Host Suitability of Summer Cover Crops and Peach Rootstocks to the Peach Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne floridensis.

Greenhouse experiments were conducted to determine the host suitability of ten summer cover crops and two peach rootstocks to Meloidogyne floridensis by inoculating them with 10,000 M. floridensis eggs. Brown top millet and sunn hemp were nonhosts as they did not support nematode reproduction. Buckwheat, cowpea, pearl millet, Japanese millet, and sunflower supported more than 25,000 eggs/pot, which indicated that these crops are good hosts to M. floridensis. The crops that supported poor nematode reproduction were sesame, grain sorghum, and sorghum-sudangrass, with their reproduction ranging from 219 to 7,750 eggs/pot. In addition to having many galls on the roots, the peach rootstock Guardian had 10,100 eggs on the roots and 450 second-stage juveniles in the pot, which indicated that 'Guardian' is a good host to M. floridensis. Although the nematode reproduction on MP-29 rootstock was relatively lower, the presence of many large galls on the roots indicates MP-29 is susceptible to M. floridensis. Results from the current study suggest that the employment of nonhost cover crops and poor-host rootstocks could aid in effective nematode management programs for peaches.

The Impact of Peach Rootstocks and Winter Cover Crops on Reproduction of Ring Nematode.

Two peach rootstocks ('Guardian' and 'MP-29') and ten winter cover crops (rye, wheat, barley, triticale, oat, Austrian winter pea, crimson clover, balansa clover, hairy vetch, and daikon radish) were evaluated in a greenhouse environment to determine their suitability to host ring nematode, Mesocriconema xenoplax. Each crop was inoculated with 500 ring nematodes, and the experiments were terminated 60 days after inoculation. The reproduction factor (ratio of final and initial nematode population) ranged from 0 to 13.8, indicating the crops greatly varied in their host suitability to ring nematode. 'Guardian' has been known to tolerate ring nematode; however, results from the current study suggest the tolerance statement is anecdotal. Another peach rootstock, 'MP-29', was also a good host for ring nematode, suggesting an urgency to develop ring nematode-resistant peach rootstocks. Wheat supported the least to no nematode reproduction while pea supported the greatest reproduction. The rest of the cover crops were poor to good hosts to ring nematodes. Although planting cover crops in peach orchards is not common, employing non or poor host crops can help suppress nematodes in addition to having soil health benefits. Furthermore, peach breeding programs should focus on finding and introgressing ring nematode resistance in commercial rootstocks.

Dermatoscopy of primary localised cutaneous amyloidosis - A cross-sectional study in a setting of South Asian public dermatology department.

Background: Amyloidosis, deposition of misfolded protein in body, is a fairly common condition. The deposition of misfolded proteins in skin which occurs in absence of systemic comorbidities, namely Primary Cutaneous Amyloidosis (PCA) is also a well-known entity in skin of colour patients of Asian subcontinent. Primary Cutaneous Amyloidosis is usually diagnosed with good clinical acumen and typical clinical phenotype and involved site. Dermoscope has been used as an adjunct non-invasive tool to confirm cases with diagnostic uncertainty and in those in whom biopsy is deferred. Typical dermoscopic features of PCA helps differentiate it from other pigmentary dermatoses and avoids unwanted invasive biopsies and investigations especially in resource poor settings with financial constraints. Objectives: This study aims to identify and corroborate clinically, typical dermoscopic features in PCA in 42 patients which includes Macular Amyloidosis (MA) and Papular Amyloidosis (PA) predominantly in skin of colour patients from government based hospital of a south east Asian country. Materials and methods: Patients with classic clinical features of PCA were selected. Primary Cutaneous Amyloidosis was subclassified into MA or PA and their corresponding clinically corroborative dermoscopic features were enlisted respectively. All patients (treatment naïve and previously treated), who consented to participate in the study were included. Patients were diagnosed based on the prototypical clinical features. Dermoscopy was done using DermLite III DL3N Polarised and Fluid Dermoscope w/PigmentBoost Brand (3Gen, DermLite LLC, San Juan Capistrano, CA, USA) and images were obtained to create digital dermoscopy system by attaching camera-equipped mobile device via an optional connection kit (Redmi Note 11, MIUI version 13.0.5, CHINA) and the findings were enlisted concurrently. Results: In this study of dermoscopic findings of PCA, 42 patients were evaluated for their clinical lesions along with its corroboration with the dermoscopic features. Macular Amyloidosis was seen in 30 patients and 12 patients had typical cutaneous phenotypic and dermoscopic feature of PA. The most common dermoscopic finding seen in patients with MA was shiny to dull white, circular or oval central hub surrounded with halo of light brown dots. Most common configuration of brownish pigmentation around central hub was fine streak type. Also eccrine clues were seen in some cases of MA, which was a unique finding. Similarly in the PA subtype, the central hub was replaced by scar like structureless translucent white area surrounded by brownish black dot like structures, especially in those with large and thick plaques. Conclusion: Dermoscopic findings of PCA and their clinical corroboration is a much-needed aspect in treating patients with pigmentary disorders and in those with skin of colour, especially in developing countries. Utilization of dermoscope in clinical settings of low income countries and in government based hospitals will decrease the add on economic burden of invasive diagnostic modalities like biopsy and other inadvertent tests done to rule out pigmentary conditions.

Intracellular amastigotes in fine-needle aspiration cytology of cutaneous leishmaniasis.

We report a case of 45-year-old farmer who presented with solitary crateriform non healing ulcer with crust over left dorsal hand. FNAC of lesion showed intracellular round to oval amastigotes within macrophage on giemsa stain. This simple diagnostic method could be utilized as a diagnostic tool in resource poor setting.

Onychomycosis among Clinically Suspected Cases Attending the Dermatology Out-patient Department of a Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.

INTRODUCTION: Onychomycosis is a fungal disease of the nail apparatus caused by dermatophytes, non-dermatophytes and yeasts. Although onychomycosis is rarely life threatening, its high incidence and the associated morbidity makes it an important public health problem. This study was aimed to find the prevalence of onychomycosis among clinically suspected patients attending the outpatient department of Dermatology and Venereology. METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional study was done in a total of 200 clinically suspected cases of onychomycosis attending the Dermatology outpatient department of a tertiary care hospital within the period of one year from 1st September 2019 to 31st August 2020. Ethical approval (Reference: 150320196) was taken and convenience sampling was done. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 19. Point estimate at 95% Confidence Interval was calculated along with frequency and proportion for binary data. RESULTS: Out of 200 clinically suspected cases prevalence of onychomycosis was found to be 40 (20%) (Confidence Interval = 19.94-20.06) by both direct microscopy and culture. Onychomycosis was commonest among age group of 21-40 years and more predominant among male patients 60 (65.21%). The fingernails were frequently involved i.e., 58 (63%) cases followed by toenails 34 (21%). Dermatophytes were the most common type of fungal infection accounting for 25 (62.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The study highlighted dermatophytes as the most common clinical pattern of onychomycosis and Trichophyton rubrum as the most common aetiological agent causing onychomycosis.