Cerebral embolic protection device utilization and outcomes in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A nationally representative propensity matched analysis.

INTRODUCTION: In patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), cerebral embolic protection devices (CEPD) are used to possibly diminish the risk of periprocedural stroke. Trends and outcomes of CEPD usage in TAVR are not well characterized. METHODS: National readmission databases (NRD) 2017-2019 was used to identify hospital admissions for TAVR using ICD-10 codes, with versus without Sentinel CEPD. Primary outcomes of the study were in-hospital and 30-day stroke. Secondary outcomes include in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, 30-day readmission rate, and other procedural complications. We matched both cohorts using propensity score matching (PSM) and performed logistic regression to compute the odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Out of 190,837 TAVR admissions in the United States, 10,643 (5.6 %) patients had TAVR with Sentinel CEPD. After propensity score matching, our cohort included 10,503 patients with CEPD and 10,541 without CEPD. Trends in CEPD utilization are noted in Fig. 1. In the PSM cohort, Sentinel CEPD was not associated with decreased risk of in-hospital stroke (1.9 % vs. 1.8 %, OR: 0.98, 95 % CI: 0.76-1.26, p = 0.88), 30-day stroke (2.1 % vs. 2.1 %, OR: 1.01, 95 % CI: 0.78-1.30, p = 0.96), or 30-day mortality (1.3 % vs. 1.0 %, OR: 0.74, 95 % CI: 0.51-1.07, p = 0.11) when compared to TAVR without CEPD. Other in-hospital and short-term outcomes post-TAVR were not impacted by Sentinel CEPD usage, including acute kidney injury, vascular complications, paravalvular leak, cardiogenic shock, circulatory support, or permanent pacemaker (Table 1). CONCLUSION: In this nationally representative cohort, Sentinel CEPD utilization during transfemoral TAVR for stroke prevention was not associated with reduced odds of in-hospital stroke, 30-day stroke, or 30-day mortality. Future studies should focus on optimizing patient selection for CEPD and establishing predictive models to identify the subset of TAVR patients with higher risk for periprocedural stroke who might benefit from CEPD.

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the volume, cost, and outcomes of cardiac electrophysiology procedures in the United States.

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, professional societies recommended deferral of elective procedures for optimal resource utilization. OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess changes in procedural trends and outcomes of electrophysiology (EP) procedures during the pandemic. METHODS: National Inpatient Sample databases were used to identify all EP procedures performed in the United States (2016-2020) by International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes. We evaluated trends in utilization, cost/revenue, and outcomes from EP procedures performed. RESULTS: An estimated 1.35 million EP procedures (82% devices and 18% catheter ablations) were performed (2016-2020) with significant yearly uptrend. During the pandemic, there was a substantial decline in EP procedure utilization from a 5-year peak of 298 cases/million population in the second quarter of 2019 to a nadir of 220 cases in the second quarter of 2020. In 2020, the pandemic was associated with the loss of 50,233 projected EP procedures (39,337 devices and 10,896 ablations) with subsequent revenue loss of $7.06 billion. This deficit was driven by revenue deficit from dual-chamber permanent pacemaker (PPM) utilization ($2.88 billion, 49.3% of lost cases), ablation procedures ($1.84 billion, 21.7% of lost cases), and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation ($1.36 billion, 12.0% of lost cases). To the contrary, there was a 9.4% increase in the utilization of leadless PPM. EP device implantation during the pandemic was associated with higher adverse in-hospital events (9.4% vs 8.0%; P < .001). CONCLUSION: In the United States, the significant decline in EP procedures during the pandemic was primarily driven by the reduction in dual-chamber PPM utilization, followed by arrhythmia ablation and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation. There was a substantial increase in leadless PPM utilization during the pandemic.

Impact of concomitant surgical interventions on outcomes of septal myectomy in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Septal myectomy (SM) is offered to symptomatic patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM) despite medical therapy. Frequently, patients undergo concomitant planned or ad-hoc mitral valve replacement (MVR), aortic valve replacement (SAVR), or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess characteristics and outcomes of patients with oHCM undergoing concomitant surgical interventions at the time of SM. METHODS: The National Readmission Databases were used to identify all SM admissions in the United States (2010-2019). Patients undergoing SM were stratified into: isolated SM (±MV repair), SM + CABG only, SM + MVR, SM + SAVR, and SM + MVR + SAVR. Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, in-hospital adverse events, and 30-day readmission. RESULTS: 12,063 encounters of patients who underwent SM were included (56.1% isolated SM, 9.0% SM + CABG only, 17.5% SM + MVR, 13.1% SM + SAVR, and 4.3% SM + MVR + SAVR). Patients who underwent isolated SM were younger (54.3 vs. 67.1 years-old, p < 0.01) and had lower overall comorbidity burden. In-hospital mortality was lowest in isolated SM, followed by CABG only, SM + SAVR, SM + MVR, and SM + SAVR+MVR groups (2.3% vs. 3.7% vs. 5.3% vs. 6.7% vs. 13.7%, p < 0.01), respectively. SM with combined surgical interventions was associated with higher adverse in-hospital events (24.3% vs. 11.1%, p < 0.01) and 30-day readmissions (16.9% vs. 10.4%, p < 0.01). MV repair performed concomitantly with SM was not associated with increased in-hospital mortality (3.9% vs. 3.4%, p = 0.72; aOR 0.99; 95% CI: 0.54-1.80, p = 0.97]) or adverse clinical events. CONCLUSIONS: In SM for oHCM, patients undergoing concomitant surgical interventions were characteristically distinct. Aside from MV repair, concomitant interventions were associated with worse in-hospital death, adverse in-hospital events, and 30-day readmission.

Cardiovascular disease burden in the Middle East and North Africa region.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of death globally, including the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. However, limited research has been conducted on the burden of CVD in this region. Our study aims to investigate the burden of CVD and related risk factors in the MENA. METHODS: We used data from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2019 to examine CVD prevalence in 21 MENA countries. Prevalence and mortality were analyzed using Bayesian regression tools, demographic methods, and mortality-to-incidence ratios. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) were calculated, and risk factors were evaluated under the GBD's comparative risk assessment framework. RESULTS: Between 1990 and 2019, CVD raw accounts in the MENA increased by 140.9%, while age standardized prevalence slightly decreased (-1.3%). CVD raw mortality counts rose by 78.3%, but age standardized death rates fell by 28%. Ischemic heart disease remained the most prevalent condition, with higher rates in men, while women had higher rates of CVA. Age standardized DALYs decreased by 32.54%. DALY rates varied across countries and were consistently higher in males. Leading risk factors included hypertension, high LDL-C, dietary risks, and elevated BMI.  The countries with the three highest DALYs in 2019 were Afghanistan, Egypt, and Yemen. CONCLUSIONS: While strides have been made in lessening the CVD burden in the MENA region, the toll on mortality and morbidity, particularly from ischemic heart disease, remains significant. Country-specific variations call for tailored interventions addressing socio-economic factors, healthcare infrastructure, and political stability.