FGF19 Is Downregulated in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and Inhibits Lung Fibrosis in Mice.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a devastating lung disease with limited therapeutic possibilities. FGF19 (fibroblast growth factor 19), an endocrine FGF, was recently shown to decrease liver fibrosis. To ask whether FGF19 had antifibrotic properties in the lung and decipher its effects on common features associated with lung fibrogenesis, we assessed, by ELISA, FGF19 concentrations in plasma and BAL fluids obtained from control subjects and patients with IPF. In vivo, using an intravenously administered adeno11-associated virus, we overexpressed FGF19 at the fibrotic phase of two experimental models of murine lung fibrosis and assessed its effect on lung morphology, lung collagen content, fibrosis markers, and profibrotic mediator expression at mRNA and protein levels. In vitro, we investigated whether FGF19 could modulate the TGF-ß-induced differentiation of primary human lung fibroblasts into myofibroblasts and the apoptosis of murine alveolar type II cells. Although FGF19 was not detected in BAL fluid, FGF19 concentration was decreased in the plasma of patients with IPF compared with control subjects. In vivo, the overexpression of FGF19 was associated with a marked decrease of lung fibrosis and fibrosis markers, with a decrease of profibrotic mediator expression and lung collagen content. In vitro, FGF19 decreased alveolar type 2 epithelial cell apoptosis through the decrease of the proapoptotic BIM protein expression and prevented TGF-ß-induced myofibroblast differentiation through the inhibition of JNK phosphorylation. Altogether, these data identify FGF19 as an antifibrotic molecule with potential therapeutic interest in fibrotic lung disorders.

Interstitial lung disease following coronavirus disease 2019.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of this review was to summarize the recent data concerning interstitial lung disease after COVID-19, a field where knowledge is evolving very quickly. RECENT FINDINGS: It has been found that a proportion of patients displayed fibrotic-like pattern on chest computed tomography shortly after COVID-19 pneumonia. Those lesions can potentially represent precursors of fibrosis, although most of them will resolve until 1 year postinfection. There was a wide range of the prevalence of post-COVID-19 interstitial lung disease detected in the literature, which can be attributed to the heterogeneous definition of lung abnormalities and the discrepancy of study design. The severity of acute COVID-19 disease has been linked to increased risk of residual imaging and functional abnormalities, while reduced DLco was the most common functional abnormality in long-term survivors. Studies indicated that pathophysiology of post-COVID interstitial lung disease shares common mechanisms with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Regarding therapeutic strategies of post-COVID-19 interstitial lung disease, the role of immunosuppressive and antifibrotic treatment is currently under investigation. SUMMARY: We still need to learn about the natural history of COVID-19 disease, allowing for a better targeting of therapeutic interventions through a multidisciplinary approach.

Blood fibrocytes are associated with severity and prognosis in COVID-19 pneumonia.

Increased blood fibrocytes are associated with a poor prognosis in fibrotic lung diseases. We aimed to determine whether the percentage of circulating fibrocytes could be predictive of severity and prognosis during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia. Blood fibrocytes were quantified by flow cytometry as CD45+/CD15-/CD34+/collagen-1+ cells in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 pneumonia. In a subgroup of patients admitted in an intensive care unit (ICU), fibrocytes were quantified in blood and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). Serum amyloid P (SAP), transforming growth factor-ß1 (TGF-ß1), CXCL12, CCL2, and FGF2 concentrations were measured. We included 57 patients in the hospitalized group (median age = 59 yr [23-87]) and 16 individuals as healthy controls. The median percentage of circulating fibrocytes was higher in the patients compared with the controls (3.6% [0.2-9.2] vs. 2.1% [0.9-5.1], P = 0.04). Blood fibrocyte count was lower in the six patients who died compared with the survivors (1.6% [0.2-4.4] vs. 3.7% [0.6-9.2], P = 0.02). Initial fibrocyte count was higher in patients showing a complete lung computed tomography (CT) resolution at 3 mo. Circulating fibrocyte count was decreased in the ICU group (0.8% [0.1-2.0]), whereas BAL fibrocyte count was 6.7% (2.2-15.4). Serum SAP and TGF-ß1 concentrations were increased in hospitalized patients. SAP was also increased in ICU patients. CXCL12 and CCL2 were increased in ICU patients and negatively correlated with circulating fibrocyte count. We conclude that circulating fibrocytes were increased in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 pneumonia, and a lower fibrocyte count was associated with an increased risk of death and a slower resolution of lung CT opacities.

The endocrine FGFs axis: A systemic anti-fibrotic response that could prevent pulmonary fibrogenesis?

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive and fatal disease for which therapeutic options are limited, with an unmet need to identify new therapeutic targets. IPF is thought to be the consequence of repeated microlesions of the alveolar epithelium, leading to aberrant epithelial-mesenchymal communication and the accumulation of extracellular matrix proteins. The reactivation of developmental pathways, such as Fibroblast Growth Factors (FGFs), is a well-described mechanism during lung fibrogenesis. Secreted FGFs with local paracrine effects can either exert an anti-fibrotic or a pro-fibrotic action during this pathological process through their FGF receptors (FGFRs) and heparan sulfate residues as co-receptors. Among FGFs, endocrine FGFs (FGF29, FGF21, and FGF23) play a central role in the control of metabolism and tissue homeostasis. They are characterized by a low affinity for heparan sulfate, present in the cell vicinity, allowing them to have endocrine activity. Nevertheless, their interaction with FGFRs requires the presence of mandatory co-receptors, alpha and beta Klotho proteins (KLA and KLB). Endocrine FGFs are of growing interest for their anti-fibrotic action during liver, kidney, or myocardial fibrosis. Innovative therapies based on FGF19 or FGF21 analogs are currently being studied in humans during liver fibrosis. Recent data report a similar anti-fibrotic action of endocrine FGFs in the lung, suggesting a systemic regulation of the pulmonary fibrotic process. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge on the protective effect of endocrine FGFs during the fibrotic processes, with a focus on pulmonary fibrosis.

Identification of Paired-related Homeobox Protein 1 as a key mesenchymal transcription factor in pulmonary fibrosis.

Matrix remodeling is a salient feature of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Targeting cells driving matrix remodeling could be a promising avenue for IPF treatment. Analysis of transcriptomic database identified the mesenchymal transcription factor PRRX1 as upregulated in IPF. PRRX1, strongly expressed by lung fibroblasts, was regulated by a TGF-ß/PGE2 balance in vitro in control and IPF human lung fibroblasts, while IPF fibroblast-derived matrix increased PRRX1 expression in a PDGFR-dependent manner in control ones. PRRX1 inhibition decreased human lung fibroblast proliferation by downregulating the expression of S phase cyclins. PRRX1 inhibition also impacted TGF-ß driven myofibroblastic differentiation by inhibiting SMAD2/3 phosphorylation through phosphatase PPM1A upregulation and TGFBR2 downregulation, leading to TGF-ß response global decrease. Finally, targeted inhibition of Prrx1 attenuated fibrotic remodeling in vivo with intra-tracheal antisense oligonucleotides in bleomycin mouse model of lung fibrosis and ex vivo using human and mouse precision-cut lung slices. Our results identified PRRX1 as a key mesenchymal transcription factor during lung fibrogenesis.

Clinical Impact of Surgical Lung Biopsy for Interstitial Lung Disease in a Reference Center.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of interstitial lung disease is based on the analysis of clinical, biological, radiological, and pathological findings during a multidisciplinary discussion (MDD). When a definitive diagnosis is not possible, guidelines recommend obtaining lung samples through surgical lung biopsy (SLB). We sought to determine morbidity, mortality, diagnostic yield, and therapeutic impact of SLB in the management of patients with interstitial lung disease. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed morbidity, mortality, diagnostic yield, and therapeutic changes after SLB for interstitial lung disease performed electively from January 2015 to May 2019 in a reference center. Each case was reviewed during 2 MDDs, first without and then with the result of the SLB. RESULTS: The study group included 73 patients (56% male, age 66 [interquartile range (IQR), 57-70] years, forced vital capacity 79% [IQR, 69%-91%], diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide 52% [IQR, 46%-63%]). Median postoperative hospital length of stay was 2 (IQR, 0-11) days. Thirteen (17%) patients experienced at least 1 complication, including pain at 1 month (n = 8) and residual pneumothorax (n = 6). No serious complication or postoperative death was noticed. After the first retrospective MDD, the working diagnosis was idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia in 20 (27%), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in 18 (25%), fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis in 15 (21%), unclassifiable interstitial lung disease in 5 (7%), and other diagnosis in 15 (21%) patients. After SLB and second retrospective MDD, the final diagnosis was modified in 35 (48%) patients and led to therapeutic changes in 33 (45%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: SLB is associated with no serious complication or death and notably changes the diagnosis and treatment of interstitial lung disease.

Chaotic activation of developmental signalling pathways drives idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is characterised by an important remodelling of lung parenchyma. Current evidence indicates that the disease is triggered by alveolar epithelium activation following chronic lung injury, resulting in alveolar epithelial type 2 cell hyperplasia and bronchiolisation of alveoli. Signals are then delivered to fibroblasts that undergo differentiation into myofibroblasts. These changes in lung architecture require the activation of developmental pathways that are important regulators of cell transformation, growth and migration. Among others, aberrant expression of profibrotic Wnt-ß-catenin, transforming growth factor-ß and Sonic hedgehog pathways in IPF fibroblasts has been assessed. In the present review, we will discuss the transcriptional integration of these different pathways during IPF as compared with lung early ontogeny. We will challenge the hypothesis that aberrant transcriptional integration of these pathways might be under the control of a chaotic dynamic, meaning that a small change in baseline conditions could be sufficient to trigger fibrosis rather than repair in a chronically injured lung. Finally, we will discuss some potential opportunities for treatment, either by suppressing deleterious mechanisms or by enhancing the expression of pathways involved in lung repair. Whether developmental mechanisms are involved in repair processes induced by stem cell therapy will also be discussed.

No association between human herpesvirus or herpesvirus saimiri and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

There is a high prevalence of human herpesviruses in lung samples of IPF patients but this does not differ from controls, neither regarding prevalence, viral load levels nor co-infection rates. Herpesvirus saimiri DNA is not detected in any lung samples. https://bit.ly/2ZrKiDJ.

The genetics of interstitial lung diseases.

Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) are a set of heterogeneous lung diseases characterised by inflammation and, in some cases, fibrosis. These lung conditions lead to dyspnoea, cough, abnormalities in gas exchange, restrictive physiology (characterised by decreased lung volumes), hypoxaemia and, if progressive, respiratory failure. In some cases, ILDs can be caused by systemic diseases or environmental exposures. The ability to treat or cure these ILDs varies based on the subtype and in many cases lung transplantation remains the only curative therapy. There is a growing body of evidence that both common and rare genetic variants contribute to the development and clinical manifestation of many of the ILDs. Here, we review the current understanding of genetic risk and ILD.