Body Composition and Physical Activity in Pediatric Intestinal Failure On and Off Parenteral Nutrition.

OBJECTIVES: Data on the relationship between body composition (BC) and physical activity (PA) in children with intestinal failure (IF) are lacking. The objectives were to collect data on PA and BC in children with IF, both parenterally and enterally fed, and to assess the relationship between PA and BC. METHODS: Cross-sectional study in children 5-18 years with IF including those receiving parenteral nutrition (PN) and those fully enterally fed. PA levels were measured using accelerometry. BC was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Data were compared to age- and sex-matched population norms using t tests. Regression analysis assessed the relationship between BC and PA. RESULTS: Fifty-eight children with IF (38 males), mean (SD) age of 10.0 (3.5) years, 20 dependent on PN were included. Patients with IF had significantly fewer steps per day ( P ≤ 0.001) compared with literature controls, with a mean (SD) of 7,972 (3,008) and 11,749 (1,106), respectively. There were no significant differences between patients receiving PN and those enterally fed, but both groups were significantly less active than literature controls ( P < 0.001). Patients with IF had higher fat mass and lower fat-free mass compared to literature controls ( P = 0.008). PA had a significant effect on BC ( r2 = 0.32, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Children with IF, those receiving PN and those fully enterally fed, are at risk of decreased PA and altered BC. PA should be part of ongoing rehabilitation and management to optimize outcomes.

Composite lipid emulsion use and essential fatty acid deficiency in pediatric patients with intestinal failure with high parenteral nutrition dependence: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Reports of essential fatty acid deficiency (EFAD) in patients receiving parenteral nutrition (PN) and a composite lipid (mixed oil intravenous lipid emulsion [MO ILE]) are predominantly when managed by lipid restriction. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of EFAD in patients with intestinal failure (IF) who are PN dependent without lipid restriction. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients, ages 0-17 years, followed by our intestinal rehabilitation program between November 2020 and June 2021 with PN dependency index (PNDI) of >80% on a MO ILE. Demographic data, PN composition, PN days, growth, and plasma fatty acid profile were collected. A plasma triene-tetraene (T:T) ratio >0.2 indicated EFAD. Summary statistics and Wilcoxon rank sum test evaluated to compare between PNDI category and ILE administration (grams/kilograms/day). P < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients (median age, 4.1 years [interquartile range (IQR) = 2.4-9.6]) were included. The median duration of PN was 1367 days (IQR = 824-3195). Sixteen patients had a PNDI of 80%-120% (61.5%). Fat intake for the group was 1.7 g/kg/day (IQR = 1.3-2.0). The median T:T ratio was 0.1 (IQR = 0.1-0.2) with no values >0.2. Linoleic and arachidonic acid were low in 85% and 19% of patients, respectively; however, Mead acid was normal in all patients. CONCLUSION: This report is the largest to date on the EFA status of patients with IF on PN. These results suggest that, in the absence of lipid restriction, EFAD is not a concern when using MO ILEs in children receiving PN for IF.

Assessment of body composition in pediatric intestinal failure: A comparison study.

BACKGROUND: The objective of the study was to compare bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and skinfolds with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in the assessment of body composition of children with intestinal failure. DXA is the reference method for body composition assessment in clinical settings. METHODS: Children aged 1-18 years with intestinal failure whohave DXA as part of routine clinical monitoring were eligible. BIA measured total body water on the same day as DXA. Skinfold measurements were taken at four sites: triceps, biceps, subscapular, and suprailiac. Percentage of fat mass (%FM) and fat-free mass (%FFM) were derived from resistance and reactance measured by BIA by using age-specific equations. Percentage of FM was calculated from skinfold measures by using age-specific equations. Data on patient characteristics, intestinal failure-related factors, and feeding method were collected. Paired t test examined differences in %FM and %FFM and Bland-Altman analysis determined the agreement between BIA, skinfolds, and DXA. Marginal linear model assessed the effect of age, sex, and feeding method on the difference in body composition obtained between DXA and BIA and between DXA and skinfolds. RESULTS: Sixty-eight children with intestinal failure, mean age 8.9 ± 4.2 years, were studied. There was no difference between %FFM and %FM obtained by DXA and BIA (P = 0.26), with a mean bias (95% CI) of -0.69 (-1.9 to 0.5) for %FFM. Sex and age were individually and jointly associated with the bias observed between DXA and BIA (P < 0.05). Skinfold and DXA measurements were significantly different (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: BIA is an acceptable clinical tool for assessing body composition in pediatric intestinal failure.

Safety and Efficacy of Long-Term Deutetrabenazine Use in Children and Adolescents with Tics Associated with Tourette Syndrome: An Open-Label Extension Study.

Background: Tourette syndrome (TS) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by motor and phonic tics. Objective: To assess the safety and efficacy of deutetrabenazine (Teva Neuroscience, Inc, Parsippany, NJ), a vesicular monoamine transporter 2 inhibitor, in children and adolescents with TS. Methods: Alternatives for Reducing Tics in TS (ARTISTS) open-label extension (OLE) (NCT03567291) was a 54-week, global, phase 3, open-label extension study of deutetrabenazine (6-48 mg daily) conducted May 28, 2018 to April 3, 2020 with a 2-week randomized withdrawal period. Participants (6-16 years of age) had TS and active tics causing distress or impairment. Safety (primary outcome) was assessed by treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and clinical laboratory testing. Efficacy was measured by the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale-Total Tic Score (YGTSS-TTS). Results: The intent-to-treat population (228 participants; mean age, 12.0 years; 79.8% male; 86.4% white) had a median (range) duration of exposure of 28.4 (0.3-52.9) weeks. Of 227 participants in the safety analysis, 161 (70.9%) reported ≥1 TEAE (exposure-adjusted incidence rate, 2.77/patient-year), of which 95 (41.9%) were treatment related. The most frequently reported TEAEs were headaches, somnolence, nasopharyngitis, weight increases, and anxiety. No additional safety signals were observed. Worsening of YGTSS-TTS after the 2-week randomized withdrawal was not statistically significant (least squares mean difference, -0.4; P = 0.78). Several exploratory measures showed sustained improvement throughout the treatment periods. Conclusions: In this long-term, open-label trial, deutetrabenazine was well tolerated with low frequency of TEAEs. There was no significant difference in tics between treatment arms during the 2-week randomized withdrawal period, however, descriptive statistics and comparison with baseline showed a numeric improvement in tics, quality of life, and other measures.

Efficacy and Safety of Fixed-Dose Deutetrabenazine in Children and Adolescents for Tics Associated With Tourette Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Tourette syndrome is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by childhood onset of motor and phonic tics, often accompanied by behavioral and psychiatric comorbidities. Deutetrabenazine is a vesicular monoamine transporter 2 inhibitor approved in the US for the treatment of chorea associated with Huntington disease and tardive dyskinesia. Objective: To report results of the ARTISTS 2 (Alternatives for Reducing Tics in Tourette Syndrome 2) study examining deutetrabenazine for treatment of Tourette syndrome. Design, Setting, and Participants: This phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, fixed-dose study was conducted over 8 weeks with a 1-week follow-up (June 21, 2018, to December 9, 2019). Children and adolescents aged 6 to 16 years with a diagnosis of Tourette syndrome and active tics causing distress or impairment were enrolled in the study. Children were recruited from 52 sites in 10 countries. Data were analyzed from February 4 to April 22, 2020. Interventions: Participants were randomized (1:1:1) to low-dose deutetrabenazine (up to 36 mg/d), high-dose deutetrabenazine (up to 48 mg/d), or a matching placebo, which were titrated over 4 weeks to the target dose followed by a 4-week maintenance period. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary efficacy end point was change from baseline to week 8 in the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale-Total Tic Score (YGTSS-TTS) for high-dose deutetrabenazine. Key secondary end points included changes in YGTSS-TTS for low-dose deutetrabenazine, Tourette Syndrome Clinical Global Impression score, Tourette Syndrome Patient Global Impression of Impact score, and Child and Adolescent Gilles de la Tourette Syndrome-Quality of Life Activities of Daily Living subscale score. Safety assessments included incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events, laboratory parameters, vital signs, and questionnaires. Results: The study included 158 children and adolescents (mean [SD] age, 11.7 [2.6] years). A total of 119 participants (75%) were boys; 7 (4%), Asian; 1 (1%), Black; 32 (20%), Hispanic; 4 (3%), Native American; 135 (85%), White; 2 (1%), multiracial; 9 (6%), other race; and 1 (0.6%), of unknown ethnic origin. Fifty-two participants were randomized to the high-dose deutetrabenazine group, 54 to the low-dose deutetrabenazine group, and 52 to the placebo group. Baseline characteristics for participants were similar between groups. Of the total 158 participants, 64 (41%) were aged 6 to 11 years, and 94 (59%) were aged 12 to 16 years at baseline. Mean time since Tourette syndrome diagnosis was 3.3 (2.8) years, and mean baseline YGTSS-TTS was 33.8 (6.6) points. At week 8, the difference in YGTSS-TTS was not significant between the high-dose deutetrabenazine and placebo groups (least-squares mean difference, -0.8 points; 95% CI, -3.9 to 2.3 points; P = .60; Cohen d, -0.11). There were no nominally significant differences between groups for key secondary end points. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported for 34 participants (65%) treated with high-dose deutetrabenazine, 24 (44%) treated with low-dose deutetrabenazine, and 25 (49%) treated with placebo and were generally mild or moderate. Conclusions and Relevance: In this fixed-dose randomized clinical trial of deutetrabenazine in children and adolescents with Tourette syndrome, the primary efficacy end point was not met. No new safety signals were identified. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03571256.

Safety and Efficacy of Flexible-Dose Deutetrabenazine in Children and Adolescents With Tourette Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Tourette syndrome is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by childhood onset of motor and phonic tics; treatments for tics are associated with safety concerns. Deutetrabenazine is a selective vesicular monoamine transporter 2 inhibitor approved for the treatment of chorea associated with Huntington disease and tardive dyskinesia in adults. Objective: To examine whether deutetrabenazine is effective and safe for the treatment of Tourette syndrome in children and adolescents. Design, Setting, and Participants: This phase 2/3, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-titration study included children and adolescents (aged 6-16 years) with Tourette syndrome with active tics causing distress or impairment (ie, Yale Global Tic Severity Scale-Total Tic Score [YGTSS-TTS] ≥20). The trial was conducted over 12 weeks, with 1 week of follow-up from February 2018 to November 2019 at 36 centers in the United States, Canada, Denmark, Russia, Serbia, and Spain. Data analysis was conducted from January 31 to April 22, 2020. Intervention: Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive deutetrabenazine or placebo, titrated during 7 weeks to an optimal level, followed by a 5-week maintenance period. The maximum total daily deutetrabenazine dose was 48 mg/d. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary efficacy end point was change from baseline to week 12 in YGTSS-TTS. Key secondary end points included changes in Tourette Syndrome-Clinical Global Impression, Tourette Syndrome-Patient Global Impression of Impact, and Child and Adolescent Gilles de la Tourette Syndrome-Quality of Life Activities of Daily Living subscale score. Safety was assessed based on treatment-emergent adverse events, vital signs, questionnaires, and laboratory parameters. Results: A total of 119 participants were randomized to deutetrabenazine (59 participants; mean [SD] age, 11.5 [2.5] years; 53 [90%] boys; 49 [83%] White; 3 [5%] Black) and placebo (60 participants; mean [SD] age, 11.5 [2.6] years; 51 [85%] boys; 53 [88%] White; 3 [5%] Black). At week 12, the difference in YGTSS-TTS score was not significant between deutetrabenazine and placebo (least squares mean difference, -0.7; 95% CI, -4.1 to 2.8; P = .69; Cohen d, -0.07). There were no nominally significant differences between groups for key secondary end points. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported for 38 patients (66%) and 33 patients (56%) receiving deutetrabenazine and placebo, respectively, and were generally mild or moderate. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study of deutetrabenazine in children and adolescents with Tourette syndrome, the primary efficacy end point was not met. No new safety signals were identified. These results may be informative for future studies of treatments for tics in Tourette syndrome. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03452943.

Comparative genomics of Spiraeoideae-infecting Erwinia amylovora strains provides novel insight to genetic diversity and identifies the genetic basis of a low-virulence strain.

Erwinia amylovora is the causal agent of fire blight, one of the most devastating diseases of apple and pear. Erwinia amylovora is thought to have originated in North America and has now spread to at least 50 countries worldwide. An understanding of the diversity of the pathogen population and the transmission to different geographical regions is important for the future mitigation of this disease. In this research, we performed an expanded comparative genomic study of the Spiraeoideae-infecting (SI) E. amylovora population in North America and Europe. We discovered that, although still highly homogeneous, the genetic diversity of 30 E. amylovora genomes examined was about 30 times higher than previously determined. These isolates belong to four distinct clades, three of which display geographical clustering and one of which contains strains from various geographical locations ('Widely Prevalent' clade). Furthermore, we revealed that strains from the Widely Prevalent clade displayed a higher level of recombination with strains from a clade strictly from the eastern USA, which suggests that the Widely Prevalent clade probably originated from the eastern USA before it spread to other locations. Finally, we detected variations in virulence in the SI E. amylovora strains on immature pear, and identified the genetic basis of one of the low-virulence strains as being caused by a single nucleotide polymorphism in hfq, a gene encoding an important virulence regulator. Our results provide insights into the population structure, distribution and evolution of SI E. amylovora in North America and Europe.

Understanding the use of over-the-counter pain treatments in adolescents with chronic pain.

Background: The prevalence of chronic pain in children and adolescents is well established. What is not well understood is how over-the-counter (OTC) oral and topical pain treatments are being used by adolescents with chronic pain, their decision making around use of these products, and how they communicate with their health care providers about their use. Aims: The aim of this study was to explore the use, decision-making process, and communication about the use of OTC pain medications with health care professionals among adolescents living with chronic pain and their primary caregiver. Methods: A qualitative descriptive design with semistructured, audiotaped individual interviews was undertaken with adolescents with chronic pain (n = 15, aged 12-18 years, mean age = 16, SD = 1.79) and their caregivers (n = 16). A convenience sample of patient-caregiver dyads was recruited from a tertiary care pediatric chronic pain clinic in Ontario. Results: Interview questions focused on four topics: (1) experience with chronic pain and medication; (2) perceptions of medications and concerns with long-term consumption; (3) decision making for use of OTC medications guided mainly by a trusted source or health care professional; and (4) topical OTC medications perceived as harmless. Content analysis within these four topics uncovered two to four subthemes, which are described in detail. Conclusions: An improved understanding of the prevalence of use, decision-making process around use, and how patients and their families communicate about the use of OTC pain medications with health care providers can help clinicians better personalize treatments and help adolescents with chronic pain to make sound self-care decisions.

Contexte: La prévalence de la douleur chronique chez les enfants et les adolescents est bien établie. Toutefois, on ne comprend pas bien comment les traitements antidouleur en vente libre administrés par voie topique ou orale sont utilisés par les adolescents souffrant de douleur chronique, leur prise de décision concernant ces produits et la façon dont ils communiquent avec les prestataires de soins de santé au sujet de leur utilisation.But: Étudier l'utilisation des médicaments antidouleur en vente libre, ainsi que la prise de décision et la communication avec les professionnels de la santé au sujet de l'utilisation de ces médicaments chez les adolescents souffrant de douleur chronique et leur principal prestataire de soins.Méthodes: Un devis de recherche axé sur la description qualitative à l'aide d'entrevues semi-structurées individuelles a été utilisé auprès d'adolescents souffrant de douleur chronique (n = 15, âgés de 12 à 18 ans, âge moyen de 16 ans, ÉT = 1,79) et leurs prestataires de soins (n = 16). Un échantillon de commodité de dyades patient-prestataire de soins a été recruté dans une clinique de soins tertiaires en douleur chronique pédiatrique de l'Ontario.Résultats: Les questions d'entrevue portaient sur quatre sujets: (1) l'expérience de la douleur chronique et la médication; (2) la perception des médicaments et les préoccupations concernant leur consommation à long terme; (3) la prise de décision concernant l'utilisation de médication en vente libre, principalement guidée par une personne de confiance ou un professionnel de la santé et (4) les médicaments en vente libre appliqués par voie topique qui sont perçus comme étant sans danger. L'analyse de contenu pour ces quatre sujets a révélé de 2 à 4 sous-thèmes, qui sont décrits en détail.Conclusions: Une meilleure compréhension de la prévalence de l'utilisation des médicaments antidouleur en vente libre, ainsi que du processus de décision entourant leur utilisation et de la façon dont les patients et leur famille communiquent avec les professionnels de la santé peut aider les cliniciens à mieux personnaliser les traitements et aider les adolescents qui souffrent de douleur chronique à prendre des décisions judicieuses en matière de soins auto-administrés.

Obtaining pediatric indications for new anti-epileptic drugs: how and when.

Drug development in children poses a number of challenges that must be overcome to obtain adequate information in product labeling. Trials in children must be supported by appropriate toxicology and formulation work, which tends to delay completion of work in children until after the drug is available for adults. The Pediatric Research Equity Act (PREA) contains a decision tree to help companies devise an appropriate pediatric program for drugs in development. The medical community does not currently endorse the assumption that the progression of epilepsy and response to treatment is the same in adults and children. Therefore, a complete drug development program in children is necessary and includes efficacy and safety trials along with pharmacokinetic studies. These studies are needed to justify the risk/benefit in children. Formulations appropriate for children are needed. Seizure diaries must be maintained by caretakers and in the case of infants, seizures may need to be counted by EEG. Early planning and discussion of a pediatric program with regulatory agencies will facilitate this work.

Exposure-response analysis of pregabalin add-on treatment of patients with refractory partial seizures.

OBJECTIVE: Our objectives were to describe the exposure-response relationship of pregabalin add-on treatment for refractory partial seizures after multiple dosing in patients and to identify the factors that influence this relationship. METHODS: A mixed-effects model was used to characterize the relationship between monthly seizure frequency over a 3-month period and pregabalin daily dose (0, 50, 150, 300, and 600 mg) as add-on treatment in 3 double-blind, parallel-group studies in patients with refractory partial seizures (N = 1042). Seizure frequency was modeled as a Poisson process expressed as a function of baseline seizures, drug treatment, placebo effect, and subject-specific random effects. The model included a parameter that partitioned the population into subpopulations with respect to response. RESULTS: Seventy-five percent of patients showed an asymptotic decrease in seizure frequency with increasing doses of pregabalin, whereas 25% did not demonstrate a significant decrease in seizure frequency from baseline. In patients who demonstrated a dose-related decrease in seizure frequency from baseline, the maximal percentage of seizure reduction from baseline was 100% for women and 80% for men, with a 186-mg daily dose decreasing seizures on average to 50% of maximum. Age, race, and menopausal status did not significantly affect seizure frequency. CONCLUSION: Pregabalin add-on treatment demonstrates a dose-response relationship in 3 out of 4 patients with refractory partial seizures. A dose of 186 mg pregabalin daily is expected to decrease the seizure rate by 50% of maximum from baseline. Age, race, and menopausal status of women did not affect the dose-response relationship.

Clinical development of antiepileptic drugs for children.

A clinical development plan specific to children is a necessary component of every development plan for a new antiepileptic drug (AED). In the last decade, considerable discussion has occurred in the medical and regulatory communities, resulting in specific pediatric drug development legislation. Ethical issues are a foremost consideration in the design and conduct of studies. The timing of clinical studies differs between adults and children. In general, studies in children will not be performed until efficacy and safety has been demonstrated in adults. Exceptions include development of AEDs for seizure types seen only in children. Formulation preparation and dosing selection are often more challenging in children. Clinical trials including pharmacokinetic studies will be conducted in patients. A relatively small number of children, given subdivision into age groups and seizure types, are available for study. Clinical trials must be designed with children in mind, adjusting the length of the trials and the choice of controls. Efficacy extrapolation from adults may be considered for partial seizures in children, but not in infants. Seizure counts remain an appropriate efficacy endpoint; however, ascertainment in infants and younger children may require EEG monitoring. Safety specific to growing and developing children must be evaluated and long-term effects monitored.

Pregabalin add-on treatment: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response study in adults with partial seizures.

PURPOSE: To evaluate pregabalin (PGB), 150 mg/day, and PGB, 600 mg/day, as an add-on treatment for patients with refractory partial seizures concurrently treated with one to three anticonvulsants (AEDs). METHODS: An international (13 countries), multicenter (45 centers), 12-week, double-blind, randomized study in which patients with partial seizures received placebo (n = 96); PGB, 150 mg/day (n = 99); or PGB, 600 mg/day (n = 92); given 3 times a day (t.i.d.). The primary efficacy criterion was reduction in seizure frequency during treatment as compared with baseline, as measured by RRatio, the symmetrical percentage change in seizure rates determined from daily seizure diaries. The RRatio between the 8-week baseline (pretreatment phase) and the 12-week treatment period were compared between each of the PGB groups and the placebo group by using an analysis of variance analysis of the intent-to-treat population. RESULTS: PGB, 150 mg/day and 600 mg/day, were both significantly more effective than placebo in reducing the RRatio [-11.5 (p = 0.0007) and -31.4 (p < or = 0.0001), respectively, vs. 0.9]. These RRatio values correspond to seizure-frequency reductions from baseline of -1.8, 20.6, and 47.8% for placebo, 150 mg/day, and 600 mg/day, respectively. PGB efficacy was significantly dose related (p < or = 0.0001). Secondary efficacy variables corroborated the findings of the primary analysis. Significantly more patients were responders (> or =50% reduction in seizure frequency) in the PGB, 600 mg/day (43.5%), group than in the placebo group (6.2%) (p < or = 0.001). PGB was well tolerated. Dose-related, treatment-emergent adverse events (> or =10%), mostly mild or moderate in intensity, were somnolence, dizziness, ataxia, diplopia, and weight gain. The withdrawal rate due to adverse events was 10% of patients at 150 mg/day and 18.5% of patients at 600 mg/day, compared with 6.2% of patients receiving placebo. CONCLUSIONS: PGB, 150 mg/day and 600 mg/day, is highly effective and well-tolerated add-on therapy in patients with partial seizures.

Gabapentin versus lamotrigine monotherapy: a double-blind comparison in newly diagnosed epilepsy.

PURPOSE: This randomised, double-blind study compared the newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) gabapentin (GBP) and lamotrigine (LTG) as monotherapy in newly diagnosed epilepsy. METHODS: Patients with partial seizures with and/or without secondary generalization or primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures were randomized to either GBP or LTG. During 2- and 6-week titration periods, respectively, GBP dosage reached 1,800 mg/day, and LTG, 150 mg/day. In the subsequent 24-week maintenance phase, the dose could be adjusted based on seizure control or adverse events between 1,200 and 3,600 mg/day for GBP and 100 and 300 mg/day for LTG. The primary end point was time to exit, a composite of efficacy and tolerability. Evaluable patients were used for the primary efficacy analysis, whereas tolerability was examined on an intent-to-treat basis. RESULTS: A total of 309 patients was randomized, and 291 (148 GBP, 143 LTG) were included in the evaluable population. Nineteen patients in each group had an exit event. The median time to exit was 69 days for GBP and 48 days for LTG. The hazard ratio was estimated as 1.043 (90% confidence intervals, 0.602-1.809). Overall, 106 (71.6% of the evaluable population) GBP-treated and 96 (67.1%) LTG-treated patients completed the study. Of those, 80 (75.5%) patients taking GBP and 73 (76.0%) taking LTG remained seizure free during the final 12 weeks of treatment. Only 14 (8.9%) GBP-treated patients and 15 (9.9%) LTG-treated patients withdrew because of study drug-related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: GBP and LTG monotherapy were similarly effective and well tolerated in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy.