Cross-cultural validation of Lupus Impact Tracker in five European clinical practice settings.

Objectives: The aim was to evaluate the cross-cultural validity of the Lupus Impact Tracker (LIT) in five European countries and to assess its acceptability and feasibility from the patient and physician perspectives. Methods: A prospective, observational, cross-sectional and multicentre validation study was conducted in clinical settings. Before the visit, patients completed LIT, Short Form 36 (SF-36) and care satisfaction questionnaires. During the visit, physicians assessed disease activity [Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment (SELENA)-SLEDAI], organ damage [SLICC/ACR damage index (SDI)] and flare occurrence. Cross-cultural validity was assessed using the Differential Item Functioning method. Results: Five hundred and sixty-nine SLE patients were included by 25 specialists; 91.7% were outpatients and 89.9% female, with mean age 43.5 (13.0) years. Disease profile was as follows: 18.3% experienced flares; mean SELENA-SLEDAI score 3.4 (4.5); mean SDI score 0.8 (1.4); and SF-36 mean physical and mental component summary scores: physical component summary 42.8 (10.8) and mental component summary 43.0 (12.3). Mean LIT score was 34.2 (22.3) (median: 32.5), indicating that lupus moderately impacted patients' daily life. A cultural Differential Item Functioning of negligible magnitude was detected across countries (pseudo- R 2 difference of 0.01-0.04). Differences were observed between LIT scores and Physician Global Assessment, SELENA-SLEDAI, SDI scores = 0 (P < 0.035) and absence of flares (P = 0.004). The LIT showed a strong association with SF-36 physical and social role functioning, vitality, bodily pain and mental health (P < 0.001). The LIT was well accepted by patients and physicians. It was reliable, with Cronbach α coefficients ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 among countries. Conclusion: The LIT is validated in the five participating European countries. The results show its reliability and cultural invariability across countries. They suggest that LIT can be used in routine clinical practice to evaluate and follow patient-reported outcomes in order to improve patient-physician interaction.

Clinical profile and direct medical cost of care of adults presenting with systemic lupus erythematosus in Italy.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the clinical profile and estimate the annual direct medical cost of care of adult patients with active, autoantibody positive systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in Italy. METHODS: A two-year, retrospective, multicentre, observational study was conducted from January to May 2011. Patients' characteristics, SLE disease activity and severity, rate of flares, healthcare consumption (e.g. medications, etc.) were evaluated. Medical costs were assessed from the Italian National Health Insurance perspective. RESULTS: Four centres enrolled 96 eligible patients, including 85.4% women. Patients were equally stratified per disease severity (severe SLE: 51%). The mean (SD) age was 42.9 (13.8) years. At baseline, SLE duration was 12.6 (7.2) years. The mean (SD) SELENA-SLEDAI score was higher in severe than in non-severe patients 9.2 (6.4) vs. 3.3 (3.1) (p<0.001). The mean (SD) SLICC/ACR index score was similar in the two subgroups: 0.4 (0.8) vs. 0.3 (0.8). Over the study period, severe patients experienced on average 0.73 (0.56) flares/year and non-severe patients 0.57 (0.63). The annual medical cost was 1.6 times higher in severe than in non-severe patients (€2,101 vs. €1,320; p=0.031). The cost of medications was also 2.5 times higher in severe patients (€1101 vs. €445, p=0.007). Low C3/C4 complement levels and each severe flare incremented the annual cost of €550 (p=0.011) and €465 (p=0.02), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The medical cost of SLE in Italy is related to disease severity and flares. Medications identified as the main cost drivers, and low C3/C4 complement levels and severe flares as the main cost predictors, increased significantly the cost of SLE management.

Annual direct medical cost of active systemic lupus erythematosus in five European countries.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the annual direct medical cost of managing adult systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients with active autoantibody positive disease in Europe. METHODS: A 2-year, retrospective, multicentre, observational study was conducted in five countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK). Data included patients' characteristics, disease activity and severity, flare assessments and health resource use (eg, laboratory tests, medications, specialist visits and hospitalisations). Costs were assessed from the public payers' perspective. Cost predictors were estimated by multivariate regression models. RESULTS: Thirty-one centres enrolled 427 consecutive eligible patients stratified equally by disease severity. At baseline, mean (SD) age was 44.5 (13.8) years, 90.5% were women and mean (SD) SLE duration was 10.7 (8.0) years. The SELENA-SLEDAI (11.2 vs 5.3) and SLICC/ACR index (1.0 vs 0.7) scores were higher in severe patients. Over the study period, patients experienced on average 1.02 (0.71) flares/year. The mean annual direct medical cost was higher in severe compared to non-severe patients (€4748 vs €2650, p<0.001). Medication costs were €2518 in severe versus €1251 in non-severe patients (p<0.001). Medications represented 53% and 47% of the total cost for severe and non-severe patients, respectively, primarily due to immunosuppressants and biologics. Flares, especially severe flares, were identified as the major cost predictor, with each flare increasing the annual total cost by about €1002 (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The annual direct medical cost of SLE patients in Europe is related to disease severity and flares. Medical treatments were the main cost drivers. Severe flares and major organ involvement were identified as important cost predictors.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease: impact on work productivity and daily-life activities of daytime workers. A French cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have evaluated the impact of gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms on work productivity and no French data are available. AIM: To compare the impact of typical symptoms of nocturnal vs diurnal gastroesophageal reflux disease on work productivity and daily activities. METHODS: A French prospective, multicenter, observational study was performed in primary care setting. Patient characteristics, symptomatology and treatment were reported. Work productivity loss was assessed using the work productivity and activity impairment questionnaire, predictors were identified using multivariate regression models, and estimated cost was calculated. RESULTS: 716 eligible patients (mean age: 46.3 years) were included by 407 physicians. Nocturnal symptoms were reported in 50.8% of patients and exclusively diurnal symptoms in 49.2%. Mean work productivity and daily activities decreased by 31.4% and 32.6%, respectively (both p<0.001). Work productivity was influenced by symptom intensity, diurnal symptoms occurrence, regurgitation and diurnal sleepiness. The mean associated cost per patient/week (€313) was higher in patients with diurnal symptoms (without (€346) or with nocturnal (€312) symptoms) than in patients with exclusive nocturnal symptoms (€253) (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Gastroesophageal reflux disease incurs high work productivity loss especially in patients with diurnal symptoms. Further medico-economic analyses are needed to estimate the cost effectiveness ratio according to therapeutic strategies.