Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
2.
J Pediatr Surg ; 57(4): 563-569, 2022 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34274078

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: As survival rates for patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) increase, long-term sequelae become increasingly prevalent. We present the outcomes of patients who underwent CDH repair at our institution and discuss standardization of follow-up care in our long-term multidisciplinary follow-up clinic. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients followed in multidisciplinary clinic after CDH repair at our institution from January 1, 2005 to December 1, 2020. RESULTS: A total of 193 patients met inclusion criteria, 73 females (37.8%) and 120 males (62.2%). Left-sided defects were most common (75.7%), followed by right-sided defects (20.7%). Median age at repair was 4 days (IQR 3-6) and 59.6% of all defects required patch repair. Median length of stay was 29 days (IQR 16.8-50.0). Median length of follow up was 49 months (IQR 17.8-95.3) with 25 patients followed for more than 12 years. Long-term outcomes included gastroesophageal reflux disease (42.0%), diaphragmatic hernia recurrence (10.9%), asthma (23.6%), neurodevelopmental delay (28.6%), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (7.3%), autism (1.6%), chest wall deformity (15.5%), scoliosis (11.4%), and inguinal hernia (6.7%). CONCLUSION: As survival of patients with CDH improves, long-term care must be continuously studied and fine-tuned to ensure appropriate surveillance and optimization of long-term outcomes.


Assuntos
Hérnias Diafragmáticas Congênitas , Escoliose , Parede Torácica , Feminino , Hérnias Diafragmáticas Congênitas/complicações , Hérnias Diafragmáticas Congênitas/cirurgia , Herniorrafia , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Escoliose/complicações , Parede Torácica/anormalidades , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
J Pediatr Surg ; 56(5): 905-910, 2021 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33220973

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Early presentation and prompt diagnosis of acute appendicitis are necessary to prevent progression of disease leading to complicated appendicitis. We hypothesize that patients had a delayed presentation of acute appendicitis during the COVID-19 pandemic, which affected severity of disease on presentation and outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients who were treated for acute appendicitis at Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital (MSCH) between March 1, 2020 and May 31, 2020 when the COVID-19 pandemic was at its peak in New York City (NYC). For comparison, we reviewed patients treated from March 1, 2019 to May 31, 2019, prior to the pandemic. Demographics and baseline patient characteristics were analyzed for potential confounding variables. Outcomes were collected and grouped into those quantifying severity of illness on presentation to our ED, type of treatment, and associated post-treatment outcomes. Fisher's Exact Test and Kruskal-Wallis Test were used for univariate analysis while cox regression with calculation of hazard ratios was used for multivariate analysis. RESULTS: A total of 89 patients were included in this study, 41 patients were treated for appendicitis from March 1 to May 31 of 2019 (non-pandemic) and 48 were treated during the same time period in 2020 (pandemic). Duration of symptoms prior to presentation to the ED was significantly longer in patients treated in 2020, with a median of 2 days compared to 1 day (p = 0.003). Additionally, these patients were more likely to present with reported fever (52.1% vs 24.4%, p = 0.009) and had a higher heart rate on presentation with a median of 101 beats per minute (bpm) compared to 91 bpm (p = 0.040). Findings of complicated appendicitis on radiographic imaging including suspicion of perforation (41.7% vs 9.8%, p < 0.001) and intra-abdominal abscess (27.1% vs 7.3%, p = 0.025) were higher in patients presenting in 2020. Patients treated during the pandemic had higher rates of non-operative treatment (25.0% vs 7.3%, p = 0.044) requiring increased antibiotic use and image-guided percutaneous drain placement. They also had longer hospital length of stay by a median of 1 day (p = 0.001) and longer duration until symptom resolution by a median of 1 day (p = 0.004). Type of treatment was not a predictor of LOS (HR = 0.565, 95% CI = 0.357-0.894, p = 0.015) or duration until symptom resolution (HR = 0.630, 95% CI = 0.405-0.979, p = 0.040). CONCLUSION: Patients treated for acute appendicitis at our children's hospital during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic presented with more severe disease and experienced suboptimal outcomes compared to those who presented during the same time period in 2019. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.


Assuntos
Apendicite , COVID-19 , Apendicectomia , Apendicite/diagnóstico , Apendicite/epidemiologia , Apendicite/cirurgia , Criança , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Cidade de Nova Iorque , Pandemias , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2
4.
Mil Med ; 184(11-12): 948-950, 2019 12 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31125069

RESUMO

Microcystic adnexal carcinoma (MAC) is a rare, malignant cutaneous neoplasm that often presents as an inconspicuous, benign appearing lesion. Patients most commonly are asymptomatic and present for improved cosmesis, however perineural invasion may result in local numbness, paresthesia or pruritus. Although distant metastasis is rare, MAC has an increased propensity for local invasion, often resulting in significant morbidity as late presentation and misdiagnosis are common. A high index of suspicion is imperative, and deep tissue biopsy with defining histologic characteristics is required for diagnosis. Mohs micrographic surgery is currently the standard of care, providing the highest possibility for long-term cure. We present a case report of a 43-year-old male Air Force U-2 pilot with a benign presentation and initial clinical misdiagnoses of MAC, who underwent Mohs micrographic surgery followed by cervicofacial flap reconstruction of a 5.5 × 3.5 cm defect. We also identify increased radiation exposure of U-2 pilots as a potential risk factor for the early development of MAC, emphasizing the importance of exploring patient risk factors while having a high index of suspicion to aid in early diagnosis.


Assuntos
Cirurgia de Mohs/métodos , Neoplasias de Anexos e de Apêndices Cutâneos/cirurgia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/cirurgia , Adulto , Erros de Diagnóstico/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Militares , Neoplasias de Anexos e de Apêndices Cutâneos/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de Anexos e de Apêndices Cutâneos/patologia , Pilotos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Retalhos Cirúrgicos/patologia , Retalhos Cirúrgicos/cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa