative medicine specifically for GERD symptoms, despite a higher usage of supplemental alternative medicine for non-GERD-related illness. Being female and having acid regurgitation daily were positively associated with alternative medicine usage for GERD.

Progression or regression of Barrett's esophagus--is it all in the eye of the beholder?

OBJECTIVES: Accurate measurements of Barrett's esophagus length are important in clinical follow-up as well as in studies of therapeutic intervention in Barrett's esophagus. Our aim was to evaluate both the inter- and intraobserver reliability in measuring Barrett's length during two consecutive endoscopies by either the same or different experienced endoscopists. The relationship between Barrett's mucosa length and the absolute change in Barrett's length measurements on a follow-up endoscopy was also evaluated. METHODS: A total of 96 Barrett's patients underwent two consecutive endoscopies. The diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus was confirmed by the presence of intestinal metaplasia on biopsy. The Barrett's esophagus length was carefully measured and recorded during the two endoscopies. Procedures were performed by only two experienced endoscopists, who were not aware of previous endoscopic measurements. Only patients with long-segment (> or =3 cm) Barrett's esophagus were included in this study. RESULTS: The 55 patients who had their consecutive endoscopies performed by the same endoscopist had a mean 1.6-cm difference between the two measurements as compared to 1.4 cm in the 41 patients who had their endoscopies performed by different endoscopists (p = 0.3). The agreement between the two Barrett's length measurements was high in both groups, although it was slightly higher for endoscopies performed by the same endoscopist (r = 0.79 vs r = 0.67). Linear regression analysis of the absolute change in Barrett's length between the two endoscopic measurements and Barrett's mucosa length demonstrated a significant relationship (r = 0.28, p = 0.005). For every 1-cm increase in the mean length of Barrett's mucosa, a 0.15-cm increase in the absolute difference between two consecutive endoscopic measurements of Barrett's length was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Consecutive measurements of Barrett's length performed by different experienced endoscopists or by the same experienced endoscopist demonstrated a high degree of agreement. A range of variability in Barrett's length measurement was determined (+/-1.4-1.6 cm). True regression or progression of Barrett's mucosa should be considered only if the change is greater than the range of variability. In addition, endoscopists should be well aware that the longer the Barrett's mucosa the greater the absolute difference in Barrett's length measurement on follow-up endoscopy.

Risk factors for dysplasia in patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE): results from a multicenter consortium.

Studies show Barrett's esophagus prevalence increases with age, while mean length of Barrett's esophagus is unchanged. Few data are available about the relationship between age and length on the development of dysplasia. Our aim was to assess age and length as risk factors for dysplasia. Consecutive patients with Barrett's esophagus were enrolled in a multicenter study establishing a tissue bank of Barrett's esophagus patients 1994 and 1998. Demographics, length of Barrett's esophagus (centimeters), and histology were recorded. Risk factors for dysplasia were assessed, including patient age, gender, and length of Barrett's esophagus. Statistical analysis was performed comparing prevalence of dysplasia (which included the presence of any carcinoma and high- or low-grade dysplasia) to age and length. In all, 309 patients were studied [278 (90%) male and 31 (10%) female]: 5 had adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, 11 had high-grade dysplasia, and 29 had low-grade dysplasia. Patients with Barrett's esophagus without dysplasia were younger than those with dysplasia [62 +/- 0.8 years vs 67 +/- 1.7 years (mean +/- SEM, P = 0.02)]. The risk of dysplasia increased by 3.3%/yr of age. Mean length of Barrett's esophagus in patients with Barrett's alone vs dysplasia was 4.0 +/- 0.2 cm vs 5.4 +/- 0.4 cm (P = 0.003). Patients with Barrett's esophagus length > or = 3 cm had a significantly greater prevalence of dysplasia compared to length < 3 cm (23% vs 9%, P = 0.0001). The risk of dysplasia increased by 14%/cm of increased length. Multivariate analysis showed age and length to be independent risk factors. In conclusions: prevalence of dysplasia is strongly associated with age and length of Barrett's esophagus. These preliminary results can be used to develop a strategy for screening/surveillance based on age and length of Barrett's epithelium.

Intratumoral cisplatin/epinephrine gel in advanced head and neck cancer: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase III study in North America.

BACKGROUND: The objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel intratumoral cisplatin/epinephrine injectable gel (CDDP/epi gel) for local control and palliation of tumor-related symptoms in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-seven patients were randomly assigned to either CDDP/epi or placebo gel in this phase III, double-blind study. Tumors were < or =20 cm(3); most recurrences (88%) were in a previously irradiated field. The most symptomatic or threatening tumor was designated as the target tumor. DOSE: 0.25 mL CDDP/epi gel/cm(3) tumor volume. TREATMENTS: < or =6 weekly intratumoral injections in an 8-week period. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: target tumor response and symptom relief. RESULTS: During the blinded phase, 34% (21 of 62) of patients achieved an objective response (CR or PR) in the target tumor treated with CDDP/epi gel vs 0% (0 of 24) treated with placebo gel (p <.001). Responses occurred within a median of four treatments (range, 2-6) and were durable (median, 95 days; range, 34-168+ days). More patients treated with CDDP/epi gel achieved palliative benefit than did those treated with placebo gel (37% vs 12%, p =.036). Most frequent side effects were local pain and local cutaneous reactions, which resolved over 3-12 weeks. Renal and hematologic toxicities were rare. CONCLUSIONS: This phase III trial showed that CDDP/epi gel significantly reduces tumor burden, palliates tumor-related symptoms, and is an effective local treatment for recurrent tumors.